Concurrent and Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide and Etoposide with Preoperative Radiotherapy for High-Risk Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Matched-Pair Analysis with 20-year Follow-up

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. S682-S683
Author(s):  
R. Dagan ◽  
D.J. Indelicato ◽  
C. Gibbs ◽  
J.A. Knapik ◽  
C.G. Morris ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Berrin Inanc, MD ◽  
Kubilay Inanc, MD

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the prognostic factors and survival after preoperative radiotherapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas (ESTS). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients treated for an extremity sarcoma with pre-operative radiotherapy followed by surgery. Results: The mean follow-up for all 24 ESTS patients was 15.5 (range: 10-39 months). At last follow-up, 9 patients (37%) were alive, 15 patients (62%) had died of distant disease progression. Among the patients died, there were 15 with metastatic relapse (13 lung and 2 cranial metastasis), 5 with both local and metastatic recurrence. The median OS was 16 month. The 2-years actuarial OS rate and 3-years OS rate were 39% and 26%, respectively. The median RFS was 14(12.5-15.4) month. The 2-years and 3-years RFS rate was 71%.The median MFS was 12 months. The 2-years and 3-years MFS rate were 33%, 17%, respectively. The effects of age, sex, histopathologic type, tumor size, tumor localization, tumor grade, tumor depth, radiation doses and recestion margin on OS, RFS, MFS were not observed. In univariate and multivariate model, it was observed that recurrence decreased OS time significantly (p<0.05). Conclusion: Recurrens and metastasis are strong and negative prognostic factor for survival in extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Nestler ◽  
Patrick Levien ◽  
Andreas Neisius ◽  
Christian Thomas ◽  
Mohammed M. Kamal ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4529-4529
Author(s):  
Arne Trummer ◽  
Juergen Krauter ◽  
Michael Stadler ◽  
Arnold Ganser ◽  
Stefanie Buchholz

Abstract Abstract 4529 Published data about outcome after cryopreserved allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation are scarce and, so far, have only been compared to historic cohorts of fresh graft recipients. We have performed a matched pair analysis of 66 patients receiving either cryopreserved or fresh grafts from matched related donors at our institution between January 2005 and June 2011 with a median follow-up time of 576 days (range: 18–2080 days). For matching patients we calculated a propensity score including patient age, sex, diagnosis, performance status, remission status before transplantation (first remission vs. other), conditioning therapy (standard vs. reduced intensity), GvHD prophylaxis (with or without methotrexate) and CD34 cell count in the graft. Consequently, there were no significant differences between both groups for these parameters: median patient and donor age were 53 years (range: 18–68 and 23–76 years, respectively) for 34 male and 32 female patients with a performance status of ECOG 0 (n=60) or ECOG 1 (n=6). Diagnoses were AML (n=47), ALL (8), lymphoma (10) and CMPN (1). 31 patients were in first remission before transplantation. Reduced intensity conditioning therapy (n=52) and GvHD prophylaxis without methotrexate (n=41) were more frequent than standard conditioning (n=14) and prophylaxis with methotrexate (n=25), respectively. Median cell counts were also almost equal in fresh and cryopreserved grafts for CD34 cells (5.7×106/kg (range: 3.1–11.4×106/kg) vs. 5.1×106/kg (2.6–12.3×106/kg), respectively), total nuclear cells (10.0×108/kg (4.9–21.4×108/kg) vs. 9.6×108/kg (5.0–19.1×108/kg) and CD3 lymphocytes (3.8×108/kg (2.1–6.8×108/kg vs. 3.4×108/kg (0.6–4.5×108/kg)). All patients engrafted. Median neutrophil engraftment with an ANC >0.5×109/l was reached after 16 days (range: 10–21) vs. 15 days (10–31) (p=.15 by paired t-test) and platelet engraftment >20×109/l (for 3 consecutive days without requiring transfusion) occurred after 13 days (8–33) vs. 14 days (9–45) (p=.27). Median follow-up time was similar between both groups (566 vs. 586 days, p=.894) and mean overall survival time, as calculated by Kaplan-Meyer analysis, was 1113 days for patients receiving fresh compared to 1258 days for patients receiving cryopreserved grafts (p=.582 by log rank test). Relapse or progression occurred in 13 vs. 14 patients, giving a mean disease/progression-free survival time of 922 vs. 1114 days (p=.467). In summary, we did not observe any relevant outcome differences between patients receiving fresh or cryopreserved peripheral stem cell grafts of matched related donors. Therefore, the use of cryopreserved grafts can be considered safe and may even allow a more flexible transplant scheduling compared to fresh allografts. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1120-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Sperk ◽  
Daniela Astor ◽  
Grit Welzel ◽  
Axel Gerhardt ◽  
Marc Suetterlin ◽  
...  

