Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction

Paleobiology ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Raup

Benthic ecologists have successfully applied rarefaction techniques to the problem of compensating for the effect of sample size on apparent species diversity (= species richness). The same method can be used in studies of diversity at higher taxonomic levels (families and orders) in the fossil record where samples represent world-wide distributions of species or genera over long periods of geologic time.Application of rarefaction to several large samples of post-Paleozoic echinoids (totaling 7,911 species) confirms the utility of the method. Rarefaction shows that the observed increase in the number of echinoid families since the Paleozoic is real in the sense that it cannot be explained solely by the increase in numbers of preserved species. There has been no statistically significant increase in the number of families since mid-Cretaceous, however. At the order level, echinoid diversity may have been nearly constant since late Triassic or early Jurassic.

Paleobiology ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl F. Koch

The published fossil record has significant bias in favor of common and biostratigraphically important taxa when compared with data obtained from a thorough examination of several hundred collections from the Western Interior of North America. Overall species diversity is underestimated by a factor of 3 to 4, and bivalve and gastropod diversity by a factor of 5. The proportion of bivalves increased from 40 to 56% of the fauna, and the proportion of ammonites decreased from 28 to 18%. Thirteen published reports listed 65 species from 203 reported occurrences. Data from all sources showed 170 species for 1050 occurrences. By using abundance data and assuming a log-normal distribution, as many as 200 fossilizable mollusc species may have inhabited the Western Interior during the uppermost biozone of the Cenomanian. The importance of this study is that it quantifies the bias in the published fossil record relative to the potential fossil record for an unusually well studied interval of geologic time. The bias would be greater for less well studied strata.


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Julius

The understanding of diatom evolution has progressed greatly over the last two decades. Existing data sets have been reanalyzed, new data sets have been generated, and new tools have been employed. Hindering progress is the seemingly endless number of diatom species remaining to be described and relative small number of investigators active in the field. This problem is further confounded by the dramatic reorganization of generic level classification in the group. Despite these problems, many conclusions can be made about prior hypotheses concerning the group's development. Most notably, the origin of the diatoms can be bracketed between the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic using fossil record and molecular clock estimates. This combination of techniques has also provided consensus and clarification to the origin and duration of specific lineages enhancing our understanding of the group's diversification, early ecology, and evolutionary relationships.


1984 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 32-47
Author(s):  
Farish A. Jenkins

The origin of mammals, often treated as a discrete but obscure event that took place sometime between the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic, can also be viewed as the product of many transitions - from the early synapsid radiations during the Pennsylvanian and Early Permian through the emergence of placentals and marsupials in the Cretaceous (see Hopson, 1969). A fundamental dichotomy appeared early in the evolution of amniotes; sauropsids (represented today by living reptiles and birds) constituted one lineage, synapsids (which includes the mammal-like reptiles- pelycosaurs and therapsids- and their mammalian descendants) the other. Thus, mammalian ancestry may be traced to pelycosaurs that first appear in the fossil record as part of the earliest known reptilian fauna (Carroll, 1982). And mammalian bony and dental structures continued to undergo substantial modification throughout the Mesozoic, long after the appearance of forms technically classified as Mammalia. Given these phylogenetic changes, the suggestion that there occurred a point when mammals “originated” seems simplistic. Yet the major evolutionary stages may still be evaluated with the purpose of identifying the inception of features and functions basic to the radiation of modern mammals. Accordingly, this survey summarizes our current understanding of the evolution of mammals with full acknowledgment that an account of mammalian origins has neither a definitive beginning nor a climactic end.


Paleobiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Indrė Žliobaitė ◽  
Mikael Fortelius

Abstract We know that the fossil record is incomplete. But how incomplete? Here we very coarsely estimate the completeness of the mammalian record in the Miocene, assuming that the duration of a mammalian species is about 1 Myr and the species diversity has stayed constant and is structurally comparable to the taxonomic diversity today. The overall completeness under these assumptions appears to be around 4%, but there are large differences across taxonomic groups. We find that the fossil record of proboscideans and perissodactyls as we know it for the Miocene must be close to complete, while we might know less than 15% of the species of artiodactyl or carnivore fossil species and only about 1% of primate species of the Miocene. The record of small mammals appears much less complete than that of large mammals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 887-905
Author(s):  
Masateru Shibata ◽  
David J. Varricchio

AbstractA locality in the Upper Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation of Montana preserves abundant and variable horseshoe crab tracks and trails of the ichnotaxon Kouphichnium isp. These specimens span six morphologies differing in track form and trail configuration. These differences likely reflect variations in track-maker locomotion and behavior, substrate consistency, epichnial versus hypichnial preservation, and undertrack versus true tracks. Several tracks preserve the first clear appendage impressions for an extinct horseshoe crab. This discovery adds new information to the fossil horseshoe crab diversity in the Cretaceous Period. Trackway dimensions, such as the external width across the pusher legs or of the prosomal drag mark, provide information on the track-maker size. Most trackways correspond with crabs 9–14 cm wide; the abundance but limited size range of the traces suggests the large assemblage corresponds to a mating aggregation. The trace fossil record of xiphosurids indicates that throughout their history, horseshoe crabs inhabited both marine and nonmarine settings. They were definitively present in freshwater habitats from the lower Carboniferous through at least the Paleogene. Horseshoe crab trace abundance is highest from the upper Carboniferous through the Jurassic and likely reflects two factors: true upper Carboniferous taxonomic diversity and a preponderance of suitable sites for trackway preservation in the Late Triassic and Jurassic. Cretaceous traces are uncommon, and this Two Medicine locality is the first occurrence of horseshoe crab traces in the Late Cretaceous worldwide. Overall, track abundance and diversity would seem to correspond well with the reported horseshoe crab body fossil record.


