Deferral of Payments under a Credit Agreement as an Extraordinary Measure Due to the Epidemic: A Slovenian Approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 779-792
Author(s):  
Miha Juhart
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ninik Meiyudianti

Obligation of creditor in making report for nullification of debt in fiduciary registration office to delete the record of fiduciary object is known as liability omission (Roya). Liability omission can be done when debtor paying off all debts that is possessed to the creditor.  When liability omission (roya) is not conducted by the creditor after debtor pay off all the debt, it certainly harms  the debtor since he/she as debtor is not able to use the fiduciary object to make new credit agreement with other parties. The present research aims to elaborate and examine further about the obligation of creditor in performing liability omission toward the fiduciary object when the debtor paying off all the debts. Moreover, the present study tries to elaborate further about accountability of creditor regarding negligence in performing liability omission toward fiduciary object that has been paid off.  The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches.  The present study shows that deletion record of fiduciary object based on paying off of debts by the debtor shall be performed by the creditor. When creditor neglects in performing this act within fourteen days (14) after the repayment of debt, it can be justified as infringement of law. Moreover, creditor shall responsible to pay all losses that is experienced by the debtor.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Yusup Sugiarto ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto

ABSTRAKKebutuhan akan lembaga notariat tidak terlepas dari kebutuhan akan perlunya pembuktian tertulis dalam lapangan hukum perdata. Mengingat keadaan ini maka notaris tidak saja berperan sebagai orang yang membuat alat bukti autentik namun juga sebagai penemu hukum. Notaris dalam profesinya sesungguhnya merupakan instansi yang dengan akta-aktanya menimbulkan alat-alat pembuktian tertulis dengan mempunyai sifat autentik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan penandatanganan akta notaris dalam pembuatan SKMHT dan akibat hukum penandatanganan akta SKMHT oleh penerima kuasa tidak di hadapan notaris dalam perjanjian kredit pemilikan rumah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, sedangkan sifat dari penelitiannya sendiri bersifat deskriptif analisis. Penandatanganan akta notaris oleh penerima kuasa dalam akta SKMHT dimungkinkan untuk dilakukan tidak di hadapan notaris, karena lazimnya suatu akta SKMHT ada kaitannya dengan akta perjanjian kredit yang telah dibuat terlebih dahulu oleh para pihak. Akibat hukumnya penerima kuasa dalam akta SKMHT menjadi terikat untuk mematuhi ketentuan-ketentuan yang ada dalam SKMHT.Kata kunci: notaris, akta, perdata, kredit, perjanjian. ABSTRACTThe need for notarial institutions is inseparable from the need for the necessity of verification in the field of civil law. In view of this situation the notary not only plays the role of the person who makes authentic evidence but also the inventor of the law. Notary in his profession is in fact an institution which with its deeds evokes written proof means with authentic nature. This study aims to analyse the execution of the signing of notary deed in the making of SKMHT and the effect of the signing of SKMHT deed by the power of attorney not before the notary in the mortgage agreement. The method used in this study is the normative juridical approach, while the nature of the research itself is descriptive analysis. The signing of notarial deed by the power of attorney in the deed of SKMHT is possible to be done not in the presence of a notary, because usually a deed of SKMHT is related to the credit agreement which has been made beforehand by the parties. As a result of the law the power of attorney in the SKMHT deed becomes bound to comply with the provisions contained in SKMHT.Keywords: notary, deed, civil, credit, agreement.


2017 ◽  
pp. 65-89
Author(s):  
Rocky Marciano Ambar ◽  
Budi Santoso ◽  
Hanif Nur Widhiyanti

