Survival of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) seed in four environments

Weed Science ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail A. Wicks
Keyword(s):  
Great Plains ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Winter Precipitation ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Downy Brome ◽  
Smooth Brome ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Chemical Fallow ◽  
Germinable Seed

Downy brome is one of the most troublesome winter annual weeds in winter wheat-fallow rotations in the central Great Plains. A 3-yr seed burial study was initiated to determine how long downy brome seed remained germinable when placed on the soil surface or 2.5 cm deep at four different times in four environments. Only 1 to 7% of the downy brome seed survived after 1 yr on the soil surface in chemical fallow and stubble mulch when deposited in August, but survival varied in September, October, and November. In 1970, a year with low fall and winter precipitation, 36 to 46% of the seed placed on the soil surface of chemical fallow in September, October, and November survived, compared with 1 to 8% for stubble mulch tillage. Early spring tillage covered more seed with soil, and downy brome seed survival decreased. When fall and winter precipitation was normal, stubble mulch and chemical fallow had 1 to 20% germinable seed remaining. Induced dormancy existed in some years. More downy brome seed survived when placed on the soil surface of crested wheatgrass sod (14 to 50%) than on smooth brome sod (0 to 36%). No differences existed among environments when downy brome seed was buried 2.5 cm deep. Only 0.4% of downy brome seed buried 2.5 cm survived after 1 yr when averaged across all environments.

Interference of Annual Weeds in Seedling Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Weed Science ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert J. Fischer ◽  
Jean H. Dawson ◽  
Arnold P. Appleby
Keyword(s):  
Medicago Sativa ◽  
Bromus Tectorum ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Amaranthus Retroflexus ◽  
Downy Brome ◽  
Weed Interference ◽  
Alfalfa Hay ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Annual Weeds

Barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli(L.) Beauv. #4ECHCG] and pigweeds (mixture ofAmaranthus retroflexusL. # AMARE andA. powelliiS. Wats. # AMAPO) seeded separately with alfalfa (Medicago sativaL.) in mid-August suppressed alfalfa severely before frost killed them in October and November. Some alfalfa was killed, and yield of alfalfa forage was reduced in each of three harvests the following year. These weeds did not harm alfalfa seeded in mid-September. Downy brome (Bromus tectorumL. # BROTE) and tumble mustard (Sisymbrium altissimumL. # SSYAL) suppressed alfalfa seeded in August and September. They reduced alfalfa stands and reduced yield of alfalfa forage in each of three harvests the following year. Alfalfa seeded August 27 and allowed to compete with a mixture of these species for various periods was injured most by weeds that emerged with the alfalfa and remained uncontrolled until forage harvest in May. These weeds did not reduce alfalfa yields if removed by 36 days after alfalfa emergence. Thereafter, yield decreased as the period of weed interference increased. Interference was most damaging in early spring, when growth of winter annual weeds was rapid and vigorous. Weeds seeded 65 or more days after alfalfa emergence did not reduce alfalfa yields but sometimes produced enough biomass to reduce the quality of the first-cutting alfalfa hay.

Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum), Jointed Goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) and Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Fallow

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen F. Wiese ◽  
Clay D. Salisbury ◽  
Brent W. Bean
Keyword(s):  
Great Plains ◽  
Conservation Tillage ◽  
Conyza Canadensis ◽  
Downy Brome ◽  
Optimum Conditions ◽  
Aegilops Cylindrica ◽  
Southern Great Plains ◽  
Jointed Goatgrass ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Annual Weeds

Jointed goatgrass, downy brome, and horseweed are increasingly troublesome winter annual weeds during fallow periods in conservation-tillage systems in the southern Great Plains. These experiments determined the optimum weed size, vigor, and minimum herbicide rate required for 95% or better control of these weeds on fallow land. Jointed goatgrass and downy brome were controlled best when plants were 10 cm or less tall and growing vigorously at time of treatment. Horseweed was controlled best when plants were 30 cm tall and growing vigorously. Based on local retail and application costs and assuming optimum conditions for control, the two most economical herbicide treatments that controlled each weed 95% or better were: jointed goatgrass, clethodim at 250 g ai/ha and glyphosate + 2,4-D at 249 + 479 g ae/ha; downy brome, quizalofop at 18 g ai/ha and glyphosate + 2,4-D at 582 + 950 g ae/ha; and horseweed, 2,4-D at 560 g ae/ha and metsulfuron at 5 g ai/ha.

