Do IPOs Affect Market Price? Evidence from China

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 1391-1416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Shi ◽  
Qian Sun ◽  
Xin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Market Price ◽  
Good News ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Regulatory Commission ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Robust Evidence

We examine whether sizable initial public offerings (IPOs) affect the whole market. Using a Chinese IPO sample, we find robust evidence that sizable IPOs depress the market price on not only the listing day but also the offering (subscription) day. The impact on the market is negatively correlated with IPO size on the listing day. However, this impact is largely transitory. The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) often places a moratorium on IPOs to support the market, which seems ineffective as the negative IPO effect is transitory and moratoriums are not perceived as good news.

scholarly journals Do Discounts Enhance or Degrade IPOs Valuation Performance?

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Douaa Tizniti ◽  
Mohammed Rachid Aasri
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Market Price ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Fundamental Analysis ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Final Offer ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

In the present study, we investigate the impact of discounts on the valuation performance of initial public offerings. Review of existing literature reveals that such valuation performance lacks examination in terms of discounts as most studies focus on valuation methods. Accordingly, we examine the valuation performance of initial public offerings before and after applying discounts. Whereby, underwriters apply a deliberate discount to fair value estimate before setting the final offer price. We assess the valuation performance of initial public offerings through bias and accuracy errors as well as explainability. When valuation errors are low, the valuation performance is deemed superior. Our sample consists of 39 initial public offerings conducted on the Moroccan stock exchange between 2004 and 2018. We use publicly available prospectus to collect necessary data. Our results reveal that discounts applied to fair value estimate when setting the final offer price reduce valuation errors. Consequently, discounts enhance the valuation performance of initial public offerings. In fact, both optimistic and pessimistic final offer price are closer to market price in comparison with optimistic and pessimistic fair value estimate. We conclude that if valuations conducted by underwriters are objective, discounts serve as a qualitative valuation to supplement the quantitative one. This qualitative valuation incorporates relevant information about market circumstances with regard to initial public offerings. This indicates the superior fundamental analysis underwriters are capable of performing. However, if valuations conducted by underwriters are subjective, then underwriters deliberately overestimates fair value estimate to justify applying discounts when setting the final offer price. Nonetheless, our study reveals that discounts are more than proportional to valuation optimism. Consequently, while discounts absorb this valuation optimism, they also set a valuation pessimism. In other words, discounts avoid overpricing initial public offerings, yet they result in underpricing them. Interestingly, we discover that although optimistic fair value estimate and pessimistic final offer price have approximate valuation errors, underwriters are more comfortable underpricing initial public offerings than overpricing them.

The Role of the Media in the Internet IPO Bubble

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 657-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Utpal Bhattacharya ◽  
Neal Galpin ◽  
Rina Ray ◽  
Xiaoyun Yu
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Good News ◽  
News Item ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Share Prices ◽  
Dramatic Rise ◽  
The Media ◽  
Media Hype

AbstractWe read all news items that came out between 1996 and 2000 on 458 Internet initial public offerings (IPOs) and a matching sample of 458 non-Internet IPOs (a total of 171,488 news items) and classify each news item as good news, neutral news, or bad news. We first document that the media were more positive for Internet IPOs in the period of the dramatic rise in share prices and more negative for Internet IPOs in the period of the dramatic fall in share prices. We then document that media hype is unable to explain the Internet bubble: A 1,646% difference exists in returns between Internet stocks and non-Internet stocks from January 1, 1997, through March 24, 2000 (the market peak), and the media can explain only 2.9% of that.

Stage financing and syndication in the IPO underpricing of venture-backed firms: Venture capital and IPO underpricing

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awounou-N’dri Honorine ◽  
Dubocage Emmanuelle
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Ipo Underpricing ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Venture Capital Investment ◽  
Ipo Performance ◽  
The Impact

The article investigates the impact of stage financing and syndication practices on the underpricing level of venture-backed firms (VBFs) undertaking their initial public offerings (IPOs). This empirical study uses a unique hand-collected data set concerning more than 260 VBFs that went public on Euronext Paris and Alternext between 1997 and 2013. Our findings suggest a lower level of underpricing for firms backed by syndicated venture capital investment. Additionally, we find that the syndicate size is negatively associated with the level of underpricing. However, there is no evidence that stage financing has a significant impact. Syndication thus appears to be the only relevant mechanism to improve IPO performance (measured by the underpricing level), as it reduces agency costs and information asymmetry between the different stakeholders in an IPO process.

