Safety profile of biologic drugs in the therapy of Crohn disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1237-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Moćko ◽  
Paweł Kawalec ◽  
Andrzej Pilc
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Crohn Disease ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biologic Drugs

scholarly journals Cardiovascular Toxicities Secondary to Biotherapy and Molecular Targeted Therapies in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2159
Author(s):  
Charalampos Aktypis ◽  
Maria-Eleni Spei ◽  
Maria Yavropoulou ◽  
Göran Wallin ◽  
Anna Koumarianou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Controlled Trials

A broad spectrum of novel targeted therapies with prime antitumor activity and/or ample control of hormonal symptoms together with an overall acceptable safety profile have emerged for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). In this systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis, the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched to assess and compare the safety profile of NEN treatments with special focus on the cardiovascular adverse effects of biotherapy and molecular targeted therapies (MTTs). Quality/risk of bias were assessed using GRADE criteria. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with metastatic NENs, including medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) were included. A total of 3695 articles and 122 clinical trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov were screened. We included sixteen relevant RCTs comprising 3408 unique patients assigned to different treatments compared with placebo. All the included studies had a low risk of bias. We identified four drug therapies for NENs with eligible placebo-controlled RCTs: somatostatin analogs (SSAs), tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects (AE) were more often encountered in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors and TKI (odds ratio [OR]: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.87–3.12 and OR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.46–7.96, respectively) as compared to SSAs (OR:0.77, 95% CI: 0.47–1.27) and TPH inhibitors (OR:0.77, 95% CI: 0.35–1.69). MTOR inhibitors had the highest risk for serious cardiac AE (OR:3.28, 95% CI: 1.66–6.48) followed by TKIs (OR:1.51, 95% CI: 0.59–3.83). Serious vascular AE were more often encountered in NEN patients treated with mTOR inhibitors (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 0.64–4.64) and TKIs (OR:1.64, 95% CI: 0.35–7.78). Finally, patients on TKIs were at higher risk for new-onset or exacerbation of pre-existing hypertension (OR:3.31, 95% CI: 1.87–5.86). In conclusion, SSAs and TPH inhibitors appear to be safer as compared to mTOR inhibitors and TKIs with regards to their overall toxicity profile, and cardiovascular toxicities in particular. Special consideration should be given to a patient-tailored approach with anticipated toxicities of targeted NEN treatments together with assessment of cardiovascular comorbidities, assisting clinicians in treatment selection and early recognition/management of cardiovascular toxicities. This approach could improve patient compliance and preserve cardiovascular health and overall quality of life.

Early vs Late Use of Anti-TNFa Therapy in Adult Patients With Crohn Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1808-1818
Author(s):  
Shadi Hamdeh ◽  
Muhammad Aziz ◽  
Osama Altayar ◽  
Mojtaba Olyaee ◽  
Mohammad Hassan Murad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Crohn Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinical Series ◽  
Early Use

Abstract Objectives While anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFa) therapies for Crohn disease (CD) were initially introduced in 1998 for biologic therapies are often introduced after a minimum of 6 years after diagnosis. The benefit of anti-TNFa early in the course of CD is still controversial, with some studies showing better outcomes but others not. To determine whether earlier introduction of anti-TNFa therapy improves efficacy in clinical trials or clinical series, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing early vs late anti-TNFa use in the management of CD. Methods A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus was conducted from each database’s inception to November 3, 2019. We included comparative studies of early vs late use of anti-TNFa therapy in adult patients with CD. Results Eleven studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 2501 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the early use of anti-TNFa was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the need for surgery (relative risk [RR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.69; I2 = 68%) and disease progression (RR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35–0.75; I2 = 61%). Early use also showed an increase in early remission (RR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.54–2.46; I2 = 0%) and clinical response. There was no statistically significant difference in achieving late remission (RR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.94–2.05; I2 = 65%) or mucosal healing (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.63–1.91; I2 = 0%). Conclusion This systematic review suggests that using anti-TNFa earlier in the treatment of CD (within 3 years) may improve clinical outcomes compared to late administration in terms of achieving early clinical remission, clinical response, disease progression, and the need for surgery.

Immunotherapy efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) versus programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in pan-cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14113-e14113
Author(s):  
Jianchun Duan ◽  
Longgang Cui ◽  
Guoqiang Wang ◽  
Zhengyi Zhao ◽  
Shiqing Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Pan Cancer

