scholarly journals The genetic basis of inbreeding depression

1999 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRIAN CHARLESWORTH ◽  
DEBORAH CHARLESWORTH
Keyword(s):  
Inbreeding Depression ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Significant Contribution ◽  
Balancing Selection ◽  
Genetic Data ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Fitness Components ◽  
Mutation Pressure ◽  
Quantitative Genetic ◽  
Experimental Approaches

Data on the effects of inbreeding on fitness components are reviewed in the light of population genetic models of the possible genetic causes of inbreeding depression. Deleterious mutations probably play a major role in causing inbreeding depression. Putting together the different kinds of quantitative genetic data, it is difficult to account for the very large effects of inbreeding on fitness in Drosophila and outcrossing plants without a significant contribution from variability maintained by selection. Overdominant effects of alleles on fitness components seem not to be important in most cases. Recessive or partially recessive deleterious effects of alleles, some maintained by mutation pressure and some by balancing selection, thus seem to be the most important source of inbreeding depression. Possible experimental approaches to resolving outstanding questions are discussed.

scholarly journals Causes of natural variation in fitness: Evidence from studies of Drosophila populations

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1662-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Charlesworth
Keyword(s):  
Population Genetics ◽  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Balancing Selection ◽  
Large Contribution ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Weak Selection ◽  
Fitness Components ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Standing Variation ◽  
Available Information

DNA sequencing has revealed high levels of variability within most species. Statistical methods based on population genetics theory have been applied to the resulting data and suggest that most mutations affecting functionally important sequences are deleterious but subject to very weak selection. Quantitative genetic studies have provided information on the extent of genetic variation within populations in traits related to fitness and the rate at which variability in these traits arises by mutation. This paper attempts to combine the available information from applications of the two approaches to populations of the fruitfly Drosophila in order to estimate some important parameters of genetic variation, using a simple population genetics model of mutational effects on fitness components. Analyses based on this model suggest the existence of a class of mutations with much larger fitness effects than those inferred from sequence variability and that contribute most of the standing variation in fitness within a population caused by the input of mildly deleterious mutations. However, deleterious mutations explain only part of this standing variation, and other processes such as balancing selection appear to make a large contribution to genetic variation in fitness components in Drosophila.

scholarly journals An experimental test of the mutation-selection balance model for the maintenance of genetic variance in fitness components

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel P. Sharp ◽  
Aneil F. Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variance ◽  
Balancing Selection ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Balance Model ◽  
Male Mating ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Fitness Component ◽  
Fitness Components ◽  
Female Fecundity ◽  
Mutational Variance

ABSTRACTDespite decades of research, the factors that maintain genetic variation for fitness are poorly understood. Mutation selection balance will always contribute to standing variance, but it is unclear what fraction of the variance in a typical fitness component can be explained by mutation-selection balance and whether fitness components differ in this respect. In theory, the level of standing variance in fitness due to mutation-selection balance can be predicted using the rate of fitness decline under mutation accumulation, and this prediction can be directly compared to the actual standing variance observed. This approach allows for controlled statistical tests of the sufficiency of the mutation-selection balance model, and could be used to identify traits or populations where genetic variance is maintained by factors beyond mutation-selection balance. For example, some traits may be influenced by sexually antagonistic balancing selection, resulting in an excess of standing variance beyond that generated by deleterious mutations. To encourage the application of this approach, we describe the underlying theory and use it to test the mutation selection balance model for three traits in Drosophila melanogaster. We find some evidence for non-mutational variance in male mating success and female fecundity relative to larval viability, which is consistent with balancing selection on sexual fitness components. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical limitations to this approach, and discuss how to apply it successfully.

scholarly journals An experimental test of the mutation-selection balance model for the maintenance of genetic variance in fitness components

2018 ◽  
Vol 285 (1890) ◽  
pp. 20181864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel P. Sharp ◽  
Aneil F. Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variance ◽  
Balancing Selection ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Balance Model ◽  
Male Mating ◽  
Male Mating Success ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Fitness Component ◽  
Fitness Components ◽  
Female Fecundity

