scholarly journals EP-1369: High local control for lung SBRT of comorbid patients: prospective monocenter phase II STRIPE trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. S747-S748
Author(s):  
S. Adebahr ◽  
U. Nestle ◽  
K. Kaier ◽  
T. Schimek-Jasch ◽  
E. Gkika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (30) ◽  
pp. 4833-4839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Timmerman ◽  
Ronald McGarry ◽  
Constantin Yiannoutsos ◽  
Lech Papiez ◽  
Kathy Tudor ◽  
...  

PurposeSurgical resection is standard therapy in stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, many patients are inoperable due to comorbid diseases. Building on a previously reported phase I trial, we carried out a prospective phase II trial using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in this population.Patients and MethodsEligible patients included clinically staged T1 or T2 (≤ 7 cm), N0, M0, biopsy-confirmed NSCLC. All patients had comorbid medical problems that precluded lobectomy. SBRT treatment dose was 60 to 66 Gy total in three fractions during 1 to 2 weeks.ResultsAll 70 patients enrolled completed therapy as planned and median follow-up was 17.5 months. The 3-month major response rate was 60%. Kaplan-Meier local control at 2 years was 95%. Altogether, 28 patients have died as a result of cancer (n = 5), treatment (n = 6), or comorbid illnesses (n = 17). Median overall survival was 32.6 months and 2-year overall survival was 54.7%. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity occurred in a total of 14 patients. Among patients experiencing toxicity, the median time to observation was 10.5 months. Patients treated for tumors in the peripheral lung had 2-year freedom from severe toxicity of 83% compared with only 54% for patients with central tumors.ConclusionHigh rates of local control are achieved with this SBRT regimen in medically inoperable patients with stage I NSCLC. Both local recurrence and toxicity occur late after this treatment. This regimen should not be used for patients with tumors near the central airways due to excessive toxicity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. S748-S749
Author(s):  
C.Y. Shang ◽  
M. Kasper ◽  
T.R. Williams ◽  
R. Benda ◽  
J.C. Shope ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fdg Pet ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 457-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Fariselli ◽  
Lucia Cuppini ◽  
Paola Gaviani ◽  
Marcello Marchetti ◽  
Valentina Pinzi ◽  
...  

Purpose Despite recent advances, the prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of multiple daily fraction radiotherapy performed with multiple temozolomide (TMZ) administrations in newly diagnosed patients with GBM. Methods This trial was a prospective, open-label, monocentric, nonrandomized, single arm, phase II study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of progression-free patients at 12 months, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Thirty-five patients underwent two radiotherapy courses concomitant with TMZ after surgery. At each course, radiation was delivered 3 times daily, 2 Gy/fraction, for 5 consecutive days, and the total dose was 60 Gy; concurrent TMZ was administered in a total dose of 150-200 mg/m2/day. Results The primary endpoint failed to be applied; Macdonald criteria could be used in 16 (46%) patients with local or intracerebral recurrence (group A). In 12 patients, due to suspicion of radiation necrosis vs recurrence, Macdonald criteria were not applied (group B). The OS was 22 months, and OS probabilities at 12, 18, and 24 months were 82%, 59%, and 44%, respectively. Hematologic toxicities generally did not exceed grade 2. The quality of life and cognitive functioning did not significantly change between baseline and the first follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, necrosis and pseudoprogression were significant prognostic factors of OS. Conclusions To improve local control and OS, a more aggressive treatment schedule should be explored. The related higher necrosis risk and its implications regarding local control deserve further investigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16133-e16133
Author(s):  
Xiangbing Deng ◽  
Liang Bi ◽  
Qingbin Wu ◽  
Du He ◽  
Hongfeng Gou ◽  
...  

