scholarly journals Implementation of a Resource-Efficient Indirect Handshake Stewardship Model at an Academic Medical Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s272-s272
Author(s):  
Ronald Beaulieu ◽  
Milner Staub ◽  
Thomas Talbot ◽  
Matthew Greene ◽  
Gowri Satyanarayana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Communication Model ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Antimicrobial Utilization ◽  
Data Feedback ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Background: Handshake antibiotic stewardship is an effective but resource-intensive strategy for reducing antimicrobial utilization. At larger hospitals, widespread implementation of direct handshake rounds may be constrained by available resources. To optimize resource utilization and mirror handshake antimicrobial stewardship, we designed an indirect feedback model utilizing existing team pharmacy infrastructure. Methods: The antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) utilized the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) improvement methodology to implement an antibiotic stewardship intervention centered on antimicrobial utilization feedback and patient-level recommendations to optimize antimicrobial utilization. The intervention included team-based antimicrobial utilization dashboard development, biweekly antimicrobial utilization data feedback of total antimicrobial utilization and select drug-specific antimicrobial utilization, and twice weekly individualized review by ASP staff of all patients admitted to the 5 hospitalist teams on antimicrobials with recommendations (discontinuation, optimization, etc) relayed electronically to team-based pharmacists. Pharmacists were to communicate recommendations as an indirect surrogate for handshake antibiotic stewardship. As reviewer duties expanded to include a rotation of multiple reviewers, a standard operating procedure was created. A closed-loop communication model was developed to ensure pharmacist feedback receipt and to allow intervention acceptance tracking. During implementation optimization, a team pharmacist-champion was identified and addressed communication lapses. An outcome measure of days of therapy per 1,000 patient days present (DOT/1,000 PD) and balance measure of in-hospital mortality were chosen. Implementation began April 5, 2019, and data were collected through October 31, 2019. Preintervention comparison data spanned December 2017 to April 2019. Results: Overall, 1,119 cases were reviewed by the ASP, of whom 255 (22.8%) received feedback. In total, 236 of 362 recommendations (65.2%) were implemented (Fig. 1). Antimicrobial discontinuation was the most frequent (147 of 362, 40.6%), and most consistently implemented (111 of 147, 75.3%), recommendation. The DOT/1,000 PD before the intervention compared to the same metric after intervention remained unchanged (741.1 vs 725.4; P = .60) as did crude in-hospital mortality (1.8% vs 1.7%; P = .76). Several contributing factors were identified: communication lapses (eg, emails not received by 2 pharmacists), intervention timing (mismatch of recommendation and rounding window), and individual culture (some pharmacists with reduced buy-in selectively relayed recommendations). Conclusion: Although resource efficient, this model of indirect handshake did not significantly impact total antimicrobial utilization. Through serial PDSA cycles, implementation barriers were identified that can be addressed to improve the feedback process. Communication, expectation management, and interpersonal relationship development emerged as critical issues contributing to poor recommendation adherence. Future PDSA cycles will focus on streamlining processes to improve communication among stakeholders.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Improvement of gram-negative susceptibility to fluoroquinolones after implementation of a pre-authorization policy for fluoroquinolone use: A decade-long experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1419-1424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael A. Lee ◽  
Morgan C. Scully ◽  
Bernard C. Camins ◽  
Russell L. Griffin ◽  
Danielle F. Kunz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Restriction Policy ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Gram Negative Organisms

AbstractObjectiveDue to concerns over increasing fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance among gram-negative organisms, our stewardship program implemented a preauthorization use policy. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between hospital FQ use and antibiotic resistance.DesignRetrospective cohort.SettingLarge academic medical center.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of FQ susceptibility of hospital isolates for 5 common gram-negative bacteria: Acinetobacter spp., Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Primary endpoint was the change of FQ susceptibility. A Poisson regression model was used to calculate the rate of change between the preintervention period (1998–2005) and the postimplementation period (2006–2016).ResultsLarge rates of decline of FQ susceptibility began in 1998, particularly among P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., and E. cloacae. Our FQ restriction policy improved FQ use from 173 days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days to <60 DOT per 1,000 patient days. Fluoroquinolone susceptibility increased for Acinetobacter spp. (rate ratio [RR], 1.038; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.005–1.072), E. cloacae (RR, 1.028; 95% CI, 1.013–1.044), and P. aeruginosa (RR, 1.013; 95% CI, 1.006–1.020). No significant change in susceptibility was detected for K. pneumoniae (RR, 1.002; 95% CI, 0.996–1.008), and the susceptibility for E. coli continued to decline, although the decline was not as steep (RR, 0.981; 95% CI, 0.975–0.987).ConclusionsA stewardship-driven FQ restriction program stopped overall declining FQ susceptibility rates for all species except E. coli. For 3 species (ie, Acinetobacter spp, E. cloacae, and P. aeruginosa), susceptibility rates improved after implementation, and this improvement has been sustained over a 10-year period.

