Science, Religion, and Psychical Research: The Monistic Thought of Sir Oliver Lodge

1978 ◽  
Vol 71 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 245-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Root

In his long and distinguished career which bridged two centuries, Sir Oliver Lodge (1851–1940) was one of the most versatile intellectual figures in England. His discoveries in physics placed him in the first rank of British science. For his work in electricity, radio, and wave theory Lodge was awarded the Rumford and Alfred medals by the Royal Society. He also was a Romanes Lecturer at Oxford, a president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, and the first Principal of the University of Birmingham. Lodge's publication record is breathtaking: more than 1,200 items, including nearly forty books, over a sixty-year period. While more than half of these were purely scientific or technical, it is significant that more than 100 pieces dealt with psychical research and an additional 170 books and articles dealt with topics in philosophy and religion. More than half of Lodge's writings in this latter category appeared between 1896 and 1914.

By the death of Sir George Howard Darwin, which took place on December 7 last, the Society has lost an investigator of rare skill and untiring patience, whose work has done much to add lustre to a name already pre-eminent in the annals of British science. Sir George, the second son of Charles Darwin, was born at Down, Kent, in the year 1845. Brought up amidst scientifc surroundings from the start, he received his early education privately at the hands of Rev. Charles Pritchard, who afterwards became Savilian Professor of Astronomy in the University of Oxford. Among Pritchard’s pupils at the time were numbered the sons of many of England’s leading scientists, and many of these in turn have since won for themselves distinguished careers, no fewer than three having officiated in after years as presidents of the British Association.


1869 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 127-161 ◽  

In 1862 the authorities of the Colony of Victoria formed the design of adding to the Observatory, which they were then establishing at Melbourne, a powerful telescope which should be applied in reviewing the Nebulæ of the Southern Hemisphere. They applied through the Duke of Newcastle, then Foreign Secretary, to the President and Council of the Royal Society, for encouragement in this undertaking, and advice as to the best means of carrying it into execution. The subject was not new to that Body. They had been, conjointly with the British Association, engaged, though ineffectually, for several years in trying to induce the British Government to adopt a similar plan. With this object they had appointed a Committee, including several of the brightest names of British Science, to examine the subject thoroughly and recommend the plan which they considered most desirable to be adopted. Subsequent to their report, Mr. Lassell had actually constructed a 4-feet Newtonian, which he was using most successfully at Malta, M. L. Foucault, whose recent death all lament, had invented the silvered glass speculum which bears his name, and Mr. Warren De La Rue had changed Celestial Photography from a toy into a potent instrument of astronomical research. These new facts required new discussion, which was carefully made, but resulted in adopting the former report with little change. In consequence the legislature of Victoria, acting on the recommendation of our Pre­sident and Council, voted in 1865 the requisite sum; and Mr. Grubb undertook the con­struction of this gigantic equatorial, under the direction of a Committee consisting of the late Lord Rosse, Mr. Warren De La Rue, and myself. After Lord Rosse’s death, his son, the present Earl, was nominated to succeed him by the President. The instru­ment has been very successfully completed; and we hope that a detailed account of its construction will be acceptable, both from the interest which belongs to the accomplishment of a great undertaking, and because, though the late Lord Rosse and Mr. Lassell have published their methods of making large specula, the subject is by no means ex­hausted, and anything which lessens the difficulties which still beset it, and makes the use of large reflectors more attainable, cannot but tend to the progress of some of the most interesting branches of astronomy.


1951 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-276
Author(s):  
D. P. Cuthbertson

The Rowett Institute for research on animal nutrition had its origin under a scheme for promoting scientific research in agriculture adopted by the Development Commission in 1911.The Governing Body, which originally consisted of an equal number of members appointed by the Court of the University of Aberdeen and the Governors of the North of Scotland College of Agriculture, was constituted in 1913. Within recent years it has been expanded to include persons nominated by the Secretary of State for Scotland, the Royal Society, the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the Agricultural Research Council, and the Medical Research Council. Research work was begun in temporary accommodation in Marischal College in 1914, under the direction of Dr John Boyd Orr—now Lord Boyd-Orr—who continued as Director until his retirement in 1945.


