scholarly journals Patient-level predictors of detection of depressive symptoms, referral, and uptake of depression counseling among chronic care patients in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Kemp ◽  
Ntokozo Mntambo ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
Arvin Bhana ◽  
Deepa Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Depression Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Low Resource Settings ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Kwazulu Natal

Abstract Background Integration of depression treatment into primary care could improve patient outcomes in low-resource settings. Losses along the depression care cascade limit integrated service effectiveness. This study identified patient-level factors that predicted detection of depressive symptoms by nurses, referral for depression treatment, and uptake of counseling, as part of integrated care in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Methods This was an analysis of baseline data from a prospective cohort. Participants were adult patients with at least moderate depressive symptoms at primary care facilities in Amajuba, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Participants were screened for depressive symptoms prior to routine assessment by a nurse. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate associations between patient characteristics and service delivery outcomes. Results Data from 412 participants were analyzed. Nurses successfully detected depressive symptoms in 208 [50.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 38.9–62.0] participants; of these, they referred 76 (36.5%, 95% CI 20.3–56.5) for depression treatment; of these, 18 (23.7%, 95% CI 10.7–44.6) attended at least one session of depression counseling. Depressive symptom severity, alcohol use severity, and perceived stress were associated with detection. Similar factors did not drive referral or counseling uptake. Conclusions Nurses detected patients with depressive symptoms at rates comparable to primary care providers in high-resource settings, though gaps in referral and uptake persist. Nurses were more likely to detect symptoms among patients in more severe mental distress. Implementation strategies for integrated mental health care in low-resource settings should target improved rates of detection, referral, and uptake.

The Perspective of Older Men With Depression on Suicide and Its Prevention in Primary Care

Crisis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Vannoy ◽  
Mijung Park ◽  
Meredith R. Maroney ◽  
Jürgen Unützer ◽  
Ester Carolina Apesoa-Varano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Older Men ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Depression Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Self Image ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Background: Suicide rates in older men are higher than in the general population, yet their utilization of mental health services is lower. Aims: This study aimed to describe: (a) what primary care providers (PCPs) can do to prevent late-life suicide, and (b) older men's attitudes toward discussing suicide with a PCP. Method: Thematic analysis of interviews focused on depression and suicide with 77 depressed, low-socioeconomic status, older men of Mexican origin, or US-born non-Hispanic whites recruited from primary care. Results: Several themes inhibiting suicide emerged: it is a problematic solution, due to religious prohibition, conflicts with self-image, the impact on others; and, lack of means/capacity. Three approaches to preventing suicide emerged: talking with them about depression, talking about the impact of their suicide on others, and encouraging them to be active. The vast majority, 98%, were open to such conversations. An unexpected theme spontaneously arose: "What prevents men from acting on suicidal thoughts?" Conclusion: Suicide is rarely discussed in primary care encounters in the context of depression treatment. Our study suggests that older men are likely to be open to discussing suicide with their PCP. We have identified several pragmatic approaches to assist clinicians in reducing older men's distress and preventing suicide.

scholarly journals Development of a training programme for primary care providers to counsel patients with risky lifestyle behaviours in South Africa

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zelra Malan ◽  
Bob Mash ◽  
Kathy Everett-Murphy
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Communicable Disease ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Nurse ◽  
Lifestyle Behaviours ◽  
Behaviour Change Counselling

Background: We are facing a global epidemic of non-communicable disease (NCDs), which has been linked with four risky lifestyle behaviours. It is recommended that primary care providers (PCPs) provide individual brief behaviour change counselling (BBCC) as part of everyday primarycare, however currently training is required to build capacity. Local training programmes are not sufficient to achieve competence.Aim: This study aimed to redesign the current training for PCPs in South Africa, around a new model for BBCC that would offer a standardised approach to addressing patients’ risky lifestyle behaviours.Setting: The study population included clinical nurse practitioners and primary care doctors in the Western Cape Province.Methods: The analyse, design, develop, implement and evaluate (ADDIE) model provided a systematic approach to the analysis of learning needs, the design and development of the training programme, its implementation and initial evaluation.Results: This study designed a new training programme for PCPs in BBCC, which was based on a conceptual model that combined the 5As (ask, alert, assess, assist and arrange) with a guiding style derived from motivational interviewing. The programme was developed as an eight-hour training programme that combined theory, modelling and simulated practice with feedback, for either clinical nurse practitioners or primary care doctors.Conclusion: This was the first attempt at developing and implementing a best practice BBCC training programme in our context, targeting a variety of PCPs, and addressing different risk factors.

