Lower leukocytes at initial diagnosis may predict poor outcome of very late relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 659-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Nakasone ◽  
Michiko Kida ◽  
Seiko Iki ◽  
Kensuke Usuki
Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 848-848
Author(s):  
Deepa Bhojwani ◽  
Elizabeth Raetz ◽  
Naomi Moskowitz ◽  
Hokyung Lee ◽  
Bret Sohn ◽  
...  

Abstract In contrast to the excellent outcomes for children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), outcomes following ALL marrow relapse have remained poor despite incremental increases in the intensity of therapy. Those children whose relapse occurs after therapy is completed (late relapse; >36 months from diagnosis) have a much better outcome than those who relapse during therapy (early relapse; ≤36 months). To discover differences in the underlying biological mechanisms of treatment failure we have extended our study of gene expression profiling to patients who experienced their first bone marrow relapse in whom matched pairs of marrow samples from both initial diagnosis and initial marrow relapse were available (30 pairs). These children were treated on contemporary cooperative group studies over the past six years. Twenty patients had relapsed early while ten had relapsed late. Affymetrix U133A microarrays were used and data was normalized, filtered and analyzed. In an unsupervised analysis (hierarchical clustering), we observed that the diagnosis and relapse samples of individual patients who relapsed early tended to cluster together (median correlation coefficient = 0.38) while the diagnosis and relapse samples from the patients who relapsed late were more divergent (median correlation coefficient = 0.03). Using Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) many genes were identified that were commonly deregulated at relapse compared to initial diagnosis (459 probe sets with a false discovery rate (FDR)< 10%). Strikingly, a number of cell cycle genes were found to be up-regulated at the time of relapse consistent with the known increased proliferation rate of ALL cells at relapse, which often have defects in negative regulators of cell cycle progression such as p16. Key differences in gene expression were validated on an independent set of samples obtained at diagnosis (29 samples) and relapse (19 samples) by real time quantitative PCR. These included BIRC5, TOP2A, CCNB1 and PTTG1. We were able to identify many common differences in early relapse pairs (221 probe sets, FDR< 10%). Many of these genes are involved in DNA replication and repair (FEN1, CHAF1A, ORC6L). To date we have been unable to identify genes uniformly deregulated at late relapse compared to initial diagnosis. Thus late relapse mechanisms may be more diverse although the smaller number of late pairs may preclude the identification of common pathways. The more divergent nature of late relapse pairs suggests that late relapse may more commonly be the result of additional transforming events that take place in a reservoir of premalignant leukemic stem cells, while early relapse represents selective outgrowth of resistant cells from the fully leukemic clone present at diagnosis. Analysis of matched diagnosis and relapse pairs have identified candidate pathways that may mediate drug resistance and suggests that agents that target the cell cycle regulatory pathway may have particular efficacy in ALL cases that relapse early. Documentation of their direct role in this process by modulation of expression in preclinical model systems will identify opportunities for rationale design of new therapeutic approaches to prevent and treat relapse.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Sas ◽  
Vlad Moisoiu ◽  
Patric Teodorescu ◽  
Sebastian Tranca ◽  
Laura Pop ◽  
...  

During recent decades, understanding of the molecular mechanisms of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved considerably, resulting in better risk stratification of patients and increased survival rates. Age, white blood cell count (WBC), and specific genetic abnormalities are the most important factors that define risk groups for ALL. State-of-the-art diagnosis of ALL requires cytological and cytogenetical analyses, as well as flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing assays. An important aspect in the diagnostic characterization of patients with ALL is the identification of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, which warrants the addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) to the chemotherapy backbone. Data that support the benefit of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high risk patient subsets or in late relapse patients are still questioned and have yet to be determined conclusive. This article presents the newly published data in ALL workup and treatment, putting it into perspective for the attending physician in hematology and oncology.


Blood ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 1226-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore P. Dibenedetto ◽  
Luca Lo Nigro ◽  
Sharon Pine Mayer ◽  
Giovanni Rovera ◽  
Gino Schilirò

Abstract The aims of this study were twofold: (1) to assess the marrow of patients with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) for the presence of molecular residual disease (MRD) at different times after diagnosis and determine its value as a prognostic indicator; and (2) to compare the sensitivity, rapidity, and reliability of two methods for routine clinical detection of rearranged T-cell receptor (TCR). Marrow aspirates from 23 patients with T-ALL diagnosed consecutively from 1982 to 1994 at the Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Catania, Italy, were obtained at diagnosis, at the end of induction therapy (6 to 7 weeks after diagnosis), at consolidation and/or reinforced reinduction (12 to 15 weeks after diagnosis), at the beginning of maintenance therapy (34 to 40 weeks after diagnosis), and at the end of therapy (96 to 104 weeks after diagnosis). DNA from the patients' marrow was screened using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the four most common TCR δ rearrangements in T-ALL (Vδ1Jδ1, Vδ2Jδ1, Vδ3Jδ1, and Dδ2Jδ1) and, when negative, further tested for the presence of other possible TCR δ and TCR γ rearrangements. After identification of junctional rearrangements involving V, D, and J segments by DNA sequencing, clone-specific oligonucleotide probes 5′ end-labeled either with fluorescein or with [γ-32P]ATP were used for heminested PCR or dot hybridization of PCR products of marrows from patients in clinical remission. For 17 patients with samples that were informative at the molecular level, the estimated relapse-free survival (RFS) at 5 years was 48.6% (±12%). The sensitivity and specificity for detection of MRD relating to the outcome were 100% and 88.9% for the heminested fluorescence PCR and 71.4% and 88.9% for Southern/dot blot hybridization, respectively. Predictive negative and positive values were 100% and 90.7% for heminested fluorescence PCR, respectively. The probability of RFS based on evidence of MRD as detected by heminested fluorescence PCR at the time of initiation of maintenance therapy was 100% and 0% for MRD-negative and MRD-positive patients, respectively. Thus, the presence of MRD at the beginning of maintenance therapy is a strong predictor of poor outcome, and the molecular detection of MRD at that time might represent the basis for a therapeutic decision about such patients. By contrast, the absence of MRD at any time after initiation of treatment strongly correlates with a favorable outcome. The heminested fluorescence PCR appears to be more accurate and more rapid than other previously used methods for the detection of residual leukemia.


Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (19) ◽  
pp. 3717-3724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna ◽  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Koichi Takahashi ◽  
Nicholas J. Short ◽  
Guilin Tang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document