Narcotic Prescribing Practices at Pediatric Trauma Centers in the US

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e192
Author(s):  
Shiliang A. Cao ◽  
Hale E. Wills
2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
JANE SALODOF MACNEIL

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. VanRooyen ◽  
Edward P. Sloan ◽  
John A. Barrett ◽  
Robert F. Smith ◽  
Hernan M. Reyes

AbstractHypothesis:Pediatric mortality is predicted by age, presence of head trauma, head trauma with a low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, a low Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), and transport directly to a pediatric trauma center.Population:Studied were 1,429 patients younger than 16 years old admitted to or declared dead on arrival (DOA) in a pediatric trauma center from January through October, 1988. The trauma system, which served 3-million persons, included six pediatric trauma centers.Methods:Data were obtained by a retrospective review of summary statistics provided to the Chicago Department of Health by the pediatric trauma centers.Results:Overall mortality was 4.8% (68 of 1429); 32 of the patients who died (47.1%) were DOA. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.6%. Head injury was the principal diagnosis in 46.2% of admissions and was a factor in 72.2% of hospital deaths. The mortality rate was 20.3% in children with a GCS≤10 and 0.4% when the GCS was >10 (odds ratio [OR] = 67.0, 95% CI = 15.0–417.4). When the PTS was ≤ 5, mortality was 25.6%; with a PTS > 5, the mortality was 0.2% (OR = 420.7, 95% CI = 99.3–2,520). Although transfers to a pediatric trauma center accounted for 73.6% of admissions, direct field triage to a pediatric trauma center was associated with a 3.2 times greater mortality risk (95% CI = 1.58–6.59). Mortality rates were equal for all age groups. Pediatric trauma center volume did not influence mortality rates.Conclusions:Head injury and death occur in all age groups, suggesting the need for broad prevention strategies. Specific GCS and PTS values that predict mortality can be used in emergency medical services (EMS) triage protocols. Although the high proportion of transfers mandates systemwide transfer protocols, the lower mortality in these patients suggests appropriate EMS field triage. These factors should be considered as states develop pediatric trauma systems.


2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 566-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Notrica ◽  
Jeffrey Weiss ◽  
Pamela Garcia-Filion ◽  
Erin Kuroiwa ◽  
Daxa Clarke ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Finn D. Schubert ◽  
Laura J. Gabbe ◽  
Marc A. Bjurlin ◽  
Audrey Renson

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 922-924
Author(s):  
JOHN P. GEARHART ◽  
FRANKLIN C. LOWE

Trauma to the lower genitourinary tract in children and adolescents has been a rare occurrence. However, with the advent of pediatric trauma centers, more of these injuries are now being seen and evaluated. Although trauma to the genitourinary tract alone is an uncommon cause of death, trauma centers are seeing more children in which decisions regarding the management of the genitourinary tract must be made. Most injuries that have been reported have been secondary to blunt trauma such as straddle injuries, falls, or motor vehicle accidents. Recently, two cases of lower genitourinary tract trauma have been seen associated with the current fad of break dancing.


2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-421
Author(s):  
Jeremy J. Johnson ◽  
David W. Tuggle ◽  
Nilda M. Garcia ◽  
James W. Eubanks ◽  
David M. Notrica ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paige J. Ostahowski ◽  
Nithya Kannan ◽  
Mark S. Wainwright ◽  
Qian Qiu ◽  
Richard B. Mink ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Posttraumatic seizure is a major complication following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to determine the variation in seizure prophylaxis in select pediatric trauma centers. The authors hypothesized that there would be wide variation in seizure prophylaxis selection and use, within and between pediatric trauma centers. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter cohort study including 5 regional pediatric trauma centers affiliated with academic medical centers, the authors examined data from 236 children (age < 18 years) with severe TBI (admission Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8, ICD-9 diagnosis codes of 800.0–801.9, 803.0–804.9, 850.0–854.1, 959.01, 950.1–950.3, 995.55, maximum head Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3) who received tracheal intubation for ≥ 48 hours in the ICU between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS Of 236 patients, 187 (79%) received seizure prophylaxis. In 2 of the 5 centers, 100% of the patients received seizure prophylaxis medication. Use of seizure prophylaxis was associated with younger patient age (p < 0.001), inflicted TBI (p < 0.001), subdural hematoma (p = 0.02), cerebral infarction (p < 0.001), and use of electroencephalography (p = 0.023), but not higher Injury Severity Score. In 63% cases in which seizure prophylaxis was used, the patients were given the first medication within 24 hours of injury, and 50% of the patients received the first dose in the prehospital or emergency department setting. Initial seizure prophylaxis was most commonly with fosphenytoin (47%), followed by phenytoin (40%). CONCLUSIONS While fosphenytoin was the most commonly used medication for seizure prophylaxis, there was large variation within and between trauma centers with respect to timing and choice of seizure prophylaxis in severe pediatric TBI. The heterogeneity in seizure prophylaxis use may explain the previously observed lack of relationship between seizure prophylaxis and outcomes.


2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1135-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle D Furler ◽  
Mark S Rolnick ◽  
Kathleen S Lawday ◽  
Miranda W Mak ◽  
Thomas R Einarson

BACKGROUND: There is a recent trend to switching medications from prescription to nonprescription status. Often, such switches are accompanied by dramatic changes in utilization due to increased availability or decreased insurance coverage. The histamine2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) underwent such status change in the UK in 1994, the US in 1995, and Canada in 1996. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of the status change for H2RAs on the market for gastrointestinal (GI) agents in the US, UK, and Canada. METHODS: IMS market sales data from 1992 to 1997 were procured. All costs were converted to 1997 US dollars using the consumer price index. Per capita sales figures were determined using population data from the US Census Bureau's International Database. RESULTS: Overall spending on GI remedies increased in all 3 markets between 1992 and 1997; however, the contribution of prescription sales and number of prescriptions varied across the 3 countries. An increased market share for nonprescription H2RAs occurred in the US, correlating with a decline in prescription numbers for GI remedies. The opposing trend occurred in the UK, where market share of nonprescription H2RAs was minimal and use of prescription H2RAs increased. Prescription and nonprescription H2RA sales could not be differentiated for Canada. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the H2RA status change varied across countries. Differences in utilization may be attributed to many factors such as differing healthcare systems, patient convenience, and physician prescribing practices. Further research is required to identify the reasons for differences in utilization and to quantify the potential clinical impact.


2012 ◽  
Vol 172 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
K. Matsushima ◽  
E.W. Schaefer ◽  
E.J. Won ◽  
H.L. Frankel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document