scholarly journals Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses

2017 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Toews ◽  
Andrew Booth ◽  
Rigmor C. Berg ◽  
Simon Lewin ◽  
Claire Glenton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Dissemination Bias

scholarly journals Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Where Are We at?

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 160940692199327
Author(s):  
Kate Flemming ◽  
Jane Noyes
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Synthesis Methods ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Method Paper ◽  
Increasing Demand

Qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) have increased in prominence and profile over the last decade as a discrete set of methodologies to undertake systematic reviews of primary qualitative research in health and social care and in education. The findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis can enable a richer interpretation of a particular phenomenon, set of circumstances, or experiences than single primary qualitative research studies can achieve. Qualitative evidence synthesis methods were developed in response to an increasing demand from health and social professionals, policy makers, guideline developers and educationalists for review evidence that goes beyond “what works” afforded by systematic reviews of effectiveness. The increasing interest in the synthesis of qualitative research has led to methodological developments documented across a plethora of texts and journal articles. This “State of the Method” paper aims to bring together these methodological developments in one place, contextualizing advances in methods with exemplars to support readers in making choices in approach to a synthesis and aid understanding. The paper clarifies what a “qualitative evidence synthesis” is and explores its role, purpose and development. It details the kind of questions a QES can explore, the processes associated with a QES, including the methods for synthesis. The rational and methods for integrating a QES with systematic reviews of effectiveness are also detailed. Finally approaches reporting and recognition of what a “good” or rigorous QES look like are provided.

scholarly journals Barriers and enablers to monitoring and deprescribing opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e034039
Author(s):  
Amanda J Cross ◽  
Rachelle Buchbinder ◽  
Allison Bourne ◽  
Christopher Maher ◽  
Stephanie Mathieson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Theoretical Domains Framework ◽  
Opioid Analgesics ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Barriers And Enablers ◽  
Qualitative Evidence

IntroductionThe over-prescription and overuse of opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a growing issue. Synthesis of evidence about the barriers and enablers to reducing long-term opioid prescribing and use will enable the development of tailored interventions to address both problems.ObjectiveTo synthesise the barriers and enablers to monitoring the ongoing appropriateness of opioid treatment and deprescribing opioids for CNCP from the clinician, patient and general public point of view, and to map the findings to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).Methods and analysisWe will perform a qualitative evidence synthesis using the TDF. We will include qualitative research that has explored clinician, patient and the general public’s perceptions regarding barriers and enablers to monitoring and deprescribing opioids for CNCP. Studies will be identified via searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO. Databases will be searched from inception to July 2019, and the studies must be published in English. Article selection and data extraction will be completed independently by two review authors. Methodological quality of included studies will be independently assessed by two review authors using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme quality assessment tool. We will conduct thematic synthesis and then map identified themes and sub-themes to TDF domains. Confidence in synthesis findings will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research tool.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required to conduct this review. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019140784

scholarly journals A qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with pelvic organ prolapse

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 2631-2644
Author(s):  
Francine Toye ◽  
Jeannine Pearl ◽  
Katy Vincent ◽  
Karen Barker
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Healthcare Improvement ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making

Abstract Introduction and hypothesis Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects the lives of many people. We aimed to systematically search for, identify and synthesize qualitative research that explores what it is like to live with POP and make this knowledge available for healthcare improvement. Methods We systematically searched Medline, PsychInfo, Embase and CINAHL, from inception to March 2020, for qualitative research exploring the experience of living with POP. We used meta-ethnography to synthesize findings. This is a conceptual approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. We used the recent guidelines for reporting meta-ethnography. Results We screened 3103 titles and 255 abstracts and included 37 primary studies. These incorporated the experience of 777 women, (aged 18 to 95 years) from a range of countries. We organized 162 ideas into 27 conceptual categories and 10 themes. We developed a conceptual model that helps us to understand the experience of pelvic organ prolapse. This model indicates that (1) the physical losses of POP are intricately linked to loss of identity; (2) women conceptualized POP as part of womanhood, yet also its thief; (3) there is a vicious cycle of taboo, silence and misunderstanding about POP and its treatment; (4) this silence is exacerbated by a feeling that POP is not taken seriously in healthcare. Conclusions This meta-ethnography helps us to understand the experience of living with a POP. Our model illustrates the complex process of healthcare decision making. Further studies to explore the complexity of decision making from the perspective of patient and health professional are timely.

scholarly journals Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. e000882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Flemming ◽  
Andrew Booth ◽  
Ruth Garside ◽  
Özge Tunçalp ◽  
Jane Noyes
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Guideline Development ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Complex Interventions ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Synthesis Methods ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Broad Term

This paper is one of a series exploring the implications of complexity for systematic reviews and guideline development, commissioned by the WHO. The paper specifically explores the role of qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative evidence synthesis is the broad term for the group of methods used to undertake systematic reviews of qualitative research evidence. As an approach, qualitative evidence synthesis is increasingly recognised as having a key role to play in addressing questions relating to intervention or system complexity, and guideline development processes. This is due to the unique role qualitative research can play in establishing the relative importance of outcomes, the acceptability, fidelity and reach of interventions, their feasibility in different settings and potential consequences on equity across populations. This paper outlines the purpose of qualitative evidence synthesis, provides detail of how qualitative evidence syntheses can help establish understanding and explanation of the complexity that can occur in relation to both interventions and systems, and how qualitative evidence syntheses can contribute to evidence to decision frameworks. It provides guidance for the choice of qualitative evidence synthesis methods in the context of guideline development for complex interventions, giving ‘real life’ examples of where this has occurred. Information to support decision-making around choice qualitative evidence synthesis methods in the context of guideline development is provided. Approaches for reporting qualitative evidence syntheses are discussed alongside mechanisms for assessing confidence in the findings of a review.

