The response of lactating sows and their litters to different dietary energy allowances. 1. Milk yield and composition, reproductive performance of sows and growth rate of litters

1973 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. O'Grady ◽  
F. W. H. Elsley ◽  
R. M. MacPherson ◽  
I. McDonald

SUMMARYTwenty-four gilts were used at each of two centres in an experiment designed to examine the effects of dietary energy intake during lactation on yield and composition of sows' milk and the growth of their litters. Gestation feed intake was standardized at 2 kg per day supplying 6·28 Meal digestible energy (DE) and 280 g crude protein. The energy levels fed during lactation ranged from 12·2 to 18·25 Meal DE per day for gilts, 12·9 to 19·6 Meal DE per day for second parity and from 13·2 to 20·25 Meal DE per day for third parity sows. Daily crude protein intake and amino acid balance ofthe protein were kept constant.In the first lactation milk yield and composition and growth of litters were not influenced by dietary energy intake. In the second lactation milk yield was depressed by lower energy intakes and this was reflected in litter weights at 21 though not at 42 days. In the third lactation lower energy intakes seriously depressed milk yield and daily output of milk nutrients. On the lowest level of energy, milk yield was 32% lower at day 24 and 20% lower at day 41 of lactation than on the highest energy level. The corresponding depressions in litter weights were 17·2 and 13·5% at 21 and 42 days respectively.

1975 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. O'Grady ◽  
F. W. H. Elsley ◽  
R. M. MacPherson ◽  
I. McDonald

SummaryThe live-weight changes of 48 sows were recorded over three reproductive cycles. All sows were given standard amounts of feed in gestation and one of four energy allowances during lactation. The daily intakes of digestible energy during lactation ranged from 12·2 to 182·2 Meal in the first, 122·9 to 192·6 Meal in the second and 132·2 to 202·2 Meal in the third lactation. Weight change in lactation responded to energy intake; sows on the lowest energy intake lost weight whilst those on the highest intake gained. At weaning of their third litters, sows on the highest energy allowance weighed 44 kg more than those on the lowest level and this was equivalent to a carcass difference of 372·3 kg at slaughter.All the sows were slaughtered after the third litters had been weaned and the carcasses were dissected into lean, subcutaneous fat+skin, and bone. Sows from all treatments had less subcutaneous fat+skin and more muscle and bone than non-pregnant gilts killed at a mean weight of 129 kg, a weight equivalent to that of the experimental animals at their first mating.The reduction in fat reserves was linearly correlated with dietary energy intake of the sows. Sows receiving the lowest energy intake in lactation possessed fat reserves which were estimated to be only 25% as great as in gilts comparable to those used to initiate the experiment. This reduction in body reserves has implications with regard to the long-term effects of feeding lactating sows low intakes of energy during 6-week lactations.


2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 452-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Beyer ◽  
Werner Jentsch ◽  
Siegfried Kuhla ◽  
Hildegard Wittenburg ◽  
Fred Kreienbring ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luana C. dos Santos ◽  
Mariana N. Pascoal ◽  
Mauro Fisberg ◽  
Isa de P. Cintra ◽  
Lígia A. Martini

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4561
Author(s):  
R A Lewis

AbstractObjectiveTo estimate the daily dietary energy intake for me to maintain a constant body weight. How hard can it be?DesignVery introspective study.SettingAt home. In lockdown. (Except every Tuesday afternoon and Saturday morning, when I went for a run.)ParticipantsMe. n=1.Main outcome measuresMy weight, measured each day.ResultsSleeping, I shed about a kilogram each night (1.07 (SD 0.25) kg). Running 5 km, I shed about half a kilogram (0.57 (SD 0.15) kg). My daily equilibrium energy intake is about 10 000 kJ (10 286 (SD 201) kJ). Every kJ above (or below) 10 000 kJ adds (or subtracts) about 40 mg (35.4 (SD 3.2) mg).ConclusionsBody weight data show persistent variability, even when the screws of control are tightened and tightened.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-117
Author(s):  
Christopher G. BEAN ◽  
Helen R. WINEFIELD ◽  
Amanda D. HUTCHINSON ◽  
Charli SARGENT ◽  
Zumin SHI

1969 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Davey ◽  
D. P. Morgan ◽  
C. M. Kincaid

2000 ◽  
Vol 2000 ◽  
pp. 107-107
Author(s):  
R. H. Santos Ricalde ◽  
I. J. Lean

Energy requirements for maintenance in pregnant sows increase when they are kept outdoors under temperate climates in comparison to indoors. However, there is little information on the energy requirements of breeding sows kept outdoors in tropical environments. Knowledge about the correct feeding management for pregnant sows kept outdoors will optimise the utilisation of feeding resources available in the tropics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of energy level supply during pregnancy on backfat change and liveweight change of primiparous sows kept outdoors under tropical conditions.


2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (15) ◽  
pp. 1472-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Odum ◽  
Helen Tinwell ◽  
Graham Tobin ◽  
John Ashby

1985 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1164-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Nelssen ◽  
A. J. Lewis ◽  
E. R. Peo ◽  
J. D. Crenshaw

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document