scholarly journals P071: A three-year analysis of adult protection patients in the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S88-S89
Author(s):  
N. Kelly ◽  
C. Crooks ◽  
S. Campbell ◽  
N. Daniels
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Social Work ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Medical Work ◽  
Consulting Services ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Adult Protection

Introduction: While boarding of patients in the emergency department (ED) has been well documented and is carefully monitored, the time spent in emergency beds by patients waiting for Adult Protection (AP) placement is often relatively unnoticed, as they are not flagged as ‘admitted’. These patients have no emergency needs, yet consume considerable ED resources, often in excess of patients requiring emergency care. Staff familiarity with this issue may also bias them to premature diagnostic closure of patients as ‘placement problems’, risking misdiagnosis of active medical conditions. An observational study to retrospectively quantify the time spent in the ED by patients referred to AP services for urgent placement from the ED. Methods: A three-year audit of ED social work records of patients referred for AP. Results: For the period of October 1 2015-September 30, 2018, the ED social work service kept records of patients referred for AP from the ED. During this period, a total of 142 patients were referred to AP (40, 50, and 52 in each year respectively). There was an increase of 10 patients between 2015/16 and 2016/17 and two patients from 2016/17 to 2017/18. The overall length of stay for this subset of ED patients during this three-year period was alarmingly high, with an average length of stay of four days per patient (range 2.7 hours-18.5 days) compared to an average of all patients of 4.9 hours and admitted patients of 13.6 hours. Conclusion: Patients in the ED who are referred to AP services consume considerable ED resources, often requiring complete medical work-up, capacity assessments and close monitoring by multiple emergency personnel. This has been reported to cause considerable stress and friction between staff and consulting services. Furthermore, these patients are poorly served in a hectic, brightly lit, and noisy environment. The impact is often not fully appreciated due to ineffective capture by patient tracking systems.

scholarly journals MP32: Mid-morning huddle: a coordinated team approach to facilitating disposition of older adults

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S54
Author(s):  
N. Kelly ◽  
S. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Consulting Services ◽  
Discharge Rates ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Bounce Back

Background: Older adults in the emergency department (ED) take an increasingly larger portion of resources, have increased length of stay and a higher likelihood of adverse outcomes. In many cases bad planning, multiple vague handovers, and lack of coordinated care exacerbate this problem. With the impending onset of our aging population this is a situation that can be expected to compound in complexity in the years to come. Aim Statement: We describe daily interdisciplinary review of ED patients over the age of 75 years (or otherwise identified as a challenging discharge) to discuss barriers and facilitators to discharge/disposition. We will use data to identify the impact of this particular population to ED flow. Measures & Design: This initiative developed from our participation in the Acute Care of the Elderly (ACE) Collaborative and applies Plan/Do/Study/Act (PDSA) cycles and run reports to compare: length of stay; Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening tool; ED census, admission/discharge rates, bounce back rates, consulting services, and interdisciplinary participation. Evaluation/Results: The average daily census of our ED between the months of July-October of 2018 was over 211 patients/day, of which over 12% were patients 75 years and older. We conducted over 70 huddles, reviewing an average of 11 patients per day. The average length of stay for patients at the time of the huddle was 19 hours, significantly higher than the general emergency population. Next day admission and discharge rates were comparable, 44.8% and 43.1% respectively with the additional patients remaining in the ED with no disposition. Internal medicine was consulted on 30% of all huddle patients and 38.4% subsequently admitted. Thirty day bounce back rates for huddle patients discharged home was 29.3%. Around 60% of patients 75 and older were screened with the ISAR and 55.7% of these were positive (2 or more questions). Discussion/Impact: Older patients consume a disproportionate amount of ED resources. Daily interdisciplinary ‘geriatric huddles’ improved communication between members of the ED team and with consulting services. The huddles enhanced awareness of the unique demands that older adults place on the flow of the ED, and identified opportunities to enhance patient flow.

scholarly journals Emergency Surgery in A Tertiary Hospital: The Covid-19 Experience

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Perrone ◽  
Mario Giuffrida ◽  
Elena Bonati ◽  
Paolo Del Rio ◽  
Vittoria Pattonieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
The Impact