Banks in credit agreements use more standard agreements, standard contracts in 2 (two) things, (1) There is an unbalanced position between banks and debtors, banks that have a more dominant position and debtors. (2) There is an understanding of the principle of freedom of contracting and without limits. The Bank has the freedom to seek the form and content of the agreement. Code of Ethics in agreement. The provisions of the Civil Code provide types of compensation for parties. Based on the background, then for problems the problem is written (1). Does the inclusion of Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code on the banking system have collected the principles of balance and justice. (2) What are the legal implications of the exclusion clause. The research method is normative juridical research. The result of this research is the neglect of civil law and the principle of compensation is the principle of balance. The basic principle according to Rawls is that it is unfair or more people. in the sense of "freedom of results", in other words. is the nature of the debtor in a bank credit agreement. For the legal implications of the clause that excludes Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code concerning the right of the debtor to the debtor. Legal efforts in finding and resolving problems that cannot be made by a decision due to the imbalance of the parties in the agreement. For people who make changes, no party will be harmed.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 655
Author(s):  
Ardiansyah Alrawi ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto

The emergence of various institutions today's economy helped spur the economy of the community. But unfortunately the growth of the economic institutions are not supported by an adequate legal development. The presence of various financial institutions helped bring a major role in economic development of society, especially the poor. These financial institutions emerged as a form of providing funds or capital goods for the public to purchase goods on payment in installments or periodically by consumers. Construction consumer finance based on an agreement with the principle of freedom of contract as legal bases for both parties. In practice financing undertaken by financial institutions poured in the form of a credit agreement. In each of providing credit to their customers finance institutions always face a risk, therefore the customer's business situation and developments to be followed continuously starts the moment the credit is given to the loan. As for giving legal protection to the parties in the process of providing collateral (guarantee), then one of them is with the enactment of Law Fiduciary. Implementation of lending followed by a fiduciary assurance processes at financial institutions in the city of Cirebon most important is the legal effect if the Borrower defaults which are expected to creditors (financial institutions) can be easily exercised fiduciary object. Constraints faced in a fiduciary guarantee is as follows: a. Any cost of making a deed by the Borrower felt heavy, incomplete b. Any requirements of the Borrower to elaborate on the type, brand and quality of the fiduciary object, c. The office registration still limited fiduciary, fiduciary registration e. The office could not provide information on everything about the guarantee with the issuance.Keywords: Financing Institution, Credit Agreements, Fiduciary.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akmal Adicahya

Mortgage abolishment because the expiration of the Right of Exploitation (HGU) , Right of Building (HGB), and Right of Use burdened not cause the abolishment of collateralized debt obligations. Duration HGU, HGB and wear rights expire, then the mortgage that is charged against the land becomes clear. This additional agreement means clear. Instead principal agreement (credit agreement) is not necessarily to be clear, and move on. In this case resulted in the creditors are in a weak position because of unpaid debts, Mortgage over land as collateral to remove. This study discusses the normative legal efforts to do the lender to avoid the possible risk of the abolishment of land rights based on Law Number 42 Year 1996, which includes the manufacture of promise land extend rights in the imposition of mortgage deed, power of attorney making mortgage charging time HGB changes become ownership rights residential, Object insurance burden for advantage mortgage holder mortgage, debitor to request additional collateral


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 321-326
Author(s):  
P O. Ivakhnenko

Based on expert practice, the article analyzes main questions that experts are asked to solve when forensic economic examinations are commissioned in order to study documents on financial and credit transactions. The article provides a detailed consideration of problems that are connected with determining the total cost of the credit and calculation of the real interest rate for the use of credit resources, as well as the methods to calculate and use the floating interest rate when the credit agreement is concluded. It analyzes the most important tasks that experts solve in the course of the studies on the abovementioned questions. The article provides normative acts that regulate the order for disclosing information on the total cost of credit resources when credit agreements are concluded, the order for the formation of the floating interest rate. It considers problematic aspects of conducting examinations of documents on financial and credit transactions and offers proposals on amending and updating the array of methods in this area of research.


