Effectiveness of combination therapy versus monotherapy with a third-generation cephalosporin in bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia: A propensity score analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. De la Calle ◽  
H.G. Ternavasio-de la Vega ◽  
L. Morata ◽  
F. Marco ◽  
C. Cardozo ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S312-S312
Author(s):  
Satoshi Hayano ◽  
Shungo Yamamoto ◽  
Ryota Hase ◽  
Akihiro Toguchi ◽  
Yoshihito Otsuka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Enterobacter spp. can develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins (3GC: ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ceftazidime) because of derepression of AmpC β-lactamase. However, the clinical significance of this phenomena remains undetermined. This study aims to assess the outcome of patients with 3GC-susceptible Enterobacter bacteremia (EB) who received definite therapy with 3GC or broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) using propensity score analysis. Methods In this retrospective, cohort study conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in Japan, we determined consecutive patients with EB identified from the laboratory databases between January 2010 and December 2017. We enrolled patients with 3GC-susceptible EB treated with 3GC or BSA (defined as fourth-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, and piperacillin/tazobactam) as definitive therapy. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The secondary outcome was the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strain during antimicrobial therapy. We compared outcomes using the propensity scores and inverse-probability-weighting (IPW) adjustment to decrease the confounding by indication. Results We identified 320 patients with EB; of these, 191 cases were eligible (86 treated with 3GC and 105 treated with BSA). All the measured covariates were well balanced after the IPW adjustment. We observed no significant differences in the unadjusted mortality [5.8% in the 3GC group vs. 13.3% in the BSA group; risk difference, −7.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI): −15.7–0.6; P = 0.09], and the IPW-adjusted mortality (5.1% vs. 9.4%; risk difference −4.3%; 95% CI: −12.2–3.5; P = 0.3) between the groups. The results of the propensity score-matched analysis and sensitivity analysis were similar. Furthermore, we did not observe the emergence of antimicrobial resistance during antimicrobial therapy in both groups. Conclusion Definitive therapy with 3GC for susceptible EB was not associated with an increased risk of the 28-day mortality after adjustment for potential confounders with the propensity score analysis or with the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strain. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Ito ◽  
Tadashi Ishida ◽  
Hiromasa Tachibana ◽  
Yosuke Nakanishi ◽  
Fumiaki Tokioka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Previous studies reported that β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy significantly improved outcomes for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) compared with a non-macrolide regimen. However, whether β-lactam and macrolide therapy truly reduces mortality is controversial, because no randomized, controlled trials have been conducted. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia patients hospitalized in the ICU compared with a non-macrolide β-lactam-containing regimen.Methods: A prospective, observational, cohort study of hospitalized pneumonia patients was performed. Hospitalized severe community-acquired pneumonia patients admitted to the ICU within 24 hours between October 2010 and October 2017 were included for analysis. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes were 14-day mortality and ICU mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis as a propensity score analysis was used to reduce biases, including six covariates: age, sex, C-reactive protein, albumin, Pneumonia Severity Index score, and APACHE II score.Results: A total of 78 patients were included. There were 48 patients in the non-macrolide-containing β-lactam therapy group, including β-lactam monotherapy and β-lactam and non-macrolide-containing combination therapy, and 30 patients in the macrolide combination therapy group. β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy significantly decreased 30-day mortality (16.7% vs. 43.8%; P=0.015) and 14-day mortality (6.7% vs. 31.3%; P=0.020), but not ICU mortality (10% vs 27.1%, P=0.08) compared with non-macrolide-containing β-lactam therapy. After adjusting by inverse probability of treatment weighting, macrolide combination therapy also decreased 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.29; 95%CI, 0.09-0.96; P=0.04) and 14-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.19; 95%CI, 0.04-0.92; P=0.04), but not ICU mortality (odds ratio, 0.34; 95%CI, 0.08-1.36; P=0.13).Conclusions: Combination therapy with β-lactam and macrolides significantly improved the prognosis of severe community-acquired pneumonia patients hospitalized in the ICU compared with a non-macrolide-containing β-lactam regimen on propensity score analysis.Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000004353. Registered on 7 October 2010,


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. E2-E89
Author(s):  
M Giesler ◽  
D Bettinger ◽  
M Rössle ◽  
R Thimme ◽  
M Schultheiss

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document