e14113 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have led to a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, while whether PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors deliver different clinical outcomes remains obscure. Here we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety profile of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in pan-cancer patients. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane library, and Embase from January 2000 to December 2018 for randomized controlled trials that compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with standard treatment in patients with solid tumors. We also reviewed abstracts and presentations from all major conference proceedings. Retrospective studies and trials that compared anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with other immunotherapies were excluded. The primary outcome was the difference in overall survival (OS). Studies were stratified into comparison groups upon studies mirrored with trial design and patient characteristics. Effect size in each comparison group was pooled first, the difference in overall survival was estimated, and the overall effect sizes was pooled using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 3864 publications were retrieved through initial literature search, 17 randomized controlled trials involving 9549 patients with solid tumors were included for this meta-analysis. PD-1 inhibitors exhibited significantly improved OS over PD-L1 inhibitors either in overall population (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.87), as monotherapy (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96), or combination with chemotherapy (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.82). PD-1 inhibitors also showed improved progression free survival (PFS) over PD-L1 inhibitors in overall population (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.94). No significant difference was observed for safety profile between PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy. PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy have less Grade 3-5 adverse events than PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (overall RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93). Sensitivity analysis presented a satisfactory consistency of the overall estimates across these analyses. Conclusions: PD-1 inhibitors exhibited better clinical performance for survival outcome and safety profile over PD-L1 inhibitors. Future studies and explorations of the underlying mechanisms are needed for the further optimization of treatment strategies in clinical practice.

scholarly journals A juxtaposition of safety outcomes between various doses of sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors, in insulin-treated type-1 diabetes mellitus patients: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-172
Author(s):  
Sumanta Saha
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

  Background: Several clinical trials have tested the safety profile of sodium-glucose co-transport inhibitors’ (SGLTis) in adult type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. However, no systematic review has yet compared its variation between large and low dose SGLTis. Henceforth, a review protocol is proposed here to review it. Methods: Different electronic databases will be searched for randomized-controlled trials (published in the English language) studying the above objective, irrespective of their publication date. After selecting the eligible trials, their data on the study design, population characteristics, compared interventions, and outcomes of interest will be extracted. Then, utilizing the Cochrane tool, each trial's risk of selection bias, detection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias will be judged. Next, depending on clinical heterogeneity among the trials, a random-effect or fixed-effect model meta-analysis will be used to compare the respective outcomes. Via the Chi2 and I2 statistics, the statistical inconsistency among the trials will be estimated. When this is substantial, subgroup analysis will follow. Publication bias will be evaluated by funnel plots and Egger’s test. A sensitivity analysis will be done to check different assumptions. If a quantitative juxtaposition is not possible, a narrative reporting will ensue. Conclusion: The proposed study will perform a dose-wise juxtaposition of the safety profile of SGLTis in insulin-treated T1DM patients. Registration: Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (Registration no. CRD42019146578)    

scholarly journals Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis: Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilars, Biologics and JAK1 Inhibitors for Active Crohn Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guozhi Wu ◽  
Yuan Yang ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
Yuping Wang ◽  
Qinghong Guo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Crohn Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Certolizumab Pegol ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Maintenance Of Remission

Background: Crohn disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects quality of life. There are several drugs available for the treatment of CD, but their relative efficacy is unknown due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head randomized controlled trials.Aim: To perform a mixed comparison of the efficacy and safety of biosimilars, biologics and JAK1 inhibitors for CD.Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to Dec. 28, 2020. Only RCTs that compared the efficacy or safety of biosimilars, biologics and JAK1 inhibitors with placebo or another active agent for CD were included in the comparative analysis. Efficacy outcomes were the induction of remission, maintenance of remission and steroid-free remission, and safety outcomes were serious adverse events (AEs) and infections. The Bayesian method was utilized to compare the treatments. The registration number is CRD42020187807.Results: Twenty-eight studies and 29 RCTs were identified in our systematic review. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that infliximab and adalimumab were superior to certolizumab pegol (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.35–4.97; OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.57–5.40, respectively) and tofacitinib (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.27–5.97; OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.47–6.52, respectively) and revealed the superiority of CT-P13 compared with placebo (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.31–7.59) for the induction of remission. Infliximab (OR 7.49, 95% CI 1.85–34.77), adalimumab (OR 10.76, 95% CI 2.61–52.35), certolizumab pegol (OR 4.41, 95% CI 1.10–21.08), vedolizumab (OR 4.99, 95% CI 1.19–25.54) and CT-P13 (OR 10.93, 95% CI 2.10–64.37) were superior to filgotinib for the maintenance of remission. Moreover, infliximab (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.49–10.23), adalimumab (OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.43–16.95), vedolizumab (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.21–6.52) and CT-P13 (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.05–27.58) were superior to placebo for steroid-free remission. Among all treatments, adalimumab ranked highest for the induction of remission, and CT-P13 ranked highest for the maintenance of remission and steroid-free remission.Conclusion: CT-P13 was more efficacious than numerous biological agents and JAK1 inhibitors and should be recommended for the treatment of CD. Further head-to-head RCTs are warranted to compare these drugs.

scholarly journals Safety Profile of Using Ciprofloxacin in Paediatrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Baraneh Masoumi ◽  
Gohar Eslami ◽  
Reza Alizadeh-Navaei ◽  
Pritish Mondal ◽  
Mohammad Sadegh Rezai
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Meta Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document