Obiter ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Roestoff

One of the purposes of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA) is to protect consumers by inter alia providing mechanisms for resolving overindebtedness. Section 86 of the NCA provides for such measure in that it allows a consumer to apply to a debt counsellor to conduct a debt review of the credit agreements to which he is a party and to be declared over-indebted. One of the first steps in the debt review process is therefore, a determination by the debt counsellor whether the consumer is over-indebted, likely to become over-indebted, or not over-indebted at all. Where the debt counsellor concludes that the consumer is indeed over-indebted, section 86(7)(c) requires of the debt counsellor to issue a proposal recommending that the Magistrate’s Court make an appropriate order to declare one or more of the consumer’s credit agreements to be reckless credit (if applicable) and/or to re-arrange or restructure theconsumer’s obligations. In terms of section 86(8)(b) the debt counsellor is also obliged to refer the recommendation to the Magistrate’s Court for a hearing under section 87. In Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Kruger (unreported case number 45438/09 (GSJ)) and Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Pretorius (unreported case number 39057/09 (GSJ)) the court (Kathree-Setiloane AJ)had to interpret section 86(10) of the Act which provides as follows: “If a consumer is in default under a credit agreement that is being reviewed in terms of this section, the credit provider in respect of that credit agreement may give notice to terminate the review in the prescribed manner to – (a) the consumer; (b) the debt counsellor; and (c) the National Credit Regulator, at any time at least 60 business days after the date on which the consumer applied for debt review.” The court had to determine whether the credit provider in casu was entitled to terminate the debt review in terms of section 86(10) and thereafter to proceed with the enforcement of the credit agreements in circumstances where the debt counsellor had referred the debt review matter to the Magistrate’s Court for a hearing in terms of section 87 of the Act. In what follows, the facts and decision in Kruger and Pretorius will be analysed and commented on. In addition, relevant provisions of the Act pertaining to the termination of debt review proceedings and the credit provider’s right to enforce its claim will also be interpreted and commented on. Regarding the credit provider’s right to enforce its claim the position where the debt review process is still pending whilst the matter has not been referred to the Magistrate’s Court for determination yet, will be distinguished from the position where the matter has indeed been referred to the Magistrate’s Court.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 681
Author(s):  
Febriyan Budi Santoso ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto

The purpose of this study (1) To analyze whether the fiduciary Agreement of Notary in Kudus which implemented the Act No.42 Of 1999 on Fiduciary (2) to analyze What barriers and solutions for Notary in Kudus in practicing the implementation of a credit agreement with fiduciary Agreement he made. Juridical approach method performed empirically, that is an approach which is conducted to analyze the extent to which a rule of law or the law being applied effectively.[1] Discussion of the results showed that (1) fiduciary Agreement of Notary in Kudus what is already implementing Act No.42 Of 1999 on Fiduciary (2) barriers and solutions for Notary in Kudus in practice the implementation of a credit agreement with a fiduciary warranty Agreement made.Keywords: Notary Agreement; Implementation; Agreement of Fiduciary.[1] Soerjono Soekamto 1982 Pengantar Penelitian Hukum UI Jakarta Page 52


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 485
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hilmi Akhsin ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun

