Timing and route of contamination of hospitalized patient rooms with healthcare-associated pathogens

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Sarah N. Redmond ◽  
Basya S. Pearlmutter ◽  
Yilen K. Ng-Wong ◽  
Heba Alhmidi ◽  
Jennifer L. Cadnum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pathogen Detection ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Portable Equipment ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Bacteriophage Ms2 ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Objective: To investigate the timing and routes of contamination of the rooms of patients newly admitted to the hospital. Design: Observational cohort study and simulations of pathogen transfer. Setting: A Veterans’ Affairs hospital. Participants: Patients newly admitted to the hospital with no known carriage of healthcare-associated pathogens. Methods: Interactions between the participants and personnel or portable equipment were observed, and cultures of high-touch surfaces, floors, bedding, and patients’ socks and skin were collected for up to 4 days. Cultures were processed for Clostridioides difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Simulations were conducted with bacteriophage MS2 to assess plausibility of transfer from contaminated floors to high-touch surfaces and to assess the effectiveness of wearing slippers in reducing transfer. Results: Environmental cultures became positive for at least 1 pathogen in 10 (59%) of the 17 rooms, with cultures positive for MRSA, C. difficile, and VRE in the rooms of 10 (59%), 2 (12%), and 2 (12%) participants, respectively. For all 14 instances of pathogen detection, the initial site of recovery was the floor followed in a subset of patients by detection on sock bottoms, bedding, and high-touch surfaces. In simulations, wearing slippers over hospital socks dramatically reduced transfer of bacteriophage MS2 from the floor to hands and to high-touch surfaces. Conclusions: Floors may be an underappreciated source of pathogen dissemination in healthcare facilities. Simple interventions such as having patients wear slippers could potentially reduce the risk for transfer of pathogens from floors to hands and high-touch surfaces.

Microbial bioburden of inpatient and outpatient areas beyond patient hospital rooms

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Cadnum ◽  
Basya S. Pearlmutter ◽  
Annette L. Jencson ◽  
Hanan Haydar ◽  
Michelle T. Hecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Pathogens ◽  
Outpatient Clinics ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumanii ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Fluorescent Markers ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Cleaning And Disinfection ◽  
Surgery Center

Abstract Objective: To investigate the frequency of environmental contamination in hospital areas outside patient rooms and in outpatient healthcare facilities. Design: Culture survey. Setting: This study was conducted across 4 hospitals, 4 outpatient clinics, and 1 surgery center. Methods: We conducted 3 point-prevalence culture surveys for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Clostridioides difficile, Candida spp, and gram-negative bacilli including Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in each facility. In hospitals, high-touch surfaces were sampled from radiology, physical therapy, and mobile equipment and in emergency departments, waiting rooms, clinics, and endoscopy facilities. In outpatient facilities, surfaces were sampled in exam rooms including patient and provider areas, patient bathrooms, and waiting rooms and from portable equipment. Fluorescent markers were placed on high-touch surfaces and removal was assessed 1 day later. Results: In the hospitals, 110 (9.4%) of 1,195 sites were positive for 1 or more bacterial pathogens (range, 5.3%–13.7% for the 4 hospitals) and 70 (5.9%) were positive for Candida spp (range, 3.7%–5.9%). In outpatient facilities, 31 of 485 (6.4%) sites were positive for 1 or more bacterial pathogens (range, 2% to 14.4% for the 5 outpatient facilities) and 50 (10.3%) were positive for Candida spp (range, 3.9%–23.3%). Fluorescent markers had been removed from 33% of sites in hospitals (range, 28.4%–39.7%) and 46.3% of sites in outpatient clinics (range, 7.4%–82.8%). Conclusions: Surfaces in hospitals outside patient rooms and in outpatient facilities are frequently contaminated with healthcare-associated pathogens. Improvements in cleaning and disinfection practices are needed to reduce contamination.

scholarly journals Factors influencing environmental sampling recovery of healthcare pathogens from non-porous surfaces with cellulose sponges