e16133 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is the standard of care for stage II/III rectal cancer (RC) for its local-control effect. As advancement in surgery, local relapse was no longer the primary cause of failures, especially in low/intermediated-risk stage II/III RCs, in which benefit of radiotherapy in local control wasn’t shown in our previous trial. Distant relapse has become the major form of recurrences, and occurs at an increased rate when chemotherapy was delayed. This trial explores the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), and the possibility of early assessment of chemotherapeutic response in low/intermediated-risk stage II/III RCs. Methods: This prospective, single arm, phase II trial planned to enroll 60 low/intermediate-risk stage II/III mid-low RCs (low: cT3a-bN0-1M0 MRF(-); mid: cT3a-c or T4aN0-1M0). 4 cycles of CAPOX NCT were scheduled. Rectal MRI, transanal US, endoscopy, CT were examined prior to treatment and after every two cycles. The primary outcome was the clinicopathological response, defined as pathological TRG0-1, TRG2 without tumor length increase, or TRG3 with tumor length regression over 30%. This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of West China Hospital and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03666442). Results: From Dec. 2017 to Oct. 2019, 61 eligible patients were enrolled. Two patients received 3 cycles and 2 had only 2 cycles of chemotherapy due to intolerable adverse effects; 57 cases finished 4 cycles. In pathological evaluation, 13 patients (21.3%) were complete response (pTRG0) with one positive node in one patient; 5 cases were pTRG1; 26 were pTRG2; 17 had no response (pTRG3). 48 cases (78.7%) were responders. In the ROC curve predicting the responder via the 2-cycle regression in tumor length, the AUC was 0.864 (95%CI (0.764,0.963), p < 0.001), and the best cutoff regression rate after 2 cycles NCT was 27%. With this cutoff, the sensitivity was 83.3%; specificity was 84.6%; accuracy was 83.6%; positive likelihood ratio was 5.42; negative likelihood ratio was 0.20. Conclusions: NCT achieve more favorable pCR and tumor response rate in low/intermediated-risk stage II/III RCs, comparing to previous studies. The tumor regression after 2 cycles NCT had good accuracy in diagnosing the chemotherapeutic response. This early assessed chemosensitivity may become another feature for tailored use of neoadjuvant treatments, further cohort study will be conducted. Clinical trial information: NCT03666442 .


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Min Yoon ◽  
So Yeon Kim ◽  
Young-Suk Lim ◽  
Kang Mo Kim ◽  
Ju Hyun Shim ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is used as an alternative ablative treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not suitable for curative treatments. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of SBRT for small (≤5 cm) HCCs.Methods: A phase II, single-arm clinical trial on SBRT for small HCCs was conducted at an academic tertiary care center. The planned SBRT dose was 45 Gy with a fraction size of 15-Gy over 3 consecutive days. The primary endpoint was 2-year local control rate. Radiologic responses were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) and the modified RECIST criteria.Results: Between 2013 and 2016, 50 patients (53 lesions) were enrolled, with a median follow-up period of 47.8 months (range, 2.9–70.6). Patients’ age ranged from 41 to 74 years, and 80% were male. Median tumor size was 1.3 cm (range, 0.7–3.1). The 2- and 5-year local control rates were 100% and 97.1%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate was 77.6%. Six months after SBRT, radiologic responses were evident in 44 lesions (83%) according to the RECIST criteria and 49 (92.4%) according to the modified RECIST criteria. None of the patients showed grade ≥3 adverse events.Conclusions: SBRT showed excellent results as an ablative treatment for patients with small HCCs while showing minimal toxicities. SBRT can be a good alternative for both curative and salvage intents in patients with HCCs that are unsuitable for curative treatments.


Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Seidensaal ◽  
M. Kieser ◽  
A. Hommertgen ◽  
C. Jaekel ◽  
S. B. Harrabi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Following surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, the predominant pattern of failure is local recurrence, which remains the main cause of death. Radiotherapy is utilized to reduce recurrence rates but the efficacy of this strategy has not been definitely established. As treatment tolerability is more favorable with preoperative radiotherapy, normofractionated neoadjuvant treatment is the current approach. The final results of the prospective, randomized STRASS (EORTC 62092) trial, which compared the efficacy of this combined treatment to that of surgery alone, are still awaited; preliminary results presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting indicated that combined treatment is associated with better local control in patients with liposarcoma (74.5% of the cohort, 11% benefit in abdominal progression free survival after 3 years, p = 0.049). Particles allow better sparing of surrounding tissues at risk, e.g., bowel epithelium, and carbon ions additionally offer biologic advantages and are preferred in slow growing tumors. Furthermore, hypofractionation allows for a significantly shorter treatment interval with a lower risk of progression during radiotherapy. Methods and design We present a prospective, randomized, monocentric phase II trial. Patients with resectable or marginally resectable, histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum will be randomized between neoadjuvant proton or neoadjuvant carbon ion radiotherapy in active scanning beam application technique (39 Gy [relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 13 fractions [5–6 fractions per week] in each arm). The primary objective is the safety and feasibility based on the proportion of grade 3–5 toxicity (CTCAE, version 5.0) in the first 12 months after surgery or discontinuation of treatment for any reason related to the treatment. Local control, local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life are the secondary endpoints of the study. Discussion The aim of this study is to confirm that hypofractionated, accelerated preoperative radiotherapy is safe and feasible. The rationale for the use of particle therapy is the potential for reduced toxicity. The data will lay the groundwork for a randomized phase III trial comparing hypofractionated proton and carbon ion irradiation with regard to local control. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219202. Retrospectively registered on January 6, 2020


