scholarly journals Racial/Ethnic Differences in Acute Care Utilization, Costs, and Hospice Use Among Patients Who Receive Palliative Care Consultation to Discuss Goals of Care (SCI953)

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 698-699
Author(s):  
Lauren Starr ◽  
Connie Ulrich ◽  
Salimah Meghani ◽  
Nina O'Connor
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina R. O’Connor ◽  
Paul Junker ◽  
Scott M. Appel ◽  
Robert L. Stetson ◽  
Jeffrey Rohrbach ◽  
...  

Background: Hospitals are under increasing pressure to manage costs across multiple episodes of care. Most studies of the financial impact of palliative care have focused on costs during a single hospitalization. Objective: To compare future acute health-care costs and utilization between patients who received inpatient palliative care consultation for goals of care (Palliative Care Service [PCS]) and a propensity-matched cohort of patients who did not receive palliative care consultation (non-PCS) in a single academic medical center. Methods: Data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic records for admissions and discharges between July 2014 and October 2016. A stratified propensity score matching was used to account for nonrandom assignment and potential inherent differences between PCS and non-PCS groups using variables of theoretical interest: age, gender, race, diagnosis, risk of mortality, and prior acute care costs. Results: The analytical sample for this study included 41 363 patients (PCS = 1853; non-PCS = 39 510). Future acute care costs were significantly higher in the non-PCS group after propensity score matching (highest tier = US$15 654 vs US$8831; second highest tier = US$12 200 vs US$5496; P = .0001). The non-PCS group also had significantly higher future acute care utilization across all propensity tiers and outcomes including 30-day readmission ( P = .0001), number of future hospital days ( P = .0001), and number of future intensive care unit days ( P = .0001). Conclusion: Palliative care consultations for goals of care may decrease future health-care utilization with cost savings that persist into future hospitalizations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 521-521
Author(s):  
Lauren Starr ◽  
Connie Ulrich ◽  
Scott Appel ◽  
Paul Junker ◽  
Nina O’Connor ◽  
...  

Abstract African Americans receive less hospice care and more aggressive end-of-life care than Whites. Little is known about how palliative care consultation to discuss goals-of-care (“PCC”) is associated with future acute care utilization and costs, or hospice use, by race. To compare future acute care costs and utilization and discharge to hospice between propensity-matched cohorts of African Americans with and without PCC, and Whites with and without PCC, we conducted a secondary analysis of 35,154 seriously-ill African American and White adults who had PCC at a high-acuity hospital and were discharged 2014-2016. We found no significant difference between African Americans with or without PCC in mean future acute care costs ($11,651 vs. $15,050, P=0.09), 30-day readmissions (P=0.58), future hospital days (P=0.34), future ICU admission (P=0.25), or future ICU days (P=0.30), but found greater discharge to hospice among African Americans with PCC (36.5% vs. 2.4%, P<0.0001). We found significant differences between Whites with PCC vs. without PCC in mean future acute care costs ($8,095 vs. $16,799, P<0.001), 30-day readmissions (10.2% vs. 16.7%, P<0.0001), future days hospitalized (3.7 vs. 6.3 days, P<0.0001), and discharge to hospice (42.7% vs. 3.0%, P<0.0001). Results suggest PCC decreases future acute care costs and utilization in Whites and, directionally but not significantly, in African Americans; and increases discharge to hospice in both races (15-fold in African Americans, 14-fold in Whites). Research is needed to understand how PCC supports end-of-life decision-making and hospice use across races and how systems and policies can enable effective goals-of-care consultations across settings.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (32) ◽  
pp. 3802-3808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashmi K. Sharma ◽  
Kenzie A. Cameron ◽  
Joan S. Chmiel ◽  
Jamie H. Von Roenn ◽  
Eytan Szmuilowicz ◽  
...  

Purpose Inpatient palliative care consultation (IPCC) may help address barriers that limit the use of hospice and the receipt of symptom-focused care for racial/ethnic minorities, yet little is known about disparities in the rates of IPCC. We evaluated the association between race/ethnicity and rates of IPCC for patients with advanced cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with metastatic cancer who were hospitalized between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, at an urban academic medical center participated in the study. Patient-level multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and IPCC. Results A total of 6,288 patients (69% non-Hispanic white, 19% African American, and 6% Hispanic) were eligible. Of these patients, 16% of whites, 22% of African Americans, and 20% of Hispanics had an IPCC (overall P < .001). Compared with whites, African Americans had a greater likelihood of receiving an IPCC (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.44), even after adjusting for insurance, hospitalizations, marital status, and illness severity. Among patients who received an IPCC, African Americans had a higher median number of days from IPCC to death compared with whites (25 v 17 days; P = .006), and were more likely than Hispanics (59% v 41%; P = .006), but not whites, to be referred to hospice. Conclusion Inpatient settings may neutralize some racial/ethnic differences in access to hospice and palliative care services; however, irrespective of race/ethnicity, rates of IPCC remain low and occur close to death. Additional research is needed to identify interventions to improve access to palliative care in the hospital for all patients with advanced cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Author(s):  
Manali I. Patel ◽  
Kim Smith ◽  
Etsegenet Sisay ◽  
David J. Park