scholarly journals 1130. Impact of a New Pediatric Antibiotic Stewardship Program on Ceftriaxone Use at an Academic Medical Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S656-S656
Author(s):  
Derek Evans ◽  
Mariana M Lanata Piazzon ◽  
Kaitlyn Schomburg
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Severe Infection ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Post Intervention Period ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Hoop’s Family Children’s Hospital is a pediatric hospital with 72 beds, nested within Cabell Huntington Hospital. There is an established adult antibiotic stewardship program (ASP), however, since 2014 there has not been a pediatric infectious disease (ID) specialist and no pediatric ASP. With the recent hire of a pediatric ID specialist in Oct 2019 and the formation of a targeted pediatric ASP, we tracked the use of ceftriaxone (CRO) in our facility. Methods Starting January 2020, education was provided to pediatric providers in regards to appropriate CRO dosing and clinical indications via email communication. The main goals were to limit 100mg/kg/day dosing to severe infections and reduce CRO use in community-acquired pneumonia. This was sustained through intermittent prospective audits and feedback. A retrospective chart review was done from 2019-2021 for the months of January, April and December of each year. Patients ≤18 years of age who received CRO were included. Dosing, interval frequency, indication, and treatment duration were reviewed. Patients who received a single dose of CRO were excluded. Results From Jan 2019 – April 2021, 391 patient charts were reviewed (189 in the pre-intervention period and 202 in the post intervention period). There were no significant differences in age, race/ethnicity and gender in the two study groups. In the pre-intervention period, 86% of patients were prescribed CRO at severe infection dosing vs 33% in the post intervention period (p&lt; 0.0001) (Figure 1). When dosing was paired with indication, only 20% of patients in the pre intervention period had the appropriate dosing per clinical indication compared to 83% in the post intervention period (p&lt; 0.0001) (Figure 2). We also saw that in the pre-intervention period the most common indication for CRO was pneumonia (66%), which decreased to 57% in 2020 and to 35% in 2021 (p&lt; 0.0001) (Figure 3). Figure 1 describes the percentage of patients receiving ceftriaxone at severe infection dosing. This changed from an average of 86% in the pre-intervention period to 33% in the post-intervention period. Figure 2 describes the percentage of patients receiving ceftriaxone at the appropriate dosing dependent on the clinical indication provided. This changed from 20% in the pre-intervention period to closer to 90% in the post-intervention period. Conclusion Pediatric specific ASP efforts and expertise proved to be crucial in appropriate CRO use in our institution. With a feasible education strategy and targeted prospective audit and feedback, there has been a sustained impact in inappropriate CRO use. This underscores the importance of targeted pediatric ASP efforts in pediatric hospitals within larger adult hospitals. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Implementation of a Dexmedetomidine Stewardship Program at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1400-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel M. Blum ◽  
Craig A. Stevens ◽  
Danielle M. Carter ◽  
Aaron P. Hussey ◽  
Kathleen A. Marquis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Academic Medical

scholarly journals 154. Antibiotic Use During Three Separate Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Academic Medical Center in Detroit, MI

