scholarly journals The impact of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on cognition in Bipolar Disorder: A review

2019 ◽  
Vol 243 ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.M. Mandolini ◽  
M. Lazzaretti ◽  
A. Pigoni ◽  
G. Delvecchio ◽  
J.C. Soares ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1831-1839 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Montag ◽  
B. Weber ◽  
K. Fliessbach ◽  
C. Elger ◽  
M. Reuter

BackgroundThe role of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the pathogenesis of affective disorders such as depression has been controversial. Mounting evidence comes from structural imaging, that the functional BDNF Val66Met polymorphism influences the hippocampal volume with carriers of the 66Met allele (Val/Met and Met/Met group) having smaller hippocampi. Given that stress-induced atrophy of the hippocampus is associated with the pathogenesis of affective disorders, the functional BDNF Val66Met polymorphism could be an incremental risk factor.MethodEighty-seven healthy Caucasian participants underwent structural imaging and were genotyped for the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism. Data were analysed by means of voxel-based morphometry (VBM).ResultsRegion of interest (ROI) analyses revealed an association between the 66Met allele and smaller parahippocampal volumes and a smaller right amygdala. In addition, the whole-brain analysis showed that the thalamus, fusiformus gyrus and several parts of the frontal gyrus were smaller in 66Met allele carriers.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that the impact of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is not confined to the hippocampus but also extends to the parahippocampal gyrus and the amygdala.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Rai ◽  
Farhin Jamal ◽  
Pradeep Kumar

AbstractBipolar disorder (BPD) is a psychiatric disease, characterized by the cycles of mania and depression. Several genetic studies investigated BDNF gene Val66Met polymorphism as risk factor for BPD, but results were inconclusive. Therefore, present meta-analysis was performed to reevaluate the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and BPD association. Four databases (Pubmed, Springer Link, Science Direct and Google Scholar) were searched for eligible studies up to March 31,2018. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the strength of the association. All statistical analyses were done by MetaAnalyst and Mix program. Forty studies with a total of 28,787 subjects (10,085 cases and 18,702 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, pooled analysis indicated that there was no significant association between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and BPD risk under all five genetic models (ORA vs.G =0.99, 95%CI= 0.94-1.03, p=0.49; ORAG vs. GG= 0.1.02, 95%CI= 0.95-1.07, p= 0.57; ORAA vs. GG = 0.98, 95%CI=0.89-1.08, p=0.75; ORAA+AG vs. GG= 1.0, 95%CI= 0.94-1.06, p= 0.89;ORAA vs. AG+GG= 0.96, 95%CI= 0.89-1.05, p= 0.47). Similarly, no significant association was observed in ethnicity based subgroup analysis in both Asian and Caucasian population. However, significant association was found in subtype analysis between BDNF Val66Met and BPDII (ORAA+AG vs. GG= 1.21, 95%CI= 1.06-1.37, p= 0.003) but not with BPDI. These findings suggested that the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism confer no genetic susceptibility to BPD I but risk for BPDII.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e38469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Ann Teh ◽  
Tih-Shih Lee ◽  
Margaratha Kuchibhatla ◽  
Allison Ashley-Koch ◽  
James MacFall ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document