4 Background: Lay health workers (LHWs) who are trained to proactively discuss goals of care and assess patient symptoms have improved value-based cancer care among Veterans and a Medicare Advantage population. Little data exists regarding the effect of integrating LHWs into community oncology care among commercially insured populations. In this study, we implemented an LHW intervention to assist with goals of care and symptom management in collaboration with a private community oncology practice among patients with advanced cancer. This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effect of the intervention on acute care use and secondarily on goals of care documentation and patient satisfaction. Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with advanced stages of solid and hematologic malignancies were randomized from 8/11/2016 through 6/5/2019 into the intervention and control groups. All patients were followed for 12 months or death, whichever was first. Patients reported satisfaction with care using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey at time of enrollment and 9 months follow-up. We compared risk of death using Cox Models and compared rates of acute care, palliative care and hospice use using generalized models adjusted for length of follow-up. Results: A total of 104 patients were randomized with 52 in the intervention and 52 in the control. In both groups, the mean age was 67 years; 70% were non-Hispanic white, 25% Asian Pacific Islander, 1% Native Hawaiian, 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 3% multiple races/ethnicities. There were no differences in cancer diagnoses or stages. There were no differences in rates of survival between the two groups. Intervention patients as compared to the control had lower mean emergency department visits (0.80 +/- 0.17 versus 1.9 +/- 0.46, p = 0.02) and hospitalizations (0.67 +/- 0.19 versus 1.49 +/- 0.37, p = 0.04), greater rates of goals of care documentation (92% versus 33% p = 0.002) and no differences in palliative care (88% versus 77% p = 0.16) or hospice use (27% versus 21% p = 0.45). At 9 months follow-up as compared to baseline, patients in the intervention experienced greater improvements in satisfaction with their care (difference-in-difference: 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.60, p < 0.001). Conclusions: An LHW intervention significantly reduced acute care use and improved patient experiences with cancer care as compared to a control group. This intervention may be a solution to improve care delivery and experiences for patients after a diagnosis of cancer in community oncology settings. Clinical trial information: NCT03154190 .


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 132-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana L. Alvarez ◽  
Renato Verayo Samala ◽  
Mona Gupta ◽  
Lisa A. Rybicki

132 Background: Home-based palliative care programs by multi-disciplinary providers improve patient and caregiver satisfaction, enhance symptom control, increase hospice use, and decrease acute care encounters. We launched a community-based consultation service to deliver high-quality palliative care to patients who are homebound or staying in various post-acute care facilities. The study described the characteristics of our patients, and determined the relationship between certain demographic features and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a restrospective chart review of patients seen on initial consultation and subsequent visits between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011. All patient encounters were done by 4 palliative care physicians. Data pertaining to demographics, diagnosis, hospice use, and death were obtained and analyzed. Results: A total of 221 patients were evaluated. The median age was 75 years, 61.1% were female, 51.1% had cancer, 79.1% were seen at home, and 57% possessed advance directives at initial consultation. Almost half (45.2%) of the referrals were made by primary care physicians. Majority (82.4%) of the referrals were for symptom management, while 37.6% were for goals of care discussion. Many patients had several reasons for consultation, as well as multiple symptoms, such as pain (65%), fatigue (54.8%), and dyspnea (22.6%). The mean number of follow-up visits was 0.62 + 1.08. During the study period, 33.5% of patients died, and 42.5% enrolled in hospice. Of the deaths, 48.7% occurred within 30 days of initial consultation, and 50.0% died at home. Age, gender, race and marital status were not related to hospice enrollment, death, and time and site of death. Patients with advance directives were more likely to enroll in hospice (50.0% vs 32.2%, p=0.009), while those seen at home were more likely to die at home rather than in a facility or hospital (61.0% vs 16.9% vs 22.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Patients referred to our community-based palliative care consultation service were mostly homebound older adults needing symptom management and goals of care discussion. Our program may have been helpful in providing quality end-of-life care by facilitating hospice enrollment and death at home.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 1279-1285
Author(s):  
Emily J Woods ◽  
Alexander D Ginsburg ◽  
Fernanda Bellolio ◽  
Laura E Walker

Background: Palliative care has been identified as an area of low outpatient referral from our emergency department, yet palliative care has been shown to improve the quality of patient’s lives. Aim: This study investigates both provider and patient perspectives on palliative care for the purpose of identifying barriers to increased palliative care utilization within our healthcare system. Design: Two surveys were developed, one for patients/caregivers and one for healthcare providers. Setting/participants: This was a single-center study completed at a quaternary academic emergency department. A survey was sent to emergency medicine providers with 47% response rate. Research staff approached Emergency Department patients who had been identified to be high risk to fill out paper surveys with 76% response rate. Results: Only 28% of patients had already undergone palliative care, with an additional 25% interested in palliative care. Nearly half of the patients felt that they needed more resources to prevent hospital visits. Patients identified low understanding of palliative care and difficulty accessing appointments as barriers to consultation. Among providers, 98% indicated that they had patients who would benefit from palliative care. A majority of providers highlighted patient understanding of palliative care and access to appointments as barriers to palliative care. Notably, 52% of providers reported that emergency medicine provider knowledge was a barrier to palliative care consultation. Conclusions: Despite emergency department patients’ self-identified need for resources and emergency medicine providers’ recognition of patients who would benefit from palliative care, few patients receive palliative care consultation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Paris ◽  
R. Sean Morrison

Palliative care consultation was associated with increased hospice use, decreased likelihood of dying in a hospital, and increased likelihood of dying at home.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay J. Shen ◽  
Eunjeong Ko ◽  
Pearl Kim ◽  
Sun Jung Kim ◽  
Yong-Jae Lee ◽  
...  

