Inter-rater Agreement in the Choice of Prophylactic Treatment for Vestibular Migraine and Role of an Assisted Algorithm for This Choice

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-146
Author(s):  
Emilio Domínguez-Durán ◽  
Pablo Baños-López ◽  
Elena Martín-Castillo ◽  
Hugo Galera-Ruiz
US Neurology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Naegel ◽  
◽  
Manjit Matharu ◽  
Mark Obermann ◽  
◽  
...  

Although vestibular migraine is a common cause of vertigo, affecting approximately 1% of the Western world’s population, it remains widely under-recognized and is under-diagnosed. Diagnostic criteria for vestibular migraine were recently published in collaboration with the International Headache Society and the Bárány-Society. Trials investigating the treatment of vestibular migraine are sparse but some are now underway. This review focuses on the treatments options available for vestibular migraine, based on the existing evidence base where available. Regarding acute treatments, there are two randomized controlled trials that provide evidence for the use of triptans (zolmitriptan and rizatriptan) for the management of vestibular migraine attacks. For prophylactic treatment, the evidence base is largely non-existent, since the only multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial testing metoprolol versus placebo is still underway. Consequently, the treatment recommendations for the prophylactic treatment of vestibular migraine are mainly based on expert opinion and the treatments guidelines for migraine with and without aura.


Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Otmar Bayer ◽  
◽  
Christine Adrion ◽  
Amani Al Tawil ◽  
Ulrich Mansmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Vestibular migraine (VM) is the most frequent cause of recurrent spontaneous attacks of vertigo causally related to migraine. The objective of the Prophylactic treatment of vestibular migraine with metoprolol (PROVEMIG) trial was to demonstrate that metoprolol succinate is superior to placebo in the prevention of episodic vertigo- and migraine-related symptoms in patients with VM. Methods This phase III, two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was designed to be conducted at tertiary referral centres at neurology and ear, nose and throat departments of eight German university hospitals. The planned sample size was a total of 266 patients to be allocated. Adults aged 18 years or above diagnosed with probable or definitive VM according to the Neuhauser criteria 2001 were randomly assigned 1:1 to 6 months blinded metoprolol (maintenance dosage of 95 mg daily) or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the self-reported number of vertiginous attacks per 30 days documented by means of a paper-based daily symptom diary. The pre-specified time period of primary interest was defined as months 4 to 6. Secondary outcomes included the patient-reported number of migraine days and vertigo days, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, and clinical assessments. Adverse events were reported throughout the whole 9-month study period. Results At the time of trial termination, no evidence for a difference in the incidence of vertiginous attacks between groups was detected. For the full analysis set, the incidence rate ratio was 0.983 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.902–1.071) for metoprolol versus placebo. In both groups, there was a significant decline over time in the overall monthly vertigo attacks by a factor of 0.830 (95% CI 0.776–0.887). Results were consistent for all subjective and objective key measures of efficacy. The treatment was well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings. Conclusions After randomizing 130 patients PROVEMIG had to be discontinued because of poor participant accrual not related to the tolerability of the study medication or safety concerns; no treatment benefit of metoprolol over placebo could be established. Additional preparatory work is much needed in the development, psychometric evaluation and interpretation of clinically meaningful end points in trials on episodic syndromes like VM taking into consideration the complexity of this disease entity comprising two domains (vertigo- and headache-related disability). Trial registration EudraCT, 2009-013701-34. Prospectively registered on 8 April 2011.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengzhi Wang ◽  
Jiaoqi Wang ◽  
Yumeng Cao ◽  
Zhongxin Xu

