Minimally-invasive technologies in uro-oncology: The role of cryotherapy, HIFU and photodynamic therapy in whole gland and focal therapy of localised prostate cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hashim Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Caroline Moore ◽  
Mark Emberton
2013 ◽  
pp. 727-751
Author(s):  
Bob Djavan ◽  
Herbert Lepor ◽  
Reza Zare ◽  
Seyed Saeid Dianat

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 963-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott E. Eggener ◽  
Jonathan A. Coleman

Epidemiologic and pathologic features of prostate cancer have given rise to an interest in focal treatment for carefully selected patients. Prostate cancer remains highly prevalent, particularly in the U.S. and Europe. As screening programs have become more aggressive and widespread, a substantial proportion of men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer have disease characteristics associated with a low risk of progression. Treatments such as radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy can lead to durable recurrence-free survival in most patients, but carry variable risks of bowel, urinary, and sexual side effects. Few men and few urologists are comfortable leaving a potentially curable prostate cancer untreated. Focal therapy offers an attractive alternative for the patient faced with a choice between aggressive local intervention (radiation or surgery) and watchful waiting. Contemporary diagnostic biopsy strategies and imaging tools, and the development of predictive statistical models (nomograms), have led to improvements in tumor characterization and risk stratification, making focal therapy a viable treatment option for specific men. This article reviews the rationale and indications for focal therapy and highlights vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) as one of many promising focal therapy techniques.


Author(s):  
Hannah Sjoberg

Hanna T Sjoberg, Yiannis Philippou, Anette L Magnussen, Iain DC Tullis, Esther Bridges, Andrea Chatrian, Joel Loefebvre, Ka Ho Tam, Emma A Murphy, Jens Rittscher, Dina Preise, Lilach Agemy, Tamar Yechezkel, Sean C Smart, Paul Kinchesh, Stuart Gilchrist, Danny P Allen, David A Scheiblin, Stephen J Lockett, David A Wink, Alastair D Lamb, Ian G Mills, Adrian Harris, Ruth J Muschel, Boris Vojnovic, Avigdor Scherz, Freddie C Hamdy, Richard J Bryant.   Introduction There is an important clinical need to improve the treatment of high risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa), and to reduce the side effects of these treatments. We hypothesised that multi-modality therapy combining radiotherapy and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) could PCa tumour control compared against monotherapy with each of these treatments alone. This could provide proof-of-concept to take to the clinic. VTP is a minimally invasive focal surgical therapy for localised PCa, which rapidly destroys targeted tumours through vascular disruption. Tumour vasculature is characterised by vessel immaturity, increased permeability, aberrant branching and inefficient flow. Fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) alters the tumour microenvironment and promotes transient vascular normalisation. Materials and Methods We investigated whether sequential delivery of FRT followed by VTP 7 days later improves PCa tumour control compared to monotherapy with FRT or VTP alone. Results FRT induced vascular normalisation changes in PCa flank tumour allografts, improving vascular function as demonstrated using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. FRT followed by VTP significantly delayed tumour growth in flank PCa allograft pre-clinical models, compared with monotherapy with FRT or VTP alone, and improved overall survival. Conclusion Taken together, these results suggest that combining FRT and VTP could become a promising multimodal clinical strategy in PCa therapy. This provides proof-of-concept for this multi-modality therapy approach to take forward to early phase clinical trials.


Author(s):  
Hashim Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Louise Dickinson ◽  
Mark Emberton

Minimally-invasive therapies in localized prostate cancer offer the potential to reduce side effects and the healthcare burden/costs associated with radical modalities such as surgery or radiotherapy. As radical treatments carry significant perioperative morbidity (wound infection, haemorrhage, hospital stay), potentially life-long side effects (such as incontinence, erectile dysfunction, rectal toxicity), and fail to cure many men, ablative therapies that reduce treatment burden while retaining acceptable cancer control have increasingly become areas of evaluation. This chapter reviews the role of these approaches and the therapeutic dilemma that men with localized low volume prostate cancer currently face as in the context of novel therapies which aim to find a middle ground—tissue-preserving focal therapy—that follows the paradigm of almost all other solid organ cancers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 197 (1) ◽  
pp. W90-W96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz ◽  
Stephen M. Scionti ◽  
Savvas Mendrinos ◽  
Samir S. Taneja

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4S) ◽  
pp. 176-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markos Karavitakis ◽  
Hashim Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Naomi Livni ◽  
Ian Beckley ◽  
Matt Winkler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document