Postoperative radiotherapy use and patterns of care analysis for node positive or parametria positive cervical cancer

ObjectivesTo investigate the safety and outcomes of elective para-aortic (PA) nodal irradiation utilizing modern treatment techniques for patients with node positive cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with pelvic lymph node positive cervical cancer who received radiation were included. All patients received radiation therapy (RT) to either a traditional pelvic field or an extended field to electively cover the PA nodes. Factors associated with survival were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model, and toxicities between groups were compared with a chi-square test.Results96 patients were identified with a mean follow up of 40 months. The incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 31% in the elective PA nodal RT group and 15% in the pelvic field group (Chi-square p = 0.067. There was no significant difference in rates of grade ≥ 3 acute or late toxicities between the two groups (p>0.05). The KM estimated 5-year OS was not statistically different for those receiving elective PA nodal irradiation compared to a pelvic only field, 54% vs. 73% respectively (log-rank p = 0.11).ConclusionsElective PA nodal RT can safely be delivered utilizing modern planning techniques without a significant increase in severe (grade ≥ 3) acute or late toxicities, at the cost of a possible small increase in non-severe (grade 2) acute toxicities. In this series there was no survival benefit observed with the receipt of elective PA nodal RT, however, this benefit may have been obscured by the higher risk features of this population. While prospective randomized trials utilizing a risk adapted approach to elective PA nodal coverage are the only way to fully evaluate the benefit of elective PA nodal coverage, these trials are unlikely to be performed and instead we must rely on interpretation of results of risk adapted approaches like those used in ongoing clinical trials and retrospective data.

Download Full-text

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Alone for Oncological Outcomes of Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer—A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.730753 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Weili Li ◽

Wenling Zhang ◽

Lixin Sun ◽

Li Wang ◽

Zhumei Cui ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Radical Hysterectomy ◽

Protective Factor ◽

Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Oncological Outcomes ◽

Response To Chemotherapy ◽

Sensitive Group

ObjectiveTo compare the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with cervical cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NACT) with those who received abdominal radical hysterectomy alone (ARH).MethodsWe retrospectively compared the oncological outcomes of 1410 patients with stage IB3 cervical cancer who received NACT (n=583) or ARH (n=827). The patients in the NACT group were divided into an NACT-sensitive group and an NACT-insensitive group according to their response to chemotherapy.ResultsThe 5-year oncological outcomes were significantly better in the NACT group than in the ARH group (OS: 96.2% vs. 91.2%, respectively, p=0.002; DFS: 92.2% vs. 87.5%, respectively, p=0.016). Cox multivariate analysis suggested that NACT was independently associated with a better 5-year OS (HR=0.496; 95% CI, 0.281-0.875; p=0.015), but it was not an independent factor for 5-year DFS (HR=0.760; 95% CI, 0.505-1.145; p=0.189). After matching, the 5-year oncological outcomes of the NACT group were better than those of the ARH group. Cox multivariate analysis suggested that NACT was still an independent protective factor for 5-year OS (HR=0.503; 95% CI, 0.275-0.918; p=0.025). The proportion of patients in the NACT group who received postoperative radiotherapy was significantly lower than that in the ARH group (p<0.001). Compared to the ARH group, the NACT-sensitive group had similar results as the NACT group. The NACT-insensitive group and the ARH group had similar 5-year oncological outcomes and proportions of patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy.ConclusionAmong patients with stage IB3 cervical cancer, NACT improved 5-year OS and was associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy. These findings suggest that patients with stage IB3 cervical cancer, especially those who are sensitive to chemotherapy, might consider NACT followed by surgery.

Download Full-text

Patterns of care and clinical outcomes in stage IVA cervical cancer: 14-year experience from a tertiary care centre in South India

Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice ◽

10.1017/s1460396921000443 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Neenu Oliver John ◽

Arvind Sathyamurthy ◽

Shanthi Prasoona ◽

Jeba Karunya Ramireddy ◽

Grace Rebekah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

South India ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽

Patterns Of Care ◽

Care Centre ◽

Tertiary Care Centre ◽

Gynecology And Obstetrics

Abstract Aim: To analyse the patterns of care and clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVA treated at a tertiary care centre in South India. Materials and methods: The electronic medical records of 2,476 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer at a tertiary care institution between January 2005 and December 2018 were reviewed. Among them, 96 patients diagnosed with histologically proven carcinoma cervix stage IVA established by either cystoscopy or proctoscopy were included. Four patients who did not receive treatment at the study centre were excluded and 92 patients were available for final analysis. Results: The median follow-up period was 12 months (2–131 months). Of the 92 patients, 59 patients (64·13%) received radiation therapy (RT) alone, 22 patients (23·9%) received chemoradiation (CRT), three patients (3·26%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by RT, one (1·08%) received NACT followed by CRT, four patients (4·35%) received chemotherapy alone, while three (3·26%) were offered best supportive care. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (95% CI: 9·6–14·4 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 25 months (95% CI: 16·6–33·4 months). The 2-year and 3-year PFS was 30 and 20%, respectively, and the OS was 50 and 32%, respectively. Conclusion: The management of stage IVA cervical cancer needs to be individualised to achieve a fine balance between local control, toxicity, and quality of life. RT is the mainstay of treatment with concurrent chemotherapy in carefully selected patients. Involvement of palliative care team early in the course of treatment adds a holistic approach to the continuum of oncological care.

Download Full-text