A 39-year-old man with a generalized rash with bupropion XL administration

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1225-1225
Author(s):  
M.A. Ates ◽  
M. Cetin ◽  
S. Ebrinc ◽  
C. Basoglu ◽  
A. Algul
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Dry Mouth ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Cutaneous Side Effect ◽  
Dermatological Side Effects

IntroductionAn once-daily formulation, bupropion XL, was developed with the goal of further improving tolerability and compliance (1). Common adverse effects contain dry mouth, nausea, constipation, headache, agitation and skin rash (2).ObjectiveA case of skin rash caused by bupropion XL used for depression is discussed.ResultsA 39-year-old man with depression developed a rash on his extremities 13 days after the initiation of bupropion XL followed by pruritus of the arms, feet, and face.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first reported case of skin rash and urticaria induced by bupropion XL therapy. The most common cutaneous side-effect is urticaria and rash by bupropion XL. This develops from between 8 and 21 days after taking the medicine (3). In our case dermatological side effects developed on 13 days. On discontinuation of bupropion XL, there was whole resolution of symptom. We report this case to notify clinicians of the potential dermatological side effects that can occur with extended release bupropion therapy.

Cutaneous ulcers following hydroxyurea therapy

Phlebologie ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 33 (06) ◽  
pp. 202-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hartmann ◽  
S. Nagel ◽  
T. Erichsen ◽  
E. Rabe ◽  
K. H. Grips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Antineoplastic Agent ◽  
Limited Time ◽  
Myeloproliferative Diseases ◽  
Dermatological Side Effects ◽  
Chronic Myeloproliferative Diseases ◽  
Hydroxyurea Therapy

SummaryHydroxyurea (HU) is usually a well tolerated antineoplastic agent and is commonly used in the treatment of chronic myeloproliferative diseases. Dermatological side effects are frequently seen in patients receiving longterm HU therapy. Cutaneous ulcers have been reported occasionally.We report on four patients with cutaneous ulcers whilst on long-term hydroxyurea therapy for myeloproliferative diseases. In all patients we were able to reduce the dose, or stop HU altogether and their ulcers markedly improved. Our observations suggest that cutaneous ulcers should be considered as possible side effect of long-term HU therapy and healing of the ulcers can be achieved not only by cessation of the HU treatment, but also by reducing the dose of hydroxyurea for a limited time.

Short-term adverse effects of testosterone used for priming in prepubertal boys before growth hormone stimulation test

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Albrecht ◽  
Theresa Penger ◽  
Michaela Marx ◽  
Karin Hirsch ◽  
Helmuth G. Dörr
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Serum Testosterone ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Effect Rate ◽  
Testosterone Levels ◽  
Testicular Pain ◽  
Prepubertal Boys

AbstractBackground:Despite the fact that priming with sex steroids in prepubertal children before growth hormone (GH) provocative tests is recommended, there is an ongoing controversial discussion about the appropriate age of the children, the drug used for priming, the dose and the period between priming and the GH test. Interestingly, there is no discussion on the safety of this procedure. To date, only little data have been available on the possible side effects of priming with testosterone.Methods:We analyzed the outcome in 188 short-statured prepubertal boys who had been primed with testosterone enanthate (n=136: 50 mg; n=51: 125 mg, and accidentally one boy with 250 mg) 7 days prior to the GH test. Serum testosterone levels were measured on the day of the GH test in 99 boys.Results:Overall, only five boys developed adverse side effects. Two boys (dose 125 mg) showed severe low-flow priapism and had to undergo decompression of the corpora cavernosa. One boy suffered from self-limiting priapism and testicular pain (dose 50 mg). Two patients reported testicular pain (each dose 50 mg). The single patient with 250 mg testosterone did not show any adverse effects. The total side effect rate was 2.7%. The serum testosterone levels of the boys with side effects were not different from the testosterone levels of the boys without any side effects.Conclusions:Parents and patients should be informed about the possible side effects of priming with testosterone such as priapism and testicular pain. However, the overall side effect rate is low. We found no correlation between the outcome and the testosterone dose used and/or the level of serum testosterone.

Elucidating the Potential Side Effects of Current Anti- Seizure Drugs for Epilepsy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enes Akyüz ◽  
Mohd. Farooq Shaikh ◽  
Betül Köklü ◽  
Cansu Ozenen ◽  
Alina Arulsamy
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
First Line ◽  
Epileptic Patients ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Visual Problems ◽  
Gaba Transmission