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S188-S189
Author(s):  
Deepika Sivakumar ◽  
Shelbye R Herbin ◽  
Raymond Yost ◽  
Marco R Scipione
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Bacterial Pneumonia ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Percent Change ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Inpatient antibiotic use early on in the COVID-19 pandemic may have increased due to the inability to distinguish between bacterial and COVID-19 pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of COVID-19 on antimicrobial usage during three separate waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to Detroit Medical Center between 3/10/19 to 4/24/21. Median days of therapy per 1000 adjusted patient days (DOT/1000 pt days) was evaluated for all administered antibiotics included in our pneumonia guidelines during 4 separate time periods: pre-COVID (3/3/19-4/27/19); 1st wave (3/8/20-5/2/20); 2nd wave (12/6/21-1/30/21); and 3rd wave (3/7/21-4/24/21). Antibiotics included in our pneumonia guidelines include: amoxicillin, azithromycin, aztreonam, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, linezolid, meropenem, moxifloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, tobramycin, and vancomycin. The percent change in antibiotic use between the separate time periods was also evaluated. Results An increase in antibiotics was seen during the 1st wave compared to the pre-COVID period (2639 [IQR 2339-3439] DOT/1000 pt days vs. 2432 [IQR 2291-2499] DOT/1000 pt days, p=0.08). This corresponded to an increase of 8.5% during the 1st wave. This increase did not persist during the 2nd and 3rd waves of the pandemic, and the use decreased by 8% and 16%, respectively, compared to the pre-COVID period. There was an increased use of ceftriaxone (+6.5%, p=0.23), doxycycline (+46%, p=0.13), linezolid (+61%, p=0.014), cefepime (+50%, p=0.001), and meropenem (+29%, p=0.25) during the 1st wave compared to the pre-COVID period. Linezolid (+39%, p=0.013), cefepime (+47%, p=0.08) and tobramycin (+47%, p=0.05) use remained high during the 3rd wave compared to the pre-COVID period, but the use was lower when compared to the 1st and 2nd waves. Figure 1. Antibiotic Use 01/2019 to 04/2019 Conclusion Antibiotics used to treat bacterial pneumonia during the 1st wave of the pandemic increased and there was a shift to broader spectrum agents during that period. The increased use was not sustained during the 2nd and 3rd waves of the pandemic, possibly due to the increased awareness of the differences between patients who present with COVID-19 pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Changes in antibiotic use following implementation of a telehealth stewardship pilot program

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 810-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigid M. Wilson ◽  
Richard E. Banks ◽  
Christopher J. Crnich ◽  
Emma Ide ◽  
Roberto A. Viau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

AbstractStarting in 2016, we initiated a pilot tele-antibiotic stewardship program at 2 rural Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs). Antibiotic days of therapy decreased significantly (P < .05) in the acute and long-term care units at both intervention sites, suggesting that tele-stewardship can effectively support antibiotic stewardship practices in rural VAMCs.

scholarly journals 1064. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at a Large Academic Medical Center, Impact Over 12 Years

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S376-S377
Author(s):  
Susan E Kline ◽  
Kimberly Boeser ◽  
Jeana Houseman ◽  
Samantha Saunders ◽  
Shawnda Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Downward Trend ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Background The University of Minnesota Medical Center (UMMC) is a tertiary care facility, which has had a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) for 12 years. Methods The antimicrobial stewardship team is comprised of a full-time PharmD and ID staff physicians. Recommendations are placed in the electronic medical record as a progress note. Verbal recommendations may also be made. Results There was a downward trend in Hospital-acquired (HA) C. difficile diarrhea from 2007 to 2014 from 1.2 to 0.5/1000 patient-days (pt day). Rates appear stable from 2014 to 2019 with adjustment for change to NHSN lab-based CDI surveillance (Figure 1). From 2009 to 2019 a decrease was seen in VRE hospital-acquired infections (HAI) from 0.53 to 0.21/1,000 patient-days and in MRSA HAIs from 0.2 to 0.14/1,000 patient-days. Newly acquired ESBL HAIs have remained relatively stable from 2009 to 2019 at 0.09 to 0.05/1,000 patient-days. CRE HAIs are low but stable rates at 0.02/1,000 patient-days (Figure 2). We track antimicrobial utilization for internal and national reporting (starting in July 2017). A SAAR for all Antibacterial agents (ICUs, wards, and oncology units) of 1.33 in 2018. Our top four agents average DOT; piperacillin/tazobactam (66.81), cefepime (34.40), oral levofloxacin (23.56) and intravenous meropenem (21.49). We demonstrate lower average DOT for our restricted antimicrobials (206.21) as compared with our nonrestricted antimicrobials (236.74) (Figure 3). Cost savings continued from year to year. After adjusting for inflation annually, our expected costs ($84.08) compared with actual costs ($40.12 ytd 2019), demonstrates effective cost management of antimicrobial agents. (Figure 4) Conclusion We observed a decrease in HAIs VRE and C. difficile infections after 3 years of operation, and MRSA after 5 years. This downward trend has continued. ESBL HAIs remain relatively stable and CRE are stable at low rates but remain emerging HAIs of concern. We are now focusing efforts on limiting unneeded fluoroquinolone and carbapenem use. We continue to analyze our SAAR data and internal DOT data to identify areas of opportunity to improve antimicrobial use. The ASP outcomes have continued to cost justify ongoing efforts. The effects of the program and the Infection Prevention Department appear to be synergistic. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Early and intermediate outcomes for surgical management of infective endocarditis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Volk ◽  
Nina Verghis ◽  
Antonio Chiricolo ◽  
Hirohisa Ikegami ◽  
Leonard Y. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Patient Death ◽  
Intermediate Outcomes ◽  
Uncertain Outcomes

