Occurrence of pyrites in sandstone-type uranium deposits: Relationships with uranium mineralization in the North Ordos Basin, China

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 426-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Chen ◽  
Ruoshi Jin ◽  
Peisen Miao ◽  
Jianguo Li ◽  
Hu Guo ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 893-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingjian Dai ◽  
Yunbiao Peng ◽  
Chenjun Wu ◽  
Yangquan Jiao ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
...  

The Ordos Basin is one of the top oil-, gas-, and coal-producing basins in China and is increasingly recognized as an important uranium mineralization province. Uranium deposits occur near the margin of the basin and are mainly hosted in the sandstones of the Jurassic Zhiluo Formation. The Daying uranium deposit in the Ordos Basin is one of the most important large sandstone-type uranium deposits in China. Based on thin section analysis and electron microprobe measurements, we used analytical chemical data to study the characteristics of the Daying uranium deposit, including the type, structure, particle size, material composition, chemical composition, form, and valence state of the uranium. The uranium mainly exists in three forms: an absorbed form, independent minerals, and uranium-bearing minerals. Most of the uranium in the ore is U4+, and the proportion of U6+ ranges from 18% to 55%, with an average of 33%. The proportion of U6+ is relatively high in the cores containing low-grade ore. This study provides a reference for determining the best smelting technology with which to further develop this deposit.


Author(s):  
E. Adlakha ◽  
K. Hattori

Basement rocks below the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, have been intensely altered through paleoweathering and multiple hydrothermal events, including the formation of world-class unconformity-type uranium deposits. Here, we demonstrate the utility of Ti-oxide thermochronology for identifying thermotectonic events in these altered rocks leading to uranium mineralization along basement structures. Rutile grains along the P2 fault, a major fault in the eastern Athabasca Basin, exhibit 207Pb/206Pb ages of ca. 1850−1700 Ma, with a weighted mean of 1757 ± 6 Ma (mean square of weighted deviation [MSWD] = 1.4, n = 116). The older ages (>1770 Ma) record regional metamorphism reaching a temperature of 875 °C during the Trans-Hudson orogeny. Pb diffusion modeling indicates that metamorphic rutile should exhibit cooling ages of 1760−1750 Ma. Rutile grains showing young ages, <1750 Ma, reflect isotopic resetting during regional asthenospheric upwelling between 1770 and 1730 Ma related to the emplacement of the Kivalliq igneous suite to the north. This thermotectonic event (temperature > 550 °C) promoted hydrothermal activity to produce silicified rocks, i.e., “quartzite,” along the P2 fault, which later focused mineralizing fluids for unconformity-type uranium deposits. The young rutile ages also indicate that the basement rocks remained hot until 1700 Ma, providing the maximum age for the deposition of the Athabasca sediments. Anatase yields a concordia age of 1569 ± 31 Ma (MSWD = 0.30, n = 5), which is within uncertainty of the oldest ages for uraninite of the McArthur River deposit. This age corresponds to the incursion of basinal fluids in the basement along the P2 fault during uranium mineralization.


1987 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Bray ◽  
E. T. C. Spooner ◽  
C. M. Hall ◽  
D. York ◽  
T. M. Bills ◽  
...  

The McClean group of uranium deposits consists of elongate pods of high-grade uranium mineralization (width = ~ 15–40 m) tightly confined to within ±40 m of the basal unconformity. Uraninite–coffinite–sulphide/arsenide–chlorite–siderite mineralization at McClean is surrounded by a muscovite/illite ± haematite hydrothermal alteration halo,which can contain coffinite–pararammelsbergite (NiAs2) – muscovite/illite nodules. Ten laser probe 40Ar/39Ar dates, two of which are step-heat runs showing good plateaus, and 10 conventional K – Ar dates for this material show a distribution with asharp beginning at ~ 1320 Ma, a marked peak in the 1250–1200 Ma class interval, and a tail to dates as young as 1002 ± 33 (1σ) Ma. These determinations are in complete agreement with direct (U–Pb and Sm–Nd) dates on uraninite at the Midwest (e.g., 1328 ± 9 and 1110 ± 28 Ma), Key Lake (e.g., 1350 ± 4 and 1281 ± 6 Ma), and Collins Bay B deposits(e.g., 1281 ± 80 Ma). Since estimated depositional ages for the Athabasca sedimentary sequence are in the 1470 ± 15 to1428 ± 15 Ma range, uranium mineralization and associated hydrothermal alteration started ~ 100–150 Ma after Athabasca sedimentation, a result consistent with fluid-inclusion data, which indicate that mineralization took place at ~ 160–220 °C beneath ~ 3000 m of cover at a relatively advanced stage in the evolution of the basin. It is suggested that the similar initiation dates for uranium mineralization might reflect a widespread faulting event that affected the eastern part of the basin. A muscovite/illite closure temperature calculated from a measured argon diffusion activation energy of 36 ± 4 kcal/mol(1 kcal = 4.1868 kJ) indicates that the base of the Athabasca Basin in the McClean area has not been disturbed by temperatures greater than ~ 140 °C for 1.1–1.0 Ga. It is suggested that mineralization ceased when fracture permeability had been sealed by crystallization of secondary minerals. The duration of mineralization may have been ~ 150 Ma, a relatively long time interval not unreasonable for the base of a sedimentary basin.Secondary illites interstitial to quartz grains from the HLM1 stratigraphic borehole give 40Ar/39Ar ages of 1459 ± 4, 1341 ± 4, and 1113 ± 11 Ma, indicating that formation of diagenetic sheet silicates predated uranium mineralization. Recrystallization or formation of sheet silicates in relict sedimentary layers and in subunconformity altered basement referred to as "regolith" started at approximately the same time, since dates of 1484 ± 55 Ma (sedimentary layer), 1482 ± 49 Ma (regolith), and 1453 ± 49 Ma (regolith) have been obtained. Resetting of interstitial, sedimentary layer, and regolith sheet-silicate dates continued to ages of, for example, 1113 ± 11 Ma (interstitial) and 1038 ± 55 Ma (sedimentary layer), which exactly coincide with the youngest ages obtained for the alteration halo associated with mineralization.The youngest date obtained is a 40Ar/39Ar plateau age of 673 ± 3 Ma. The sample (2045-517) was obtained from within 2 mm of a concentrated pitchblende nodule and may have been disturbed in some way by its proximity to uranium.