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0261588
Author(s):  
Laura J. Rose ◽  
Hollis Houston ◽  
Marla Martinez-Smith ◽  
Amanda K. Lyons ◽  
Carrie Whitworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pathogen Detection ◽  
Intervention Studies ◽  
Surface Type ◽  
Drying Time ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Cellulose Sponge ◽  
Test Soil ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Contamination Levels ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Results from sampling healthcare surfaces for pathogens are difficult to interpret without understanding the factors that influence pathogen detection. We investigated the recovery of four healthcare-associated pathogens from three common surface materials, and how a body fluid simulant (artificial test soil, ATS), deposition method, and contamination levels influence the percent of organisms recovered (%R). Known quantities of carbapenemase-producing KPC+ Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC), Acinetobacter baumannii, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, and Clostridioides difficile spores (CD) were suspended in Butterfield’s buffer or ATS, deposited on 323cm2 steel, plastic, and laminate surfaces, allowed to dry 1h, then sampled with a cellulose sponge wipe. Bacteria were eluted, cultured, CFU counted and %R determined relative to the inoculum. The %R varied by organism, from <1% (KPC) to almost 60% (CD) and was more dependent upon the organism’s characteristics and presence of ATS than on surface type. KPC persistence as determined by culture also declined by >1 log10 within the 60 min drying time. For all organisms, the %R was significantly greater if suspended in ATS than if suspended in Butterfield’s buffer (p<0.05), and for most organisms the %R was not significantly different when sampled from any of the three surfaces. Organisms deposited in multiple droplets were recovered at equal or higher %R than if spread evenly on the surface. This work assists in interpreting data collected while investigating a healthcare infection outbreak or while conducting infection intervention studies.

Use of viral DNA surrogate markers to study routes of transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Manish Thakur ◽  
Heba Alhmidi ◽  
Jennifer L. Cadnum ◽  
Annette L. Jencson ◽  
Jessica Bingham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Markers ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Pathogen Transmission ◽  
Cauliflower Mosaic Virus ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Portable Equipment ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Background: The hands of healthcare personnel are the most important source for transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens. The role of contaminated fomites such as portable equipment, stethoscopes, and clothing of personnel in pathogen transmission is unclear. Objective: To study routes of transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA markers from 31 source patients and from environmental surfaces in their rooms. Design: A 3-month observational cohort study. Setting: A Veterans’ Affairs hospital. Methods: After providing care for source patients, healthcare personnel were observed during interactions with subsequent patients. Putative routes of transmission were identified based on recovery of DNA markers from sites of contact with the patient or environment. To assess plausibility of fomite-mediated transmission, we assessed the frequency of transfer of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from the skin of 25 colonized patients via gloved hands versus fomites. Results: Of 145 interactions involving contact with patients and/or the environment, 41 (28.3%) resulted in transfer of 1 or both DNA markers to the patient and/or the environment. The DNA marker applied to patients’ skin and clothing was transferred most frequently by stethoscopes, hands, and portable equipment, whereas the marker applied to environmental surfaces was transferred only by hands and clothing. The percentages of MRSA transfer from the skin of colonized patients via gloved hands, stethoscope diaphragms, and clothing were 52%, 40%, and 48%, respectively. Conclusions: Fomites such as stethoscopes, clothing, and portable equipment may be underappreciated sources of pathogen transmission. Simple interventions such as decontamination of fomites between patients could reduce the risk for transmission.

scholarly journals Discontinuation of Reflex Testing of Stool Samples for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Resulted in Increased Prevalence

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 838-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy Bodily ◽  
Kathleen M. McMullen ◽  
Anthony J. Russo ◽  
Nupur D. Kittur ◽  
Joan Hoppe-Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Reflex Testing ◽  
Stool Samples ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Discontinuation of reflex testing of stool submitted forClostridium difficiletesting for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) led to an increase in the number of patients with healthcare-associated VRE bacteremia and bacteriuria (0.21 vs 0.36 cases per 1,000 patient-days;P< .01). Cost-benefit analysis showed reflex screening and isolation of VRE reduced hospital costs.

scholarly journals Quantifying the Exposure to Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens Among Patients Discharged From a Single Hospital Across All California Healthcare Facilities

