scholarly journals Neurocognitive Changes in Tertiary Neurosyphilis: A Retrospective Chart Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 452-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Beauchemin ◽  
Robert Laforce
Keyword(s):  
Chart Review ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility ◽  
Behavioral Impairments

Context:Since the beginning of the new millennium, prevalence of syphilis has re-increased and is once again, a major public health problem. Neurosyphilis is the extension of syphilitic infection to the nervous system. It is considered by many as a cause of reversible dementia, when treated early. However, scarce data exist on the evolution of cognitive and behavioral impairments in patients affected by tertiary neurosyphilis.Objectives:The aim of this study was to explore the cognitive and behavioral changes in a cohort of patients diagnosed with neurosyphilis.Design:A retrospective study based on systematized chart review between 2000 and 2012 in a large neurological tertiary care facility.Outcome measure:Clinical evaluations by treating physicians.Results:Eighteen patients were identified with tertiary neurosyphilis. Out of this group, only two had systematic neuropsychological follow-up despite physician reports of significant and persistent cognitive and psychiatric changes. For these two cases, only slight improvements were noted in memory and executive skills while improvements in attention were marked. None of our patients had previous psychiatric history yet a large proportion developed symptoms after the infection.Conclusion:Although neurosyphilis is traditionally considered a reversible form of dementia, we found limited support for this claim in our two patients with close follow-up. Quality data on the cognitive and psychiatric changes in the rest of our cohort was dramatically lacking, and this could not be explained by absence of symptoms at presentation. Given the recrudescence of syphilis, we propose a systematic approach to the evaluation and follow-up of this disorder.

Does Use of Intraoperative Irrigation with Open or Laparoscopic Appendectomy Reduce Post-Operative Intra-abdominal Abscess?

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Moore ◽  
R. Stephen Smith ◽  
Robert Herbertson ◽  
Christine Toevs
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Abscess Formation ◽  
Abdominal Abscess ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility

To date, no study shows a decrease in postoperative abscess with the use of irrigation during appendectomy. Postoperative abscess rate for laparoscopic and open appendectomy is 3.3 and 2.6 per cent. The purpose of this study is to determine if irrigation at appendectomy decreases the postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rate. Retrospective chart review of 176 consecutive appendectomies, open (39%) and laparoscopic (61%), at a university affiliated tertiary care facility from July 2007 to November 2008 for use of intraoperative irrigation was performed. Patients under age 18 were excluded. There were no differences between the irrigation groups in regards to age, sex, or weight. Perforation was observed in 28 per cent (50/176), of which 86 per cent (43/50) of patients received intraoperative irrigation. Eleven patients (9.6%) with irrigation developed postoperative abscess compared with two (3.3%) patients without irrigation ( P = 0.22). Our results do not show decrease in postoperative intra-abdominal abscess with use of intraoperative irrigation. Thirteen patients developed postoperative abscess: 11 with irrigation, two without irrigation. Ten of 13 patients who developed abscess were perforated; nine with irrigation and one without. These results suggest routine use of intraoperative irrigation for appendectomies does not prevent intra-abdominal abscess formation, adds extra costs, and may be avoided.

S210 – Asymmetric Sudden SNHL: Is All This Screening Necessary?

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P146-P146
Author(s):  
Selena E. Heman-Ackah ◽  
Dunn Ryan ◽  
Tina C. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Diagnostic Evaluation ◽  
Diagnostic Screening ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility

Objectives A number of factors have been identified that contribute to the presentation of asymmetric sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ASSNHL). Routinely patients presenting with ASSNHL undergo a battery of serologic testing and imaging in an attempt to determine a cause. The study will assess the utility of this diagnostic evaluation in elucidating a cause of an asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. At the conclusion of this presentation, the participants should be able to: 1) Understand the utility of diagnostic screening in the management of ASSNHL. 2) Understand the cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic screening for ASSNHL. Methods The study design is a retrospective chart review. Charts from patients presenting to the otolaryngology clinic of a tertiary care facility between January 1, 2000, and November 30, 2007, with ASSNHL confirmed with audiometric evaluation were reviewed. Diagnostic tests included in the work-up of ASSNHL and test results were recorded. Percentage of positive tests was determined and compared to national data. Cost analysis of the diagnostic battery was performed. Results All patients presenting with sudden sensorineural hearing loss received 1 or more of the following serologic and radiographic tests: ANA, cholesterol, creatinine, DNA-ds, ESR, blood glucose, Lyme titer, rheumatoid factor, RPR, FTA-ABS, HSP, T3, TSH and MRI with gadolinium. The average cost associated with the full diagnostic evaluation is greater than $1,500. The positive rate for any of these tests was extremely low. Conclusions The utility of the comprehensive ASSNHL evaluation should be reconsidered. The choice of diagnostic evaluation should be directed by patient risk factors and exposures.

