Eastern Black Nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) Interference in Processing Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Weed Science ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 38 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 385-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances G. M. Perez ◽  
John B. Masiunas

In replacement experiments in the greenhouse, plant relative yield (PRY) of both eastern black nightshade and tomato increased as the proportion of nightshade plants increased in the pots, indicating that nightshade is less competitive than tomato. In field studies tomato yield was reduced by two-thirds if three nightshade plants m–1of row were allowed to grow with tomato more than 6 weeks following tomato establishment The percent marketable fruit decreased linearly from 73% with no nightshade to 49% when nightshade were present for 12 weeks. When nightshade and tomato were transplanted together, tomato yield was 9000 kg ha–1and 49% of the fruit was marketable, while tomato yields were 30 000 kg ha–1and 70% of the fruit was marketable when nightshade was established 9 weeks after tomato planting.

Weed Science ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Weaver ◽  
Nancy Smits ◽  
Chin S. Tan

Reductions in yields of processing tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentumMill. ‘H2653’ and ‘Earlirouge′) caused by interference from eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthumDun. # SOLPT) and hairy nighthsade (S. sarrachoidesSendt. # SOLSA) were estimated for transplanted and seeded tomatoes at two locations in southern Ontario. Tomato yield losses were significantly greater in seeded than in transplanted tomatoes. Stomatal conductance and transpiration rates of seeded tomatoes decreased more rapidly with increased nightshade density than did those of transplanted tomatoes. Percent yield losses also differed between sites. Seeded tomatoes grown at high density in twin rows (33 300 and 45 000 plants/ha) had higher yields and lower percent yield losses than did tomatoes grown at low density in single rows (12 500 to 22 500 plants/ha). Nightshade dry weight and seed production decreased per plant but increased per unit area with increasing nightshade density. Nightshade dry weights and seed production did not vary with site or method of tomato establishment. A hyperbolic model provided an excellent fit to data on both tomato yield losses and nightshade seed production as a function of nightshade density.


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne M. Rich ◽  
Karen A. Renner

Reducing seeding rates in 19- or 76-cm row soybean below the optimum rate may reduce soybean competitiveness with weeds, and indirectly increase production costs to the grower. Field studies in 2001 and 2002 evaluated the effect of soybean seeding rate and row spacing on the emergence, growth, and competitiveness of eastern black nightshade (EBN) in soybean. EBN emergence ceased within 45 d after planting (DAP), and was similar across soybean seeding rates and row spacing. EBN control by glyphosate was not affected by soybean population or row spacing. Soybean planted in 19-cm rows was more competitive with EBN, regardless of seeding rate. Increasing the soybean seeding rate in 76-cm rows from 185,000 seeds/ha to 432,000 seeds/ha reduced EBN dry weight threefold at East Lansing and nearly twofold at Clarksville in 2002. There was no increase in EBN density or dry weight in 19-cm row soybean planted at 308,000 seeds/ha compared with 556,000 seeds/ha, whereas a seeding rate of 432,000 seeds/ha in 76-cm row soybean did not suppress EBN dry weight or increase soybean yield in the presence of EBN compared with a seeding rate of 308,000 seeds/ha.


Weed Science ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 902-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert N. Andersen ◽  
H. Lynn Walker

The fungusColletotrichum coccodes(Wallr.) Hughes was isolated from diseased plants of eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthumDun. ♯ SOLPT) growing in the field. In greenhouse experiments, the isolate was highly pathogenic to eastern black nightshade and less so to seven other weedy species within the Solanaceae. No disease symptoms were observed on seedlings of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumMill.), potato (Solanum tuberosumL.), or 10 other species inoculated with the isolate. Dew periods of 16 h or longer were required for maximum disease development. This requirement could limit the practical use of this pathogen as a my coherbicide.


1987 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley F. Gorski ◽  
Monica K. Wertz

Field experiments were conducted to determine the influence of growth stage on tolerance of seeded tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentumMill.) and of eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthumDun. #3SOLPT) to the sodium salt of acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid} at low use rates. Tomatoes as young as the 2 true-leaf stage exhibited some tolerance to acifluorfen at rates of 0.14 kg ae/ha and less. Rates of 0.28 and 0.56 kg/ha caused increased phytotoxicity; however, yield was not greatly reduced. At the 8-leaf stage, foliar injury was slight and existed only at the highest rates tested; however, tomato yields were reduced. Control of black nightshade at the 2-leaf stage was acceptable at rates as low as 0.14 kg/ha. When nightshade was at the 5-leaf stage, 0.28 and 0.56 kg/ha rates provided acceptable control − 87% and 96%, respectively. Nightshade in the 10-leaf stage was not controlled effectively at rates below 0.56 kg/ha.


HortScience ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1132b-1132
Author(s):  
Milton E. McGiffen ◽  
John B. Masiunas ◽  
Morris G. Huck

Eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) and black (Solanum nigrum) nightshade are difficult to control in tomato, interfering with harvest and decreasing fruit quality and yield. In irrigated tomatoes, soil water depletion was greater as nightshade density increased. However, tomato yield loss due to black nightshade was greatest at the lower weed densities. As density increases, photosynthetic activity (photosynthetic rates, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration, and stomatal resistance) of black nightshade is more affected than eastern black nightshade. Photosynthetic activity of tomato is the least affected. In greenhouse experiments where water was denied for approximately a week prior to measurement, tomatoes were more sensitive to water stress than were nightshades. Nightshades were more adapted to drought stress than were tomatoes.