Objective: Evaluate the impact of Covid-19 in a critical area and analyze the changes in the daily activities in an Emergency Department of a tertiary COVID-Hospital. Methods: We reported and compared the surgical procedures performed for acute appendicitis and acute cholecystitis between two periods (March and April 2019 and March and April 2020) at Emergency Surgery Department of Parma University Hospital, a tertiary COVID-Hospital. Results: A total of 72 patients underwent surgery between March and April 2019 and 36 between March and April 2020 for acute appendicitis and cholecystitis. The average length of stay was comparable in the two considered years for LA (4.23±1.69 days in 2019 versus 4.5±2.33 days in 2020). The average length of stay in patients with acute cholecystitis was 5.9±3.8 days in 2019 and 8.23±5.5 days in 2020(P=0.038). The average hospitalization was comparable with 2019 data (5.62±3.77 days)n March 2020;whereas, April 2020 was statistically significantly longer 10.5±6 days (P= 0.023). Conclusions: Half of the emergency centers reported a drop in the overall number of urgent cases as confirmed in our department, where the number of total appendicectomy and cholecystectomy was halved comparing the two months in 2019 and 2020, 72 operations in 2019 versus 36 operations in 2020.During the pandemic, the confidence of the population to the healthcare systems was poor, and this can explain the delayed access to the emergency department of patients who suffered from an acute illness. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.19(0) 2020 p. S 66-S 68

scholarly journals The Impact of an Emergency Department Toxicology Team in the Management of Acute Intoxication

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
AHY Chung ◽  
SH Tsui ◽  
HK Tong
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Acute Intoxication ◽  
Patient Disposition ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Objective To evaluate the impact of the recently established Emergency Department (ED) Toxicology Team of Queen Mary Hospital (QMH) in the management of acute intoxication. Method A descriptive comparative study with retrospective data collection from all intoxicated and suspected intoxicated patients over two separate half-year periods in 2001 and 2006, before and after the establishment of the ED Toxicology Team in July 2005. Data on reasons of intoxication, drugs and substances involved, ED treatments, patient disposition, length of stay in ED, length of stay in hospital, patient outcome, and 30-day ED re-attendance and hospital re-admission were collected and examined. Results A total of 333 intoxicated patients were included in the study, 171 in 2001 and 162 in 2006. The basic epidemiological data were similar in both groups. There was a marked reduction in hospital admissions from 89.5% to 40.7% (P<0.01) and significant decline in average length of hospital stay from 46.8 hours to 29.2 hours (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in patient outcome, 30-day ED re-attendance and hospital re-admission. Conclusion Our findings showed that the establishment of the ED Toxicology Team in QMH achieved significant reductions in hospital admissions and the length of stay in hospital in the management of patients with acute intoxication without jeopardising patient outcome. The results illustrate that the new model has a beneficial role in reducing cost and alleviating stress on hospital bed availability, therefore it can be recognised as a cost-effective means of management of acute intoxication.

scholarly journals Association of Emergency Department Waiting Times With Patient Experience in Admitted and Discharged Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110114
Author(s):  
Andrew Nyce ◽  
Snehal Gandhi ◽  
Brian Freeze ◽  
Joshua Bosire ◽  
Terry Ricca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Short Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient’S Experience ◽  
Discharged Patients ◽  
The Impact

Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse patient experience in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). However, it is unclear which component of the waiting times is most impactful to the patient experience and the impact on hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of ED patients between July 2018 and March 30, 2020. In all, 3278 patients were included: 1477 patients were discharged from the ED, and 1680 were admitted. Discharged patients had a longer door-to-first provider and door-to-doctor time, but a shorter doctor-to-disposition, disposition-to-departure, and total ED time when compared to admitted patients. Some, but not all, components of waiting times were significantly higher in patients with suboptimal experience (<100th percentile). Prolonged door-to-doctor time was significantly associated with worse patient experience in discharged patients and in patients with hospital length of stay ≤4 days. Prolonged ED waiting times were significantly associated with worse patient experience in patients who were discharged from the ED and in inpatients with short length of stay. Door-to-doctor time seems to have the highest impact on the patient’s experience of these 2 groups.

scholarly journals Times of change in complex environments - Evaluating hospital co-payments in Palestine refugee camps

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
S V Valente de Almeida ◽  
H Ghattas ◽  
G Paolucci ◽  
A Seita
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Policy Change ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Policy Impact ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
The Impact

