Efficacy of primary prevention of venous thromboembolism among subgroups of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A post- hoc analysis of the AVERT trial

Author(s):  
Ameeta L. Nayak ◽  
Amin Zahrai ◽  
Ranjeeta Mallick ◽  
Tzu-Fei Wang ◽  
Aurélien Delluc ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1866-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Di Nisio ◽  
Nick van Es ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Tzu‐Fei Wang ◽  
David Garcia ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Darren M. Brenner ◽  
Neal E. Slatkin ◽  
Nancy Stambler ◽  
Robert J. Israel ◽  
Paul H. Coluzzi

Abstract Purpose Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists such as methylnaltrexone (MNTX, Relistor®) are indicated for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The structural properties unique to MNTX restrict it from traversing the blood-brain barrier (BBB); however, the BBB may become more permeable in patients with brain metastases. We investigated whether the presence of brain metastases in cancer patients compromises the central effects of opioids among patients receiving MNTX for OIC. Methods This post hoc analysis of pooled data from 3 randomized, placebo-controlled trials included cancer patients with OIC who received MNTX or placebo. Endpoints included changes from baseline in pain scores, rescue-free laxation (RFL) within 4 or 24 h of the first dose, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including those potentially related to opioid withdrawal symptoms. Results Among 356 cancer patients in the pooled population, 47 (MNTX n = 27; placebo n = 20) had brain metastases and 309 (MNTX n = 172; placebo n = 137) did not have brain metastases. No significant differences in current pain, worst pain, or change in pain scores from baseline were observed between patients treated with MNTX or placebo. Among patients with brain metastases, a significantly greater proportion of patients who received MNTX versus placebo achieved an RFL within 4 h after the first dose (70.4% vs 15.0%, respectively, p = 0.0002). TEAEs were similar between treatment groups and were generally gastrointestinal in nature and not related to opioid withdrawal. Conclusion Focal disruptions of the BBB caused by brain metastases did not appear to alter central nervous system penetrance of MNTX.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuyoshi Urashima ◽  
Mai Okuyama ◽  
Taisuke Akutsu ◽  
Hironori Ohdaira ◽  
Mutsumi Kaji ◽  
...  

Vitamin D has been shown to suppress the growth of cancer cells. Cancer cells are believed to take up bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) (i.e., not bound to vitamin-D-binding protein (DBP)) more efficiently than DBP-bound 25(OH)D. Our aim was to use this bioavailable 25(OH)D, rather than total 25(OH)D, as a biomarker of vitamin D deficiency to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation improves the relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with digestive tract cancer from the esophagus to the rectum by conducting a post hoc analysis of the AMATERASU trial (UMIN000001977). The bioavailable 25(OH)D levels were calculated via an equation using data of serum total 25(OH)D, albumin, and DBP levels, and DBP genotypes (rs7041 and rs4588). We estimated bioavailable 25(OH) levels in 355 patients. In a subgroup of patients with low bioavailable 25(OH)D levels (<median) (n = 177), 5 year RFS was 77% in the vitamin D group vs. 58% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.95; p = 0.03), whereas no significant difference was seen in a subgroup of patients with high bioavailable 25(OH)D levels (p for interaction = 0.046). We hypothesize that vitamin D supplementation may be effective in improving RFS among digestive tract cancer patients with low bioavailable 25(OH)D levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document