Risk factors underlying depressive symptoms among parents/primary care providers of kids with autism spectrum disorder: A study from Muscat, Oman

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 600-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muna Alshekaili ◽  
Naser Al‐Balushi ◽  
Mohammed Al‐Alawi ◽  
Hassan Mirza ◽  
Salim Al‐Huseini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Autism Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Care Providers

The use of electronic health record systems to create treatment summaries and survivorship care plans.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 56-56
Author(s):  
Katherine Ramsey Gilmore ◽  
David K Choi ◽  
Patricia Chapman ◽  
Paula A. Lewis-Patterson ◽  
Guadalupe R. Palos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Treatment Summaries ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
Electronic Health

56 Background: The Commission on Cancer’s recent mandate stated that accredited programs issue treatment summaries (TSs) with survivorship follow-up care plans (SCPs). ASCO’s model of survivorship care also supports the use of these documents. One of the primary purposes of the documents is to enhance coordination and communication between the oncology team and primary care providers. Here we describe the experience of a survivorship program in using electronic health records (EHR) to develop TSs and SCPs. Methods: An interdisciplinary team at an academic cancer center was appointed to develop clinical tools to facilitate the creation and dissemination of TSs and SCPs. Enhancements were made to an institutional off-the-shelf EHR system that automatically populated available treatment information to the TS. This system used SmartLinks to pull data from the primary source of entry (e.g. surgical history, chemotherapy administered, and cancer stage). Clinicians edited and added pertinent information not automatically generated using one of the 19 disease-specific templates that provided lists of common treatments for various cancers. Electronic routing functions existed to share TSs with external providers through the medical records department. Results: From March-Sept, 2016, 766 SCP were completed by 50 providers in 14 clinics. Reports were created in the EHR to track SCPs and TS metrics. Data was reported from the TS on both a patient level and aggregate level by provider and clinic. Patient level data allowed providers to track incomplete TSs and edit them directly from the report. Of the TSs completed, 528 (69%) have been shared with patients and 261 (34%) have been shared with their community-based providers. Conclusions: EHRs provide a mechanism to successfully create and share TSs and SCPs among team members and primary care providers. They promote patient-provider education and communication about follow-up care. Research is needed to determine how they enhance coordination and ultimately outcomes for long-term survivors.

scholarly journals Low-touch, team-based care for co-morbidity management in cancer patients: the ONE TEAM randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah L. Zullig ◽  
Mohammad Shahsahebi ◽  
Benjamin Neely ◽  
Terry Hyslop ◽  
Renee A. V. Avecilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Team Based Care ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background As treatments for cancer have improved, more people are surviving cancer. However, compared to people without a history of cancer, cancer survivors are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Increased risk for CVD-related mortality among cancer survivors is partially due to lack of medication adherence and problems that exist in care coordination between cancer specialists, primary care physicians, and cardiologists. Methods/Design The Onco-primary care networking to support TEAM-based care (ONE TEAM) study is an 18-month cluster-randomized controlled trial with clustering at the primary care clinic level. ONE TEAM compares the provision of the iGuide intervention to patients and primary care providers versus an education-only control. For phase 1, at the patient level, the intervention includes video vignettes and a live webinar; provider-level interventions include electronic health records-based communication and case-based webinars. Participants will be enrolled from across North Carolina one of their first visits with a cancer specialist (e.g., surgeon, radiation or medical oncologist). We use a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design. Outcomes (measured at the patient level) will include Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures of management of three CVD comorbidities using laboratory testing (glycated hemoglobin [A1c], lipid profile) and blood pressure measurements; (2) medication adherence assessed pharmacy refill data using Proportion of Days Covered (PDC); and (3) patient-provider communication (Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care, PCC-Ca-36). Primary care clinics in the intervention arm will be considered non-responders if 90% or more of their participating patients do not meet the modified HEDIS quality metrics at the 6-month measurement, assessed once the first enrollee from each practice reaches the 12-month mark. Non-responders will be re-randomized to either continue to receive the iGuide 1 intervention, or to receive the iGuide 2 intervention, which includes tailored videos for participants and specialist consults with primary care providers. Discussion As the population of cancer survivors grows, ONE TEAM will contribute to closing the CVD outcomes gap among cancer survivors by optimizing and integrating cancer care and primary care teams. ONE TEAM is designed so that it will be possible for others to emulate and implement at scale. Trial registration This study (NCT04258813) was registered in clinicaltrals.gov on February 6, 2020.