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1101-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arturo Navarro-Martin ◽  
Samantha Aso ◽  
Jon Cacicedo ◽  
Maria Arnaiz ◽  
Valentin Navarro ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Lang ◽  
Sebastian Adeberg ◽  
Semi Harrabi ◽  
Thomas Held ◽  
Meinhard Kieser ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adenoid cystic carcinoma is a rare form of head and neck cancer with a slow, but aggressive growth pattern which remains a challenge for local tumor control. Based on phase II data, radiation treatment using partially high LET radiation results in a prolonged PFS and OS. There is a paucity of randomized clinical data examining the role of the use of high LET radiation only. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective clinical trial is to analyze local control rates in patients with node negative ACC treated with carbon ion radiotherapy alone compared to a combined modality approach. Methods This trial is conducted as a prospective, open-label, phase II, two-armed, investigator-initiated study comparing the local control rates in node negative ACCs of the head and neck treated either with sole carbon ion radiotherapy or a combination of carbon ions and photons. Secondary outcomes investigated are progression-free survival, overall survival, acute and late toxicity, and quality of life. A total of 314 patients will be randomly assigned to C12 treatment alone or bimodal treatment: Patients in the experimental group will receive a dose of 51 Gy (RBE) in 17 fractions and a boost of 15 Gy (RBE) in 5 fractions. Patients in the control group will receive 25 fractions photon IMRT 50Gy and a boost using 8 × 3 Gy (RBE) carbon ions. Local control will be assessed in regular follow up examinations until 5 years after the completion of treatment. Discussion The present trial aims to evaluate local control rates to compare sole carbon ion radiotherapy to bimodal radiotherapy with carbon ions and photons in patients with node negative ACCs of the head and neck region. Local control is selected as the primary endpoint due to its major clinical relevance because of slow but aggressive growth patterns. Trial registration The study was prospectively registered on 2nd January 2020: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04214366. “Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma and Carbon Ion Only Irradiation (ACCO)”. Study status Under recruitment, participant recruitment is not completed. Start of recruitment was January 2020. There are no results been published or submitted to any journal.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4564-4564
Author(s):  
Raquibul Hannan ◽  
Michael Christensen ◽  
Aurelie Garant ◽  
Hans J. Hammers ◽  
Waddah Arafat ◽  
...  

4564 Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients on systemic therapy may experience oligoprogression. SAbR has been demonstrated to be safe and is associated with high local control rates in mRCC. In this prospective phase II single arm trial, we investigated SAbR to control oligoprogressive mRCC. Methods: Patients with mRCC who demonstrated response to systemic therapy with subsequent radiographic evidence of three or fewer sites of progression were treated with SAbR to all progressive sites. Systemic therapy was held during SAbR at the discretion of the treating oncologist. Follow-up included radiographic imaging at three-month intervals. Sequential SAbR for continued oligoprogression was allowed. The primary objective was extension of ongoing systemic therapy by >6 months in 40% of the patients. Progression was defined by any of these 3 criteria: (1) local failure at a radiated site; (2) progression ineligible for additional SAbR (>3 sites) or involving >30% of metastasis; or (3) progression as clinically determined by treating physicians. An exact binomial test was used to test the probability of postponing systemic therapy. Secondary endpoints focused on overall survival (OS), local control (LC) rates, toxicity, and health-related quality of life (QOL). Results: The trial completed accrual with enrollment of 20 patients who received SAbR to a total of 36 sites. At enrollment four, twelve, three, and one patients were on first, second, third, and fourth line of systemic therapy, respectively. Eleven were on immunotherapy and nine on a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. Three patients required repeat SAbR to a new site for sequential disease control. At a median follow-up of 8.3 months (interquartile range 3.9 – 15.1), SAbR extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy by >6 months in 12 out of 17 patients (70.6%, 95% CI: 48.9%-92.3%). Thirteen out of 20 patients progressed with a median PFS of 8.7 months (95% CI: 3.2-12.4). Five patients died and the OS did not reach the median. LC was 36/36 (100%). Treatment related grade 1 and grade 2 toxicity was experienced by three and one patient, respectively; no grade 3 toxicities were reported. When compared to baseline, no significant decline in QOL was detected. Conclusions: SAbR extended PFS of ongoing systemic by >6 months in oligoprogressive patients with mRCC. SAbR was safe and did not adversely affect QOL. These data support further evaluation of SAbR for oligoproressive mRCC in a prospective randomized setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03696277.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document