Replication research in L2 listening comprehension: A conceptual replication of Graham & Macaro (2008) and an approximate replication of Vandergrift & Tafaghodtari (2010) and Brett (1997)

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Vandergrift ◽  
Jeremy Cross

Most recent publications related to listening comprehension research deal with listening strategy instruction, metacognitive instruction or multimedia applications. This paper discusses one study from each of these three domains – Graham & Macaro (2008), Vandergrift & Tafaghodtari (2010) and Brett (1997) – and presents the need and possibilities for replication, along with a few minor, but interesting, variations that could help test the robustness of the original study. After providing some background to each of the three domains, we overview the respective studies and propose approaches to replication (both approximate and conceptual) along with the accompanying benefits.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naheen Madarbakus

<p><b>The ephemeral nature of listening makes it challenging to teach and learn as a language skill. One approach to addressing this challenge is to focus on listening strategy instruction. This thesis investigates process-based metacognitive instruction in a pre-sessional English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programme at a New Zealand university using two research methods: a situation analysis (Phase 1) and a quasi-experimental study (Phase 2). </b></p> <p>The Phase 1 situation analysis investigated teacher and learner perspectives and practices in teaching and learning listening in the programme. Data consisted of a survey, focus groups with learners, interviews with teachers, and classroom observations. The findings revealed that the teachers (n=15) give equal time to teaching all four skills, although they find listening to be the most difficult skill to teach. The teachers are guided by a three-stage approach when using the listening textbook and supplementary materials. However, they find selecting supplementary materials time-consuming and problematic. The teachers also prioritised using metacognitive and vocabulary-based activities but expressed a need for more guidance in using perception activities (e.g., distinguishing word boundaries) in listening lessons. The learners (n=63) reported being positive about their listening in general but were not confident listeners. They preferred audio-visual and entertainment resources to audio-only and factual resources when listening. They reported an awareness of metacognitive (e.g., planning and evaluation and directed attention) and vocabulary-based (e.g., mental translation and problem solving) strategies. In lessons, the learners believed that product-based activities (e.g., comprehension questions) were more helpful than process-based activities (e.g., listening journals) for their listening improvement. These findings indicate the teachers and learners have some awareness of metacognitive instruction but further guidance in using process-based listening frameworks could help address learners’ difficulties. </p> <p>Phase 2 used a quasi-experimental design to investigate the impact of a TED Talks-based metacognitive intervention on the learners’ use of listening strategies. The intervention consisted of five TED Talks-based listening lessons delivered in two modes; either self-study (n=13) or classroom instruction (n=11). A third group, a control group (n=9), received regular listening instruction but did not receive any TED Talks-based metacognitive strategy instruction. Data were collected via surveys, focus group interviews, and journal data and analysed using inferential statistics. The results showed that the self-study group showed meaningful gains in one strategy subscale (planning and evaluation). Although this gain was more than the other groups, there was minimal change. Further, only the classroom instruction group showed meaningful gains in before-listening and listening behaviour, although these gains were marginal. After receiving different types of metacognitive instruction, the results showed both the classroom instruction and self-study group approached their listening differently but identified the same listening difficulties. Both groups found resource familiarity helpful for their listening comprehension, but had difficulties using visual aids, taking notes, and understanding the speaker while-listening. Thus, although metacognitive instruction had a minimal impact on the use of listening strategies by learners, guided listening resource selections helped them interact with the listening text. </p> <p>This thesis presents theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical implications for research. Theoretically, the research contributes to our understanding of how theoretically derived accounts of the L2 listening process can be translated into instructional models. Methodologically, the thesis highlights how established research methods (i.e., quasi-experimental study, situation analysis) can be complemented by listening-specific research instruments (e.g., listening journals) which provide a richer emic perspective on the topic being investigated. Pedagogically, this thesis has shown how TED Talks can be selected using McGrath’s guiding principles (Field, 2008) and Romanelli, Cain, and McNamara’s (2014) Essential Aspects and used as the basis for process-based listening lessons.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naheen Madarbakus

