No apparent effects of a viscous, superabsorbent hydrogel on appetite, energy intake, or fecal excretion in overweight adults

2021 ◽  
pp. 113643
Author(s):  
Evan J Reister ◽  
Richard D Mattes
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. S376-S377
Author(s):  
E. Tasali ◽  
E. Kahn ◽  
B. Stell Tucker ◽  
K. Hoddy ◽  
J. Kilkus ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1180
Author(s):  
Alison Mary Coates ◽  
Samantha Morgillo ◽  
Catherine Yandell ◽  
Andrew Scholey ◽  
Jonathan David Buckley ◽  
...  

Long term nut consumption is associated with reduced risk of coronary heart disease and better cognitive function. This study examined supplementing habitual diets with almonds or carbohydrate-rich snack foods (providing 15% energy) on biomarkers of cardiovascular and metabolic health, mood and cognitive performance. Participants (overweight/obese, 50–80 years) were randomised to an almond-enriched diet (AED) or isocaloric nut-free diet (NFD) for 12 weeks. Body weight, blood lipids, glucose, insulin, blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness, cell adhesions molecules, C reactive protein (CRP), mood, and cognitive performance (working memory primary outcome), dietary profiles and energy intake/expenditure were measured at baseline and Week 12 in 128 participants (n = 63 AED, n = 65 NFD). Compared with NFD, AED was associated with altered macro and micronutrient profiles, but no differences in energy intake or expenditure. The AED significantly reduced triglycerides and SBP but there were no other changes in cardiometabolic biomarkers, mood, or cognitive performance. The inclusion of almonds in the diet improves aspects of cardiometabolic health without affecting cognitive performance or mood in overweight/obese adults.


Obesity ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1362-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah B. Lewis ◽  
Amy L. Ahern ◽  
Ivonne Solis-Trapala ◽  
Celia G. Walker ◽  
Frank Reimann ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1741-1748 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Butterfield ◽  
J. Gates ◽  
S. Fleming ◽  
G. A. Brooks ◽  
J. R. Sutton ◽  
...  

The hypothesis that high-altitude weight loss can be prevented by increasing energy intake to meet energy requirement was tested in seven men, 23.7 +/- 4.3 (SD) yr, taken to 4,300 m for 21 days. Energy intake required to maintain body weight at sea level was found to be 3,118 +/- 300 kcal/day, as confirmed by nitrogen balance. Basal metabolic rate (BMR), determined by indirect calorimetry, increased 27% on day 2 at altitude and then decreased and reached a plateau at 17% above the sea level BMR by day 10. Energy expended during strenuous activities was 37% lower at altitude than at sea level. Fecal excretion of energy, nitrogen, total fiber, and total volatile fatty acids was not significantly affected by altitude. Energy intake at altitude was adjusted after 1 wk, on the basis of the increased BMR, to 3,452 +/- 452 kcal/day. Mean nitrogen balance at altitude was negative (-0.25 +/- 0.71 g/day) before energy intake was adjusted but rose significantly thereafter (0.20 +/- 0.71 and 0.44 +/- 0.66 g/day during weeks 2 and 3). Mean body weight decreased 2.1 +/- 1.0 kg over the 3 wk of the study, but the rate of weight loss was significantly diminished after the increase in energy intake (201 +/- 75 vs. 72 +/- 48 g/day). Individual regression lines drawn through 7-day segments of body weight showed that in four of seven subjects the slopes of body weight were not significantly different from zero after the 2nd wk. Thus weight loss ceased in four of seven men in whom increased BMR at altitude was compensated with increased energy intake.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary T. Kelly ◽  
Julie M. W. Wallace ◽  
Paula J. Robson ◽  
Kirsten L. Rennie ◽  
Robert W. Welch ◽  
...  

Large food portions may be facilitating excess energy intake (EI) and adiposity among adults. The present study aimed to assess the extent to which EI and amounts of foods consumed are influenced by the availability of different-sized food portions. A randomised within-subject cross-over, fully residential design was used, where forty-three (twenty-one men and twenty-two women) normal-weight and overweight adults were randomly allocated to two separate 4 d periods where they were presented with either ‘standard’ or ‘large’ food portions of the same foods and beverages. The main outcome measures were the amount of food (g) and EI (MJ) consumed throughout each study period. Mean EI over 4 d was significantly higher on the large portion condition compared with the standard condition in the total group (59·1 (sd 6·6) v. 52·2 (sd 14·3) MJ; P = 0·020); men and women increased their EI by 17 % (10 (sd 6·5) MJ; P < 0·001) and 10 % (4 (sd 6·5) MJ; P = 0·005) respectively when served the large food portions relative to the standard food portions. The increased intakes were sustained over the 4 d in the large portion condition with little evidence of down-regulation of EI and food intake being made by subjects. Increased food portion size resulted in significant and sustained increases in EI in men and women over 4 d under fully residential conditions. The availability and consumption of larger portions of food may be a significant factor contributing to excess EI and adiposity.


Nutrients ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sayer ◽  
Akua Amankwaah ◽  
Gregory Tamer ◽  
Ningning Chen ◽  
Amy Wright ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document