Abstract We measure the impact introducing a of 10% co-payment component on hospitalisation costs for Palestine refugees from Lebanon in public and private hospitals. This ex-post analysis provides a detailed insight on the direction and magnitude of the policy impact in terms of demand and supply for healthcare. The data was collected by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and include episode level information from all public, private and Red Crescent Hospitals in Lebanon, between April 2016 and October 2017. This is a complete population episode level dataset with information from before and after the policy change. We use multinomial logit, negative binomial and linear models to estimate the policy impact on demand by type of hospital, average length of stay and treatment costs for the patient and the provider. After the new policy was implemented patients were 18% more likely to choose a (free-of-charge) PRCS hospital for secondary care, instead of a Private or Public hospital, where the co-payment was introduced. This impact was stronger for episodes with longer stays, which are also the more severe and more expensive cases. Average length of stay decreased in general for all hospitals and we could not find a statistically significant impact on costs for the provider nor the patient. We find evidence that the introduction of co-payments is hospital costs led to a shift in demand, but it is not clear to what extent the hospitals receiving this demand shift were prepared for having more patients than before, also because these are typically of less quality then the others. Regarding costs, there is no evidence that the provider managed to contain costs with the new policy, as the demand adapted to the changes. Our findings provide important information on hospitalisation expenses and the consequences of a policy change from a lessons learned perspective that should be taken into account for future policy decision making. Key messages We show that in a context of poverty, the introduction of payment for specific hospital types can be efficient for shifting demand, but has doubtable impact on costs containment for the provider. The co-payment policy can have a negative impact on patients' health since after its implementation demand increased at free-of-charge hospitals, which typically have less resources to treat patients.

scholarly journals Rapid Multiplex Testing for Upper Respiratory Pathogens in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa May ◽  
Grant Tatro ◽  
Eduard Poltavskiy ◽  
Benjamin Mooso ◽  
Simson Hon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Respiratory Pathogens ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Upper Respiratory ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Acute upper respiratory tract infections are a common cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits and often result in unnecessary antibiotic treatment.  Methods We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of a rapid, multi-pathogen respiratory panel (RP) test versus usual care (control). Patients were eligible if they were ≥12 months old, had symptoms of upper respiratory infection or influenza like illness, and were not on antibiotics. The primary outcome was antibiotic prescription; secondary outcomes included antiviral prescription, disposition, and length of stay (ClinicalTrials.gov# NCT02957136). Results Of 191 patients enrolled, 93 (49%) received RP testing; 98 (51%) received usual care. Fifty-three (57%) RP and 7 (7%) control patients had a virus detected and reported during the ED visit (p=0.0001). Twenty (22%) RP patients and 33 (34%) usual care patients received antibiotics during the ED visit (-12% [95% CI -25%, 0.4%]; p=0.06/0.08); 9 RP patients received antibiotics despite having a virus detected. The magnitude of antibiotic reduction was greater in children (-19%) versus adults (-9%; post-hoc analysis). There was no difference in antiviral use, length of stay, or disposition. Conclusions Rapid RP testing was associated with a trend towards decreased antibiotic use, suggesting a potential benefit from more rapid viral tests in the ED. Future studies should determine if specific groups are more likely to benefit from testing and evaluate relative cost and effectiveness of broad testing, focused testing, and a combined diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship approach.

The Impact of Language on Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Length of Stay Among Home Care Recipients

Medical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Reaume ◽  
Ricardo Batista ◽  
Emily Rhodes ◽  
Braden Knight ◽  
Haris Imsirovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Care Recipients ◽  
The Impact

Impact of Length of Stay on Functional Outcomes of TBI Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 920-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Hawkins ◽  
F.D. Lewis ◽  
R.S. Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Inpatient Care ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of two groups of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) with attention to the impact of reduced length of stay (LOS) in the trauma center (TC) and rehabilitation hospital (RH). From 1991 to 1994, 55 patients, Group 1, with serious TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥3) were admitted to a level 1 TC and subsequently transferred to a comprehensive inpatient RH. These results have been previously published. From 1996 to 2002, 64 similarly injured patients, Group 2, received inpatient care at the same TC and RH. These patients had a marked decrease in length of stay. Functional Independence Measures (FIM) were obtained at admission (Adm), discharge (D/C), and at 1 year follow-up for both groups. The average length of stay at the TC dropped from 36 days in Group 1 to 26 days in Group 2. In addition, the average length of stay at the RH dropped from 46 days (Group 1) to 25 days (Group 2); overall, an average reduction of 31 days of inpatient care. Group 2 had significantly lower FIM scores at the time of RH discharge for self-care, locomotion, and mobility compared to Group 1. At the 1 year follow-up, however, there were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 in these FIM scores. FIM scores at 1 year were higher in Group 2 for communication (90% vs 71%) and social cognition (77% vs 49%) compared to Group 1. Over one-fourth of each group returned to work by the 1 year follow-up. Socially disruptive behavior occurred at least weekly in 28 per cent (Group 1) and 23 per cent (Group 2) of patients. The outcome for serious TBI is better than generally perceived. Reduction of inpatient LOS did not adversely affect the ultimate functional outcome. The decreased LOS placed a greater demand on outpatient rehabilitative services as well as a greater burden on the family of the brain-injured patient

scholarly journals P139: The impact of a pancreatitis admission algorithm on emergency department length of stay in a tertiary care academic hospital