Background and objectivesThe role of serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in migraine prophylaxis has not been completely established. Current treatments for vestibular migraine (VM) are based on scarce evidence. We aimed to perform an updated review focusing on the efficacy and tolerability of SNRIs for migraine and VM prevention.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies. The primary outcome was migraine frequency. In the case of VM, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores and Vertigo Severity Scores (VSSs) were extracted.ResultsSix randomized controlled trials involving 418 patients were analyzed. Patients receiving SNRIs had fewer migraine days than those receiving a placebo (standardized mean difference −0.38, 95% CI −0.76 to −0.01, p=0.04). The effects of SNRIs and other active drugs were comparable. In patients with VM, venlafaxine had a significant advantage over other active drugs in decreasing the VSS (weighted mean difference (MD) −1.45, 95% CI −2.11 to −0.78, p<0.0001) and the emotional domain score of the DHI (MD −2.64, 95% CI −4.97 to −0.31, p=0.03). We found no significant difference in the rate of withdrawals due to any reason or withdrawals due to side effects between SNRIs and active drugs and between SNRIs and a placebo.ConclusionsSNRIs were clinically safe and effective for migraine and VM prophylaxis, were better than a placebo, and not inferior to other active drugs. SNRIs may be a preferable choice for patients with VM with psychiatric disorders.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariangela Rondanelli ◽  
Alessandra Miccono ◽  
Silvia Lamburghini ◽  
Ilaria Avanzato ◽  
Antonella Riva ◽  
...  

Maintaining a normal healthy immune defense system lowers the incidence and/or the severity of symptoms and/or the duration of common cold (CC). Physical barriers and innate and adaptive immunity have been involved during a CC episode. Vitamins C and D, zinc, and Echinacea have evidence-based efficacy on these immune system barriers. This review includes 82 eligible studies to consider the preventive role of these nutrients in immune clusters and in CC to provide advice on dosage and assumption of these nutrients. Regarding vitamin C, regular supplementation (1 to 2 g/day) has shown that vitamin C reduces the duration (in adults by 8%, in children by 14%) and the severity of CC. Considering zinc, the supplementation may shorten the duration of colds by approximately 33%. CC patients may be instructed to try zinc within 24 hours of onset of symptoms. As for vitamin D, the supplementation protected against CC overall, considering baseline levels and age. Patients with vitamin D deficiency and those not receiving bolus doses experienced the most benefit. Regarding Echinacea, prophylactic treatment with this extract (2400 mg/day) over 4 months appeared to be beneficial for preventing/treating CC. In conclusion, the current evidence of efficacy for zinc, vitamins D and C, and Echinacea is so interesting that CC patients may be encouraged to try them for preventing/treating their colds, although further studies are needed on this topic.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Assaf Arie Barg ◽  
Gili Kenet ◽  
Tami Livnat ◽  
Einat Avishai ◽  
Ivan Budnik ◽  
...  