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1275-1282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupak Datta ◽  
Shawn Brown ◽  
Vinh Q. Nguyen ◽  
Chenghua Cao ◽  
John Billimek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Total Exposure ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

OBJECTIVETo assess the time-dependent exposure of California healthcare facilities to patients harboring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) upon discharge from 1 hospital.METHODSRetrospective multiple-cohort study of adults discharged from 1 hospital in 2005–2009, counting hospitals, nursing homes, cities, and counties in which carriers were readmitted, and comparing the number and length of stay of readmissions and the number of distinct readmission facilities among carriers versus noncarriers.RESULTSWe evaluated 45,772 inpatients including those with MRSA (N=1,198), VRE (N=547), ESBL (N=121), and CDI (N=300). Within 1 year of discharge, MRSA, VRE, and ESBL carriers exposed 137, 117, and 45 hospitals and 103, 83, and 37 nursing homes, generating 58,804, 33,486, and 15,508 total exposure-days, respectively. Within 90 days of discharge, CDI patients exposed 36 hospitals and 35 nursing homes, generating 7,318 total exposure-days. Compared with noncarriers, carriers had more readmissions to hospitals (MRSA:1.8 vs 0.9/patient; VRE: 2.6 vs 0.9; ESBL: 2.3 vs 0.9; CDI: 0.8 vs 0.4; all P<.001) and nursing homes (MRSA: 0.4 vs 0.1/patient; VRE: 0.7 vs 0.1; ESBL: 0.7 vs 0.1; CDI: 0.3 vs 0.1; all P<.001) and longer hospital readmissions (MRSA: 8.9 vs 7.3 days; VRE: 8.9 vs 7.4; ESBL: 9.6 vs 7.5; CDI: 12.3 vs 8.2; all P<.01).CONCLUSIONSPatients harboring antibiotic-resistant pathogens rapidly expose numerous facilities during readmissions; regional containment strategies are needed.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(11):1275–1282

scholarly journals A nosocomial cluster of vancomycin resistant enterococci among COVID-19 patients in an intensive care unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Kampmeier ◽  
Hauke Tönnies ◽  
Carlos L. Correa-Martinez ◽  
Alexander Mellmann ◽  
Vera Schwierzeck
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Whole Genome Sequence ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Background Currently, hospitals have been forced to divert substantial resources to cope with the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It is unclear if this situation will affect long-standing infection prevention practices and impact on healthcare associated infections. Here, we report a nosocomial cluster of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) that occurred on a COVID-19 dedicated intensive care unit (ICU) despite intensified contact precautions during the current pandemic. Whole genome sequence-based typing (WGS) was used to investigate genetic relatedness of VRE isolates collected from COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients during the outbreak and to compare them to environmental VRE samples. Methods Five VRE isolated from patients (three clinical and two screening samples) as well as 11 VRE and six vancomycin susceptible Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) samples from environmental sites underwent WGS during the outbreak investigation. Isolate relatedness was determined using core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST). Results WGS revealed two genotypic distinct VRE clusters with genetically closely related patient and environmental isolates. The cluster was terminated by enhanced infection control bundle strategies. Conclusions Our results illustrate the importance of continued adherence to infection prevention and control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic to prevent VRE transmission and healthcare associated infections.

Reality Check: Should We Try to Detect and Isolate Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Patients?

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 116-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda Ostrowsky ◽  
James T. Steinberg ◽  
Barry Farr ◽  
Annette H. Sohn ◽  
Ronda L. Sinkowitz-Cochran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Reality Check ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

AbstractAntimicrobial resistance, including vancomycin resistance in enterococci (VRE), is a growing problem in healthcare facilities. This “Reality Check” session focused on the question of whether we should try to detect and isolate patients colonized or infected with VRE.

scholarly journals DEKONTAMINASI DAN PEMBERSIHAN AKHIR (TERMINAL CLEANING) DI LINGKUNGAN ICU (Intensive Care Unit)

Medicinus ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cucunawangsih Cucunawangsih
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Beta Lactamase ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Acinetobacter Spp ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor

