Carbon‑nitrogen compounds, alcohols, mercaptans, monoterpenes, acetates, aldehydes, ketones, SF6, PH3, and other fire gases in coal-mining waste heaps of Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Poland) – a re-investigation by means of in situ FTIR external database approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 698 ◽  
pp. 134274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Kruszewski ◽  
Monika J. Fabiańska ◽  
Tomasz Segit ◽  
Danuta Kusy ◽  
Rafał Motyliński ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mining ◽  
Mining Waste ◽  
Nitrogen Compounds ◽  
In Situ Ftir ◽  
Coal Basin ◽  
External Database ◽  
Upper Silesian Coal Basin

scholarly journals Hindcasting and forecasting of regional methane from coal mine emissions in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using the online nested global regional chemistry–climate model MECO(n) (MESSy v2.53)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1925-1943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Leah Nickl ◽  
Mariano Mertens ◽  
Anke Roiger ◽  
Andreas Fix ◽  
Axel Amediek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mining ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Climate Mitigation ◽  
Coal Basin ◽  
Airborne Measurements ◽  
Upper Silesian Coal Basin ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Methane is the second most important greenhouse gas in terms of anthropogenic radiative forcing. Since pre-industrial times, the globally averaged dry mole fraction of methane in the atmosphere has increased considerably. Emissions from coal mining are one of the primary anthropogenic methane sources. However, our knowledge about different sources and sinks of methane is still subject to great uncertainties. Comprehensive measurement campaigns and reliable chemistry–climate models, are required to fully understand the global methane budget and to further develop future climate mitigation strategies. The CoMet 1.0 campaign (May to June 2018) combined airborne in situ, as well as passive and active remote sensing measurements to quantify the emissions from coal mining in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB, Poland). Roughly 502 kt of methane is emitted from the ventilation shafts per year. In order to help with the flight planning during the campaigns, we performed 6 d forecasts using the online coupled, three-time nested global and regional chemistry–climate model MECO(n). We applied three-nested COSMO/MESSy instances going down to a spatial resolution of 2.8 km over the USCB. The nested global–regional model system allows for the separation of local emission contributions from fluctuations in the background methane. Here, we introduce the forecast set-up and assess the impact of the model's spatial resolution on the simulation of methane plumes from the ventilation shafts. Uncertainties in simulated methane mixing ratios are estimated by comparing different airborne measurements to the simulations. Results show that MECO(3) is able to simulate the observed methane plumes and the large-scale patterns (including vertically integrated values) reasonably well. Furthermore, we obtain reasonable forecast results up to forecast day four.

scholarly journals Polish legal regulations considering recovery of secondary materials from coal mining dumping grounds

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 43-46
Author(s):  
Łukasz Gawor
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mining ◽  
Environmental Impacts ◽  
Mining Waste ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Coal Basin ◽  
Fire Hazards ◽  
Coal Recovery ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Waste Dumps ◽  
Secondary Materials

Abstract In the article there is presented temporary situation of coal mining dumping grounds in Poland – their inventarization, localization and environmental impacts. The coal mining dumping grounds in Poland are situated in three coal basins: Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Lower Silesian Coal Basin and Lublin Coal Basin. In all mentioned areas occur ca. 270 coal mining waste dumps, covering surface of over 4400 ha. The main environmental impacts connected with dumping grounds are fire hazards, water pollution and a danger of slope sliding. The question of recovery of coal from disposed wastes with regard to legal regulations is discussed. There are presented technical methods of coal recovery considering environmental protection issues. There is a necessity and technical possibility of recovery of coal from the coal-mining waste dumps. The coal recovery reduces hazards of self-ignition and fires of the dump. It is also economically justified. The analysis of required regulations in legal system in Poland for safe exploitation of secondary materials from coal mining dumps is done. Socio-economic aspects of recovery of coal are discussed. The valid legal regulations in Poland regulate the issues connected with coal mining dumping grounds in a very general way. It is necessary to prepare supplements to the legal provisions or new regulations concerning post-mining dumping grounds.

The Application of Mesoporous ZSM-5 Zeolite in the ULSD Catalysts

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Liu L
Keyword(s):  
Catalytic Performance ◽  
Nitrogen Compounds ◽  
In Situ Ftir ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
N2 Adsorption ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Acidic Sites ◽  
Adsorption Desorption ◽  
Al2o3 Catalyst

The mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite containing MoCoP/Al2O3 catalyst (C12-ZSM5) with the mixture of Al2O3 and mesoporous ZSM- 5 zeolite as carrier was synthesized. The catalytic performance of C12-ZSM5 catalyst was evaluated by the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) of different diesel feedstock. The carriers and catalysts were characterized by N2 adsorption-desorption, pyridine-FTIR, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and CO in-situ FTIR (CO-FTIR) techniques. Results showed that mesoporous ZSM-5 can improve the acidity of the catalyst and increase the number of MoCoS active phases. The C12-ZSM5 catalyst had low HDS and HDN activity, because the acidic sites of mesoporous ZSM-5 were easily occupied by nitrogen compounds. The HDS activity of C12-ZSM5 catalyst was fully exploited by using graded packing technology, the sulfur content of product oil was 5.9 ng/μL. The relative HDS activity of C12-ZSM5 catalyst is 1.47 times that of FHUDS-8 catalyst.

scholarly journals Estimating CH<sub>4</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub> and CO emissions from coal mining and industrial activities in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using an aircraft-based mass balance approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (21) ◽  
pp. 12675-12695
Author(s):  
Alina Fiehn ◽  
Julian Kostinek ◽  
Maximilian Eckl ◽  
Theresa Klausner ◽  
Michał Gałkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Mass Balance ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Emission ◽  
Climate Mitigation ◽  
Emission Inventories ◽  
Ch4 Emission ◽  
Coal Basin ◽  
Upper Silesian Coal Basin

Abstract. A severe reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is necessary to reach the objectives of the Paris Agreement. The implementation and continuous evaluation of mitigation measures requires regular independent information on emissions of the two main anthropogenic greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). Our aim is to employ an observation-based method to determine regional-scale greenhouse gas emission estimates with high accuracy. We use aircraft- and ground-based in situ observations of CH4, CO2, carbon monoxide (CO), and wind speed from two research flights over the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB), Poland, in summer 2018. The flights were performed as a part of the Carbon Dioxide and Methane (CoMet) mission above this European CH4 emission hot-spot region. A kriging algorithm interpolates the observed concentrations between the downwind transects of the trace gas plume, and then the mass flux through this plane is calculated. Finally, statistic and systematic uncertainties are calculated from measurement uncertainties and through several sensitivity tests, respectively. For the two selected flights, the in-situ-derived annual CH4 emission estimates are 13.8±4.3 and 15.1±4.0 kg s−1, which are well within the range of emission inventories. The regional emission estimates of CO2, which were determined to be 1.21±0.75 and 1.12±0.38 t s−1, are in the lower range of emission inventories. CO mass balance emissions of 10.1±3.6 and 10.7±4.4 kg s−1 for the USCB are slightly higher than the emission inventory values. The CH4 emission estimate has a relative error of 26 %–31 %, the CO2 estimate of 37 %–62 %, and the CO estimate of 36 %–41 %. These errors mainly result from the uncertainty of atmospheric background mole fractions and the changing planetary boundary layer height during the morning flight. In the case of CO2, biospheric fluxes also add to the uncertainty and hamper the assessment of emission inventories. These emission estimates characterize the USCB and help to verify emission inventories and develop climate mitigation strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document