: Over the decades, various interventions have been developed and utilized to treat epilepsy. However, majority of epileptic patients are often first prescribed with anti-epileptic drugs (AED), now known as anti-seizure drugs (ASD), as a first line of defense to suppress their seizures and regain their quality of life. ASDs exert their anti-convulsant effects through various mechanisms of action including regulation of ion channels, blocking of glutamate-mediated stimulating neurotransmitter interaction, and enhancing the inhibitory GABA transmission. About one third of epileptic patients are often resistant to anti-convulsant drugs, while others develop numerous side effects which may lead to treatment discontinuation and further deterioration of quality of life. Common side effects of ASDs include headache, nausea and dizziness. However, more adverse effects such as auditory and visual problems, skin problems, liver dysfunction, pancreatitis and kidney disorders may also be witnessed. Some ASDs may even result in life-threatening conditions as well as serious abnormalities, especially in patients with comorbidities and in pregnant women. Nevertheless, some clinicians had observed a reduction in the development of side effects post individualized ASD treatment. This suggest that a careful and well-informed ASD recommendation to patients may be crucial for an effective and side-effect free control of their seizures. Therefore, this review aimed to elucidate the anticonvulsant effects of ASDs as well as their side effect profile, by discussing their mechanism of action and reported adverse effects based on clinical and preclinical studies, thereby providing clinicians with a greater understanding of the safety of current ASDs.

Once-Daily Treatment for Mixed Anxiety/Depressive States: A Comparison of Slow Release Amitriptyline and Fluphenazine with Nortriptyline

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
R V Magnus ◽  
A A Schiff
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Sustained Release ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
Anxiolytic Effect ◽  
Daily Treatment ◽  
Dry Mouth ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Therapeutic Advantage ◽  
Depressive States

Patients suffering from mixed anxiety/depressive states referred to a psychiatric out-patient clinic completed a four week course of either a once-daily tablet of 30 mg nortriptyline with 1· 5 mg fluphenazine, or a sustained release capsule of 50 mg amitriptyline once daily, on a double-blind basis. Depression improved satisfactorily on either treatment, but there was a greater reduction of anxiety on fluphenazine/nortriptyline. Drowsiness, however, occurred more frequently among the patients on amitriptyline, suggesting the sedative properties of this drug did not substitute adequately for a specific anxiolytic effect. Dry mouth was also noticeably more frequent with amitriptyline. As might be expected on pharmacokinetic and physiological grounds, the results suggest that the sustained release characteristics of the amitriptyline preparation lead to a maximization of side-effects during the day without conferring any therapeutic advantage.

scholarly journals Topical Isotretinoin in Acne Vulgaris

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
M Moksedur Rahman ◽  
M Abdullah ◽  
M Moazzem Hossain ◽  
MA Siddique ◽  
M Nessa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Outpatient Department ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Cutaneous Reactions

This study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of topical isotretinoin 0.05% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. This prospective study was undertaken in Skin & VD outpatient department of Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi. One hundred patients with mild tomoderate acne vulgaris were enrolled and were instructed to apply isotretinoin 0.05% gel once daily at night for 12 weeks. Patients were followed up at 2,4,8 and 12 weeks for efficacy and tolerability. Efficacy was measured by counting facial inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions and by grading acne severity. Cutaneous tolerance was assessed by determining erythema, scaling and burning with pruritus.Response was excellent in 80%of cases.None of the cutaneous reactions was severe, all were mild and well tolerated.Nobody had to discontinue the therapy for side effects. This study confirms that isotretinoin 0.05% gel is safe and effective topical therapy for mild to moderate acnevulgaris.TAJ 2016; 29(2): 1-5

Dermatological side effects of immunotherapy drugs and targeted cancer therapies: Importance of dermatology and oncology collaboration

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522097062
Author(s):  
Uğur Çelik ◽  
Ertuğrul H Aydemir ◽  
Burhan Engin ◽  
Muazzez Ç Oba ◽  
Mesut Yılmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Outpatient Clinic ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Targeted Cancer Therapies ◽  
Dermatological Side Effects ◽  
Skin Side Effects

Introduction Novel anti-cancer drugs such as targeted cancer therapies and immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) have adverse events, especially concerning the skin. The aim of this study is to report an overview of the commonly consulted dermatological side effects of ICIs and targeted cancer therapies in clinical practice, along with their management. Methods In this single-center study, we evaluated consecutive oncological patients who were referred from the oncology outpatient clinic to the dermatology outpatient clinic due to skin side effects of ICIs and targeted therapies. All patients were examined and treated at the same day of referral by experienced dermatologists. Patient characteristics, clinical findings, diagnostic workups and treatments were retrieved from outpatient records. Results Sixty three patients were enrolled. Most common diagnoses were lung carcinoma, melanoma and colon carcinoma. Fifty patients (79%) were using targeted therapies while 13 (21%) were using ICIs. Xerosis was the most common side effect (44%), followed by acneiform rash, paronychia, eczema and pruritus. Majority of the side effects were grade 2 and 3. Psoriasis was a common side effect of ICIs. One patient had a newly developed dysplastic nevus on vemurafenib treatment. Oncological treatment was not withheld in any of the patients. Conclusions This study revealed the most commonly consulted skin side effects of novel anti-cancer drugs and their management in daily practice. We underlie the importance of collaborative work of oncology and dermatology professionals as early management of cutaneous side effects of targeted therapies and ICIs improves patient outcomes.