Despite decades of research, the factors that maintain genetic variation for fitness are poorly understood. It is unclear what fraction of the variance in a typical fitness component can be explained by mutation-selection balance (MSB) and whether fitness components differ in this respect. In theory, the level of standing variance in fitness due to MSB can be predicted using the rate of fitness decline under mutation accumulation, and this prediction can be directly compared to the standing variance observed. This approach allows for controlled statistical tests of the sufficiency of the MSB model, and could be used to identify traits or populations where genetic variance is maintained by other factors. For example, some traits may be influenced by sexually antagonistic balancing selection, resulting in an excess of standing variance beyond that generated by deleterious mutations. We describe the underlying theory and use it to test the MSB model for three traits in Drosophila melanogaster . We find evidence for differences among traits, with MSB being sufficient to explain genetic variance in larval viability but not male mating success or female fecundity. Our results are consistent with balancing selection on sexual fitness components, and demonstrate the feasibility of rigorous statistical tests of the MSB model.

scholarly journals The Sheltered Genetic Load Linked to the S Locus in Plants: New Insights From Theoretical and Empirical Approaches in Sporophytic Self-Incompatibility

Genetics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 183 (3) ◽  
pp. 1105-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Violaine Llaurens ◽  
Lucy Gonthier ◽  
Sylvain Billiard
Keyword(s):  
Inbreeding Depression ◽  
Balancing Selection ◽  
Genetic Load ◽  
Relative Fitness ◽  
Self Incompatibility ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Gas Treatment ◽  
Genomic Inbreeding ◽  
Genomic Regions ◽  
Empirical Approaches

Inbreeding depression and mating systems evolution are closely linked, because the purging of deleterious mutations and the fitness of individuals may depend on outcrossing vs. selfing rates. Further, the accumulation of deleterious mutations may vary among genomic regions, especially for genes closely linked to loci under balancing selection. Sporophytic self-incompatibility (SSI) is a common genetic mechanism in angiosperm that enables hermaphrodite plants to avoid selfing and promote outcrossing. The SSI phenotype is determined by the S locus and may depend on dominance relationships among alleles. Since most individuals are heterozygous at the S locus and recombination is suppressed in the S-locus region, it has been suggested that deleterious mutations could accumulate at genes linked to the S locus, generating a “sheltered load.” In this article, we first theoretically investigate the conditions generating sheltered load in SSI. We show that deleterious mutations can accumulate in linkage with specific S alleles, and particularly if those S alleles are dominant. Second, we looked for the presence of sheltered load in Arabidopsis halleri using CO2 gas treatment to overcome self-incompatibility. By examining the segregation of S alleles and measuring the relative fitness of progeny, we found significant sheltered load associated with the most dominant S allele (S15) of three S alleles tested. This sheltered load seems to be expressed at several stages of the life cycle and to have a larger effect than genomic inbreeding depression.

scholarly journals Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants

2003 ◽  
Vol 358 (1434) ◽  
pp. 1071-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Carr ◽  
Michele R. Dudash
Keyword(s):  
Inbreeding Depression ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Genetic Load ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Major Effect ◽  
Inbred Lines ◽  
Recessive Mutations ◽  
Deleterious Alleles ◽  
Experimental Approaches ◽  
Marker Segregation Distortion

Predictions for the evolution of mating systems and genetic load vary, depending on the genetic basis of inbreeding depression (dominance versus overdominance, epistasis and the relative frequencies of genes of large and small effect). A distinction between the dominance and overdominance hypotheses is that deleterious recessive mutations should be purged in inbreeding populations. Comparative studies of populations differing in their level of inbreeding and experimental approaches that allow selection among inbred lines support this prediction. More direct biometric approaches provide strong support for the importance of partly recessive deleterious alleles. Investigators using molecular markers to study quantitative trait loci (QTL) often find support for overdominance, though pseudo–overdominance (deleterious alleles linked in repulsion) may bias this perception. QTL and biometric studies of inbred lines often find evidence for epistasis, which may also contribute to the perception of overdominance, though this may be because of the divergent lines initially crossed in QTL studies. Studies of marker segregation distortion commonly uncover genes of major effect on viability, but these have only minor contributions to inbreeding depression. Although considerable progress has been made in understanding the genetic basis of inbreeding depression, we feel that all three aspects merit more study in natural plant populations.