scholarly journals Integrated Care for Depression in Older Primary Care Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 439-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha L. Bruce ◽  
Jo Anne Sirey
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Depression Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Effective Models

For decades, depression in older adults was overlooked and not treated. Most treatment was by primary care providers and typically poorly managed. Recent interventions that integrate mental health services into primary care have increased the number of patients who are treated for depression and the quality of that treatment. The most effective models involve systematic depression screening and monitoring, multidisciplinary teams that include primary care providers and mental health specialists, a depression care manager to work directly with patients over time and the use of guideline-based depression treatment. The article reviews the challenges and opportunities for providing high-quality depression treatment in primary care; describes the 3 major integrated care interventions, PRISM-E, IMPACT, and PROSPECT; reviews the evidence of their effectiveness, and adaptations of the model for other conditions and settings; and explores strategies to increase their scalability into real world practice.

scholarly journals Negotiating depression treatment with older adults: Primary care providers' perspectives

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 429-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marsha N. Wittink ◽  
Jane L. Givens ◽  
Kathryn A. Knott ◽  
James C. Coyne ◽  
Frances K. Barg
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Depression Treatment ◽  
Care Providers

scholarly journals Shared Decision Making in Primary Care Based Depression Treatment: Communication and Decision-Making Preferences Among an Underserved Patient Population

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B. Matthews ◽  
Margot Savoy ◽  
Anuradha Paranjape ◽  
Diana Washington ◽  
Treanna Hackney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Depression Treatment ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Depression Care

Objectives: Although depression is a significant public health issue, many individuals experiencing depressive symptoms are not effectively linked to treatment by their primary care provider, with underserved populations have disproportionately lower rates of engagement in depression care. Shared decision making (SDM) is an evidence-based health communication framework that can improve collaboration and optimize treatment for patients, but there is much unknown about how to translate SDM into primary care depression treatment among underserved communities. This study seeks to explore patients' experiences of SDM, and articulate communication and decision-making preferences among an underserved patient population receiving depression treatment in an urban, safety net primary care clinic.Methods: Twenty-seven patients with a depressive disorder completed a brief, quantitative survey and an in-depth semi-structured interview. Surveys measured patient demographics and their subjective experience of SDM. Qualitative interview probed for patients' communication preferences, including ideal decision-making processes around depression care. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Univariate statistics report quantitative findings.Results: Overall qualitative and quantitative findings indicate high levels of SDM. Stigma related to depression negatively affected patients' initial attitude toward seeking treatment, and underscored the importance of patient-provider rapport. In terms of communication and decision-making preferences, patients preferred collaboration with doctors during the information sharing process, but desired control over the final, decisional outcome. Trust between patients and providers emerged as a critical precondition to effective SDM. Respondents highlighted several provider behaviors that helped facilitated such an optimal environment for SDM to occur.Conclusion: Underserved patients with depression preferred taking an active role in their depression care, but looked for providers as partner in this process. Due to the stigma of depression, effective SDM first requires primary care providers to ensure that they have created a safe and trusting environment where patients are able to discuss their depression openly.

The Recognition and Treatment of Late-Life Depression: A View from Primary Care

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Callahan ◽  
Hugh C. Hendrie ◽  
William M. Tierney
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Late Life ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Late Life Depression ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Objective: Efforts to improve the recognition and treatment of late-life depression in primary care are often based on the assumption that primary care physicians underutilize currently available and effective treatments. This article reviews the validity of this assumption and offers recommendations for future research. Methods: Clinical trials designed to improve the recognition and treatment of late-life depression in primary care are reviewed. Because studies limited to older adults are rare, we also include studies enrolling younger patients. These data are reviewed in the context of recent reviews on the prevalence of depression in primary care settings and the effectiveness of available treatments. Results: Although depressive symptoms are common among older adults, there is insufficient literature documenting the proportion of these patients who respond to currently available treatments. Patients with uncomplicated major depressive disorder constitute the minority of primary care patients with depressive symptoms. Nearly all available studies of treatment effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy focus on older adults with uncomplicated major depression. Currently available treatment options may apply to less than 15 percent of depressed primary care patients. Conclusions: More research is needed to help primary care providers manage their depressed patients with comorbid medical conditions, functional disability, or minor or chronic depressions. In addition, more research is needed to identify those patients who would benefit from specialized or interdisciplinary care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document