ABSTRACTFiduciary agreements by notarial deed are not sufficient, but should be continued with fiduciary registrants. Fiduciary agreements set forth in notarial deeds without registration do not grant preferential rights to fiduciary recipients. Whereas the objective of Law Number 42 Year 1999 is basically to provide legal protection for creditors from losses caused by default from debtor. From this, the authors in this thesis take the title "Consequences of Fiduciary Guaranty Laws Not Registered According to Law Number 42 Year 1999." With the scope of the issues covered include: (1) How the procedure or implementation of credit with fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia; (2) What are the constraints and solutions in the implementation of credit with fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia, and (3) What are the consequences of fiduciary guarantee law enlisted under Law No. 42 of 1999.To obtain the results of research from these problems, the authors use the scientific method with an approach that is juridical empirical and normatiif. Empirically that is researching secondary data first and then continued by conducting research of primary data in field. The jurisdiction is to study the rules that exist with the problem in the perusal.Furthermore, from the results of the research can obtain the understanding that the first, that the credit agreement made by debtors and creditors is the principal agreement that refers to the general principles of the agreement, while the imposition of fiduciary collateral meruapakan follow-up agreement or accesoir, which registers it has been regulated by Law No. 42 of 1999 , And set further through Government Regulation No. 21 of 2015; Second, the registration of fiduciary security is a creditor's obligation, but sometimes the creditor does not register it, for cost reasons or because the treaty deed is made under the hand. Therefore, the right of the fiduciary guarantee certificate is categorized as a treaty under the hand. Therefore, the solution taken by the creditors can make the settlement by deliberation or applying through the judiciary. Third, Fiduciary Guarantees must be made by the Deed of Natariil (Notarial Deed) and registered to the Office of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, in order to have executorial power, in addition, the creditor will obtain the preferred right. If fiduciary warranties are not made under the hands and are not registered in accordance with legislative provisions, they have no executorial force, and the right of preference and may become void (vernitigbarheid).Whereas to further realize the main principle of Fiduciary Guarantee provides legal protection for the parties, it is necessary to revise the regulation of fiduciary guarantee in legislation in order to give more legal certainty.Keywords: Fiduciary Security, Registration Procedures, and Legal EffectsABSTRACT Fiduciary agreements by notarial deed are not sufficient, but should be continued with fiduciary registrants. Fiduciary agreements set forth in notarial deeds without registration do not grant preferential rights to fiduciary recipients. Whereas the objective of Law Number 42 Year 1999 is basically to provide legal protection for creditors from losses caused by default from debtor. From this, the authors in this thesis take the title "Consequences of Fiduciary Guaranty Laws Not Registered According to Law Number 42 Year 1999." With the scope of the issues covered include: (1) How the procedure or implementation of credit with fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia; (2) What are the constraints and solutions in the implementation of credit with fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia, and (3) What are the consequences of fiduciary guarantee law enlisted under Law No. 42 of 1999.To obtain the results of research from these problems, the authors use the scientific method with an approach that is juridical empirical and normatiif. Empirically that is researching secondary data first and then continued by conducting research of primary data in field. The jurisdiction is to study the rules that exist with the problem in the perusal.Furthermore, from the results of the research can obtain the understanding that the first, that the credit agreement made by debtors and creditors is the principal agreement that refers to the general principles of the agreement, while the imposition of fiduciary collateral meruapakan follow-up agreement or accesoir, which registers it has been regulated by Law No. 42 of 1999 , And set further through Government Regulation No. 21 of 2015; Second, the registration of fiduciary security is a creditor's obligation, but sometimes the creditor does not register it, for cost reasons or because the treaty deed is made under the hand. Therefore, the right of the fiduciary guarantee certificate is categorized as a treaty under the hand. Therefore, the solution taken by the creditors can make the settlement by deliberation or applying through the judiciary. Third, Fiduciary Guarantees must be made by the Deed of Natariil (Notarial Deed) and registered to the Office of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, in order to have executorial power, in addition, the creditor will obtain the preferred right. If fiduciary warranties are not made under the hands and are not registered in accordance with legislative provisions, they have no executorial force, and the right of preference and may become void (vernitigbarheid).Whereas to further realize the main principle of Fiduciary Guarantee provides legal protection for the parties, it is necessary to revise the regulation of fiduciary guarantee in legislation in order to give more legal certainty.Keywords: Fiduciary Security, Registration Procedures, and Legal Effects


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hlako Choma ◽  
Thifulufhelwi Cedric Tshidada ◽  
Tshegofatso Kgarabjang

The purpose of this paper is to examine two South Africa legislations dealing with over indebtedness of a consumer. It is clear that in terms of the South African law, section 129 (1) and 130 (3) of the National Credit Act provide that a creditor provider who wishes to enforce a debt under a credit agreement must first issue a section 129 (1) (a) notice to the consumer (the purpose of the notice is to notify the consumer of his/her arrears). On the other hand, the South African National Credit Act encourages the consumers to fulfil the financial obligations for which they are responsible. The second legislation to be examined which serve or appear to serve same purpose as the National Credit Act is the Insolvency Act. It therefore, postulated that the compulsory sequestration of a consumer in terms of the Insolvency Act would stand as an alternative remedy for a credit provider before she/he can have recourse mechanisms, such as debt review that are focused on satisfaction of the consumer’s financial obligation , in terms of the provisions of the National Credit Act. The paper determines to what extend these measures comply with the constitutional consumer protection demands. The legislature had been pertinently cognizant of the Insolvency Act when it lately enacted the National Credit Act. This is much apparent from the express amendment of section 84 of the Insolvency Act to the extent set out in schedule 2 of the National Credit Act


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document