2016 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 2117-2132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangquan JIAO ◽  
Liqun WU ◽  
Hui RONG ◽  
Yunbiao PENG ◽  
Aisheng MIAO ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 103579
Author(s):  
Andreï Lecomte ◽  
Raymond Michels ◽  
Michel Cathelineau ◽  
Christophe Morlot ◽  
Marc Brouand ◽  
...  

Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Jiaxuan Song ◽  
Hujun Gong ◽  
Jingli Yao ◽  
Huitao Zhao ◽  
Xiaohui Zhao ◽  
...  

The Paleozoic strata are widely distributed in the northwest of the Ordos Basin, and the provenance attributes of the basin sediments during this period are still controversial. In this paper, the detrital zircon LA-MC-ICPMS U-Pb age test was conducted on the drilling core samples of the Shanxi Formation of the Upper Paleozoic in the Otuokeqi area of the Ordos Basin, and the provenance age and the characteristic of the Shanxi formation in the Otuokeqi area in the northwest were discussed. The cathodoluminescence image shows that the detrital zircon has a clear core-edge structure, and most of the cores have clear oscillatory zonings, which suggests that they are magmatic in origin. Zircons have no oscillatory zoning structure that shows the cause of metamorphism. The age of detrital zircon is dominated by Paleoproterozoic and can be divided into four groups, which are 2500~2300 Ma, 2100~1600 Ma, 470~400 Ma, and 360~260 Ma. The first two groups are the specific manifestations of the Precambrian Fuping Movement (2.5 billion years) and the Luliang Movement (1.8 billion years) of the North China Craton. The third and fourth groups of detrital zircons mainly come from Paleozoic magmatic rocks formed by the subduction and collision of the Siberian plate and the North China plate. The ε Hf t value of zircon ranges from -18.36 to 4.33, and the age of the second-order Hf model T DM 2 ranges from 2491 to 1175 Ma. The source rock reflecting the provenance of the sediments comes from the material recycling of the Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic in the crust, combined with the Meso-Neoproterozoic detrital zircons discovered this time, indicating that the provenance area has experienced Greenwellian orogeny.


Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Ferguson ◽  
Guoxiang Chi ◽  
Charles Normand ◽  
Patrick Ledru ◽  
Odile Maufrais-Smith

The Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan is host to many world-class uranium deposits associated with the unconformity between the Paleoproterozoic sandstone of the basin and the underlying crystalline basement (Jefferson et al., 2007).  While the style and tonnage of these deposits vary, the current genetic model for unconformity-related uranium deposits has been a practical tool for exploration in the Athabasca Basin. However, the factors which control the location and formation of these deposits is still not fully understood. A paragenetic and petrographic study of mineralization along the Midwest Trend, located on the northeastern margin of the Athabasca Basin, aims to refine the current model and to address the general problem: What are the factors which control mineralization and non-mineralization? The Midwest Trend will be used as a "modèle réduit" for uranium mineralization, as it displays many features characteristic of unconformity type deposits. The Midwest Trend comprises three mineral leases that encompass two uranium deposits, the Midwest Main and Midwest A (Allen et al., 2017a, b). Mineralization occurs along a NE-trending graphitic structure, and is hosted by the sandstone, at the unconformity, and in much lesser amounts in the underlying basement rocks. Petrographic observations aided by the use of RAMAN spectroscopy and SEM-EDS, have been used to create a paragenetic sequence of mineralization (Fig.1). Future work will focus on fluid inclusion studies using microthermometry, LA-ICP-MS, and mass spectrometry of contained gases. References:Allen, T., Quirt, D., Masset, O. (2017a). Midwest A Uranium Deposit, Midwest Property, Northern Mining District, Saskatchewan, NTS Map Area 741/8: 2017 Mineral Resource Technical Report. AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Internal Report No. 17-CND-33-01. Allen, T., Quirt, D., Masset, O. (2017b). Midwest Main Uranium Deposit, Midwest Property, Northern Mining District, Saskatchewan, NTS Map Area 741/8: 2017 Mineral Resource Technical Report. AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Internal Report No. 17-CND-33-01. Jefferson, C.W., Thomas, D.J., Gandhi, S.S., Ramaekers, P., Delaney, G., Brisbin, D., Cutts, C., Portella, P., and Olson, R.A., 2007: Unconformity-associated uranium deposits of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 588, p. 23–67.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document