Fall and Spring Preplant Herbicide Applications Influence Spring Emergence of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis)

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vince M. Davis ◽  
Greg R. Kruger ◽  
Bryan G. Young ◽  
William G. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Early Spring ◽  
Late Spring ◽  
Conyza Canadensis ◽  
No Till ◽  
Early Fall ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Spring Emergence ◽  
Residual Control

Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) is a common weed in no-till crop production systems. It is problematic because of the frequent occurrence of biotypes resistant to glyphosate and acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides and its ability to complete its life cycle as a winter or summer annual weed. Tactics to control horseweed while controlling other winter annual weeds routinely fail; herbicide application timing and spring emergence patterns of horseweed may be responsible. The objectives of this experiment were to (1) determine the influence of fall and spring herbicides with and without soil residual horseweed activity on spring-emerging glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed density and (2) evaluate the efficacy and persistence of saflufenacil on GR horseweed. Field studies were conducted in southern Indiana and Illinois from fall 2006 to summer 2007 and repeated in 2007 to 2008. Six preplant herbicide treatments were applied at four application timings: early fall, late fall, early spring, and late spring. Horseweed plants were counted every 2 wk following the first spring application until the first week of July. Horseweed almost exclusively emerged in the spring at both locations. Spring horseweed emergence was higher when 2,4-D + glyphosate was fall-applied and controlled other winter annual weeds. With fall-applied 2,4-D + glyphosate, over 90% of the peak horseweed density was observed before April 25. In contrast, only 25% of the peak horseweed density was observed in the untreated check by April 25. Starting from the initiation of horseweed emergence in late March, chlorimuron + tribenuron applied early fall or early spring, and spring-applied saflufenacil at 100 g ai/ha provided greater than 90% horseweed control for 12 wk. Early spring–applied saflufenacil at 50 g ai/ha provided 8 wk of greater than 90% residual control, and early spring–applied simazine provided 6 wk of greater than 90% control. When applied in late spring, saflufenacil was the only herbicide treatment that reduced horseweed densities by greater than 90% compared to 2,4-D + glyphosate. We concluded from this research that fall applications of nonresidual herbicides can increase the rate and density of spring emerging horseweed. In addition, spring-applied saflufenacil provides no-till producers with a new preplant herbicide for foliar and residual control of glyphosate- and ALS-resistant horseweed.

scholarly journals Seed retention of winter annual grass weeds at winter wheat harvest maturity shows potential for harvest weed seed control

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 266-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeta Soni ◽  
Scott J. Nissen ◽  
Philip Westra ◽  
Jason K. Norsworthy ◽  
Michael J. Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Great Plains ◽  
Downy Brome ◽  
Annual Grass ◽  
Weed Seed ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Jointed Goatgrass ◽  
Seed Retention ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Feral Rye

AbstractDowny brome, feral rye, and jointed goatgrass are problematic winter annual grasses in central Great Plains winter wheat production. Integrated control strategies are needed to manage winter annual grasses and reduce selection pressure exerted on these weed populations by the limited herbicide options currently available. Harvest weed-seed control (HWSC) methods aim to remove or destroy weed seeds, thereby reducing seed-bank enrichment at crop harvest. An added advantage is the potential to reduce herbicide-resistant weed seeds that are more likely to be present at harvest, thereby providing a nonchemical resistance-management strategy. Our objective was to assess the potential for HWSC of winter annual grass weeds in winter wheat by measuring seed retention at harvest and destruction percentage in an impact mill. During 2015 and 2016, 40 wheat fields in eastern Colorado were sampled. Seed retention was quantified and compared per weed species by counting seed retained above the harvested fraction of the wheat upper canopy (15 cm and above), seed retained below 15 cm, and shattered seed on the soil surface at wheat harvest. A stand-mounted impact mill device was used to determine the percent seed destruction of grass weed species in processed wheat chaff. Averaged across both years, seed retention (±SE) was 75% ± 2.9%, 90% ± 1.7%, and 76% ± 4.3% for downy brome, feral rye, and jointed goatgrass, respectively. Seed retention was most variable for downy brome, because 59% of the samples had at least 75% seed retention, whereas the proportions for feral rye and jointed goatgrass samples with at least 75% seed retention were 93% and 70%, respectively. Weed seed destruction percentages were at least 98% for all three species. These results suggest HWSC could be implemented as an integrated strategy for winter annual grass management in central Great Plains winter wheat cropping systems.

