Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part I as a screening and diagnostic instrument for apathy in patients with Parkinson's disease

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 586-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. Gallagher ◽  
A.J. Lees ◽  
A. Schrag
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Diagnostic Instrument ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Updrs Part

scholarly journals Outcome of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease in Terms of Improvement in MDS-UPDRS Scale Over 5 Years

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-314
Author(s):  
Khalid Mahmood ◽  
Omair Afzal Ali ◽  
Adeeb-ul- Hassan ◽  
Imran Ali
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorder ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Updrs Part ◽  
Deep Brain

Background & Objective:  Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common Neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease. There are several surgical procedures for advanced PD, but amongst all deep brain stimulation has proven to be safest and effective. The objective of this study was to see the outcome of DBS for the treatment of PD in terms of improvement in MDS UPDRS over 5 years. Material and Methods:  44 patients were included in study from Oct 2014 to Sep 2019. History, examination was carried out, and preoperative MDS-UPDRS (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale) was recorded. Postoperative improvement in MDS-UPDRS score was assessed at first Programming, 2nd week, and 6th week and at 3rd month. Results:  At baseline the mean, the MDS – UPDRS (Part-I) score was 14.20 ± 0.61 and at the end of 3rd month, the mean score was 11.18 ± 0.47 respectively. At baseline the mean, the MDS – UPDRS (part-II) score was 18.99 ± 0.70 and at the end of 3rd month, the mean score was 13.01 ± 0.57, respectively. At baseline the mean, the MDS – UPDRS (part-III) score was 45.19 ± 0.90 and at the end of 3rd month, the mean score was 25.15 ± 1.20 respectively. At baseline the mean, the MDS – UPDRS (part-IV) score was 10.18 ± 0.87 and at the end of 3rd month, the mean score was 3.85 ± 1.03, respectively.  Conclusion:  The Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is safe and effective in the management of PD.

scholarly journals Factors related to Caregiver Burden in Caregivers of Patients with Parkinson’s disease in Mumbai, India

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagruti Wandrekar ◽  
Nicole D'Souza ◽  
Dr. Maria Barretto
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Mini Mental Status Examination ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Mental Status Examination ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Updrs Part

This study examined the relationship of caregiver burden with various patient and caregiver variables. 50 individuals with Parkinson’s Disease were administered the Movement Disorder Society’s Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Hoehn and Yahr’s Scale (HY), Mini Mental Status examination (MMSE), and their caregivers were administered the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Kruskal Wallis ANOVAs and Mann Whitney U tests showed that caregivers suffering from ill health (Ux=402, p= 0.03) and the patients’ MDS-UPDRS scores significantly affected caregiver burden. Simultaneous multiple regression analysis showed that MDS-UPDRS Part I,II and III were significant predictors of burden (R2= 0.72, p<0.0001) of which the motor examination emerged as the most significant predictor of burden.

scholarly journals Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy in Tremor Dominant Parkinson’s Disease: Long-Term Results

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Alon Sinai ◽  
Maria Nassar ◽  
Elliot Sprecher ◽  
Marius Constantinescu ◽  
Menashe Zaaroor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Updrs Part ◽  
Clinical Rating Scale

Background: MRI-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) has established short-term efficacy in tremor relief. Objective: We report our long-term experience of treating tremor with unilateral FUS unilateral VIM-thalamotomy in tremor dominant Parkinson’s disease (TDPD) patients. Methods: We report outcome of FUS thalamotomy in TDPD patients with 1–5 years of follow-up. Outcomes: tremor reduction assessed with Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS part III) overall and in the treated hemibody and safety. Results: Twenty-six TDPD patients completed 1–5 years of follow-up (median follow-up 36 months, range 12–60 months). Median age was 60 years (range 46–79), with median disease duration of 6 years (range 2–16). Immediately, treatment resulted in 100%improvement in tremor in the treated arm in 23 patients and 90%improvement in 3 patients. In 15 patients with leg tremor, 2 patients with chin tremor and 1 patient with head tremor, tremor was significantly improved. Up to 5 years, median CRST score, median UPDRS score, overall and in treated hemibody, decreased significantly as compared with baseline (p <  0.0001). In 2 patients tremor returned completely and in 8 patients there was partial return of tremor. Adverse events were mild and resolved within 3 months. At baseline 4 patients were not receiving any medication vs. 3 at last follow-up and 15 were not taking levodopa vs.9 at last follow-up. Conclusion: Unilateral FUS VIM-thalamotomy in TDPD patients was effective and safe and provided long-term tremor relief in most patients. FUS thalamotomy for tremor may delay initiation of levodopa treatment.