Ophthalmic adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors: the Mayo Clinic experience

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-316970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake Hugo Fortes ◽  
Harris Liou ◽  
Lauren A Dalvin
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Ocular Surface ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
Targeting Therapy

Background/AimsTo investigate immune-related ophthalmic side effects of systemic checkpoint inhibitors and compare side effect frequency and requirement for cessation of immunotherapy by checkpoint target.MethodsPatients taking immune checkpoint inhibitors at a single centre from January 1, 2010 to February 29, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for clinical characteristics, treatments and concurrent systemic adverse effects.ResultsOf 996 patients, 28 (2.8%) experienced an ophthalmic side effect that came to the attention of an eye care provider. Mean age at presentation of the side effect was 63 years (median 64, range 25–88). The checkpoint inhibitor most often preceding side effects was pembrolizumab in 12 (43%). The most common side effect was dry eye in 16 (57%), followed by uveitis in 4 (14%) patients, and singular cases of ptosis and binocular diplopia, among others. Ocular surface adverse effects occurred more frequently with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) targeting therapy. There were no significant differences in the frequency of orbit/ocular adnexa and uveitis or retinal side effects based on checkpoint targets. Follow-up was available in 13 (46%) patients, with mean duration of 20 months (median 16, range 2–52 months). Of these patients, the ophthalmic side effects were controlled without discontinuing therapy in 12 (92%). Checkpoint inhibitor cessation was required in one patient with panuveitis.ConclusionOphthalmic immune-related adverse events are rare but could be more common than previously estimated. PD-L1-directed checkpoint inhibitors may have a slight predilection for ocular surface adverse effects. Most ophthalmic events can be treated with targeted therapy without discontinuation of life-prolonging immunotherapy.

Ophthalmic adverse effects of taxanes: The Mayo Clinic experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212096904
Author(s):  
Blake H Fortes ◽  
Harris Liou ◽  
Lauren A Dalvin
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Cystoid Macular Edema ◽  
Meibomian Gland ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
Canalicular Obstruction ◽  
Clinic Experience

Purpose: To investigate ophthalmic side effects of taxanes and compare side effect frequency, requirement for cessation of taxane therapy, visual acuity outcome, and concurrent systemic effects between paclitaxel and docetaxel. Methods: Patients taking taxanes at a single center from 1/1/2010 to 2/29/2020 were retrospectively reviewed for clinical characteristics, treatments, and concurrent systemic adverse effects. Results: Of 1918 patients, 22 (1.1%) experienced an ophthalmic side effect that came to the attention of an eye care provider. Mean age at presentation of the side effect was 62 years (median 66, range 23–82). The most common side effect was meibomian gland dysfunction in 5 (23%) patients, followed by cystoid macular edema in 4 (18%) patients and canalicular obstruction in 4 (18%) patients, followed by diplopia in 2 (9%) patients, and singular cases of lash alopecia, and blepharitis, among others. Lids/lashes as well as nasolacrimal duct adverse effects occurred more frequently with docetaxel therapy than with paclitaxel therapy. Follow-up was available in 10 (45%) patients, with mean duration of 5 months (median 4, range 0–12 months). Of these patients, the ophthalmic side effects were resolved or controlled without discontinuing therapy in 8 (80%) patients. Taxane cessation was required in one patient with docetaxel-related canalicular obstruction and one patient with paclitaxel-related cystoid macular edema. Conclusion: Ophthalmic taxane-related adverse events are rare with estimated frequency of ophthalmic side effects of about 1%. Nevertheless, it is important that ophthalmologists recognize the range of side effects for optimal management. Most ophthalmic events can be treated with targeted therapy without discontinuation of life-prolonging taxane therapy.

scholarly journals Cutaneous Side Effect of Hydroxurea in a Sickle Cell Anaemia Child-A Case Report

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
A. O. Salako ◽  
S. O. Ogunmefun ◽  
O. W. Aworanti
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Sickle Cell Anaemia ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Cutaneous Lesions ◽  
Care Givers ◽  
Cutaneous Side Effect

Background: Hydroxyurea (HU) has redefined the quality of life of children with sickle cell anaemia and their care givers. Despite the acclaimed benefits of HU, the drug could be associated with variable side effects affecting different systems in the human body, including the skin and integuments. The aim of this report is to raise the awareness about the less common side effects of HU. Case Report: A 5-year 8 months old homozygous sickle cell anaemia child presented with pruritic hyperpigmented lesions on the trunk, arms and the legs, four weeks after commencement of HU. HU was initially discontinued for two weeks and thereafter recommenced with a different brand but there was worsening skin lesions despite at a daily low dose of 10 mg/kg. The rashes eventually resolved with low dose once in 3 days HU therapy.  She had recurrent episodes of acute painful crisis; average of three [3] episodes per year warranted hospital admission prior to commencement, but with HU therapy, there has been significant improvement in the crisis. Discussion: Cutaneous lesions are uncommon side effect of hydroxyurea. This side effect is dependent on genetic predisposition and photosensitivity. However, with the established benefit of HU in the management sickle cell anaemia, it is important for the sickle cell experts to continue to monitor closely the children for both the common and rare side effects and to individualize therapy to ensure maximal benefit with minimal or no side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document