scholarly journals Entrepreneurial universities: A bibliometric analysis within the business and management domains

2021 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 120522
Author(s):  
Canio Forliano ◽  
Paola De Bernardi ◽  
Dorra Yahiaoui
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Entrepreneurial Universities ◽  
Business And Management ◽  
Management Domains

COVID-19 in Relation to Business and Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
Jorge Cruz-Cárdenas ◽  
Jorge Guadalupe-Lanas ◽  
Carlos Ramos-Galarza ◽  
Nora H. Oleas ◽  
Laura Salazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Business And Management

Value Analysis and TRIZ - A Methodology for Innovative Economics and Technical Solutions

2015 ◽  
Vol 809-810 ◽  
pp. 1535-1540
Author(s):  
Gabriela Mariana Ionescu
Keyword(s):  
Classical Method ◽  
The Other ◽  
Current Interest ◽  
Value Analysis ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Wide Debate ◽  
Technical Solutions ◽  
Managerial Innovation ◽  
Business And Management ◽  
Management Domains

This paper presents a new methodology entitled AVTRIZ by its author, which allows technical, economic and managerial innovation based on the forecasting approach, while operating inside various systems. As the foundation of the new methodology, a classical method was chosen, well-known and widely applied that is the Method of Value Analysis and Engineering, a domain where the author has previous concerns. Starting from the fact that this method is deficient in terms of generating improvement solutions, the author searched and identified a method of current interest and global opportunity that is the TRIZ method [1], which is a method of wide debate, very controversial in terms of its adaptability from the technical to the business and management domains. On the other hand, TRIZ is deficient in terms of checking the solutions, a fact which can be successfully compensated by the Value Analysis Engineering method. Based on the above-mentioned approach, the research activities carried out by the author have brought in a new methodology, which is structured on 3 steps, 8 stages and 30 phases, based on the method of Value Analysis and Engineering, while also applying the TRIZ method.

Knowledge management in entrepreneurial universities

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 3226-3257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giustina Secundo ◽  
Valentina Ndou ◽  
Pasquale Del Vecchio ◽  
Gianluigi De Pascale
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Entrepreneurial University ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Entrepreneurial Universities ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
State Of Research

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review and critique the knowledge management (KM) literature within Entrepreneurial universities, providing an overview of the state of research and outlining a future research agenda. Design/methodology/approach In a systematic literature review, 1106 articles indexed at Scopus were initially submitted to a bibliometric analysis. Finally, 150 papers published in a variety of academic journals specializing in the field of Entrepreneurship, KM and Higher Education were analyzed through a content and a bibliometric analysis to minimize mistakes in interpreting findings of collected studies. Findings KM within entrepreneurial university is a research area of growing importance. Findings show that literature on KM models and tools in the entrepreneurial university is fragmented and dominated by unrelated research. Content analysis shows heterogeneous literature, but four major research streams emerge: knowledge transfer in university–industry collaboration; knowledge creation in entrepreneurship education; KM processes for university spin-offs; entrepreneurial university to support knowledge-based regional development. The results show a failure to address the implications of findings for policy makers, which risks making KM in entrepreneurial universities research irrelevant. Research limitations/implications Although different structured literature reviews (SLRs) exist separately in the field of KM and entrepreneurial universities, to the authors’ best knowledge, no studies exist in the intersection between the two fields. Originality/value The paper presents the first attempt to provide a comprehensive SLR of the articles dealing with models and processes of KM in the entrepreneurial university. Despite the increasing literature, this research area is still fragmented and undertheorized, thus requiring more systematic and holistic studies, considering both the economic and the social aspects of KM within universities. The paper’s findings can offer insights into future research avenues.

Approaching multinationals in clusters from different perspectives

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-456
Author(s):  
Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver ◽  
Fiorenza Belussi ◽  
Silvia Rita Sedita ◽  
Annalisa Caloffi ◽  
Gregorio Gonzalez-Alcaide
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
International Business ◽  
Critical Review ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Specific Topic ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Business And Management ◽  
Cross Fertilization ◽  
Blind Spots

Purpose For the specific topic of multinationals in clusters, both regional strands and international business and management literatures address the topic from different yet intertwined perspectives. This study aims to facilitate the integration of the conversations and the distinct literatures to produce a clear understanding and conceptualization of the existent knowledge on the topic, with the aim to foster an integration of those different lines of inquiry on the topic that can advance scholarly research and improve policymaking. Design/methodology/approach Mixing a robust and longitudinal bibliometric analysis (1992-2018) and a qualitative critical review, the study disentangles sub-conversations on the topic in each literature. Findings The study encounters commonalities that foster cross-fertilization and blind spots that prevent integration of findings from each literature. Research limitations/implications Both literatures need to cross-fertilize and integrate each other’s knowledge. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to integrate literatures using bibliometrics, mapping the existing knowledge on two key areas of competitiveness: clusters and multinationals.

scholarly journals User Experience (UX) in Business, Management, and Psychology: A Bibliometric Mapping of the Current State of Research

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Luther ◽  
Victor Tiberius ◽  
Alexander Brem
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Business Management ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Bibliometric Mapping ◽  
Current State ◽  
Content Analyses ◽  
State Of Research ◽  
Business And Management

User Experience (UX) describes the holistic experience of a user before, during, and after interaction with a platform, product, or service. UX adds value and attraction to their sole functionality and is therefore highly relevant for firms. The increased interest in UX has produced a vast amount of scholarly research since 1983. The research field is, therefore, complex and scattered. Conducting a bibliometric analysis, we aim at structuring the field quantitatively and rather abstractly. We employed citation analyses, co-citation analyses, and content analyses to evaluate productivity and impact of extant research. We suggest that future research should focus more on business and management related topics.

The current state of brand management research

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Serhiy Shtovba ◽  
Olena Shtovba ◽  
Lyubov Filatova
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Brand Management ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Usa ◽  
First Time ◽  
Business And Management ◽  
Made In

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify leaders and trends in branding research studies, undertaken during 2000-2019. Identification was made in the following categories: most popular subjects; most productive countries; most productive institutions; most productive scholars; most productive sources; most cited publications and most cited scholars. Design/methodology/approach Bibliometric analysis based on data from Scopus and Dimensions. Findings The majority of branding publications belong to business and management. The interest toward this research field, however, declines mostly in favor of cultural studies, psychology, sociology, etc. The majority of publications on branding are concentrated in the USA, UK and Australia. Griffith University has become a leader in the number of branding publications within 2000-2019. T C Melewar is a leader by the number of branding publications among scholars. Journal of Brand Management has been a leader among sources. Journal of Marketing is a leader by the number of the most cited papers. Research limitations/implications The authors analyze the automatically formed results on search query without human meddling. Originality/value For the first time, bibliometric analysis was carried out simultaneously upon the two bases – Scopus and Dimensions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document