Differences among Rates of Malnutrition Using AND/ASPEN Guidelines and Subjective Global Assessment

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 (9) ◽  
pp. A21 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Coltman ◽  
S. Peterson ◽  
D. Sowa
Author(s):  
Camila Ferri Burgel ◽  
Igor da Conceição Eckert ◽  
Julia Epping Brito ◽  
Fernanda Winterscheidt Rodrigues ◽  
Flávia Moraes Silva

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjun Li ◽  
Jie Dong ◽  
Li Zuo

Objective We investigated whether patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were prone to be diagnosed as malnourished by subjective global assessment (SGA) by simultaneously evaluating SGA and other indices of nutrition in a cross-sectional survey of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Patients and Method From June 2006 to June 2007, 214 PD patients were involved in the study. We recorded results of a GI symptoms questionnaire (GSQ) and SGA. Other indices of nutrition included dietary intake, chemistry examination, anthropometry, handgrip strength, and lean body mass measured by creatinine kinetics. Results Mean age of the 214 PD patients enrolled in the study was 60.22 ± 14.02 years, and mean dialysis duration was 60.22 ± 14.02 months. Of the 214 patients, 56 (27.16%) were diagnosed as malnourished by SGA. The mean GSQ scores were 9.37 ± 1.71 (range: 8 – 17). There were 90 patients with GSQ scores of 8 (group 1), 80 patients with scores of 9 or 10 (group 2), 44 patients with scores of 11 or more (group 3). The prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed by SGA was significantly different in the three groups: 15.56% in group 1, 27.5% in group 2, and 45.45% in group 3 ( p = 0.02). However, we observed no difference between the three groups in mid-arm circumference, skinfold thickness (biceps, triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac), daily protein and energy intake, handgrip strength, lean body mass, and serum albumin and prealbumin levels ( p > 0.05). Conclusions Our results showed that the reliability of SGA in PD patients with GI symptoms remains worth exploring. These patients are possibly diagnosed as malnourished by SGA, although many other indices of nutrition are not necessarily bad.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrícia Amaro Andrade ◽  
Carolina Araújo dos Santos ◽  
Heloísa Helena Firmino ◽  
Carla de Oliveira Barbosa Rosa

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine frequency of dysphagia risk and associated factors in hospitalized patients as well as to evaluate nutritional status by using different methods and correlate the status with scores of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study including 909 inpatients of a philanthropic hospital. For the diagnosis of dysphagia we used an adapted and validated Brazilian version of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). The nutritional status was evaluated through the subjective global assessment, and anthropometric measurements included weight, calf and arm circumference, and knee height. The Mann-Whitney test, associations using the Pearson’s χ2 and Spearman’s correlation were used to verify differences between the groups. Results: The prevalence of dysphagia risk was 10.5%, and aging was the associated factor with this condition. Patients at risk presented lower values of arm and calf circumference, variables that correlated inversely with the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) score. Malnutrition was observed in 13.2% of patients based on the subjective global assessment and in 15.2% based on the Body Mass Index. Conclusion: Screening for dysphagia and malnutrition should be introduced in hospitals routine to avoid or minimize damages caused by dysphagia or malnutrition, especially among older people.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document