Effect of the housing system (free-range vs. open air cages) on growth performance, carcass and meat quality and antioxidant capacity of rabbits

Meat Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Loponte ◽  
Giulia Secci ◽  
Simone Mancini ◽  
Fulvia Bovera ◽  
Valentina Panettieri ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 1883-1889 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.B. Tong ◽  
Q. Wang ◽  
J. Lu ◽  
J.M. Zou ◽  
L.L. Chang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. 6602-6610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sihua Jin ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
He Zang ◽  
Yuan Xu ◽  
Xianzen Chen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaiwen Bai ◽  
Qiang Huang ◽  
Jingfei Zhang ◽  
Jintian He ◽  
Lili Zhang ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Sather ◽  
S. D. M. Jones ◽  
A. L. Schaefer ◽  
J. Colyn ◽  
W. M. Robertson

The effects of the housing system (confinement versus free-range) and season (summer versus winter) on growth performance, carcass composition and meat quality were determined from commercial pigs with known NN genotype at the halothane locus. Free-range-housed pigs reared from 25 to 105 kg required 16 ± 1.2 (SEM) more days to reach market weight compared with confinement-housed pigs. Housing did not affect feed requirements during the summer, but food consumption increased by 13.7% for free-range pigs during the winter. Confinement-reared pigs had a 0.75 ± 0.28 kg heavier commercial carcass weight than free-range-reared pigs. While there was no difference in carcass fat thickness, muscle depth was 2.4 ± 1.02 mm greater in free-range-reared pigs with increased predicted lean yield from 59.1 ± 0.24% to 59.8 ± 24%. Free-range-reared pigs had heavier butts, loins and hams, and lighter bellies, which increased their wholesale carcass value by 2.9%. Furthermore, they had greater dissected lean in the picnic (2.0%) butt (4.0%), loin (4.5%) and ham (2.0%) with no compromise to pork quality. If the wholesale price is adjusted for the increased lean content of each cut by an additive or multiplicative model, apparent value was further increased to 5.7 or 8.1%. While these results suggest a beneficial effect on carcass merit when rearing hogs in outdoor facilities, they further suggest potential benefits to carcass grading using developing technologies that recognize differences in carcass conformation. Key words: Animal ethics, Landrace, carcass value, housing systems


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document