scholarly journals Nilotinib in Patients with Advanced Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Phase 2A Study (NILO-PD)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Simuni ◽  
Brian Fiske ◽  
Kalpana Merchant ◽  
Christopher S. Coffey ◽  
Elizabeth Klingner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Neuroprotective Effects ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Dopamine Metabolites ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Disability Movement ◽  
Updrs Part

AbstractBackgroundNilotinib, a tyrosine kinase Abelson inhibitor, exhibits neuroprotective effects in preclinical Parkinson disease (PD) models.MethodsThis Phase 2A double-blind placebo-controlled study in moderate/advanced PD randomized participants 1:1:1 to placebo:150:300 mg nilotinib in matching capsules once daily for 6 months. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability, the latter defined as ability to complete the study on assigned dose. Secondary outcomes included change in PD disability (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part 3 OFF/ON). Additional exploratory outcomes included serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and CSF dopamine metabolites.FindingsThe study screened 125 and enrolled 76 participants (39% screen failure) between November 2017 and December 2018 at 25 US sites. The last participant completed the study in September 2019. At baseline, mean (standard deviation) age was 64.6 years (7.5), disease duration 9.9 years (4.7), MDS-UPDRS Part 1-3 OFF score 66.4(19.3) and ON score 48.4(16.2), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score 27.1(2.2). Tolerability was 21(84%):19 (76%):20 (77%) in placebo:150:300 mg arm, respectively. Both active doses were safe. The most common reasons for drug suspension were elevations of amylase and/or lipase, which were dose-dependent. The 300 mg group had transitory worsening of MDS-UPDRS-3 ON at 1 month compared to placebo (p<0.01), which resolved by 6 months. There was no difference in the change of MDS-UPDRS-3 OFF from baseline to 6 months between the groups (p=0.17). CSF/serum PK ratio was 0.2-0.3%. There was no evidence of treatment-related elevation of any dopamine metabolites.InterpretationBoth doses of nilotinib were safe and tolerable in these participants, who were selected with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. There was no evidence of any symptomatic benefit of nilotinib. The drug had low CSF exposure and failed to change dopamine metabolites. These findings do not warrant further testing of nilotinib in PD.FundingThe study was funded by Funded by Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research / The Cure Parkinson Trust / Van Andel Institute. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03205488

scholarly journals Salivary caffeine in Parkinson’s disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Leodori ◽  
Maria Ilenia De Bartolo ◽  
Daniele Belvisi ◽  
Alessia Ciogli ◽  
Andrea Fabbrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Caffeine Intake ◽  
Motor Complications ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Caffeine Metabolism ◽  
Movement Disorder Society

AbstractWe aimed to investigate salivary caffeine content, caffeine absorption and metabolism in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and verify whether salivary caffeine can be used as a biomarker of PD. We enrolled 98 PD patients and 92 healthy subjects. Caffeine and its major metabolite, paraxanthine, were measured in saliva samples collected before and 4 h after the oral intake of caffeine (100 mg). We measured caffeine absorption as the normalized increase in caffeine levels, and caffeine metabolism as the paraxanthine/caffeine ratio. The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III, the Hoehn & Yahr, the presence of motor complications, and levodopa equivalent dose (LED) were assessed and correlated with caffeine levels, absorption, and metabolism. The effects of demographic and environmental features possibly influencing caffeine levels were also investigated. Caffeine levels were decreased in patients with moderate/advanced PD, while caffeine levels were normal in patients with early and de-novo PD, unrelated to caffeine intake. Caffeine absorption and metabolism were normal in PD. Decreased salivary caffeine levels in PD were associated with higher disease severity, longer duration, and the presence of motor complications, no significant association was found with LED. Salivary caffeine decrease correlates with PD progression.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Pain between Parkinson’s Disease and Multiple System Atrophy: A Clinical Cross-Sectional Survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
He-Yang You ◽  
Lei Wu ◽  
Hai-Ting Yang ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Xiao-Ling Ding
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Multiple System Atrophy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Vas Scores

