scholarly journals Recent occurrences of serious tsunami damage and the future challenges of tsunami disaster risk reduction

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumihiko Imamura ◽  
Sébastien Penmellen Boret ◽  
Anawat Suppasri ◽  
Abdul Muhari
Author(s):  
Eko Rudianto ◽  
Abdul Muhari ◽  
Kenji Harada ◽  
Hideo Matsutomi ◽  
Hendra Yusran Siry ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nnamdi G. Iloka

Indigenous knowledge is valuable knowledge that has helped local communities all over the world survive for generations. This knowledge originates from the interaction between members of the community and the environment in which they live. Although much has been written about indigenous knowledge, its documentation in the area of disaster risk reduction and climate change in Africa has been very limited. The wealth of this knowledge has not been well-recognised in the disaster risk reduction field, as policy-makers still rely on mitigation strategies based on scientific knowledge. Colonialism and lack of proper documentation of indigenous knowledge are some of the contributing factors to this. Ignoring the importance of understanding adaptive strategies of the local people has led to failed projects. Understanding how local people in Africa have managed to survive and adapt for generations, before the arrival of Western education, may be the key to developing sustainable policies to mitigate future challenges. Literature used in this article, obtained from the books, papers and publications of various experts in the fields of disaster risk reduction, climate change, indigenous knowledge and adaptation, highlight the need for more interest to be shown in indigenous knowledge, especially in the developing country context. This would lead to better strategies which originate from the community level but would aim for overall sustainable development in Africa.


Author(s):  
Sri Indarti ◽  
Juim Juim

This study analyzes Collaborative governance in the earthquake and tsunami Disaster Risk Reduction Policy (DRR). Collaborative governance analysis in disaster risk reduction policy uses Ratner's Collaborative Governance Stages (2012) theory, which includes Identifying Obstacles and Opportunities, Debating Strategies for Influence and Planning Collaborative Actions Disaster Risk Reduction for Earthquake and Tsunami Disasters has been carried out in the City of Bengkulu which is located on the west coast of the island of Sumatra. Various institutions have developed DRR, with their respective patterns and limited coordination. Collaborative governance foundation has been carried out and needs to be developed strategically as an alternative implementation and development of more effective policies and management. The findings in this study that Collaboration on DRR The earthquake and tsunami in Bengkulu City were in the pilot stage, which provided the initial foundation for developing DRR policy implementation. There are obstacles in DRR implementation and management, which require strategic collaboration for the development of DRR effectively and equitably and continuously. Collaborative follow-up needs to be done with the establishment of a permanent forum that is needed flexibly, by avoiding a strict hierarchical structure or using organization horizontally, so that it can accommodate and utilize various stakeholders' potential optimally.


2019 ◽  
pp. SP501-2019-97
Author(s):  
Natt Leelawat ◽  
Panon Latcharote ◽  
Anawat Suppasri ◽  
Titaya Sararit ◽  
Mongkonkorn Srivichai ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramadhan Pancasilawan

The government has a function to protect its people, including managing the disaster. The function of government in natural disaster management is a function that is expected to be carried out with full commitment. Disaster management is an activity carried out comprehensively and there is a need for active stakeholder involvement. Pangandaran Regency is a disaster-prone area. This article aims to describe the mitigation launched by the Pangandaran Regency government to reduce disaster risk using a Qualitative approach and observation, interview and literature study. Pangandaran Regency has been stretched to get out of the tsunami disaster that had occurred. Even mitigation efforts have been carried out with the involvement of various stakeholders in Pangandaran Regency. With mitigation, disaster risk reduction can be done. Therefore the government should make efforts to overcome disaster risk through the Mitigation Program by the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD). The disaster mitigation program consists of two types namely Mitigation with a Structural approach and namely mitigation by focusing on physical development, such as the construction of temporary evacuation sites or the construction of an early warning system (EAS). Then the other form is Non-Structural mitigation which is mitigation carried out in the form of non-physical development, such as disaster education to school children and also to the community through activities carried out by mothers. Disaster training is given to private parties to understand disaster in Pangandaran.Keywords: Disaster, Mitigation, Risk Reduction, Management Disaster, Pangandaran  


