Nutritional Quality in Long Term Care Using Nursing Home Compare Data Set for the State of Indiana

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (10) ◽  
pp. A140
Author(s):  
H. Pfrank ◽  
M. Hutchins ◽  
A. Wotring
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nutritional Quality ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
The State ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Nursing Home Compare

scholarly journals DNR Linked to Reduced Depressive Symptoms in Nursing Home Residents During COVID-19 Illness

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 720-721
Author(s):  
Wingyun Mak ◽  
Orah Burack ◽  
Joann Reinhardt ◽  
Himali Weerahandi ◽  
Benjamin Canter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Care Plans

Abstract Prior work shows that older adults who establish future care plans have a lower risk of depression. Residents in long-term care may benefit from establishing a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order when cardiopulmonary resuscitation is unlikely to provide medical benefit. The current study examines whether having a DNR order in place prior to COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with fewer depressive symptoms during the illness course. Residents at a NYC skilled nursing facility with a positive COVID-19 PCR test between 3/1/2020 – 6/1/2020 were included (N=338). The Minimum Data Set (3.0) was used to examine residents’ Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores 1-30 days after diagnosis, functional status, cognition, age, and sex. A retrospective chart review was conducted to determine whether participants had an established DNR, DNI, and/or DNH order before developing COVID-19. Forty-eight percent, 46%, and 12% of participants had a DNR, DNI, or DNH order prior to COVID-19 illness, respectively. Average PHQ-9 score was 1.65 (SD=2.37). A hierarchical regression showed that after controlling for age (β=-.13, p=.06), sex (β=-.08, p=.28), cognition (β=.14, p=.04), and functional status (β=.23, p=.001; R2=.10, p=.001), having a DNR (β=-.22, p=.006) order in place prior to COVID illness was associated with lower endorsement of depressive symptoms during illness (ΔR2=.04, p=.01). Results suggest that establishing a DNR in long-term care residents when appropriate may potentially buffer depressive symptoms during illness in nursing home residents regardless of their age, sex, cognitive abilities, and functional status. Future examination of the underlying mechanism is warranted.

Uitbraak COVID-19 in de verpleeghuiszorg

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Informal Caregivers ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

Long-term care for older adults is highly affect by the COVID-19 outbreak. The objective of this rapid review is to understand what we can learn from previous crises or disasters worldwide to optimize the care for older adults in long term care facilities during the outbreak of COVID-19. We searched five electronic databases to identify potentially relevant articles. In total, 23 articles were included in this study. Based on the articles, it appeared that nursing homes benefit from preparing for the situation as best as they can. For instance, by having proper protocols and clear division of tasks and collaboration within the organization. In addition, it is helpful for nursing homes to collaborate closely with other healthcare organizations, general practitioners, informal caregivers and local authorities. It is recommended that nursing homes pay attention to capacity and employability of staff and that they support or relieve staff where possible. With regard to care for the older adults, it is important that staff tries to find a new daily routine in the care for residents as soon as possible. Some practical tips were found on how to communicate with people who have dementia. Furthermore, behavior of people with dementia may change during a crisis. We found tips for staff how to respond and act upon behavior change. After the COVID-19 outbreak, aftercare for staff, residents, and informal caregivers is essential to timely detect psychosocial problems. The consideration between, on the one hand, acute safety and risk reduction (e.g. by closing residential care facilities and isolating residents), and on the other hand, the psychosocial consequences for residents and staff, were discussed in case of other disasters. Furthermore, the search of how to provide good (palliative) care and to maintain quality of life for older adults who suffer from COVID-19 is also of concern to nursing home organizations. In the included articles, the perspective of older adults, informal caregivers and staff is often lacking. Especially the experiences of older adults, informal caregivers, and nursing home staff with the care for older adults in the current situation, are important in formulating lessons about how to act before, during and after the coronacrisis. This may further enhance person-centered care, even in times of crisis. Therefore, we recommend to study these experiences in future research.

Predictors of Mortality in Board and Care Homes

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas G. Castle
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Board And Care

Long-term care institutions have emerged as dominant sites of death for the elderly. However, studies of this trend have primarily examined nursing homes. The purpose of this research is to determine demographic, functional, disease, and facility predictors and/or correlates of death for the elderly residing in board and care facilities. Twelve factors are found to be significant: proportion of residents older than sixty-five years of age, proportion of residents who are chair- or bed-fast, proportion of residents with HIV, bed size, ownership, chain membership, affiliation with a nursing home, number of health services provided other than by the facility, the number of social services provided other than by the facility, the number of social services provided by the facility, and visits by Ombudsmen. These are discussed and comparisons with similar studies in nursing homes are made.

scholarly journals Evidence for Publicly Reported Quality Indicators in Residential Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 181-181
Author(s):  
Franziska Zúñiga ◽  
Magdalena Osinska ◽  
Franziska Zuniga
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Public Reporting ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Residential Long Term Care

Abstract Quality indicators (QIs) are used internationally to measure, compare and improve quality in residential long-term care. Public reporting of such indicators allows transparency and motivates local quality improvement initiatives. However, little is known about the quality of QIs. In a systematic literature review, we assessed which countries publicly report health-related QIs, whether stakeholders were involved in their development and the evidence concerning their validity and reliability. Most information was found in grey literature, with nine countries (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and five countries in Europe) publicly reporting a total of 66 QIs in areas like mobility, falls, pressure ulcers, continence, pain, weight loss, and physical restraint. While USA, Canada and New Zealand work with QIs from the Resident Assessment Instrument – Minimal Data Set (RAI-MDS), the other countries developed their own QIs. All countries involved stakeholders in some phase of the QI development. However, we only found reports from Canada and Australia on both, the criteria judged (e.g. relevance, influenceability), and the results of structured stakeholder surveys. Interrater reliability was measured for some RAI QIs and for those used in Germany, showing overall good Kappa values (>0.6) except for QIs concerning mobility, falls and urinary tract infection. Validity measures were only found for RAI QIs and were mostly moderate. Although a number of QIs are publicly reported and used for comparison and policy decisions, available evidence is still limited. We need broader and accessible evidence for a responsible use of QIs in public reporting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document