EP-1072 PREOPERATIVE RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY IN RECTAL CANCER PATIENTS: THE IMPACT OF AGE ON COMPLIANCE AND OUTCOMES

2012 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. S416-S417
Author(s):  
M.C. Barba ◽  
G. Rizzo ◽  
M.A. Gambacorta ◽  
C. Coco ◽  
G.B. Doglietto ◽  
...  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Abrahamsson ◽  
Sebastian Meltzer ◽  
Vidar Nyløkken Hagen ◽  
Christin Johansen ◽  
Paula A. Bousquet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We reported previously that rectal cancer patients given curative-intent chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery for non-metastatic disease had enhanced risk of metastatic progression and death if circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] were low. Here we investigated whether the association between the vitamin D status and prognosis pertains to the general, unselected population of rectal cancer patients. Methods Serum 25(OH) D at the time of diagnosis was assessed in 129 patients, enrolled 2013–2017 and representing the entire range of rectal cancer stages, and analyzed with respect to season, sex, systemic inflammation, and survival. Results In the population-based cohort residing at latitude 60°N, 25(OH) D varied according to season in men only, who were overrepresented among the vitamin D-deficient (< 50 nmol/L) patients. Consistent with our previous findings, the individuals presenting with T4 disease had significantly reduced 25(OH) D levels. Low vitamin D was associated with systemic inflammation, albeit with distinct modes of presentation. While men with low vitamin D showed circulating markers typical for the systemic inflammatory response (e.g., elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate), the corresponding female patients had elevated serum levels of interleukin-6 and the chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 7. Despite disparities in vitamin D status and the potential effects on disease attributes, significantly shortened cancer-specific survival was observed in vitamin D-deficient patients irrespective of sex. Conclusion This unselected rectal cancer cohort confirmed the interconnection of low vitamin D, more advanced disease presentation, and poor survival, and further suggested it may be conditional on disparate modes of adverse systemic inflammation in men and women. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT01816607; registration date: 22 March 2013.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Biao Ye ◽  
Yi-Kan Cheng ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Yi-Feng Zou ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Prior reports have indicated that defective mismatch repair (MMR) has a favorable impact on outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with surgery, immunotherapy, or adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the impact of MMR status on response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer is not well understood. Here we report that dMMR was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.034) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Patients with dMMR tumors who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) achieved significantly worse DFS (P = 0.026) than those treated with NCT. Conversely, NCRT improved DFS (P = 0.043) in patients with pMMR tumors, especially for stage III disease with improved DFS (P = 0.02). The presence of dMMR was associated with better prognosis in rectal cancer patients treated with NCT. NCT benefited patients with dMMR tumors; while NCRT benefited patients with stage III disease and pMMR tumors. Patients stratified by MMR status may provide a more tailored approach to rectal cancer neoadjuvant therapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14616-e14616
Author(s):  
Francesco Sclafani ◽  
Amitesh Chandra Roy ◽  
Ian Chau ◽  
Andrew Wotherspoon ◽  
Clare Peckitt ◽  
...  

e14616 Background: HER-2 is a well established therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancer. The role of HER-2 in rectal cancer is unclear, as conflicting data on prevalence of HER-2 expression have been reported. Preclinical data indicate a potential role of HER-2 in mediating resistance of rectal cancer to chemoradiotherapy and cetuximab. This analysis evaluates the prevalence of HER-2 and its impact on the outcome of high risk rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant CAPOX and CRT ± cetuximab in EXPERT-C. Methods: Eligible patients with available tumour tissue for HER-2 analysis were included. HER-2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in biopsy and/or surgical specimens (score 0 to 3+). Tumours with equivocal IHC result (2+) were tested for HER-2 amplification by B-DISH. Tumours with IHC 3+ or B-DISH ratio ≥2.0 were classified as HER-2 positive. The impact of HER-2 on primary (CR) and secondary endpoints (RR, PFS, OS) of the study was analyzed. Results: Of 164 eligible study patients, 104 (63%) biopsy and 114 (69%) surgical specimens were available for analysis. Only 3/104 (2.9%) and 3/114 (2.6%) were HER-2 positive, respectively. In 77 patients with paired specimens, concordance for HER-2 status was found in 74 (96%). Overall 141 patients were assessable for HER-2; 6/141 (4.3%) had a HER-2 positive tumour in at least 1 specimen. The median follow-up was 58.7 months. HER-2 expression or amplification was not associated with a difference in outcome for any of the study endpoints, including in the subset of 90 KRAS/BRAF wild type patients treated ± cetuximab. In an exploratory analysis, 44 IHC 0/1+ random specimens were tested by B-DISH and HER-2 amplification was found in 3/38 (7.9%, insufficient material in 6 cases). Conclusions: Based on the low prevalence of expression (according to the classical criteria for defining HER-2 positivity) as recorded in EXPERT-C, HER-2 does not appear to represent a useful therapeutic target for high risk rectal cancer. We did not confirm the role of HER-2 as prognostic factor or potential predictive biomarker for cetuximab-based treatment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 672-672
Author(s):  
Benjamin Garlipp ◽  
Patrick Stuebs ◽  
Hans Lippert ◽  
Karsten Ridwelski ◽  
Henry Ptok ◽  
...  