<p>Patogen MDRO, seperti vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA), <em>Acinetobacter spp.</em>, <em>extended spectrum beta-lactamase</em> (<em>ESBL</em>)-producing bacteria, dan <em>Clostridium defficile </em>seringkali menyebabkan kolonisasi/<em>healthcare-associated infection</em> (HAI) di lingkungan ICU. Sejumlah penelitian membuktikan bahwa petugas kesehatan menularkan pathogen ini melalui kontak langsung dengan tangan atau sarung tangan setelah menyentuh permukaan yang terkontaminasi atau pasien. Lingkungan berperan penting pada penyebaran <em>hospital-acquired pathogens</em> (HAP) dan terjadinya HAI. Metode pembersihan dan dekontaminasi rutin yang telah diterapkan dan dilakukan di lingkungan rumah sakit seringkali gagal ataupun tidak efektif dalam menggurangi penyebaran patogen MDRO. Kegagalan ini disebabkan tidak seluruh permukaan medis dan rumahtangga yang seringkali tersentuh tidak terdekontaminasi dengan sempurna. Untuk itu diperlukan tindakan lanjutan berupa pembersihan terminal menggunakan metode baru, seperti (1) hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV) dan (2) sinar UV yang telah terbukti efektif secara mikrobiologi, aman dan mudah digunakan.</p>

scholarly journals Disinfectant Wipes Transfer Clostridioides difficile Spores from Contaminated Surfaces to Uncontaminated Surfaces during the Disinfection Process

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carine A. Nkemngong ◽  
Gurpreet K. Chaggar ◽  
Xiaobao Li ◽  
Peter J. Teska ◽  
Haley F Oliver
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Quaternary Ammonium ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Cross Contamination ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Contamination Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Disinfection Process ◽  
The Us ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Background: Pre-wetted disinfectant wipes are increasingly being used in healthcare facilities to help address the risk of healthcare associated infections (HAI). However, HAIs are still a major problem in the US with Clostridioides difficile being the most common cause, leading to approximately 12,800 deaths annually in the US. An underexplored risk when using disinfectant wipes is that they may cross-contaminate uncontaminated surfaces during the wiping process. The objective of this study was to determine the cross-contamination risk that pre-wetted disinfectant towelettes may pose when challenged with C. difficile spores. We hypothesized that although the tested disinfectant wipes had no sporicidal claims, they will reduce spore loads. We also hypothesized that hydrogen peroxide disinfectant towelettes would present a lower cross-contamination risk than quaternary ammonium products. Methods: We evaluated the risk of cross-contamination when disinfectant wipes are challenged with C. difficile ATCC 43598 spores on Formica surfaces. A disinfectant wipe was used to wipe a Formica sheet inoculated with C. difficile. After the wiping process, we determined log10 CFU on previously uncontaminated pre-determined distances from the inoculation point and on the used wipes. Results: We found that the disinfectant wipes transferred C. difficile spores from inoculated surfaces to previously uncontaminated surfaces. We also found that wipes physically removed C. difficile spores and that hydrogen peroxide disinfectants were more sporicidal than the quaternary ammonium disinfectants. Conclusion: Regardless of the product type, all disinfectant wipes had some sporicidal effect but transferred C. difficile spores from contaminated to otherwise previously uncontaminated surfaces. Disinfectant wipes retain C. difficile spores during and after the wiping process.

Sharing is not always a good thing: Use of a DNA marker to investigate the potential for ward-to-ward dissemination of healthcare-associated pathogens

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heba Alhmidi ◽  
Jennifer L. Cadnum ◽  
Annette L. Jencson ◽  
Ali Abdulfatah Gweder ◽  
Curtis J. Donskey
Keyword(s):  
Dna Marker ◽  
Pathogen Transmission ◽  
Medical Ward ◽  
Good Thing ◽  
Portable Equipment ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Physician Work

AbstractA DNA marker inoculated onto portable equipment on a medical ward was disseminated to other wards when equipment was shared and to a physician work room and the hospital cafeteria by personnel. These results demonstrate the plausibility of pathogen transmission in healthcare facilities in the absence of shared ward exposure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document