1120 Background: After breast conserving surgery, radiotherapy leads to a better overall survival. In addition to whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) a boost to the tumor bed leads to a better local control. The tumor bed boost is usually added after WBRT or can be done intraoperative (IORT). Belletti et al. (Clin Cancer Res., 2008) described positive effects, an antitumoral effect and modulation of microenvironment after IORT with 50kV x-rays. A matched pair analysis was performed to investigate the impact of IORT boost on overall survival compared to standard external beam boost. Methods: Between 2002 – 2009, 370 patients were treated for breast cancer with WBRT + boost (external beam (EBRT) boost n = 146, IORT boost n =224). A matched pair analysis (1:1 propensity score matching for age, TNM, grading, hormonal treatment and chemotherapy) for overall survival and local recurrence free survival could be done for 53 pairs. All patients underwent breast conserving surgery and WBRT with 46-50Gy. 53 patients received an EBRT boost with 16Gy (2Gy/fraction, dedicated linear accelerator) and 53 patients received an IORT boost with 20Gy (INTRABEAM system, 50kV x-rays). Median follow-up was 6 months (range, 1-77 months) for the EBRT boost patients and 56 months (range, 2-97 months) for IORT boost patients. Kaplan Meier estimates were performed for overall survival and local recurrence free survival. Results: IORT boost patients had a longer follow-up than EBRT boost patients. Despite the difference in follow-up times, there was a strong trend towards better overall survival after IORT boost (90.2% vs. 62.3%, p = 0.375). One local recurrence was present in each group (EBRT boost after 15 months, local recurrence free survival 95%; IORT boost after 12 months, local recurrence free survival 98.1%). Conclusions: IORT given as a boost seems to have a positive impact on overall survival in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery. To identify such an effect a prospective randomized trial should be conducted.


2001 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. S185
Author(s):  
H. Sommer ◽  
W. Janni ◽  
B. Strobl ◽  
D. Rjosk ◽  
C. Schindlbeck ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. 3835-3839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Borgmann ◽  
Arend von Stackelberg ◽  
Reinhard Hartmann ◽  
Wolfram Ebell ◽  
Thomas Klingebiel ◽  
...  

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is frequently considered as treatment for relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For patients without a matched sibling donor, SCT from unrelated donors (UD-SCT) has been increasingly performed during the past years. However, UD-SCT–related mortality and morbidity is still considerable, and the question remains as to which patients are at such high risk of recurrence that UD-SCT is indicated and, conversely, which patients do not require transplantation for long-term disease control. A matched-pair analysis was performed among patients treated according to Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapse Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (ALL-REZ BFM) Study Group protocols after first relapse with chemotherapy or UD-SCT. Altogether 81 pairs were identified that could be matched exactly for site of relapse and immunophenotype, and as closely as possible for duration of first remission, age, diagnosis date, and peripheral blast cell count at relapse. No significant difference in the probability of event-free survival (pEFS) between UD-SCT and chemotherapy existed regarding 28 pairs with an intermediate prognosis (0.39 ± 0.10 vs 0.49 ± 0.11,P = .105), whereas the pEFS was significantly different in the 53 pairs with a poor prognosis (0.44 ± 0.07 vs 0.00 ± 0.00, P < .001). The major reasons of treatment failure among patients who underwent UD-SCT were therapy-related death (TRD; 24/81) and relapses (20/81). In contrast, TRD rarely occurred in patients treated with chemotherapy alone (3/81), but relapse was much more common (62/81). In conclusion, UD-SCT provides better event-free survival for children with high-risk relapsed ALL. However, there is no clear advantage of UD-SCT in patients with intermediate prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document