A pilot-scale, bi-layer bioretention system with biochar and zero-valent iron for enhanced nitrate removal from stormwater

2019 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 378-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Tian ◽  
Jing Jin ◽  
Pei C. Chiu ◽  
Daniel K. Cha ◽  
Mingxin Guo ◽  
...  
NANO ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
NI-BIN CHANG ◽  
MARTY WANIELISTA ◽  
FAHIM HOSSAIN ◽  
LEI ZHAI ◽  
KUEN-SONG LIN

Nutrients, such as nitrate, nitrite, and phosphorus, are common contaminants in many aquatic systems in the United States. Ammonia and nitrate are both regulated by the drinking water standards in the US primarily because excess levels of nitrate might cause methemoglobinemia. Phosphorus might become sources of the eutrophication problems associated with toxic algae in the freshwater bodies. Toxic algal blooms can cause severe acute and chronic public health problems. Chemical reduction of nitrate by using zero-valent iron started as early as 1964, and considerable research reports relating to this technology to nanomaterial were extensively reported in 1990s making the use of nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) particles for nitrate removal become one of the most popular technologies in this field. The purpose of the present study was to examine the potential of integrating green sorption media, such as sawdust, limestone, tire crumb, and sand/silt, with two types of nanoparticles, including NZVI and Titanium Dioxide ( TiO 2), for nitrate removal in an engineering process. The study consists of running packed bed column tests followed by the addition of NZVI and TiO 2 to improve nitrate and phosphorus removal efficiency. Preliminary results in this paper show that the potential and advanced study may support the creation of design criteria of stormwater and groundwater treatment systems for water reuse in the future.


2009 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 517-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kavitha ◽  
R. Selvakumar ◽  
M. Sathishkumar ◽  
K. Swaminathan ◽  
P. Lakshmanaperumalsamy ◽  
...  

Brevundimonas diminuta MTCC 8486, isolated from marine soil of coastal area of Trivandrum, Kerala, was used for biological removal of nitrate from ground water collected from Kar village of Pali district, Rajasthan. The organism was found to be resistance for nitrate up to 10,000 mg L−1. The optimum growth conditions for biological removal of nitrate were established in batch culture. The effect of carbon sources on nitrate removal was investigated using mineral salt medium (MSM) containing 500 mg L−1 of nitrate to select the most effective carbon source. Among glucose and starch as carbon source, glucose at 1% concentration increased the growth (182±8.24 × 104 CFU mL−1) and induced maximum nitrate reduction (86.4%) at 72 h. The ground water collected from Kar village, Pali district of Rajasthan containing 460±5.92 mg L−1 of nitrate was subjected to three different treatment processes in pilot scale (T1 to T3). Higher removal of nitrate was observed in T2 process (88%) supplemented with 1% glucose. The system was scaled up to 10 L pilot scale treatment plant. At 72 h the nitrate removal was observed to be 95% in pilot scale plant. The residual nitrate level (23±0.41 mg L−1) in pilot scale treatment process was found to be below the permissible limit of WHO.


2019 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 727-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soheil Rezazadeh Mofradnia ◽  
Reihaneh Ashouri ◽  
Zahra Tavakoli ◽  
Fereshteh Shahmoradi ◽  
Hamid Rashedi ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongwoo Hwang ◽  
Hiroshi Sakuma ◽  
Toshihiro Tanaka

Several batch tests and pilot-scale investigations on biological denitrification with isopropanol were performed. Isopropanol was converted to acetone by microbial oxidation during denitrification. Isopropanol itself little contributed to denitrification in practice while the converted acetone played a role of a main hydrogen donor. A larger quantity of nitrite intermediate was formed by using methanol compared to the case of isopropanol. The measured requirement of isopropanol was 2.0 mg mg−1 NO3-N, and was 2/3 of methanol. The oxygen equivalent of isopropanol for nitrate removal was almost the same as that of methanol. The denitrifier net growth yield for isopropanol was greater than for methanol. In order to maximize the denitrification rate, it is essential to convert isopropanol to acetone rapidly by accurate dosing for nitrogen load because the denitrification rate was accelerated by using acetone only. Excessive dose of isopropanol can cause a decrease in the denitrification rate as well as an increase of BOD in the effluent.


2019 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 424-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Martin ◽  
M.P. Davis ◽  
T.B. Moorman ◽  
T.M. Isenhart ◽  
M.L. Soupir

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1636-1642
Author(s):  
Sizhi Cao ◽  
Peigui Liu ◽  
Mingchao Liu ◽  
Gang Wang ◽  
Zaili Li ◽  
...  

Abstract In this study, column experiments in the laboratory were set up to examine how the concentrations of nitrate nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen, and ammonia nitrogen changed when a nitrate-rich solution was passed through a medium comprising zero-valent iron, activated carbon, zeolite, and coarse sand. We varied the proportions of the components of the medium to determine how it influenced the nitrate removal and nitrogen fractions. Three different scenarios were used, with: (1) iron, activated carbon, and coarse sand at a ratio of 3:1:6; (2) iron, activated carbon, and zeolite at a ratio of 3:1:6; and (3) iron, activated carbon, and zeolite at a ratio of 3:3:4. The nitrate nitrogen concentration decreased from 25 mg/L to 2 mg/L in the first scenario. Removal was better when zeolite was added to the medium as most of the nitrate nitrogen broke down to ammonia nitrogen, with nitrite nitrogen as an intermediate product. The results of the tests showed that nitrate removal was best when the medium was iron, activated carbon, and zeolite, mixed at a ratio of 3:1:6. This study provides a scientific reference for in situ remediation of nitrate pollution in groundwater.


2016 ◽  
Vol 91 (12) ◽  
pp. 2942-2949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo Liu ◽  
Yaqi Zhou ◽  
Zhaoyang Liu ◽  
Junjie Zhang ◽  
Binbin Tang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document