scholarly journals Combined Topical and Oral Antimicrobial Therapy for the Eradication of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureus(Mrsa) Colonization in Hospitalized Patients

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott K Fung ◽  
Marie Louie ◽  
Andrew E Simor
Keyword(s):  
Medical Devices ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Urinary Catheters ◽  
Mupirocin Ointment ◽  
Mrsa Colonization

OBJECTIVE: How to eradicate methicillin-resistantStaphylo-coccus aureus(MRSA) colonization in hospitalized patients is uncertain. We reviewed our experience with MRSA decolonization therapy in hospitalized patients.SETTING: An 1100-bed, university-affiliated tertiary care teaching hospital in Toronto, Ontario.DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 207 adult inpatients with MRSA colonization hospitalized between February 1996 and March 1999.INTERVENTIONS: All patients with MRSA colonization were assessed for possible decolonization therapy with a combination of 4% chlorhexidine soap for bathing and washing, 2% mupirocin ointment applied to the anterior nares three times/day, rifampin (300 mg twice daily) and either trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (160 mg/800 mg twice daily) or doxycycline (100 mg twice daily). This treatment was given for seven days.RESULTS: A total of 207 hospitalized patients with MRSA colonization were identified and 103 (50%) received decolonization therapy. Patients who received decolonization therapy were less likely than untreated patientsto have intravenous (P=0.004) or urinary catheters (P<0.001), or extranasal sites of colonization (P=0.001). Successful decolonization was achieved in 90% of the 43 patients who were available for at least three months of follow-up.CONCLUSIONS: Combined topical and oral antimicrobial therapy was found to be effective in eradicating MRSA colonization in selected hospitalized patients, especially those without indwelling medical devices or extranasal sites of colonization.

Nurse-Led Neonatal Follow-Up Clinic: A New Emerging Concept in a Developing Country

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Poonam Joshi ◽  
Bindu Sarojini ◽  
Meena Joshi ◽  
Anu Thukral
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Newborn Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Essential Newborn Care ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility ◽  
Neonatal Assessment ◽  
The Mean

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and acceptance of nurse-led neonatal follow-up clinic (NLNFC) in a tertiary care facility. Materials and Methods: In a prospective observational study, total 105 stable mother-neonate dyads were independently followed up in both nurse led and neonatologist run follow-up clinics. The outcome was measured in terms of agreement between the nurse and neonatologist in the domains of neonatal assessment, counselling mothers on essential newborn care (ENC) and giving advice ( P < 0.05) and mothers’ acceptability for NLNFC. Results: Agreement between the trained neonatal nurse and neonatologist varied between 87 and 100%. The most unanimity was observed in neonatal assessment and counselling on ENC (93.3%-100%) followed by prescribing treatment (87%). The mean acceptability scores of the mothers for NLNFC was 33.13 ± 2.6 (25-35, maximum possible score 35). Conclusion: Establishing NLNFCs in developing countries is feasible. Nurses can be entrusted with the responsibility of following up stable neonates here and mothers will surely be satisfied with this type of clinic.

What is the Long-Term Follow-Up of Nonoperatively Treated Patients with Appendicitis?

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 462-465
Author(s):  
Andrew Felber ◽  
Deven Catalano ◽  
Caitlin Stafford ◽  
Todd D. Francone ◽  
Patricia L. Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Interval Appendectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Emergent Surgery

In this study, we determine outcomes after nonoperative treatment of appendicitis. First, we abstracted data for patients discharged with a diagnosis of appendicitis from a tertiary care facility from August 1, 2007, through June 30, 2017. For patients treated nonoperatively, we collected additional medical treatment for appendicitis, future surgical treatment, and date of last follow-up. In our study, we identified 487 patients treated for appendicitis. From this group, 66 patients were successfully treated nonoperatively. Eight patients (12%) had an interval appendectomy at a mean follow-up time of two months. Of the 58 remaining patients, 20 (34%) did not have any further appendicitis-related issues over a mean follow-up period of 25 months. A total of 38 (66%) had recurring or additional concerns requiring further treatment or emergent surgery within a mean time of four months. A large proportion, 76 per cent (n = 29), required unscheduled or emergent appendectomy. There were more patients diagnosed with an abscess (55%) in the group that had further appendicitis issues. In conclusion, nonoperative treatment of appendicitis is associated with significant likelihood of future appendicitis-related treatment or emergency surgery (66%). In addition, patients diagnosed with an abscess are at particularly high risk of future appendicitis-related issues.