672 Background: Oxaliplatin (Ox) added to postoperative 5-fluorouracil (5FU) based adjuvant treatment has shown a survival benefit in colon cancer. For rectal cancer, the impact of Ox on survival has almost exclusively been tested in studies using 5FU +/- Ox both as a component of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and as adjuvant treatment. Only one study (NCT00807911) investigated adjuvant 5FU +/- Ox in patients undergoing preop 5FU based CRT without Ox. Thus, the evidence for the benefit of adding Ox to adjuvant 5FU in patients treated with preop 5FU based CRT is limited. Methods: Data from the prospective German multicenter Quality Assurance in Rectal Cancer observational trial involving more than 300 hospitals of all levels of care throughout Germany were retrospectively analyzed. Patients undergoing R0 total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant 5FU based treatment without oxaliplatin between 01/01/2008 and 12/31/2010 were included. Disease-free survival (DFS) in patients receiving adjuvant treatment with or without Ox was compared using the Kaplan Meier method. The impact of adjuvant treatment with 5FU with or without Ox on DFS was investigated in a Cox regression analysis including open vs. laparoscopic approach, pT stage, pN stage, tumor grading, TME quality grade, and presence of anastomotic leakage as potential confounding factors. Results: The entire data set included 1,861 patients. Data for all variables investigated were available for 599 patients of whom 512 (85%) and 89 (15%) received 5FU based adjuvant treatment without and with Ox, respectively. Mean DFS was not different in patients receiving 5FU only vs. 5FU with Ox (p=0.103). Cox regression analysis revealed no significant impact of adding Ox to adjuvant 5FU on DFS. Of all factors analyzed, only pN2 (vs. pN0) status had an independent adverse effect on DFS (Hazard ratio 4.22, p<0.001). Conclusions: These data indicate that adjuvant Ox added to 5FU does not provide a DFS benefit in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative 5FU based CRT under routine care conditions. Rectal cancer patients may be different from patients with colon cancer with respect to benefit from adjuvant Ox.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1163-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Roos ◽  
Jan H. Wong ◽  
Sharmila Roy-Chowdhury ◽  
Sharon S. Lum ◽  
John W. Morgan ◽  
...  

Multidisciplinary therapy (MDT) of node-positive rectal cancer is considered optimal. We performed a retrospective cohort study of node positive rectal cancer patients diagnosed between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2003 in Region 5 of the California Cancer Registry to determine the impact of MDT on disease specific survival (DSS). During the study period, 398 patients with stage III rectal cancer were identified. Only 251 patients (63.1%) received radiation (XRT). Patients receiving XRT had significantly improved survival when compared with those who did not (5 year DSS 55% with XRT vs 36% without XRT, median follow-up 43 months, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in T stage ( P = 0.41), the number of N1 patients ( P = 0.45), or the number of positive nodes harvested (mean 11.5 w/o XRT vs 12.8 w/XRT, P = 0.37) between patients receiving XRT and those who did not. Patients receiving XRT were far more likely to receive systemic chemotherapy (83% vs 27%, P < 0.0001). Multidisciplinary therapy of node-positive rectal cancer is associated with improved DSS. However, substantial numbers of node positive rectal cancer patients are not receiving MDT. Greater efforts are needed to implement consistent multidisciplinary algorithms into rectal cancer management.


2017 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Gomez-Millan ◽  
Maria Isabel Queipo ◽  
Maria del Mar Delgado ◽  
Lidia Perez-Villa ◽  
Alicia Roman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document