scholarly journals The mutation load under tetrasomic inheritance and its consequences for the evolution of the selfing rate in autotetraploid species

1999 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. RONFORT
Keyword(s):  
Inbreeding Depression ◽  
Deleterious Mutation ◽  
Stable State ◽  
Approximate Solutions ◽  
Balance Model ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Selfing Rate ◽  
Mutation Load ◽  
Mean Fitness ◽  
The Mean

Single-locus equilibrium frequencies of a partially recessive deleterious mutation under the mutation–selection balance model are derived for partially selfing autotetraploid populations. Assuming multiplicative fitness interactions among loci, approximate solutions for the mean fitness and inbreeding depression values are also derived for the multiple locus case and compared with expectations for the diploid model. As in diploids, purging of deleterious mutations through consanguineous matings occurs in autotetraploid populations, i.e. the equilibrium mutation load is a decreasing function of the selfing rate. However, the variation of inbreeding depression with the selfing rate depends strongly on the dominance coefficients associated with the three heterozygous genotypes. Inbreeding depression can either increase or decrease with the selfing rate, and does not always vary monotonically. Expected issues for the evolution of the selfing rate consequently differ depending on the dominance coefficients. In some cases, expectations for the evolution of the selfing rate resemble expectations in diploids; but particular sets of dominance coefficients can be found that lead to either complete selfing or intermediate selfing rates as unique evolutionary stable state.

Supergene degeneration opposes polymorphism: The curious case of balanced lethals

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Berdan ◽  
Alexandre Blanckaert ◽  
Roger K Butlin ◽  
Thomas Flatt ◽  
Tanja Slotte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Equilibrium State ◽  
Balancing Selection ◽  
Mutation Accumulation ◽  
Small Population ◽  
Quasi Equilibrium ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Critical Factors ◽  
Critical Aspect ◽  
Allopatric Divergence

Supergenes offer some of the most spectacular examples of long-term balancing selection in nature but their origin and maintenance remain a mystery. A critical aspect of supergenes is reduced recombination between arrangements. Reduced recombination protects adaptive multi-trait phenotypes, but can also lead to degeneration through mutation accumulation. Mutation accumulation can stabilize the system through the emergence of associative overdominance (AOD), destabilize the system, or lead to new evolutionary outcomes. One such outcome is the formation of balanced lethal systems, a maladaptive system where both supergene arrangements have accumulated deleterious mutations to the extent that both homozygotes are inviable, leaving only heterozygotes to reproduce. Here, we perform a simulation study to understand the conditions under which these different outcomes occur, assuming a scenario of introgression after allopatric divergence. We found that AOD aids the invasion of a new supergene arrangement and the establishment of a polymorphism. However, this polymorphism is easily destabilized by further mutation accumulation. While degradation may strengthen AOD, thereby stabilizing the supergene polymorphism, it is often asymmetric, which is the key disrupter of the quasi-equilibrium state of the polymorphism. Furthermore, mechanisms that accelerate degeneration also tend to amplify asymmetric mutation accumulation between the supergene arrangements and vice versa. As the evolution of a balanced lethal system requires symmetric degradation of both arrangements, this leaves highly restricted conditions under which such a system could evolve. We show that small population size and low dominance coefficients are critical factors, as these reduce the efficacy of selection. The dichotomy between the persistence of a polymorphism and degradation of supergene arrangements likely underlies the rarity of balanced lethal systems in nature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document