It is my pleasant duty to welcome you all most warmly to this meeting, which is one of the many events stimulated by the advisory committee of the William and Mary Trust on Science and Technology and Medicine, under the Chairmanship of Sir Arnold Burgen, the immediate past Foreign Secretary of the Royal Society. This is a joint meeting of the Royal Society and the British Academy, whose President, Sir Randolph Quirk, will be Chairman this afternoon, and it covers Science and Civilization under William and Mary, presumably with the intention that the Society would cover Science if the Academy would cover Civilization. The meeting has been organized by Professor Rupert Hall, a Fellow of the Academy and also well known to the Society, who is now Emeritus Professor of the History of Science and Technology at Imperial College in the University of London; and Mr Norman Robinson, who retired in 1988 as Librarian to the Royal Society after 40 years service to the Society.


I think it must have been Harold Hartley’s sense of history which first marked me down for his attention. In 1950 he had been President of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. 1951 was the centenary year of the Great Exhibition, inspired and largely managed by Prince Albert. Harold apparently made up his mind that it would be appropriate for me to succeed him as President of the British Association for that anniversary year. Furthermore, he hoped thereby to enlist my interest in all things scientific in the expectation that this connexion would give encouragement to scientists. In this way, at the age of 30, I was ‘Hartled’ into a position for which I had absolutely no qualifications whatever and which is usually reserved for the most distinguished scientists of the day. What is more, I was a serving Naval Officer with the Mediterranean Fleet and therefore not entirely unoccupied. It was Sir David Martin who first publicly referred to the verb ‘to Hartle’ which is declined like this: ‘I think’, ‘You do’, ‘It is successfully accomplished.’ Sir David Martin explained the process this way: ‘If Harold, in his persuasive way, says he thinks something or other should be done and convinces you that you can help, you don’t gripe about it, you put off other things to do what he suggests and do it much better than you thought you were capable of doing it.’


1954 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-200 ◽  

Otto Meyerhof was born on 12 April 1884 in Berlin and died in Philadelphia on 6 October 1951 at the age of 67; he was the son of Felix Meyerhof, who was born in 1849 at Hildesheim, and Bettina Meyerhof, nee May, born in 1862 in Hamburg; both his father and grandfather had been in business. An elder sister and two younger brothers died long before him. In 1923 he shared the Nobel prize for Physiology (for 1922) with A. V. Hill. He received an Hon. D.C.L. in 1926 from the University of Edinburgh, was a Foreign Member (1937) of the Royal Society of London, an Hon. Member of the Harvey Society and of Sigma XI. In 1944 he was elected a member of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. Otto Meyerhof went through his school life up to the age of 14 without delay, but there is no record that he was then brilliant. When he was 16 he developed some kidney trouble, which caused a long period of rest in bed. This period of seclusion seems to have been responsible for a great mental and artistic development. Reading constantly he matured perceptibly, and in the autumn of 1900 was sent to Egypt on the doctor’s advice for recuperation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Andrew A Burbige

Albert Russell Main, Emeritus Professor of Zoology and Senior Honorary Research Fellow at The University of Western Australia, had a most distinguished career as a scientist and public figure and greatly influenced the course of science and nature conservation, particularly in Western Australia.


The scientific achievements of Nicolaus Mercator have in recent years A begun to achieve a just measure of attention (1). Little beyond the bare details, however, is known about the life and career of this early Fellow of the Royal Society. Born Nicolaus Kauffman in Holstein, he was known throughout most of his life by the Latinized version of his name. He attended the University of Rostock and seems to have taught for a time at both his alma mater and at the University of Copenhagen. In 1654 he moved to England after his proposal for a revision of the calendar (2) caught the notice of Oliver Cromwell. He left England for France about 1683, having been engaged by Colbert to design the waterworks at Versailles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document