Measuring sedentary behaviour across the spectrum of adults with intellectual disabilities: A comparison between accelerometer and international physical activity questionnaire

Physiotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. e93
Author(s):  
Y. Dairo ◽  
J. Collett ◽  
H. Dawes ◽  
C. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Intellectual Disabilities ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
International Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Adults With Intellectual Disabilities ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Agreement of accelerometer and a physical activity questionnaire in adults with intellectual disabilities

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynsay Matthews ◽  
Catherine Hankey ◽  
Victoria Penpraze ◽  
Susan Boyle ◽  
Susan Macmillan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Intellectual Disabilities ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Adults With Intellectual Disabilities ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of IPAQ-SF and GPAQ for Assessing Sedentary Behaviour in Adults in the European Union: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4602
Author(s):  
Kaja Meh ◽  
Gregor Jurak ◽  
Maroje Sorić ◽  
Paulo Rocha ◽  
Vedrana Sember
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
European Union ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
National Language ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Single Item ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Questionnaires ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Current lifestyles are marked by sedentary behaviour; thus, it is of great importance for policymaking to have valid and reliable tools to measure sedentary behaviour in order to combat it. Therefore, the aim of this review and meta-analysis is to critically review, assess, and compile the reliability, criterion validity, and construct validity of the single-item sedentary behaviour questions within national language versions of most commonly used international physical activity questionnaires for adults in the European Union: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. A total of 1749 records were screened, 287 full-text papers were read, and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results and quality of studies were evaluated by the Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires checklist. Meta-analysis indicated moderate to high reliability (rw = 0.59) and concurrent validity (rw = 0.55) of national language versions of single-item sedentary behaviour questions. Criterion validity was rather low (rw = 0.23) but in concordance with previous studies. The risk of bias analysis highlighted the poor reporting of methods and results, with a total bias score of 0.42. Thus, we recommend using multi-item SB questionnaires and smart trackers for providing information on SB rather than single-item sedentary behaviour questions in physical activity questionnaires.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document