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S114-S115
Author(s):  
A. Albina ◽  
F. Kegel ◽  
F. Dankoff ◽  
G. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Physician Satisfaction ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Potential Applicability ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Algorithm Implementation ◽  
The Impact

Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is associated with a broad spectrum of poor medical outcomes, including medical errors, mortality, higher rates of leaving without being seen, and reduced patient and physician satisfaction. The largest contributor to overcrowding is access block – the inability of admitted patients to access in-patient beds from the ED. One component to addressing access block involves streamlining the decision process to rapidly determine which hospital service will admit the patient. Aim Statement: As of Sep 2011, admission algorithms at our institution were supported and formalised. The pancreatitis algorithm clarified whether general surgery or internal medicine would admit ED patients with pancreatitis. We hypothesize that this prior uncertainty delayed the admission decision and prolonged ED length of stay (LOS) for patients with pancreatitis. Our project evaluates whether implementing a pancreatitis admission algorithm at our institution reduced ED time to disposition (TTD) and LOS. Measures & Design: A retrospective review was conducted in a tertiary care academic hospital in Montreal for all adult ED patients diagnosed with pancreatitis from Apr 2010 to Mar 2014. The data was used to plot separate run charts for ED TTD and LOS. Serial measurements of each outcome were used to monitor change and evaluate for special cause variation. The mean ED LOS and TTD before and after algorithm implementation were also compared using the Student's t test. Evaluation/Results: Over four years, a total of 365 ED patients were diagnosed with pancreatitis and 287 (79%) were admitted. The mean ED LOS for patients with pancreatitis decreased following the implementation of an admission algorithm (1616 vs. 1418 mins, p = 0.05). The mean ED TTD was also reduced (1171 vs. 899 mins, p = 0.0006). A non-random signal of change was suggested by a shift above the median prior to algorithm implementation and one below the median following. Discussion/Impact: This project demonstrates that in a busy tertiary care academic hospital, an admission algorithm helped reduce ED TTD and LOS for patients with pancreatitis. This proves especially valuable when considering the potential applicability of such algorithms to other disease processes, such as gastrointestinal bleeding and congestive heart failure, among others. Future studies demonstrating this external applicability, and the impact of such decision algorithms on physician decision fatigue and within non-academic institutions, proves warranted.

scholarly journals Impact of streaming "fast track" emergency department patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra O'Brien ◽  
Aled Williams ◽  
Kerrianne Blondell ◽  
George A Jelinek
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Relative Reduction ◽  
Average Waiting Time ◽  
Discharged Patients ◽  
Track Area

Objective: Fast track systems to stream emergency department (ED) patients with low acuity conditions have been introduced widely, resulting in reduced waiting times and lengths of stay for these patients. We aimed to prospectively assess the impact on patient flows of a fast track system implemented in the emergency department of an Australian tertiary adult teaching hospital which deals with relatively few low acuity patients. Methods: During the 12-week trial period, patients in Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) categories 3, 4 and 5 who were likely to be discharged were identified at triage and assessed and treated in a separate fast track area by ED medical and nursing staff rostered to work exclusively in the area. Results: The fast track area managed 21.6% of all patients presenting during its hours of operation. There was a 20.3% (?18 min; 95%CI, ?26 min to ?10 min) relative reduction in the average waiting time and an 18.0% (?41 min; 95%CI, ?52 min to ?30 min) relative reduction in the average length of stay for all discharged patients compared with the same period the previous year. Compared with the 12-week period before the fast track trial, there was a 3.4% (?2.1 min; 95%CI, ?8 min to 4 min) relative reduction in the average waiting time and a 9.7% (?20 min; 95%CI, ?31 min to ?9 min) relative reduction in the average length of stay for all discharged patients. There was no increase in the average waiting time for admitted patients. This was despite major increases in throughput and access block in the study period. Conclusion: Streaming fast track patients in the emergency department of an Australian tertiary adult teaching hospital can reduce waiting times and length of stay for discharged patients without increasing waiting times for admitted patients, even in an ED with few low acuity patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document