scholarly journals Biophysical studies of phase separation integrating experimental and computational methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 78-86
Author(s):  
Nicolas L. Fawzi ◽  
Sapun H. Parekh ◽  
Jeetain Mittal
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9491-9504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nieves Lorenzo Gotor ◽  
Alexandros Armaos ◽  
Giulia Calloni ◽  
Marc Torrent Burgas ◽  
R Martin Vabulas ◽  
...  

Abstract Proteins and RNAs assemble in membrane-less organelles that organize intracellular spaces and regulate biochemical reactions. The ability of proteins and RNAs to form condensates is encoded in their sequences, yet it is unknown which domains drive the phase separation (PS) process and what are their specific roles. Here, we systematically investigated the human and yeast proteomes to find regions promoting condensation. Using advanced computational methods to predict the PS propensity of proteins, we designed a set of experiments to investigate the contributions of Prion-Like Domains (PrLDs) and RNA-binding domains (RBDs). We found that one PrLD is sufficient to drive PS, whereas multiple RBDs are needed to modulate the dynamics of the assemblies. In the case of stress granule protein Pub1 we show that the PrLD promotes sequestration of protein partners and the RBD confers liquid-like behaviour to the condensate. Our work sheds light on the fine interplay between RBDs and PrLD to regulate formation of membrane-less organelles, opening up the avenue for their manipulation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (13) ◽  
pp. 138701
Author(s):  
Peng-Cheng Zhang ◽  
Wen-Yu Fang ◽  
Lei Bao ◽  
Wen-Bin Kang

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10736
Author(s):  
Je-Kyung Ryu ◽  
Da-Eun Hwang ◽  
Jeong-Mo Choi

Biomolecular phase separation denotes the demixing of a specific set of intracellular components without membrane encapsulation. Recent studies have found that biomolecular phase separation is involved in a wide range of cellular processes. In particular, phase separation is involved in the formation and regulation of chromosome structures at various levels. Here, we review the current understanding of biomolecular phase separation related to chromosomes. First, we discuss the fundamental principles of phase separation and introduce several examples of nuclear/chromosomal biomolecular assemblies formed by phase separation. We also briefly explain the experimental and computational methods used to study phase separation in chromosomes. Finally, we discuss a recent phase separation model, termed bridging-induced phase separation (BIPS), which can explain the formation of local chromosome structures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (18) ◽  
pp. 10542-10554
Author(s):  
Veronica H Ryan ◽  
Scott Watters ◽  
Joshua Amaya ◽  
Balabhadra Khatiwada ◽  
Vincenzo Venditti ◽  
...  

Abstract hnRNPA2 is a major component of mRNA transport granules in oligodendrocytes and neurons. However, the structural details of how hnRNPA2 binds the A2 recognition element (A2RE) and if this sequence stimulates granule formation by enhancing phase separation of hnRNPA2 has not yet been studied. Using solution NMR and biophysical studies, we find that each of the two individual RRMs retain the domain structure observed in complex with RNA but are not rigidly confined (i.e. they move independently) in solution in the absence of RNA. hnRNPA2 RRMs bind the minimal rA2RE11 weakly but at least, and most likely, two hnRNPA2 molecules are able to simultaneously bind the longer 21mer myelin basic protein A2RE. Upon binding of the RNA, NMR chemical shift deviations are observed in both RRMs, suggesting both play a role in binding the A2RE11. Interestingly, addition of short A2RE RNAs or longer RNAs containing this sequence completely prevents in vitro phase separation of full-length hnRNPA2 and aggregation of the disease-associated mutants. These findings suggest that RRM interactions with specific recognition sequences alone do not account for nucleating granule formation, consistent with models where multivalent protein:RNA and protein:protein contacts form across many sites in granule proteins and long RNA transcripts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Castrense Savojardo ◽  
Pier Luigi Martelli ◽  
Rita Casadio

In the last decade, newly developed experimental methods have made it possible to highlight that macromolecules in the cell milieu physically interact to support physiology. This has shifted the problem of protein–protein interaction from a microscopic, electron-density scale to a mesoscopic one. Further, nowadays there is increasing evidence that proteins in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm can aggregate in membraneless organelles for different physiological reasons. In this scenario, it is urgent to face the problem of biomolecule functional annotation with efficient computational methods, suited to extract knowledge from reliable data and transfer information across different domains of investigation. Here, we revise the present state of the art of our knowledge of protein–protein interaction and the computational methods that differently implement it. Furthermore, we explore experimental and computational features of a set of proteins involved in phase separation.


Author(s):  
P. Echlin ◽  
M. McKoon ◽  
E.S. Taylor ◽  
C.E. Thomas ◽  
K.L. Maloney ◽  
...  

Although sections of frozen salt solutions have been used as standards for x-ray microanalysis, such solutions are less useful when analysed in the bulk form. They are poor thermal and electrical conductors and severe phase separation occurs during the cooling process. Following a suggestion by Whitecross et al we have made up a series of salt solutions containing a small amount of graphite to improve the sample conductivity. In addition, we have incorporated a polymer to ensure the formation of microcrystalline ice and a consequent homogenity of salt dispersion within the frozen matrix. The mixtures have been used to standardize the analytical procedures applied to frozen hydrated bulk specimens based on the peak/background analytical method and to measure the absolute concentration of elements in developing roots.


Author(s):  
J. Tong ◽  
L. Eyring

There is increasing interest in composites containing zirconia because of their high strength, fracture toughness, and its great influence on the chemical durability in glass. For the zirconia-silica system, monolithic glasses, fibers and coatings have been obtained. There is currently a great interest in designing zirconia-toughened alumina including exploration of the processing methods and the toughening mechanism.The possibility of forming nanocrystal composites by a phase separation method has been investigated in three systems: zirconia-alumina, zirconia-silica and zirconia-titania using HREM. The morphological observations initially suggest that the formation of nanocrystal composites by a phase separation method is possible in the zirconia-alumina and zirconia-silica systems, but impossible in the zirconia-titania system. The separation-produced grain size in silica-zirconia system is around 5 nm and is more uniform than that in the alumina-zirconia system in which the sizes of the small polyhedron grains are around 10 nm. In the titania-zirconia system, there is no obvious separation as was observed in die alumina-zirconia and silica-zirconia system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document