Abstract Objective The treatment of active infective endocarditis (IE) presents a clinical dilemma with uncertain outcomes. This study sets out to determine the early and intermediate outcomes of patients treated surgically for active IE at an academic medical center. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent surgical intervention for IE at our institution from July 1st, 2011 to June 30th, 2018. In-patient records were examined to determine etiology of disease, surgical intervention type, postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), 30-day in-hospital mortality, and 1-year survival. Results Twenty-five patients underwent surgical intervention for active IE. The average age of the patients was 47 ± 14 years old and most of the patients were male (N = 15). The majority of the patients had the mitral valve replaced (N = 10), with the remaining patients having tricuspid (N = 8) and aortic (N = 7) valve replacements. The etiology varied and included intravenous drug use (IVDU), and presence of transvenous catheters. The 30-day in-hospital mortality was 4% with 1 patient death and the 1-year survival was 80%. The average LOS was 27 days ±15 and the longest LOS was 65 days. Conclusions Surgical management of IE can be difficult and challenging however mortality can be minimized with acceptable morbidity. The most common complication was CVA. The average LOS is longer than traditional adult cardiac surgery procedures and the recurrence rate of valvular infection is not minimal especially if the underlying etiology is IVDU.

scholarly journals Impact of Changes in Urine Culture Ordering Practice on Antimicrobial Utilization in Intensive Care Units at an Academic Medical Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Sarg ◽  
Greer E. Waldrop ◽  
Mona A. Beier ◽  
Emily L. Heil ◽  
Kerri A. Thom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Antimicrobial Utilization ◽  
Academic Medical

OBJECTIVETo assess antimicrobial utilization before and after a change in urine culture ordering practice in adult intensive care units (ICUs) whereby urine cultures were only performed when pyuria was detected.DESIGNQuasi-experimental studySETTINGA 700-bed academic medical centerPATIENTSPatients admitted to any adult ICUMETHODSAggregate data for all adult ICUs were obtained for population-level antimicrobial use (days of therapy [DOT]), urine cultures performed, and bacteriuria, all measured per 1,000 patient days before the intervention (January–December 2012) and after the intervention (January–December 2013). These data were compared using interrupted time series negative binomial regression. Randomly selected patient charts from the population of adult ICU patients with orders for urine culture in the presence of indwelling or recently removed urinary catheters were reviewed for demographic, clinical, and antimicrobial use characteristics, and pre- and post-intervention data were compared.RESULTSStatistically significant reductions were observed in aggregate monthly rates of urine cultures performed and bacteriuria detected but not in DOT. At the patient level, compared with the pre-intervention group (n=250), in the post-intervention group (n=250), fewer patients started a new antimicrobial therapy based on urine culture results (23% vs 41%, P=.002), but no difference in the mean total DOT was observed.CONCLUSIONA change in urine-culture ordering practice was associated with a decrease in the percentage of patients starting a new antimicrobial therapy based on the index urine-culture order but not in total duration of antimicrobial use in adult ICUs. Other drivers of antimicrobial use in ICU patients need to be evaluated by antimicrobial stewardship teams.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;37(4):448–454

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document