1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D. Gaynor ◽  
A.S. Hamill ◽  
D.C. MacTavish

Metolachlor was evaluated for annual grass and eastern black nightshade (Solarium ptycanthum Dun.) control in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Metolachlor applied preplant incorporated provided excellent (> 88%) control of annual grasses and eastern black nightshade. The metolachlor, metribuzin plus trifluralin tank mix applied preplant and incorporated into the soil provided better annual grass and eastern black nightshade control than the metolachlor plus metribuzin tank mix in two of three years. Nonincorporated and posttransplant treatments of metolachlor provided good annual grass control but failed to control eastern black nightshade. Tomato yield in all herbicide treatments was similar to that from hand weeded controls. Metolachlor dissipated from the soil throughout the growing season so that at the time of harvest <10% of that applied was recovered. Metolachlor residues in the fruit were hydrolyzed to deacylated (CGA 37913) or hydrolyzed conjugated (CGA 49751) metolachlor metabolizes. Analyses of extracts from treated fruits were found to be less than the detection limit of 50 ppb in the whole fruit harvested from selected metolachlor treatments. Chemical names used: 2-chloro-N -(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N -(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) acetamide (metolachlor); 2,6-dinitro-N,N -dipropyl-4-(trifluromethyl)benzenamine (trifluralin); 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-tlriazin-5(4H)-one (metribuzin); 2-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)amino-1-propanol (CGA 37913); 4-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-morphol. inone (CGA 49751).


1987 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Teasdale

A non-linear dose-response model was used to analyze the response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumMill.) and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthumDun. #3SOLPT) to acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid}, fluoroglycofen {carboxymethyl 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoate}, fomesafen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-N-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzamide}, and lactofen {(±)-2-ethoxy-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoate}. The relative potency of these herbicides to both species was lactofen > fluoroglycofen > fomesafen > acifluorfen. Tomato was significantly more resistant to acifluorfen, fluoroglycofen, and lactofen than was eastern black nightshade, but there was no significant difference between species in response to fomesafen. At the rate required to reduce tomato weight by 10%, eastern black nightshade weight was reduced 48, 32, 20, and 5% by acifluorfen, fluoroglycofen, lactofen, and fomesafen, respectively.


HortScience ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 2076-2079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard G. Greenland ◽  
Kirk A. Howatt

Nightshade species are difficult to control in tomato production and their interference reduces both tomato yield and quality. Rimsulfuron can be used to control nightshades, but species and biotypes vary in their response to rimsulfuron. The objectives of this study were to evaluate control of hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides Sendt.) and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum Dun.) by rimsulfuron and compare North Dakota eastern black nightshade accession response to three acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibitor herbicides. In field studies conducted at Oakes, N. Dak., rimsulfuron at rates of 26 or 53 g·ha–1 a.i. was applied within 1 week after transplanting tomato (EPOST) or 2 to 4 weeks after transplanting (POST). Rimsulfuron gave excellent control of hairy nightshade when applied POST, and poor to excellent control when applied EPOST, with control being much better when hairy nightshade had emerged before the EPOST application. Rimsulfuron at 53 g·ha–1 provided greater control than at 26 g·ha–1 only for the EPOST applications. Rimsulfuron controlled hairy nightshade which allowed eastern black nightshade (which was not controlled by rimsulfuron) to dominate tomato. Tomato yield was lower when dominated by hairy nightshade than by eastern black nightshade. This was due to the earlier emergence and faster growth of hairy nightshade compared to eastern black nightshade. Tomato yield was higher in the hand-weeded check than for all other treatments in 1999, the only year the hand-weeded check was included in the study. Greenhouse studies on plants grown from seed collected at the experimental site verified that eastern black nightshade was tolerant to rimsulfuron but was controlled by tribenuron and imazethapyr. Rimsulfuron can be used in tomato production to control hairy nightshade, but not the accession of eastern black nightshade found in this study. Chemical names used: N-((4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl)-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinesulfonamide (rimsulfuron); (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N dipropyl-p-toluidine) (trifluralin); methyl 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl–1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)methylamino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoate (tribenuron methyl); (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo–1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid (imazethapyr).


Weed Science ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Yeon Yu ◽  
John B. Masiunas

Acifluorfen tolerance in eastern black nightshade somaclones was characterized in two experiments. One experiment determined the involvement of absorption, translocation, and metabolism in acifluorfen tolerance. Less than 6% of the applied14C-acifluorfen was absorbed. There were no differences in acifluorfen absorption between susceptible and tolerant somaclones. More14C-acifluorfen was translocated in the susceptible than the tolerant somaclones. The susceptible somaclone did not metabolize acifluorfen while some somaclones (i.e., EBN-3A) metabolized14C-acifluorfen. A second experiment determined the tolerance of the somaclones to oxyfluorfen, diquat, and paraquat Most acifluorfen-tolerant somaclones were tolerant to oxyfluorfen but were susceptible to diquat and paraquat One somaclone, EBN-3A, was extremely tolerant to acifluorfen, paraquat, and diquat.


Weed Science ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie D. Milliman ◽  
Dean E. Riechers ◽  
Loyd M. Wax ◽  
F. William Simmons

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document