Author(s):  
Stephen L. Brusatte ◽  
Michael J. Benton ◽  
Graeme T. Lloyd ◽  
Marcello Ruta ◽  
Steve C. Wang

ABSTRACTThe rise of archosaurs during the Triassic and Early Jurassic has been treated as a classic example of an evolutionary radiation in the fossil record. This paper reviews published studies and provides new data on archosaur lineage origination, diversity and lineage evolution, morphological disparity, rates of morphological character change, and faunal abundance during the Triassic–Early Jurassic. The fundamental archosaur lineages originated early in the Triassic, in concert with the highest rates of character change. Disparity and diversity peaked later, during the Norian, but the most significant increase in disparity occurred before maximum diversity. Archosaurs were rare components of Early–Middle Triassic faunas, but were more abundant in the Late Triassic and pre-eminent globally by the Early Jurassic. The archosaur radiation was a drawn-out event and major components such as diversity and abundance were discordant from each other. Crurotarsans (crocodile-line archosaurs) were more disparate, diverse, and abundant than avemetatarsalians (bird-line archosaurs, including dinosaurs) during the Late Triassic, but these roles were reversed in the Early Jurassic. There is no strong evidence that dinosaurs outcompeted or gradually eclipsed crurotarsans during the Late Triassic. Instead, crurotarsan diversity decreased precipitously by the end-Triassic extinction, which helped usher in the age of dinosaurian dominance.


1985 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Smith ◽  
T. H. Tranter

AbstractA new and well-preserved.asteroid, Protremaster uniserialis (gen. & sp.nov.) is described from the Lower Jurassic (Sinemurian) of Antarctica. This find extends the fossil record of the family Asterinidae and the subfamily Tremasterinae considerably and lends support to the idea that asteroids underwent an important morphological diversification in the late Triassic-early Jurassic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 294 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-142
Author(s):  
Helmut Keupp

Two cone-shaped Early Jurassic (Late Pliensbachian) chitino-phosphatic fossils are described from a clay pit near Buttenheim (northern Bavaria, Germany). The chemical composition and microstructure of their black wall corresponds partially with that of Palaeozoic presumed scyphopolyps like conulariids and the genus Byronia Matthew, 1899 and show similarities with the circular periderm tube of the modern Stephanoscyphus. A possible relationship to other chitino-phosphatic fossils, like inarticulate brachiopods or anaptychi of ammonites, is excluded. The presence of growth-lines on the tube surface further excludes an interpretation as remains of ecdysozoa (e. g., arthropods). Accordingly, the new findings are assigned to scyphozoan polyps representing a new family Liaporidae, with Liapora neubigi n. g. et n. sp. The new Early Jurassic scyphozoan genus Liopora shortens the gap in the fossil record between the so far youngest known conulariids from the Late Triassic and modern thecate scyphopolyps (Coronatae).


1992 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 189-189
Author(s):  
Spencer G. Lucas ◽  
Adrian P. Hunt

A comprehensive review of the stratigraphic and geographic distribution of the advanced, non-mammalian cynodonts (traversodontids, tritylodontids and tritheledontids) and the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic mammals indicates that: (1) traversodontids were a wholly Triassic group that disappeared during the Rhaetian; during the late Carnian-early Norian they were rare but widespread components of Pangaean land-vertebrate faunas; (2) tritylodontids first appeared in Europe during the Rhaetian, were a cosmopolitan group by the Sinemurian/Pliensbachian and disappeared during the Bathonian; (3) tritheledontids ranged in age from late Carnian to Sinemurian/Pliensbachian and were mostly a New World group; and (4) the oldest mammal is of late Carnian age from West Texas, but there is at least a 10-million-year gap between it and the next oldest mammals from the late Norian of Europe.Advanced cynodont and mammalian distributions of the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic do not suggest Late Triassic paleoprovinciality, but they do support the notion of a cosmopolitan vertebrate fauna during the Sinemurian/Pliensbachian. Proponents of a tritylodontid ancestry of mammals must explain away a 15-million-year-long absence of tritylodontids from the Late Triassic fossil record. In contrast, proponents of a tritheledontid ancestry of mammals need offer no such explanation since tritheledontids and mammals appeared simultaneously during the late Carnian.


2014 ◽  
Vol 281 (1791) ◽  
pp. 20141147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Barrett ◽  
Richard J. Butler ◽  
Roland Mundil ◽  
Torsten M. Scheyer ◽  
Randall B. Irmis ◽  
...  

Current characterizations of early dinosaur evolution are incomplete: existing palaeobiological and phylogenetic scenarios are based on a fossil record dominated by saurischians and the implications of the early ornithischian record are often overlooked. Moreover, the timings of deep phylogenetic divergences within Dinosauria are poorly constrained owing to the absence of a rigorous chronostratigraphical framework for key Late Triassic–Early Jurassic localities. A new dinosaur from the earliest Jurassic of the Venezuelan Andes is the first basal ornithischian recovered from terrestrial deposits directly associated with a precise radioisotopic date and the first-named dinosaur from northern South America. It expands the early palaeogeographical range of Ornithischia to palaeoequatorial regions, an area sometimes thought to be devoid of early dinosaur taxa, and offers insights into early dinosaur growth rates, the evolution of sociality and the rapid tempo of the global dinosaur radiation following the end-Triassic mass extinction, helping to underscore the importance of the ornithischian record in broad-scale discussions of early dinosaur history.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document