The Benefits of Robust Debate About the Place of Qualitative Research in Suicide Prevention

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 944-946
Author(s):  
Jason Bantjes ◽  
Leslie Swartz
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Suicide Prevention ◽  
Real World ◽  
Suicidal Behaviour ◽  
Cause And Effect ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Methodological Debate

It is important to give voice to people with lived experience of suicidal behaviour, but as with all narrative data, insider accounts raise methodological and interpretive challenges. A key question is that of how to work with narratives about suicide in a way that affirms both the value and the limitations of the data, so that qualitative evidence may responsibly be used to inform real-world interventions. Scholars who claim that insights gained through qualitative research have consequences for suicide prevention, should be able to provide evidence for this claim. There may be a contradiction between claiming to work within a paradigm that rejects ideas about linear cause-and-effect thinking in suicidology, while simultaneously asserting that insights from qualitative research will have a cause-effect impact on the challenging real-world practice of suicide prevention. Robust methodological debate will strengthen the field of qualitative suicidology.

scholarly journals Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e023832 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Silvério Rodrigues ◽  
Paulo Faria Sousa ◽  
Nuno Basílio ◽  
Ana Antunes ◽  
Maria da Luz Antunes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Thematic Synthesis ◽  
Qualitative Evidence

IntroductionGood patient outcomes correlate with the physicians’ capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians’ perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity.Methods and analysisThis will be a systematic review of qualitative research where PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science will be searched, supplemented with manual searches of reference lists of included studies. Qualitative studies published in Portuguese, Spanish and English language will be included, with no date limit. Studies will be eligible when they evaluate family physicians’ perspectives, opinions or perceptions on decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. The methodological quality of studies selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers before inclusion in the review using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis will be used to identify key categories and themes from the qualitative data. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach will be used to assess how much confidence to place in findings from the qualitative evidence synthesis.Ethics and disseminationThis review will use published data. No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings will be disseminated to the medical community via journal publication and conference presentation(s).PROSPERO registration numberID 91978.

What Factors Influence Whether Homicide Cases Are Solved? Insights From Qualitative Research With Detectives in Great Britain and the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Brookman ◽  
Edward R. Maguire ◽  
Mike Maguire
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Police Agency ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Police Data ◽  
Growing Body ◽  
The Individual

A growing body of research examines factors that influence the likelihood of solving homicide cases. Much of this research emanates from North America and is based on quantitative analysis of police data. This article explores the views of homicide detectives, complemented by observations of investigations, in both Great Britain and the United States, regarding factors that affect the chances of solving homicides. Although we find some important differences between nations, the qualitative evidence suggests that the likelihood of solving even the most challenging homicide cases in both nations can be influenced by police agency at the individual and strategic level.

scholarly journals Understanding Shoulder Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Exploring the Patient Experience

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Maxwell ◽  
Katie Robinson ◽  
Karen McCreesh
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Included Study ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Studies

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to review and synthesize qualitative research studies exploring the experiences of individuals living with shoulder pain to enhance understanding of the experiences of these individuals as well as facilitate health care developments. Methods A meta-ethnographic approach was adopted to review and synthesize eligible published qualitative research studies. The findings from each included study were translated into one another using the Noblit and Hares 7-stage process. A systematic search of 11 electronic databases was conducted in March 2020. Methodological quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) appraisal tool. Results Nineteen studies were included in the meta-synthesis. Included articles explored the lived experiences as well as treatment-related experiences of participants. All of the included articles were deemed to be of high methodological quality. Three themes were identified: (1) negative emotional, social, and activity impact (“It has been a big upheaval”), (2) developing an understanding (“Why is it hurting so much?”), and (3) exercise (“Am I going to go through a lot of pain in moving it…?”). Across the included studies, the severe emotional and physical impact of shoulder pain was a core finding. Many people sought a “permanent” solution involving surgery. Openness to other treatment options was influenced by factors including understanding of pain, prior experiences, and treatment expectations. Conclusion These findings deepen understanding of the impact of shoulder pain on peoples’ lives and provide novel insight into the experience of treatment. Enhanced awareness of people’s experiences of shoulder pain and treatment is crucial for clinicians when planning and implementing evidence-based recommendation. Impact To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first qualitative evidence synthesis to explore the treatment-related experiences of individuals with shoulder pain. Shoulder surgery was considered by many as the only means to achieve a more permeant resolution of symptoms. Lay Summary Shoulder pain causes emotional and physical turmoil that can permeate every facet of life. People’s understanding of their shoulder pain appears to be deeply rooted in a biomechanical view of pain, which influences their expectations relating to diagnosis and treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document