A Mechanism-Based Approach to Predict the Relative Biological Effectiveness of Protons and Carbon Ions in Radiation Therapy

Author(s):  
Malte C. Frese ◽  
Victor K. Yu ◽  
Robert D. Stewart ◽  
David J. Carlson
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. e53-e78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Paganetti ◽  
Eleanor Blakely ◽  
Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez ◽  
David J. Carlson ◽  
Indra J. Das ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3658
Author(s):  
Lawrence Bronk ◽  
Fada Guan ◽  
Darshana Patel ◽  
Duo Ma ◽  
Benjamin Kroger ◽  
...  

Large amounts of high quality biophysical data are needed to improve current biological effects models but such data are lacking and difficult to obtain. The present study aimed to more efficiently measure the spatial distribution of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of charged particle beams using a novel high-accuracy and high-throughput experimental platform. Clonogenic survival was selected as the biological endpoint for two lung cancer cell lines, H460 and H1437, irradiated with protons, carbon, and helium ions. Ion-specific multi-step microplate holders were fabricated such that each column of a 96-well microplate is spatially situated at a different location along a particle beam path. Dose, dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd), and dose-mean lineal energy (yd) were calculated using an experimentally validated Geant4-based Monte Carlo system. Cells were irradiated at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). The experimental results showed that the clonogenic survival curves of all tested ions were yd-dependent. Both helium and carbon ions achieved maximum RBEs within specific yd ranges before biological efficacy declined, indicating an overkill effect. For protons, no overkill was observed, but RBE increased distal to the Bragg peak. Measured RBE profiles strongly depend on the physical characteristics such as yd and are ion specific.


2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1623-1630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brita S. Sørensen ◽  
Michael R. Horsman ◽  
Jan Alsner ◽  
Jens Overgaard ◽  
Marco Durante ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Saager ◽  
Christin Glowa ◽  
Peter Peschke ◽  
Stephan Brons ◽  
Rebecca Grün ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and α/β-values after fractionated carbon ion irradiations of the rat spinal cord with varying linear energy transfer (LET) to benchmark RBE-model calculations. Material and methods The rat spinal cord was irradiated with 6 fractions of carbon ions at 6 positions within a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP, LET: 16–99 keV/μm). TD50-values (dose at 50% complication probability) were determined from dose-response curves for the endpoint radiation induced myelopathy (paresis grade II) within 300 days after irradiation. Based on TD50-values of 15 MV photons, RBE-values were calculated and adding previously published data, the LET and fractional dose-dependence of the RBE was used to benchmark the local effect model (LEM I and IV). Results At six fractions, TD50-values decreased from 39.1 ± 0.4 Gy at 16 keV/μm to 17.5 ± 0.3 Gy at 99 keV/μm and the RBE increased accordingly from 1.46 ± 0.05 to 3.26 ± 0.13. Experimental α/β-ratios ranged from 6.9 ± 1.1 Gy to 44.3 ± 7.2 Gy and increased strongly with LET. Including all available data, comparison with model-predictions revealed that (i) LEM IV agrees better in the SOBP, while LEM I fits better in the entrance region, (ii) LEM IV describes the slope of the RBE within the SOBP better than LEM I, and (iii) in contrast to the strong LET-dependence, the RBE-deviations depend only weakly on fractionation within the measured range. Conclusions This study extends the available RBE data base to significantly lower fractional doses and performes detailed tests of the RBE-models LEM I and IV. In this comparison, LEM IV agrees better with the experimental data in the SOBP than LEM I. While this could support a model replacement in treatment planning, careful dosimetric analysis is required for the individual patient to evaluate potential clinical consequences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document