Creating work environments where people of all genders in gynecologic oncology can thrive: An SGO evidence-based review

Author(s):  
S.M. Temkin ◽  
E. Chapman-Davis ◽  
N. Nair ◽  
D.E. Cohn ◽  
J.F. Hines ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 149 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Lefkowits ◽  
Mary K. Buss ◽  
Amin A. Ramzan ◽  
Stacy Fischer ◽  
Renata R. Urban ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Cohn ◽  
Emily Ko ◽  
Larissa A Meyer ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Sarah M. Temkin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11013-11013
Author(s):  
Linda Hong ◽  
Lisa Rubinsak ◽  
Michelle F. Benoit ◽  
Deanna Gek Koon Teoh ◽  
Yevgenia Ioffe ◽  
...  

11013 Background: A high prevalence of gender discrimination and harassment has been described among gynecologic oncologists (GOs). This study examined the work environment for women GOs and delineated the perpetrators of negative behaviors. Methods: An internet-based, IRB exempt survey of members of a 472-member Facebook group “Women of Gynecologic Oncology (WGO)” was conducted. Using REDcap survey platform, members provided demographics, practice infrastructure, personal experience with workplace bullying, gender discrimination, microaggressions, and outcomes. Demographic, practice and work environments and perpetrators of negative behaviors were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Between 7/20 and 8/19/2020, 250 (53%) of active WGO members participated in this survey. Most respondents were younger than 50 years old (93.6%); white (82.2%) and non-Hispanic (94.3%). A majority were married (84.7%) with children (75.2%). Practice environments included academic (152, 61.0%), private practice (31, 12.4%), and hospital employed (57, 22.9%). 89.9% supervised trainees. 130 (52.0%) respondents reported bullying, 140 (56.0%) gender discrimination, and 83% having experienced gender-based microaggressions. Age, race, ethnicity, practice setting, division director or chair gender or department reporting structure were not significantly associated with these experiences. Perpetrators of bullying, gender discrimination, and microaggressions were widely distributed (Table). Of those reporting bullying, 61 (46.6%) reported a male perpetrator, 25 (19.1%) female and 45 (34.4%) an equal gender distribution; of those reporting discrimination 105 (74.5%) reported a male perpetrator, 9 (6.4%) female and 27 (19.1%) an equal gender distribution. 32.9% of survey respondents acknowledged having been written up for speaking up in a way that would have been tolerated from a male colleague. 18.3% of respondents have changed jobs because of bullying; 13.5% because of discrimination. Conclusions: Women GOs report high rates of workplace bullying, gender discrimination, and microaggressions regardless of practice setting that often impact their careers. Perpetrators of these behaviors are multiple and varied. Proactive and deliberate interventions to improve the work environments for women GOs are urgently needed.[Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
pp. 233-267
Author(s):  
Anne Marie O’Donnell ◽  
Chris Little

Musculoskeletal disease (MSD) remains one of the biggest causes of disability and sickness absence in the working population. As the working population ages, this is likely to continue. The occupational practitioner’s role is to reduce the impact of these problems for both employee and employer. This requires not only knowledge of the conditions, but also an understanding of the psychosocial factors underlying sickness absence and an evidence-based approach to rehabilitation. Patients generally do not have to be completely fit to commence, remain in, or return to work, and resuming work may be part of the rehabilitation process (see Chapter 4). Reasonable accommodations under the Equality Act 2010 may help overcome barriers to work to the benefit of workers and their employers (see Chapter 2). Flexible working and well-designed work environments may help retention and facilitate useful and safe work. In this context, fitness for work is a relative concept, dependent on suitable adjustments to the work environment.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hoon Suh ◽  
Sokbom Kang ◽  
Myong Cheol Lim ◽  
Taek Sang Lee ◽  
Jeong-Yeol Park ◽  
...  

AbstractReflecting the worldwide aging trend and close association of aging with cancer, geriatric oncology is now growing beyond its pioneer years. Nevertheless, geriatric oncology in the gynecologic field is in the beginning stage; indeed, there is no geriatric specialist who is trained in this particular field of gynecologic oncology. Therefore, we held the first workshop in geriatric gynecologic oncology. In this review, we summarize what we discussed at the workshop and provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic cancer in elderly individuals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-526
Author(s):  
Ramon Rico ◽  
Cristina Gibson ◽  
Miriam Sanchez-Manzanares ◽  
Mark A. Clark

As the fabric of modern organizations, teams provide capacity to handle the ongoing adaptation demanded by contexts that characterize the future of work. While scholars have studied how team composition and structural characteristics facilitate team adaptation, both research and practice will benefit from also explicating the process of adapting—how a team’s active coping determines team adaptation over time. To move in this direction, we integrate perspectives on team adaptation which emphasize how teams understand complex environments and combine coordination processes to reach adaptive outcomes. This clarifies when, why, and how teams adapt, yielding performance benefits for organizations. Our goal is to offer evidence-based insights and theoretical reasoning to foster future research explaining the team adaptation–performance connection in current complex and changing work environments. JEL classification: L2


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document