Aim: Little is known regarding the extent to which dying patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receive life-sustaining procedures and palliative care in US hospitals. We examined temporal trends and the impact of palliative care on the use of life-sustaining procedures in this population. Materials and Methods: A retrospective nationwide cohort analysis was performed using weighted National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data obtained from 2010 to 2014. Decedents ≥18 years of age at the time of death and with a principal diagnosis of COPD were included. We examined the receipt of life-sustaining procedures, defined as1 ventilation (intubation, mechanical ventilation, and noninvasive ventilation),2 vasopressor use (infusion and intravascular monitoring),3 nutrition (enteral and parenteral infusion of concentrated nutrition),4 dialysis, and5 cardiopulmonary resuscitation as well as palliative care consultation and do not resuscitate (DNR). We used compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) and the Rao-Scott correction of the χ2 statistic to determine the statistical significance of temporal trends of life-sustaining procedures, palliative care utilization, and DNR status. Results: Among 37 312 324 hospitalizations, 38 425 patients were examined. The CAGRs of life-sustaining procedures were 6.61% and −9.73% among patients who underwent multiple procedures and patients who did not undergo any procedure, respectively (both P < .001). The CAGRs of palliative consultation and DNR were 5.25% and 36.62%, respectively (both P < .001). Conclusions: Among adults with COPD dying in US hospitals between 2010 and 2014, the utilization of life-sustaining procedures, palliative care, and DNR status increased.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4103-4103
Author(s):  
Geoffrey McInturf ◽  
Kimberly Younger ◽  
Courtney Sanchez ◽  
Charles Walde ◽  
Al-Ola Abdallah ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Despite dramatic treatment advances , multiple myeloma (MM) remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality with 13,000 deaths expected annually in the United States. We characterized patterns of mortality, palliative care involvement, and disease course at the end of life for patients with MM over the last decade. Methods: We assessed all consecutive deceased patients with a diagnosis of MM who received health care at a single health care institution from January 2010 to December 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to data review. Descriptive statistics were employed, and chi square was used to compare categorical variables. Results: A total of 456 patients were identified. Patient characteristics and outcomes are listed in Table 1. In the year prior to death, the prevalence of depression was 45.8% (209 patients), whereas 75.4% of patients were on opiates as an outpatient (344 patients). The mean number of lines of treatment received from diagnosis to death was 3 (range 0-12). Two-hundred eleven (46.3%) patients required red blood cell transfusions in the year prior to death. Palliative care physicians saw 207 (45.4%) patients, of which 97 (46.9%) were seen as outpatient (including those who saw both outpatient and inpatient), and 110 (53.1%) exclusively as an inpatient. The median time from first palliative care consultation to death was 10 days for inpatient palliative care (range 0-389 days), and 107 days for outpatient palliative care (range 2-2028 days). Only 42 (9.2%) patients saw palliative care ≥6 months prior to death. Compared to those patients who did not see palliative care, those that saw palliative care ≥6 months prior to death were more likely to be female (61.9 versus 42.2%, p=0.05), younger (median age at diagnosis 66 versus 71, p=0.03), and have a longer survival (46 months versus 35 months, p=0.006) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Amongst the patients for whom place of death was clearly reported (351, 77%), 117 patients (33.3%) died in the acute care setting, 110 (31.3%) died in a hospice facility, and 124 (35.3%) died at home. Outpatient palliative care consultation did not correlate with a statistically significant difference in deaths in an acute care setting (22/81, 27.2% seeing outpatient palliative care versus 57/174, 32.8% for those who did not, p=0.36), or in chemotherapy (any active treatment other than just steroids) utilization in last month of life (30.9% versus 29.7%, p=0.83). Conclusion: In our analysis of the entire trajectory of the MM patient experience from diagnosis to death, we found a substantial proportion of patients with MM report depression, need opiates for pain control, require blood transfusions and are repeatedly hospitalized in the year prior to their death. A fifth of all deaths occur within a year of diagnosis. With a median of three lines of therapy from diagnosis to death, patients may not live to experience therapies reserved for later lines of treatment. A minority of these patients see a palliative care physician during their treatment journey with the median time from palliative care consultation to death only a month. Palliative care referral at this health system is physician-initiated and not based on standard criteria, which may impact these findings. While there is no clear correlation that palliative care consultation impacted the rate of acute care deaths or decreased utilization of MM treatment in the last month of life, (two common but complicated proxies for quality of end-of-life care), further prospective research on optimal utilization of specialist palliative care is required. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sborov: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkylineDx: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document