<p><b>The ephemeral nature of listening makes it challenging to teach and learn as a language skill. One approach to addressing this challenge is to focus on listening strategy instruction. This thesis investigates process-based metacognitive instruction in a pre-sessional English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programme at a New Zealand university using two research methods: a situation analysis (Phase 1) and a quasi-experimental study (Phase 2). </b></p> <p>The Phase 1 situation analysis investigated teacher and learner perspectives and practices in teaching and learning listening in the programme. Data consisted of a survey, focus groups with learners, interviews with teachers, and classroom observations. The findings revealed that the teachers (n=15) give equal time to teaching all four skills, although they find listening to be the most difficult skill to teach. The teachers are guided by a three-stage approach when using the listening textbook and supplementary materials. However, they find selecting supplementary materials time-consuming and problematic. The teachers also prioritised using metacognitive and vocabulary-based activities but expressed a need for more guidance in using perception activities (e.g., distinguishing word boundaries) in listening lessons. The learners (n=63) reported being positive about their listening in general but were not confident listeners. They preferred audio-visual and entertainment resources to audio-only and factual resources when listening. They reported an awareness of metacognitive (e.g., planning and evaluation and directed attention) and vocabulary-based (e.g., mental translation and problem solving) strategies. In lessons, the learners believed that product-based activities (e.g., comprehension questions) were more helpful than process-based activities (e.g., listening journals) for their listening improvement. These findings indicate the teachers and learners have some awareness of metacognitive instruction but further guidance in using process-based listening frameworks could help address learners’ difficulties. </p> <p>Phase 2 used a quasi-experimental design to investigate the impact of a TED Talks-based metacognitive intervention on the learners’ use of listening strategies. The intervention consisted of five TED Talks-based listening lessons delivered in two modes; either self-study (n=13) or classroom instruction (n=11). A third group, a control group (n=9), received regular listening instruction but did not receive any TED Talks-based metacognitive strategy instruction. Data were collected via surveys, focus group interviews, and journal data and analysed using inferential statistics. The results showed that the self-study group showed meaningful gains in one strategy subscale (planning and evaluation). Although this gain was more than the other groups, there was minimal change. Further, only the classroom instruction group showed meaningful gains in before-listening and listening behaviour, although these gains were marginal. After receiving different types of metacognitive instruction, the results showed both the classroom instruction and self-study group approached their listening differently but identified the same listening difficulties. Both groups found resource familiarity helpful for their listening comprehension, but had difficulties using visual aids, taking notes, and understanding the speaker while-listening. Thus, although metacognitive instruction had a minimal impact on the use of listening strategies by learners, guided listening resource selections helped them interact with the listening text. </p> <p>This thesis presents theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical implications for research. Theoretically, the research contributes to our understanding of how theoretically derived accounts of the L2 listening process can be translated into instructional models. Methodologically, the thesis highlights how established research methods (i.e., quasi-experimental study, situation analysis) can be complemented by listening-specific research instruments (e.g., listening journals) which provide a richer emic perspective on the topic being investigated. Pedagogically, this thesis has shown how TED Talks can be selected using McGrath’s guiding principles (Field, 2008) and Romanelli, Cain, and McNamara’s (2014) Essential Aspects and used as the basis for process-based listening lessons.</p>


Author(s):  
Saime Kara Duman ◽  
Şebnem Yalçın ◽  
Gülcan Erçetin

Abstract The present small-scale study explores whether working memory (WM) and language aptitude (LA) explain any variance in L2 listening comprehension beyond baseline listening ability and explicit strategy-based listening instruction in an instructed EFL setting at the tertiary level. In a pretest/posttest non-randomized group design, the experimental group (N = 19) received explicit strategy-based listening instruction for 12 hours while the control group (N = 17) followed their regular L2 listening course syllabus. L2 listening comprehension was measured with an L2 academic listening comprehension test. WM measures (Foster et al., 2015) included an operation span task (OST), a symmetry span task (SST), and a rotation span task (RST). LA was assessed with LLAMA (Meara, 2005). The findings revealed the effectiveness of strategy-based intervention for L2 listening comprehension. A hierarchical regression analysis indicated that baseline listening scores explained about 52% of the variance in the post-listening scores, while listening strategy instruction explained an additional 16% of the variance. On the other hand, WM and LA did not explain any variance in listening comprehension scores, suggesting that the two individual learner differences in the present study are not significant predictors of L2 listening comprehension.


SAGE Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 215824402093387
Author(s):  
Jalil Fathi ◽  
Ali Derakhshan ◽  
Saeede Torabi

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of listening strategy instruction on second language (L2) listening comprehension ability, listening anxiety, and listening self-efficacy of Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. To this end, a sample of 52 English major learners of two intact classes from a university in Iran was employed as the participants of the study. The intact groups were randomly assigned to an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group ( N = 27) received the listening strategy instruction based on the framework proposed by Yeldham and Gruba, whereas the participants in the control group ( N = 25) were instructed traditionally without receiving any strategy instruction. To collect the required data, the listening section of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS), Foreign Language Listening Anxiety Scale (FLLAS), and Second Language Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SLLSQ) were administered to assess the listening comprehension, listening anxiety, and listening self-efficacy of the learners before and after the intervention. The findings of the study indicated that listening strategy instruction significantly improved learners’ listening comprehension ability and reduced learners’ L2 listening anxiety. However, it was revealed that listening strategy intervention failed to significantly improve L2 listening self-efficacy of the learners. In light of the gained results, the implications of this study are discussed with respect to L2 teachers, learners, and curriculum developers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-17
Author(s):  
Mahsa Assadi

This study reports a pre-experimental research on the impact of metacognitive instruction on EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness and their listening performance. To obtain the goal of the study, a group of 30 Iranian intermediate EFL learners, including 14 males and 16 females, were selected randomly. Their ages range from 20 to 24. The participants took part in 16 weeks’ intervention program based on metacognitive pedagogical sequence consisted of five stages. The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MALQ), and a listening test were also used to find changes in metacognitive awareness and listening performance before and after the treatment. The results of comparing pre and posttests scores revealed that metacognitive instruction raised the learners’ metacognitive awareness and helped them improve their listening comprehension ability.


Author(s):  
Tingting Kang

Due to the nature of listening, multiple media tools (e.g., audiocassette players, radio, video, multimedia, and language laboratory) have been utilized in second language (L2) listening instruction for a long time. This chapter recruited the most recently published empirical studies and meta-analyzed available evidence on the effects of different multiple media tools on L2 listening comprehension. The results revealed a medium-to-large effect of multiple media tools on listening comprehension in between-group designs (Cohen's d = .69). The effects of individual multiple media tools have also been statistically synthesized. Further, moderator analysis could help L2 educators and test developers make decisions on applying different multiple media tools in the fields of L2 instruction and assessment. Specifically, subtitles (in the first language/L1) /captions (in the source language/L2), as well as self-regulated listening and slow speed, are recommended to teachers and test developers as a means to improve learners' listening comprehension. In the end, this chapter concludes by identifying potential areas for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document