Environmental and economic analysis of application of water hyacinth for eutrophic water treatment coupled with biogas production

2012 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zanxin Wang ◽  
Margaret M. Calderon
2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (No. 2) ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kára ◽  
Z. Pastorek ◽  
J. Mazancová ◽  
I. Hanzlíková

The basis of the biogas production in agriculture is the processing of waste agricultural products (particularly excrements of farm animals but also phytomass). Different but rather similar is the biogas production from biologically degradable municipal waste (BDMW) and biologically degradable industrial waste (BDIW) coming mainly from food industry. The processing of these wastes in agricultural biogas stations could significantly improve their economy. It is necessary to note that all these biogas stations differ from the wastewater cleaning plants where municipal sludge water from public sewers is processed. The municipal sludge water processing to biogas by anaerobic fermentation is a classical technology introduced all over the world. At present, about 100 wastewater cleaning plants operate in the Czech Republic using regular sludge processing into biogas. Electricity produced is utilised mainly for the needs of own operation of waste water treatment plant (WWTP), partly it is sold into public power net. The heat energy is used for heating in the process and its surplus is utilised for operational and administrative facilities. Usually, the heat and electricity quantities produced do not cover the wastewater cleaning plant operation. Agricultural biogas stations and biogas stations for BDMW processing provide considerably higher gas yields because they work with higher dry matter contents in substratum, i.e. 8–12% (compared with waste water treatment plants – 2–6%), and are able to produce high gas surpluses for following applications. Frequently discussed issue are the processing of slaughter waste and grass (or public green areas at biogas stations).


Informatics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Aman Basu ◽  
Amit Kumar Hazra ◽  
Shibani Chaudhury ◽  
Andrew B. Ross ◽  
Srinivasan Balachandran

This study aims to present a systematic data-driven bibliometric analysis of the water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) infestation problem around the globe. As many solutions are being proposed in academia for its management, mitigation, and utilization, it requires investigation through a systematic scrutinizing lens. In this study, literature records from 1977 to June 2020 concerning research on water hyacinth are taken from Scopus for text analysis. Trends in the publication of different article types, dynamics of publication, clustering, correlation, and co-authoring patterns between different countries are observed. The cluster analysis indicated four clusters viz. (i) ecological works related to species, (ii) pollutant removal process and methods, (iii) utilization of biofuels for biogas production, and (iv) modelling works. It is clear from the networking analysis that most of the publications regarding water hyacinth are from India, followed by China and the United States. Sentiment analysis with the AFINN lexicon showed that the negative sentiment towards the aquatic weed has intensified over time. An exploratory analysis was performed using a bigram network plot, depicting and outlining different important domains of water hyacinth research. Water hyacinth research has passed the pioneering phase and is now at the end of a steady growth phase or at the beginning of an acceleration phase. In this article, an overview is given for the entirety of water hyacinth research, with an indication of future trends and possibilities.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adedeji A. Adelodun ◽  
Temitope M. Olajire ◽  
Ochuko Mary Ojo

Using biomass as a renewable energy source has earned tremendous interest from researchers in recent decades, especially because the technology is environmentally benign. This article reviews the recent methods for generating biogas from water hyacinth (WH, Eichornia crassipes), arguably the world’s most evasive aquatic macrophyte. Therefore, various economic, environmentally benign, and renewable procedures that enhance biogas production from WH biomass are reviewed. WH has been co-digested with numerous waste types, including poultry droppings, municipal wastes, animal tissue wastes, pig wastes, cow dungs, etc., recording varying success degrees. Other studies focused on optimizing the operation parameters, such as mixing ratio, contact time, pH, temperature, organic loading rate, etc. We observed that most attempts to generate biogas from WH alone were not promising. However, when co-digested with other biomasses or wastes, WH either increases the process rate or improves the methane yield content. Also, the potential of WH as a phytoremdiator-cum-biogas source was investigated. This chapter provides mathematical models, scale-up installation models, and specific experimental results from various studies to guide future study plans toward optimizing CH4 generation from WH co-digestion.


In this paper three sustainable approaches are made in waste management option. Firstly primary treated domestic sewage is treated by aquatic macrophytes using duckweed, water hyacinth and water lettuce. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Phosphate, Nitrates are tested before and after. Result indicates in terms of water quality, almost all three plants shows same removal efficiencies. BOD and TSS removal efficiency is attained more than 95%. COD and TDS removal is reached upto 50% for almost all plants. Secondly the used aquatic macrophytes for wastewater treatment is again used for generation of biogas (water lettuce unit, duckweed unit, water lettuce unit). In addition to three aquatic macrophytes, sludge is collected from aquatic macrophyte unit for generation of biogas. Comparison is made with conventional cow dung biogas unit. Result indicates water lettuce and duckweed produce biogas at earlier stage itself and water hyacinth takes some time for starting of biogas production. This may be due to the structure and texture causes some time for decomposition. Sludge gives maximum biogas generation among all experimental setup. Also in this study cow dung did not give biogas more may be due to poor blend ratio of cow dung with water is one of the reason.


2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (8) ◽  
pp. 04021022
Author(s):  
Tong Zhang ◽  
Haochi Zhang ◽  
Kai Tong ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Xianning Li

2013 ◽  
Vol 368-370 ◽  
pp. 282-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Quan Ji ◽  
Wei Wang

This research has examined the aquatic plants ability of removing N and P with the experiment materials of the aquatic plants in the river system in Chaohu Region. Results revealed that Ludwigia peploides subsp, Vallisneria spiralis, Water Hyacinth and Cyperus papyrus contribute to removing TN in water to the effect which correlates the growth rate of the plants. 1) Particularly, Water Hyacinth, which grows the fastest among the sample plants, effects with the highest efficiency in removing TN, with the removal ratio of about 77%, 6.8 times that of the control group; 2) 4 aquatic plants function with higher efficiency in removing NH3-N than TN, and the plants in Test 8d remove NH3-N up to the removing ratio of 65-92% or so; 3) 4 aquatic plants tend to degrade NO3--N at the ratio similar to TN, and the absorptive effect of Water Hyacinth tops among the 4 plants, while under the same conditions, the papyrus remains the lowest with the absorptive ratio of only 31.7%; 4) and the regulation that the experiment plants remove the TP in water differs from TP degradation, for, in the early stage of the experiment, plants in Test 20d remove phosphorus at the high rate; however, in the later stage of the experiment, the concentration of phosphorus in water remains stable. At the end of the experiment, the phosphorus removal ratio reached 47.2%, while the ratio that the papyrus removed the phosphorus was only 21.5%. These data suggest that the aquatic plants in Chaohu Region can exert efficient remediation effect upon the eutrophic water.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document