New approaches for developing multi-targeted drug combinations for disease modification of complex brain disorders. Does epilepsy prevention become a realistic goal?

2021 ◽  
pp. 107934
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Löscher ◽  
Pavel Klein
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (17) ◽  
pp. 9569
Author(s):  
Suman Rao ◽  
Benoît Thibault ◽  
Lisa Peyrard ◽  
Anne-Laure Larroque-Lombard ◽  
Martin Rupp ◽  
...  

The median-effect principle proposed by Chou and Talalay is the most effective approach to parameterize interactions between several agents in combination. However, this method cannot be used to evaluate the effectiveness of equimolar drug combinations, which are comparative references for dual-targeting molecular design. Here, using data acquired through the development of “combi-molecules” blocking two kinases (e.g., EGFR-c-Src and EGFR-c-Met), we established potency indices for equimolar and dual-targeted inhibitors. If the fold difference (κ) between the IC50 of the two individual kinase inhibitors was >6, the IC50 of their equimolar combination resembled that of the more potent inhibitor. Hence, the “combi-targeting” of the two kinases was considered “imbalanced” and the combination ineffective. However, if κ ≤ 6, the IC50 of the combination fell below that of each individual drug and the combi-targeting was considered “balanced” and the combination effective. We also showed that combi-molecules should be compared with equimolar combinations only under balanced conditions and propose a new parameter Ω for validating their effectiveness. A multi-targeted drug is effective if Ω < 1, where Ω is defined as the IC50 of the drug divided by that of the corresponding equimolar combination. Our study provides a methodology to determine the in vitro potency of equimolar two-drug combinations as well as combi-/hybrid molecules inhibiting two different kinase targets.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. S110-S111
Author(s):  
GH Bisping ◽  
D Wenning ◽  
M Kropff ◽  
D Gustavus ◽  
G Munzert ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1866-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liye He ◽  
Krister Wennerberg ◽  
Tero Aittokallio ◽  
Jing Tang

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Waterhouse ◽  
K. Gelmon ◽  
R. Klasa ◽  
K. Chi ◽  
D. Huntsman ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1087
Author(s):  
Jinyan Shen ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Niall G. Howlett ◽  
Paul S. Cohen ◽  
Gongqin Sun

Triple negative breast cancer is a collection of heterogeneous breast cancers that are immunohistochemically negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and ErbB2 (due to deletion or lack of amplification). No dominant proliferative driver has been identified for this type of cancer, and effective targeted therapy is lacking. In this study, we hypothesized that triple negative breast cancer cells are multi-driver cancer cells, and evaluated a biphasic mathematical model for identifying potent and synergistic drug combinations for multi-driver cancer cells. The responses of two triple negative breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468, to a panel of targeted therapy drugs were determined over a broad range of concentrations. The analyses of the drug responses by the biphasic mathematical model revealed that both cell lines were indeed dependent on multiple drivers, and inhibitors of individual drivers caused a biphasic response: a target-specific partial inhibition at low nM concentrations, and an off-target toxicity at μM concentrations. We further demonstrated that combinations of drugs, targeting each driver, cause potent, synergistic, and cell-specific cell killing. Immunoblotting analysis of the effects of the individual drugs and drug combinations on the signaling pathways supports the above conclusion. These results support a multi-driver proliferation hypothesis for these triple negative breast cancer cells, and demonstrate the applicability of the biphasic mathematical model for identifying effective and synergistic targeted drug combinations for triple negative breast cancer cells.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document