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
CB Herman Edyanto

Indonesia is in a position 'ring of fire' (Ring of Fire), which means that the possibility of occurrence of disasters, particularly earthquakes is extremely high. Earth plate movements trigger earthquakes. When the epicenter was at sea, it can be expected to be a tsunami. Forecasting earthquakes can not be done, the tsunami itself occurs and is kept up preceded by an earthquake. A short time to escape, would create chaos on the location of the location where the high population concentration, thus requiring community participation in carrying out the evacuation. This study aims to introduce issues and acts as the tsunami disaster risk reduction. The participation of communities to disasters should be able to reduce the number of victims. The methodology of the discussion in this study conducted qualitatively by studying literature, which includes secondary data, observation, interviews and documentation. Results from this study are other steps undertaken in the tsunami disaster risk reduction.Indonesia berada pada posisi ̳cincin api‘ (ring of fire), yang berarti bahwa tingkatkemungkinan kejadian bencana, khususnya gempa bumi adalah sangat tinggi. Gerakan lempeng bumi memicu gempa. Bila pusat gempa berada dilaut, maka dapat diduga akan terjadinya tsunami. Peramalan bencana gempa belum dapat dilakukan, tsunami itu sendiri terjadi dan selalui didahului dengan adanya gempa. Waktu yang begitu singkat untuk penyelamatan diri, akan menciptakan kekacauan pada lokasi lokasi dimana konsentrasi penduduknya tinggi, sehingga mengharuskan adanya partisipasi masyarakat dalam melaksanakan proses evakuasi. Studi ini bertujuan untuk memperkenalkan permasalahan tsunami dan tindakan sebagai upaya pengurangan risiko bencana. Adanya partisipasi masyarakat terhadap bencana diharapkan mampu untuk menekan jumlah korban. Metodologi pembahasan dalam studi ini dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan melakukan studi literatur, yang mencakup data sekunder, observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil dari studi ini adalah langkah-langkah lain yang dilakukan dalam pengurangan risiko bencana tsunami.Keywords: community participation, disaster risk reduction, tsunami.


Author(s):  
David Alexander

Disaster risk reduction (DRR, or disaster reduction) is an umbrella term for processes of preparing for, responding to, recovering from, and managing the risk of disasters. It refers primarily to the acts of setting the policy and strategic agendas for these tasks. It reflects a long-standing need to reorientate priorities from merely responding to disasters once they have struck to reducing or avoiding their impacts. To be achieved, DRR requires a combination of physical and social measures, with full participation of affected populations and other stakeholders. Academically, disasters have been studied systematically for more than 100 years. During this period, the emphasis has changed from analyzing natural hazards as the primary drivers of disaster to a more pluralistic approach in which vulnerability and exposure to hazards and threats are viewed as playing vitally important roles. Disasters can have natural, technological, social, or intentional (i.e., terrorism-related) causes, but they are increasingly composite events that involve combinations of factors. Hence there is now much emphasis on “natech” events, in which natural hazards affect technological systems, and cascading disasters, in which escalation points caused by interacting sources of vulnerability may have the power to make the secondary effects more important than the primary trigger. Root causes and contexts have assumed a greater salience in the explanation of disaster, which tends to involve complex interactions among social, economic, political, and physical factors. Resilience has come to the fore as a positive concept for organizing processes of DRR. It is usually defined as a mixture of adaptation to hazards and threats and the ability to resist or overcome the negative effects of disaster. DRR concepts and strategies have been mainstreamed in modern society by international action under the auspices of the United Nations and the Sendai Framework for DRR, 2015–2030. The challenges of applying UN frameworks include uncertainty about whether the underlying concepts are durable, whether they can be applied rigorously, whether they have enough support among policy and decisionmakers, and whether they can acquire a sound practical basis. The future of DRR depends on humanity’s ability to implement solutions to conflict, migration, and environmental change, not merely the impact of disasters per se. In an era in which population is rising, wealth disparities and human mobility are increasing, and environmental change has begun to lead to major upheavals, DRR has gone from being a rather esoteric, specialized field to one that is central to the future of human existence.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anawat Suppasri ◽  
Natt Leelawat ◽  
Panon Latcharote ◽  
Volker Roeber ◽  
Kei Yamashita ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document