1609 A NOVEL TRANSCRIPTIONAL VARIANT OF PCGEM1 PREDICTS BIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF PROSTATE CANCER

2011 ◽  
Vol 185 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Shiina ◽  
Hiroaki Yasumoto ◽  
Miho Hiraki ◽  
Naoko Arichi ◽  
Yozo Mitsui ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Misumi ◽  
Yoshiaki Yamamoto ◽  
Tomoyuki Murakami ◽  
Yoshihisa Kawai ◽  
Hideaki Ito ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
D M Peehl

This review focuses on primary cultures of human prostatic epithelial cells and their applications as models of normal and malignant biological behavior. Current abilities to culture cells from normal tissues, from premalignant dysplastic lesions (prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia), from primary adenocarcinomas, and from metastases are described. Evidence for representation of the interrelated cells of the normal prostatic epithelium — stem cells, basal epithelial cells, secretory epithelial cells, transit amplifying cells and neuroendocrine cells — in primary cultures is presented. Comparisons between normal and cancer-derived primary cultures are made regarding biological activities relevant to carcinogenesis, such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, senescence, adhesion, migration, invasion, steroid hormone metabolism, other metabolic pathways and angiogenesis. Analyses of tumor suppressor activity, differential gene expression and cytogenetics in primary cultures have revealed changes relevant to prostate cancer progression. Preclinical studies with primary cultures have provided information useful for designing new strategies for chemoprevention, chemotherapy, cytotoxin therapy, radiation therapy, gene therapy and imaging. While the behavior of normal primary cultures is often used as a basis for comparison with established, immortal prostate cancer cell lines, the most informative studies are performed with donor-matched pairs of normal and malignant primary cultures, grown under identical conditions. Challenges that remain to be addressed if the full potential of primary cultures as a model system is to be realized include isolation, culture and characterization of stem cells, improved methodology to induce or maintain a fully differentiated, androgen-responsive phenotype, and identification of cell surface antigens or other markers with which to purify pure populations of live cancer or premalignant cells apart from non-malignant epithelial cells prior to culture.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 231-232
Author(s):  
Jaspreet S. Sandhu ◽  
Bernard H. Bochner ◽  
S. Machele Donat ◽  
Harry W. Herr ◽  
Guido Dalbagni

2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 088-090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anju Bansal ◽  
Anup Gupta ◽  
Sunita Saxena

Abstract Background: Prediction of biological behavior in patients of prostate cancer (CaP) is a major challenge as current parameters only partially meet the need for prognostication. p53 as a prognostic indicator has been studied in several human cancers, including breast, lung, and colorectal carcinoma. However, its significance as a predictive biomarker for CaP is less well-studied. Materials and Methods: This study included 125 cases of CaP, 27 cases of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and 25 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Immunohistochemical assessment for p53 nuclear protein was performed. Assessment for apoptotic index and DNA ploidy status by flow cytometry were also done. Results: p53 immunoreactivity was low in organ confined CaP cases having Gleason score ≤3 (P < 0.003). More hormone resistant cases 37 (83%) were aneuploid when compared with hormone sensitive cases 26 (33%) (P < 0.005). 93% of p53 positive cases and none of the p53 negative patient were aneuploid suggesting a significant relation between p53 immunoreactivity and aneuploidy. p53 positivity and DNA aneuploidy, independently, were also predictors of progression and relapse. Conclusion: DNA ploidy and p53 positivity go hand in hand and together yield additional prognostic information in CaP. p53 positivity is possibly a late event in carcinogenesis in CaP and a marker of change in biological behavior of CaP.


2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 929-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Yong Chen ◽  
Gerburg Wulf ◽  
Xiao Zhen Zhou ◽  
Mark A. Rubin ◽  
Kun Ping Lu ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Androgen receptor (AR) interacts with β-catenin and can suppress its coactivation of T cell factor 4 (Tcf4) in prostate cancer (PCa) cells. Pin1 is a peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase that stabilizes β-catenin by inhibiting its binding to the adenomatous polyposis coli gene product and subsequent glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β)-dependent degradation. Higher Pin1 expression in primary PCa is correlated with disease recurrence, and this study found that Pin1 expression was markedly increased in metastatic PCa. Consistent with this result, increased expression of Pin1 in transfected LNCaP PCa cells strongly accelerated tumor growth in vivo in immunodeficient mice. Pin1 expression in LNCaP cells enhanced β-catenin/Tcf4 transcriptional activity, as assessed using Tcf4-regulated reporter genes, and increased expression of endogenous Tcf4 and c-myc. However, in contrast to results in cells with intact PTEN and active GSK-3β, Pin1 expression in LNCaP PCa cells, which are PTEN deficient, did not increase β-catenin. Instead, Pin1 expression markedly inhibited the β-catenin interaction with AR, and Pin1 abrogated the ability of AR to antagonize β-catenin/Tcf4 binding and transcriptional activity. These findings demonstrate that AR can suppress β-catenin signaling, that the AR-β-catenin interaction can be regulated by Pin1, and that abrogation of this interaction can enhance β-catenin/Tcf4 signaling and contribute to aggressive biological behavior in PCa.


Open Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 841-849
Author(s):  
Changming Liu ◽  
Mingxiong Sheng ◽  
Liheng Lin ◽  
Huizhang Li ◽  
Shanming Guo ◽  
...  

AbstractPurposeIn prostate cancer, castration resistance is a factor that frequently leads to death in individuals with this disease. Recent studies have suggested that prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs) are pivotal regulators in the establishment of castration resistance. The nanog homeobox (NANOG) and the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1/drosophila mothers against decapentaplegic protein (SMAD) signaling pathways are involved in several cancer stem cells but are not involved in PCSCs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of NANOG on the proliferation of PCSCs regulated by the TGF-β1/SMAD signaling pathway.MethodsIn this study, we used flow cytometry to isolate CD44+/CD133+/NANOG+ PCSCs from DU145 prostate cancer cells. Then we used short hairpin RNA to silence NANOG and observed the biological behavior and the TGF-β1/SMAD signal of PCSCs.ResultsNANOG decreased PCSC proliferation, increased apoptosis, and blocked cell cycling at G0/G1. Furthermore, reduction in the TGF-β1, p15, and p-SMAD2 expression was observed.ConclusionThese findings suggest that NANOG positively regulates the growth of PCSCs through the TGF-β1/SMAD signaling pathway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document