Buckwheat Residue Effects on Emergence and Growth of Weeds in Winter-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping Systems

Weed Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virender Kumar ◽  
Daniel C. Brainard ◽  
Robin R. Bellinder ◽  
Russell R. Hahn
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Cropping Systems ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Bare Soil ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds

Field and pot studies were conducted in Central New York to determine the potential weed-management benefits of a buckwheat cover crop grown before winter wheat. Specific objectives were to determine buckwheat residue effects on (1) emergence and growth of winter annual weeds; (2) wheat establishment and yield; and (3) emergence of summer annual weeds in the spring following overwinter seed burial. In a field study, buckwheat was sown at two timings (July or August), mowed, and either incorporated or left on the soil surface. Winter wheat was drilled into buckwheat residue in September and weed and crop growth were monitored. In a complementary pot study, four winter annual weeds were sown in soil removed from buckwheat and bare-soil plots at 0 or 15 d after incorporation and monitored for emergence and early growth. To assess buckwheat residue effects on spring emergence from overwintering seeds, seeds of three weed species were buried in buckwheat residue and bare-soil plots in the fall, exhumed in April, and evaluated for emergence. To investigate the mechanism for possible effects of buckwheat residue on overwintering seeds, two levels each of seed treatment (none or fungicide) and fertilization (none or 170 kg ha−1) were applied before burial. Buckwheat residue had no negative effect on wheat yields but suppressed emergence (22 to 72%) and growth (0 to 95%) of winter annual weeds, although effects were often small and inconsistent. Buckwheat residue had no effect on the emergence of buried weed seeds in spring. However, fungicide treatment enhanced the emergence of Powell amaranth seeds by 12.5 to 25.5% and of barnyardgrass seeds by 0 to 12%. Our results suggest that buckwheat residue can contribute to weed management in wheat cropping systems, but that further studies investigating the mechanistic basis for the inconsistent selective effects of buckwheat residue on weeds are needed before buckwheat use can be optimized.

Implications of late fall and early spring 2,4-D applications on subsequent canola production on Black, Dark Brown and Gray Wooded Soil

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 699-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Kirkland
Keyword(s):  
Weed Management ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Brassica Napus L ◽  
Green Seed ◽  
Late Fall ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Fall Application ◽  
Made In

Late fall or early spring application of 2,4-D to control winter annual weeds prior to canola has not been recommended as the herbicidal effects on canola growth and development on varying soil types are not well defined. 2,4-D was applied to Black, Dark Brown and Gray Wooded soils located in west-central and northwest Saskatchewan. Applications were made in the fall and early spring prior to planting Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L. canola from 1992 to 1994 at the recommended (0.42 kg ha−1) and twice the recommended rate. The rate of 2,4-D applied had no effect on canola plant population, pods per plant, yield, green seed, chlorophyll, kernel or test weight. Application of 2,4-D in the fall had no effect on any variable while spring application reduced plant stands and increased green content but had no effect on pod production, yield or chlorophyll content. Late fall application of 2,4-D prior to canola in rotation should be recognized as a valuable addition to weed management in canola, particularly when direct seeding is practised. Key words: Canola, 2,4-D, soil residual, injury

Post-harvest Management of Tobacco Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Overwintering in Peanut Fields

1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Chamberlin ◽  
J. W. Todd ◽  
A. K. Culbreath ◽  
W. C. Johnson ◽  
J. W. Demski
Keyword(s):  
Early Spring ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Harvest Management ◽  
Post Harvest ◽  
Peanut Crop ◽  
Survival And Reproduction ◽  
Tobacco Thrips ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds

A combination of fallow tillage and a March application of carbofuran were assessed as tactics for decreasing survival and reproduction of tobacco thrips overwintering in six harvested peanut fields. Large numbers of tobacco thrips, Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), developed in three fields on volunteer peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., and winter annual weeds. Adult tobacco thrips collected during the late winter were predominantly brachypterous, with percent brachyptery averaging 71–95% for females. Brachypterous adults tended to be more abundant in fields harvested in September than in those harvested in October. Disking during November and February greatly reduced the density of volunteer peanut and winter annual weeds but did not measurably decrease abundance of brachypterous tobacco thrips. Carbofuran application reduced abundance of brachypterous adults and thrips larvae on volunteer peanut by 85–100% during the early spring. Post-harvest tillage and carbofuran application did not measurably reduce incidence of tomato spotted wilt virus in the subsequent peanut crop. Implications for winter ecology and management of spotted wilt are discussed.

