scholarly journals Genetic counseling for hereditary cancer: A pilot study on experiences of patients and family members

1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.M.A Bleiker ◽  
N.K Aaronson ◽  
F.H Menko ◽  
D.E.E Hahn ◽  
C.J van Asperen ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2397-2406 ◽  

Executive Summary: As the leading organization representing cancer specialists involved in patient care and clinical research, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) reaffirms its commitment to integrating cancer risk assessment and management, including molecular analysis of cancer predisposition genes, into the practice of oncology and preventive medicine. The primary goal of this effort is to foster expanded access to, and continued advances in, medical care provided to patients and families affected by hereditary cancer syndromes. The 1996 ASCO Statement on Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility set forth specific recommendations relating to clinical practice, research needs, educational opportunities, requirement for informed consent, indications for genetic testing, regulation of laboratories, and protection from discrimination, as well as access to and reimbursement for cancer genetics services. In updating this Statement, ASCO endorses the following principles: Indications for Genetic Testing:ASCO recommends that genetic testing be offered when 1) the individual has personal or family history features suggestive of a genetic cancer susceptibility condition, 2) the test can be adequately interpreted, and 3) the results will aid in diagnosis or influence the medical or surgical management of the patient or family members at hereditary risk of cancer. ASCO recommends that genetic testing only be done in the setting of pre- and post-test counseling, which should include discussion of possible risks and benefits of cancer early detection and prevention modalities. Special Issues in Testing Children for Cancer Susceptibility:ASCO recommends that the decision to offer testing to potentially affected children should take into account the availability of evidence-based risk-reduction strategies and the probability of developing a malignancy during childhood. Where risk-reduction strategies are available or cancer predominantly develops in childhood, ASCO believes that the scope of parental authority encompasses the right to decide for or against testing. In the absence of increased risk of a childhood malignancy, ASCO recommends delaying genetic testing until an individual is of sufficient age to make an informed decision regarding such tests. As in other areas of pediatric care, the clinical cancer genetics professional should be an advocate for the best interests of the child. Counseling About Medical Management After Testing:ASCO recommends that oncologists include in pre- and post-test counseling the discussion of possible risks and benefits of cancer early-detection and prevention modalities, some of which have presumed but unproven efficacy for individuals at increased hereditary risk of cancer. Regulation of Genetic Testing:ASCO recommends strengthening regulatory oversight of laboratories that provide clinical cancer predisposition tests. These quality assurance mechanisms should include oversight of the reagents used in genetic testing, interlaboratory comparisons of reference samples, standardization of laboratory genetic test reports, and proficiency testing. Protection From Insurance and Employment Discrimination:ASCO supports establishing a federal law to prohibit discrimination by health insurance providers and employers on the basis of an individual’s inherited susceptibility to cancer. Protections against genetic discrimination should apply to those with group coverage, those with individual health insurance policies, and the uninsured. Coverage of Services:ASCO supports efforts to ensure that all individuals at significantly increased risk of hereditary cancer have access to appropriate genetic counseling, testing, screening, surveillance, and all related medical and surgical interventions, which should be covered without penalty by public and private third-party payers. Confidentiality and Communication of Familial Risk:ASCO recommends that providers make concerted efforts to protect the confidentiality of genetic information. However, they should remind patients of the importance of communicating test results to family members, as part of pretest counseling and informed consent discussions. ASCO believes that the cancer care provider’s obligations (if any) to at-risk relatives are best fulfilled by communication of familial risk to the person undergoing testing, emphasizing the importance of sharing this information with family members so that they may also benefit. Educational Opportunities in Genetics:ASCO is committed to continuing to provide educational opportunities for physicians and other health care providers regarding the methods of cancer risk assessment, the clinical characteristics of hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes, and the range of issues related to genetic testing, including pre- and post-test genetic counseling, and risk management, so that health professionals may responsibly integrate the care of persons at increased genetic risk of cancer into the practice of clinical and preventive oncology. Special Issues Relating to Genetic Research on Human Tissues:ASCO recommends that all researchers proposing to use or store human biologic specimens for genetic studies should consult either the responsible institutional review board (IRB) or a comparable body specifically constituted to assess human tissue research, to determine the requirements for protection specific to the study under consideration. This consultation should take place before the project is initiated. The determination of the need for informed consent or authorization in such studies should depend on whether the research involves tests for genetic markers of known clinical significance and whether research data will be linked to protected health information, as well as other considerations specific to the study proposed. Special attention should also be paid to 1) whether future research findings will be disclosed to the research participants, 2) whether future contact of participants is planned, 3) whether and how protected health information about the tissue donors will be stored, and what will happen to study specimens after the trial ends. In addition, ASCO affirms the right of people contributing tissue to a databank to rescind their permission, in accordance with federal privacy regulations.


