Using social return on investment to evaluate the public art exhibit Breathing Lights

Poetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 101401
Author(s):  
Dina Refki ◽  
Kathryn Mishkin ◽  
Bilge Avci ◽  
Sana Abdelkarim
Keyword(s):  
Public Art ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
The Public ◽  
Social Return On Investment ◽  
Art Exhibit

scholarly journals Oddziaływanie społeczne przedsiębiorstw społecznych w teorii i praktyce

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabela Grabowska
Keyword(s):  
Social Services ◽  
Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Social Enterprises ◽  
Economic Perspective ◽  
The Public ◽  
Change Measurement ◽  
Social Return On Investment

The publication is devoted to issues related to the development of tools for measuring social impact generated by social enterprises. A valuable aspect of the monograph is the inclusion of case studies of selected tools (such as social return on investment, local multiplier, balanced scorecard) in partnership with social enterprises. The authors pay special attention to solutions enabling the operationalization of social change measurement, taking into account not only financial but, above all, non-financial aspects. They believe that the measurement of impact should take into account not only the economic perspective, but also the public and social one, where values other than material profit also count. The tools should indicate the responsibility of entities towards various types of stakeholders and serve to increase the quality of social services by providing valuable information to individual organizations.

Implementasi Analisis Social Return On Investment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohmadina Sabila Fitri
Keyword(s):  
Return On Investment ◽  
Social Return On Investment

Artikel ini berisi implentasi Social Return On Investment terutama bagi warga Surabaya sekitar. Social Return On Investment sendiri adalah metode berbasis prinsip untuk mengukur kelebihan dari nilai keuangan relatif terhadap sumber daya yang diinvestasikan.

Social Return on Investment: Health Promotion Programs

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Worawan Chandoevwit ◽  
Kannika Thampanishvong ◽  
Rattanakarun Rojjananukulpong
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Social Return On Investment ◽  
Health Promotion Programs

scholarly journals Adding value to the use of Health Impact Assessment and social return on investment technologies

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Green ◽  
K Ashton ◽  
M Dyakova ◽  
L Parry-Williams
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Social Return On Investment ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and Social Return on Investment (SROI) are beneficial public health methodologies that assess potential effects on health including social, economic and environmental factors and have synergies in their approaches. This paper explores how HIA and SROI can complement each other to capture and account for the impact and social value of an assessed intervention or policy. A scoping review of academic and grey literature was undertaken to identify case studies published between January 1996 and April 2019 where HIA and SROI methods have been used to complement each other. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with nine international experts from a range of regulatory/legislative contexts to gain a better understanding of past experiences and expertise of both HIA and SROI. A thematic analysis was undertaken on the data collected. The review identified two published reports which outline when HIA and SROI have both been used to assess the same intervention. Interview results suggest that both methods have strengths as standalone processes i.e. HIAs are well-structured in their approach, assessing health in its broadest context and SROI can add value by monetizing social value as well as capturing social/environmental impact. Similarities of the two methods were identified i.e. a strong emphasis on stakeholder engagement and common shared principles. When questioned how the two methods could complement each other in practice, the results indicate the benefits of using HIA to explore initial impact, and as a platform on which to build SROI to monetarize social value. HIA and SROI methodologies have cross-over. The research suggests potential benefits when used in tandem or combining the methods to assess impact and account for health and social value. Innovative work is now being carried out in Wales to understand the implications of this in practice and to understand how the results of the two methods could be used by decision-makers. Key messages HIA and SROI methods can be used in tandem to capture both the health impact and social value of policies and proposed interventions. HIA and SROI when used together can provide valuable information to inform decision makers around the health impact and social value of proposed policies and interventions.

Remembering How to Forget: An Artist's Exploration of Sound

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scanner
Keyword(s):  
Public Art ◽  
Cellular Phone ◽  
Sound Art ◽  
The Public ◽  
Electronic Sound ◽  
Significant Performance ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Digital Landscape

This article is an introduction to the work of electronic sound artist Scanner, which explores the place of memory, the cityscape and the relationship between the public and the private within contemporary sound art. Beginning with a historical look at his CD releases a decade ago, the article explores his move from his cellular phone works to his more collaborative digital projects in recent times. With descriptions of several significant performance works, public art commissions and film soundtrack work, the piece explores the resonances and meanings with the ever-changing digital landscape of a contemporary sound artist.

scholarly journals Capturing the social value of buildings: The promise of Social Return on Investment (SROI)

2016 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 289-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly J. Watson ◽  
James Evans ◽  
Andrew Karvonen ◽  
Tim Whitley
Keyword(s):  
Return On Investment ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Return On Investment ◽  
The Social

Lowercase Strategies in Public Sound Art: celebrating the transient audience

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Batchelor
Keyword(s):  
Public Art ◽  
Public Domain ◽  
Sound Art ◽  
Acoustic Ecology ◽  
Public Places ◽  
The Public ◽  
Everyday Lives ◽  
A Site

Public art invariably involves the drawing of individuals into the roles of audience and participant by virtue of it being in the public domain – in public places where those individuals are getting on with their everyday lives. As such, a large proportion of the ‘audience’ is an unwitting one, subjected to the art rather than subscribing to it. This is equally true of public sound art, where response to an intervention may vary from engagement to non-engagement to indifference to unawareness, along with a variety of transitional states between. This essay seeks to investigate this ambiguous territory in public sound art, proposing it both as an area rich in possibility for creative exploration and as a means by which artists may reveal and encourage sensitivity to the existing characteristics of a site (thus accommodating the pursuit of agendas relating to acoustic ecology). In particular it investigates and presents a case for the use of lowercase strategies in sound art as ways in which the public might be invited into a dialogue with works (invitation rather than imposition) and thus empowered as partakers of public sound art.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document