Background. Pain is frequent in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Parkinson-plus syndrome. This study aimed to assess the prevalence, characteristics, therapy (especially the effect of dopaminergic therapy), and associated symptoms of pain in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients. Methods. Seventy-one PD patients, sixty-five MSA patients, and forty age-matched healthy controls were enrolled and evaluated by using the German pain questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, the influence of pain in PD patients on anxiety, depression, and the quality of life was assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Results. Compared to that of the healthy controls, the PD and MSA patients had a significantly higher presence of pain (P<0.01, P<0.01). PD patients had a higher presence of pain than MSA patients (P=0.007). No difference in VAS scores was observed between the PD and MSA patients (P=0.148). A total of 21 PD patients (42.85%) with pain and 13 MSA patients (43.33%) with pain received treatment. A total of 13 PD patients with pain and 6 MSA patients with pain had an improved pain intensity after using dopaminergic medication. The differences in the disease duration, Hoehn and Yahr stages, and scores on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor score, HAD-D, HAD-A, and PDQ-39 were significant between the PD patients with and without pain. Conclusion. PD and MSA patients are prone to pain with insufficient treatment. Pain interventions should be provided as soon as possible to improve the patient’s life.

scholarly journals The Parkinson’s Disease Comprehensive Response (PDCORE): a composite approach integrating three standard outcome measures

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Luz ◽  
Alan Whone ◽  
Niccolò Bassani ◽  
Richard K Wyse ◽  
Glenn T Stebbins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Glial Cell ◽  
Neurotrophic Factor ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Initial Development ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Recent Phase ◽  
Data Source

Abstract There is an increasing need for improved endpoints to assess clinical trial effects in Parkinson’s disease. We propose the Parkinson’s Disease Comprehensive Response as a novel weighted composite endpoint integrating changes measured in three established Parkinson’s outcomes, including: OFF state Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Motor Examination scores; Motor Experiences of Daily Living scores; and total good-quality ON time per day. The data source for the initial development of the composite described herein was a recent Phase II trial of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. A wide range of clinically derived relative weights was assessed to normalize for differentially scoring base rates with each endpoint component. The Parkinson’s disease comprehensive response, in contrast to examining practically defined OFF state Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Motor Examination scores alone, showed stability over 40 weeks in placebo patients, and all 432 analyses in this permutation exercise yielded significant differences in favour of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. The findings were consistent with results obtained employing three different global statistical test methodologies and with patterns of intra-patient change. Based on our detailed analyses, we conclude it worth prospectively evaluating the clinical utility, validity and regulatory feasibility of using clinically supported final Parkinson’s disease comprehensive response formulas (for both the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-based and Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-based versions) in future disease-modifying Parkinson’s trials. Whilst the data source employed in the initial development of this weighted composite score is from a recent Phase II trial of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, we wish to stress that the results are not described to provide post hoc evidence of the efficacy of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor but rather are presented to further the debate of how current regulatory approved rating scales may be combined to address some of the recognized limitations of using individual scales in isolation.

scholarly journals The perception of apathy by caregivers of patients with dementia in Parkinson's disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Henrique Ferreira Camargo ◽  
Rafael Arthur Serpa ◽  
Thiago Matnei ◽  
Jivago Szpoganicz Sabatini ◽  
Hélio Afonso Ghizoni Teive
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease Dementia ◽  
Disease Rating

ABSTRACT Background: Apathy is one of the main neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and is associated with Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). Objective: To identify the characteristics of apathy in individuals with PDD according to caregiver perception. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with PD according to MDS criteria for PDD were included. The following scales were used: the Hoehn and Yahr, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III, Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Cognition (SCOPA Cog), the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). Results: A total of 97.4% of the patients showed results consistent with apathy. Analysis of question 14 of the AES revealed no correlation with the total result of all the questions [r=-1293, r²=0.0167, 95%CI (-0.4274 to 0.1940), P=0.2162], however, there was a correlation of responses to the same question with depression data on the MADRS scale [r=-0.5213, r²=0.2718, 95%CI (-0.7186 to -0.2464), P=0.00033]. Conclusion: Apathy is a disorder associated with PDD. However, the scoring scheme of the AES questions can lead to different interpretations of caregiver responses, highlighting limitations of the tool for use in studies of PDD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document