2005 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Handy ◽  
Kirsty Ross

AbstractThis article discusses the methodological implications of using written accounts as the primary source of data in qualitative research. Data from a pilot study into family relationships in two families with an anorexic child is presented to illustrate the ways in which this strategy can facilitate the interpretation of different family members' perspectives. Written accounts are shown to be a time-efficient means of gathering good-quality, descriptively rich data. Differences between oral and written modes of communication mean that participants' written accounts are more highly focused and reflective than transcripts from oral interviews, facilitating data analysis and interpretation. Relationships between researchers and researched are more circumscribed than in face-to-face interviewing, which may limit opportunities to explore emergent issues or make informal observations during the interview process. However, the more circumscribed contact between researchers and respondents may also make it easier to manage the complex social dynamics that can emerge when researching families. Whilst written accounts cannot be used as a direct substitute for oral interviews their strengths appear to be undervalued in qualitative research in psychology.


Revista CEFAC ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Bramati ◽  
Lys Maria Allenstein Gondim ◽  
Adriana Bender Moreira de Lacerda

ABSTRACT Objective: to report the use of the Dangerous Decibels® program for workers of a refrigeration company and their children as an intervention strategy for hearing health. Methods: an intervention study conducted in the city of Chapecó, SC, Brazil. Eight workers from a refrigeration company and their children participated in the study. The strategies adopted were those proposed by the Dangerous Decibels® program. Results: the Dangerous Decibels® program strategies contributed to the reflection on noise and favored interaction among participants. Workers and their children mutually committed to protecting and preserving hearing by passing on the knowledge gained to other family members, friends, and co-workers. The three basic principles of the Dangerous Decibels® program adopted by the participants were: Move away from noise, turn down the volume and protect the ears. Conclusion: the Dangerous Decibels® program developed in an intergenerational context was well received and accepted by workers and their children. As an educational intervention strategy for hearing health, it proved to be viable, convenient and with adequate content to be used simultaneously in populations of different age groups.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Rachel Webster ◽  
Sarah A. Bannon ◽  
Samuel M. Hyde ◽  
Ashley H. Woodson ◽  
Nancy Yi‐Qian You ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 86 (S11) ◽  
pp. 2449-2456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry T. Lynch ◽  
Patrice Watson ◽  
Trudy G. Shaw ◽  
Jane F. Lynch ◽  
Anne E. Harty ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1579-1579
Author(s):  
Sonya Reid-Lawrence ◽  
Tuya Pal ◽  
Ingrid A. Mayer ◽  
Xiao-Ou Shu ◽  
Ann Tezak ◽  
...  

1579 Background: Per national practice guidelines, pre-test genetic counseling (GC) through a board-certified or credentialed genetics health professional (GHP) is recommended when testing for hereditary cancer. We sought to compare differences in rates of pre-test GC among young breast cancer (BC) patients tested with or without GHP involvement across three racial groups (Black, Hispanic and non-Hispanic white (NHW)). Methods: A population-based sample of Black, Hispanic and NHW women diagnosed with invasive BC ≤ age 50 from 2009 to 2012 were recruited through the Florida State Cancer Registry. Participants were asked to complete a baseline questionnaire and release medical records for verification of clinical information and genetic testing. We compared the rates of pre-test GC across racial groups in women tested with or without GHP involvement using Analysis of Variance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also conducted to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Of 1618 participants, 828 had genetic testing based on medical records and/or self-reported on their questionnaire. There were 170 (20.5%) with GHP involvement (either through consultation and/or test ordering) and the remaining 658 women (79.5%) had no documentation of GHP involvement. Among patients tested without GHP involvement, rates of pre-test GC were significantly lower among Black women (34.8%) compared to Hispanics (80%) and NHW (78.7%) (p < 0.001). In contrast, among those with GHP involvement, rates of pre-test GC were similar among Black (89.7%), Hispanic (81.1%) and NHW (84.6%) (p = 0.89). Conclusions: Our results suggest that among young breast cancer patients tested for hereditary cancer without GHP involvement, Blacks were significantly less likely to receive pre-test GC, compared to the other two groups. In contrast, rates of pre-test GC among those with GHP involvement were similar across all groups. These results suggest a disparity in receipt of pre-test GC (which is standard of care per national guidelines) among Blacks tested without GHP involvement. These findings are concerning given the need to offer guideline-adherent care to all patients receiving hereditary cancer testing.


Cancer ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 86 (S8) ◽  
pp. 1629-1636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry T. Lynch ◽  
Patrice Watson ◽  
Trudy G. Shaw ◽  
Jane F. Lynch ◽  
Anne E. Harty ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1175-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Bouju ◽  
Jean-Marc Tadié ◽  
Fabrice Uhel ◽  
Julien Letheulle ◽  
Pierre Fillatre ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Karlsson ◽  
Anna Tisell ◽  
Åsa Engström ◽  
Birgitta Andershed

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document