Initial public offerings and air pollution: evidence from China

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Luo ◽  
Xiaolin Qian ◽  
Jinjuan Ren
Keyword(s):  
Air Pollution ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Ambient Air ◽  
Environmental Conservation ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Chinese Government ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
The Impact

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of firms’ financing activities on the environment. Faced with a deteriorating global environment, both corporations and regulatory bodies have become more responsive to environmental conservation problems. However, existing literature has not adequately addressed the question of whether and how firms’ business activities influence the environment. Design/methodology/approach – Using the daily air pollution indices of 120 Chinese cities from 2001 to 2012, this study found that air pollution is alleviated after firms’ initial public offerings (IPOs). This paper proposes that firms’ IPOs influence the ambient air pollution through three channels: production scale, technical reform and corporate governance effects. Findings – The authors of this study found that the proceeds acquired in IPOs result in enlarged production scales that increase pollution, while the investment of these proceeds in social responsibility-related technical reform and enhanced corporate governance reduce pollution. Moreover, the authors discover that firms with a higher state ownership emit fewer pollutants, thus supporting the positive monitoring role of the Chinese government. Originality/value – Although this study investigates the impact of IPOs on air quality in China, the proposed analytical framework also applies to studies of other financing activities in global markets. This study has important policy implications for government regulations in environmental controls.

The impact of the quality of VC financing and monitoring on the survival of IPO firms

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Pommet
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Venture Capitalist ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Short Run ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of venture capital (VC) involvement on the survival rate of French initial public offerings (IPOs) during the period 1996-2006. The paper examines the link between the survival rates of IPO companies, and several proxies for the quality of venture capitalist financing and monitoring. Design/methodology/approach To analyze the impact of the involvement of VC on both long and short run post-IPO survival, two methods are used: survival analysis (the Cox proportional hazard), and a logit model. Findings This paper shows that the quality of venture capitalist monitoring, measured by the duration of their investment before the IPO, is positively correlated with company survival rates. However, the author does not find the expected result when the author considers the experience of venture capitalists measured by their age. Research limitations/implications The findings are limited to a sample of VC-backed companies that went public. Practical implications The findings have implications for entrepreneurs. When analyzing the advantages and disadvantages linked to the presence of VC firms in the capital of their companies, entrepreneurs should consider that certain types of venture capitalists might be more or less able to be involved in the monitoring and value adding process. Originality/value To date, there is no comprehensive study on the French IPO market analyzing both long and short run post-IPO survival of VC-backed companies. This paper fills this gap.

The impact of institutional quality on initial public offerings

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 65-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don M. Autore ◽  
Thomas J. Boulton ◽  
Scott B. Smart ◽  
Chad J. Zutter
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
The Impact

Assessing the Impact of Customer Concentration on Initial Public Offering and Balance Sheet–Based Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 42-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok R. Saboo ◽  
V. Kumar ◽  
Ankit Anand
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Balance Sheet ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
Customer Relationships ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The Impact

Using the notion of customer concentration, the authors argue that firms should evenly spread their revenues across their customers, rather than focusing on a few major customer relationships. Prior literature suggests that major customers improve efficiency and provide access to resources, thereby producing positive performance outcomes. However, building on industrial organizational literature and modern portfolio theory, the authors argue that concentration of revenues reduces the supplier firm's bargaining power relative to its customers and hurts the ability of the supplier firm to appropriate value, which, in turn, hurts profits. Using a sample of 1,023 initial public offerings (IPOs) and robust econometric methods, they find that customer concentration reduces investor uncertainty and positively impacts IPO outcomes, but significantly hurts balance sheet–based outcomes (e.g., profitability). The results suggest that a 10% increase in customer concentration reduces profitability by 3.35% (or about $7 million) in the subsequent year, or 9.4% cumulatively over the next four years (or about $20.32 million). Further, the authors find that the negative effects of customer concentration decrease with increase in organizational (marketing, technological, and operational) capabilities and increase with low customer credit quality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document