Severe Von Willebrand's disease (VWD) may be associated with chronic joint damage and may require prophylactic therapy. In severe VWD, factor VIII (FVIII) levels are low due to rapid clearness. Emicizumab is a humanized bispecific antibody which mimics the function of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). It has been approved for prophylaxis in hemophilia A. This is the first study assessing the potential role of emicizumab as an alternative prophylactic treatment in a cohort of patients with severe VWD. We present a TG model evaluating patients' hemostasis following ex vivo spiking of their plasma samples with emicizumab. We also report 24 weeks of successful emicizumab prophylaxis in a child with severe VWD and repeated hemarthroses. A cohort of twenty-four VWD patients were included in the study. Fifty-four percent of our patients were males and the cohort consisted of 14 children (≤18 years) and 10 adults. The majority of patients (96%) were of Caucasian origin. Hemarthrosis was encountered in most type 3 VWD patients, whereas none of the type 2 VWD patients had any joint bleeds. Prophylactic treatment was administered in the majority of type 3 VWD patients, whereas type 2 VWD patients largely required only intermittent on demand therapy applied for bleeding episodes or any surgical interventions. Thrombin generation analysis was carried out blindly in plasma obtained from thirteen type 3 VWD patients and eleven type 2 VWD patients. Seventeen healthy volunteers served as a control group. In plasma from type 3 VWD patients, TG was substantially lower than in plasma from type 2 VWD patients, with ETP of 765 nM×min (596-962) vs. 1954 nM×min (1483-2008) (P = 0•001) and peak height of 47 nM (36-65) vs. 262 nM (142-318) (P = 0•002) In order to examine the potential use of emicizumab as an alternative treatment option for type 3 VWD patients, an ex vivo spiking analysis comparing the effect of Haemate P and emicizumab on TG was performed. An improvement in peak height was demonstrated following spiking with both Haemate P concentrations (P = 0•001 for both) and with the higher emicizumab concentration (P = 0•011). Notably, whereas spiking with both Haemate P concentrations increased peak height to near-normal level, spiking with higher emicizumab concentration increased it to a lesser extent (the median was still lower than in normal controls (P = 0•005). Following the decision to treat our impetus patient with emicizumab prophylaxis, TG analyses were performed in the patient's plasma before and during emicizumab loading and maintenance (Figure 3). As expected, patient's initial TG was extremely low and improved following the first administration of emicizumab loading dose (at week 2 after therapy initiation), at which time emicizumab level was 21 µg/mL. Further significant improvement of TG was noted following loading period completion while emicizumab level was 62 µg/mL. Our patient has been treated with emicizumab for more than six months altogether and did not encounter any joint bleeds since the commencement of therapy. During this period, a single dose of Haemate P was administered following tooth exfoliation. Our study contributes towards a better understanding of TG as a surrogate marker of VWD patients' hemostasis. Our data suggests that some severe VWD patients could be safely and efficiently treated with emicizumab. The successful prophylaxis of our patient and our ex vivo laboratory findings should set the ground for further collaborative multicenter studies to examine the efficacy and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis in type 3 VWD patients. Disclosures Barg: roshe: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kenet:PI Healthcare, CSL Behring: Honoraria; Bayer, Pfizer, Takeda, BioMarin, Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Bayer, Pfizer, Roche, Alnylam (Sanofi), Shire: Research Funding; Bayer, Pfizer, BioMarin, Takeda, Roche, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: The use of Emicizumab in sever Von Willebrand disease


2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Grander ◽  
V Wieser ◽  
RR Gerner ◽  
F Grabherr ◽  
TE Adolph ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 000348942094677
Author(s):  
Paul Wistermayer ◽  
Derek Escalante ◽  
Wesley McIlwain ◽  
Derek J. Rogers

Objective: Iatrogenic injury is a common cause of subglottic stenosis (SGS). We investigated the role of pre-injury dexamethasone as a preventive treatment for iatrogenic subglottic stenosis. Methods: 16 New Zealand White rabbits were used in an IACUC approved study. Subjects were divided into two groups: intramuscular dexamethasone (DEX) at a dose of 2 mg/kg 15 minutes prior to an endoscopic injury to create SGS, and the same injury creation with a preoperative intramuscular saline (SAL) injection. Three independent, blinded raters evaluated endoscopic images to obtain cross sectional area (CSA) airway measurements. Rabbit airways were measured just prior to injury and at one week post-injury. All subjects were provided as-needed postoperative steroids and buprenorphine for symptoms of respiratory distress. Data analysis was performed using Student t-test. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess inter-rater agreement. Results: All subjects survived to the one-week post-injury airway evaluation. There was no difference in airway size between groups prior to injury ( P = .28). Subjects in the DEX group demonstrated an average stenosis of 20.3% (95% CI 10.2-30.5) at one week compared to 60.6% (95% CI 40.3-80.9) in the SAL group ( P = .01). Subjects in the control group required significantly more doses of postoperative dexamethasone ( P = .02). Inter-rater agreement for between raters was excellent (ICC = .88). Conclusion: This is the first study to examine the role of pre-injury glucocorticoids in preventing iatrogenic subglottic stenosis. In our model, a single dose of intramuscular dexamethasone given prior to a subglottic injury resulted in a statistically significant reduction in airway stenosis. This research suggests that administering systemic dexamethasone should be considered prior to any procedure that may injure the subglottis, including traumatic intubation, to prevent iatrogenic subglottic stenosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Naples ◽  
Drew Soda ◽  
Kahlil Rahman ◽  
Michael J. Ruckenstein ◽  
Kourosh Parham

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Ai Juan Zhang ◽  
Ai Yuan Zhang ◽  
Lin Zhi Gao ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
An Ning Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document