Preplant and Residual Herbicide Application Timings for Weed Control in No-Till Soybean

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt M. Vollmer ◽  
Mark J. VanGessel ◽  
Quintin R. Johnson ◽  
Barbara A. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Emergence Period ◽  
No Till ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Residual Herbicide ◽  
Application Programs

AbstractTimely herbicide applications for no-till soybean can be challenging given the diverse communities of both winter and summer annual weeds that are often present. Research was conducted to compare various approaches for nonselective and preplant weed control for no-till soybean. Nonselective herbicide application timings of fall (with and without a residual herbicide) followed by early-spring (4 wk before planting), late-spring (1 to 2 wk before planting), or sequential-spring applications (4 wk before planting and at planting) were compared. Spring applications also included a residual herbicide. For consistent control of winter annual weeds, two herbicide applications were needed, either a fall application followed by a spring application or sequential-spring applications. When a fall herbicide application did not include a residual herbicide, greater winter annual weed control resulted from early- or sequential-spring treatments. However, application timings that effectively controlled winter annual weeds did not effectively control summer annual weeds that have a prolonged emergence period. Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass control at 4 wk after planting was better when the spring residual treatment (chlorimuron plus metribuzin) was applied 1 to 2 wk before planting or at planting, compared with 4 wk before planting. Results indicate that in order to optimize control, herbicide application programs in soybean should coincide with seasonal growth cycles of winter and summer annual weeds.

Effects of Seedling Emergence Timing on the Population Dynamics of Horseweed (Conyza canadensisvar.canadensis)

Weed Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Tozzi ◽  
R. C. Van Acker
Keyword(s):  
Seedling Emergence ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Higher Plant ◽  
Southern Ontario ◽  
Plant Densities ◽  
Early Fall ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Dependent Growth ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Spring Emergence

Horseweed is a surface-germinating ruderal facultative winter annual. The ruderal nature is a key adaptive characteristic that implicates emergence timing as an important recruitment factor. Experiments were established at three sites in southern Ontario, Canada, from 2009 to 2012 to determine the possible effect of emergence timing of horseweed on plant number, fecundity, and flowering timing. Emerged seedlings were tagged in 0.25-m2plots in five 2-wk cohorts in the fall and spring of each experimental season. Each plot was followed though until the plants contained within each plot completed their life cycle. Generally, spring-emerging plants were found to flower earlier than fall-emerging plants, but with fall emergence there were higher plant densities in August each season compared with spring emergence. Overall, there was no difference in fecundity between spring- or fall-emerging cohorts, but when cohorts were parsed beyond just spring or fall emergence, we found that plants emerging in early fall and early spring were more fecund and flowered earlier than plants emerging in late fall and late spring. Disturbance (tilled versus not-tilled) significantly affected emergence levels but not emergence timing. The differences in performance among emergence cohorts are likely due to spatial or temporal density-dependent growth advantages. These results show that spring-emerging cohorts of horseweed, especially early spring–emerging cohorts, should not be discounted when considering the weediness of this species, and this may hold true for other facultative winter annual weeds as well.

Hairy buttercup and cutleaf evening-primrose control using halauxifen-methyl based programs in Mississippi and Oklahoma winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
J. Connor Ferguson ◽  
Misha R. Manuchehri ◽  
Justin S. Calhoun ◽  
Justin T. Childers ◽  
Luke H. Merritt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Great Plains ◽  
Acetolactate Synthase ◽  
Evening Primrose ◽  
Southern Great Plains ◽  
Synthetic Auxin ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Sites Of Action ◽  
Annual Weeds

Hairy buttercup and cutleaf evening-primrose are winter annual weeds that have become more problematic for winter wheat growers in the Southern Great Plains and the Mid-Southern United States in recent years. Little research exists to base recommendations for controlling hairy buttercup in wheat, and little research has been published on cutleaf evening-primrose control in recent years. With growing concerns of increased herbicide resistance among winter annual weeds, incorporating new herbicide sites of action has become necessary. The objective of this study was to assess halauxifen-methyl as a novel herbicide to control these two problematic winter annual broadleaf weeds in winter wheat in Mississippi and Oklahoma. Studies were conducted across four site-years in Mississippi and one site-year in Oklahoma comparing fifteen herbicide programs with and without halauxifen-methyl. Hairy buttercup and cutleaf evening-primrose control was the greatest when a synthetic auxin was combined with an acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicide. Treatments including halauxifen-methyl resulted in the greatest control of hairy buttercup, whereas a synthetic auxin herbicide plus chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron resulted in the greatest control of cutleaf evening-primrose. Halauxifen-methyl is an effective addition for control of winter annual broadleaf weeds like hairy buttercup and cutleaf evening-primrose in winter wheat.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document