Understanding the Role of the Otolaryngology Hospitalist: Tracheostomies and Tracheostomy Care

2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942110457
Author(s):  
Mohamad Issa ◽  
Nadeem El-Kouri ◽  
Sara Mater ◽  
Jonathan Y. Lee ◽  
Carl Snyderman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Consulting Services ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility

Introduction: The concept of a hospitalist has been well established. This model has been associated with reduced length of stay contributing to reduction in healthcare costs. Minimal literature is available assessing the effects of an otolaryngology (ENT) hospitalist at a tertiary medical center. The aim of this study is to assess the role of an ENT hospitalist on (1) performing tracheostomies and (2) providing care as part of the tracheostomy care team (TCT). Methods: Retrospective chart review of all tracheostomies performed by the ENT service over 2 years (July 2015-June 2017), and prospective data collection of all tracheostomy care consults over 1 year (July 2016-June 2017). In year 1 (from July 2015 to June 2016), no ENT hospitalist was employed, and in year 2 (from July 2016 to June 2017), an ENT hospitalist was employed. Results: Compared to other Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) surgeons, the ENT hospitalist performed tracheostomies with shorter patient wait times, and performed a greater proportion of percutaneous tracheostomies at the bedside versus open tracheostomies in the operating room. The tracheostomy care team (TCT) received 91 consults over the course of 1 year with an average of 1.1 billable procedures generated per consult. Conclusion: In this study, an ENT hospitalist was decreased patient wait time to tracheostomy and increased bedside percutaneous tracheostomies, which has positive implications for resource utilization and healthcare cost. The average wait time to receive a tracheostomy was reduced when calculated across the entire department due to the availability of the ENT hospitalist to see and perform tracheostomies. The TCT generated many billable bedside procedures in addition to encouraged decannulation of patients. This study highlights the fact that the ENT hospitalist contributes to providing expedient tracheostomies and provides valuable consulting services as part of a TCT at a high-volume tertiary care facility.

scholarly journals Bleb-Related Endophthalmitis: A 15-Year Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lekha K. Mukkamala ◽  
Tian Xia ◽  
Rana Mady ◽  
Lisa Athwal ◽  
Marco A. Zarbin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Glaucoma Surgery ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Light Perception ◽  
Hand Motion ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility ◽  
Systemic Antibiotics

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of bleb-related endophthalmitis (BRE). Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who presented to a tertiary care facility from 2001 to 2016 with BRE. Collected data included demographics, medical and ocular history, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), presence of hypopyon, treatment, microbiology, visual outcomes particularly of VA and IOP, and complications. Results: Thirty-six eyes (36 patients: 21 females, mean 66.8 years old, 78% with primary open-angle glaucoma) presented an average of 4.5 years (range, 2 days-33 years) after glaucoma surgery (30 trabeculectomies with mitomycin C, 6 tube shunts) with endophthalmitis. Mean VA and IOP at presentation were hand motion (HM; logMAR 2.1) and 19.9 mmHg, respectively, with 82% displaying hypopyon and 87% with purulent blebitis. Eighteen (50%) eyes (mean VA HM) underwent vitreous tap and injection (T/I) of intravitreal antibiotics (vancomycin 1 mg/0.1 cc and ceftazidime 2.25 mg/0.1 cc), and 18 (50%) eyes (mean VA HM) underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with intravitreal antibiotic injection. Eight (45%) eyes initially treated with T/I required a subsequent PPV, and 5 (28%) eyes treated initially with PPV underwent a second PPV. All patients also received systemic antibiotics (33 intravenous [IV] and 3 oral) and topical medications. Average time to documented resolution was 15 days, with mean VA of HM and IOP of 13.6 mmHg. Thirty-one (86%) eyes had vision worse than 20/200 at resolution, and those presenting with light perception or no light perception (NLP) vision (n = 6) had worse vision final VA (logMAR 2.6) than those with initial vision of HM or better (final VA logMAR 1.7). Three (8.6%) eyes were enucleated, with 4 worsening to NLP during the course of the infection. Conclusions: BRE is a visually devastating infection requiring prompt diagnosis and management. Despite aggressive treatment with antibiotics, visual prognosis is poor.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic and Endoscopic-Assisted Resection of Inverted Papillomas: A 15-Year Experience

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford A. Woodworth ◽  
Geeta A. Bhargave ◽  
James N. Palmer ◽  
Alexander G. Chiu ◽  
Noam A. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Demographic Data ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility ◽  
Inverted Papillomas

Background The endoscopic resection of sinonasal inverted papillomas (IPs) has been well described. However, the majority of published reports in the literature are small case series with limited clinical follow-up. The aim of this retrospective study was to review the experience with the endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted resection of IPs at a major academic tertiary care facility and assess long-term outcomes. Methods A retrospective review of endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted resections of IP was performed. Charts were reviewed for standard demographic data, operative technique, adjuvant approaches, complications, and postoperative follow-up times. Results One hundred fourteen patients (average age, 56 years) underwent endoscopic or endoscopic-assisted resection for IPs with a mean disease-free follow-up of 40 months (7–135 months). Seventeen patients developed disease after endoscopic or endoscopic-assisted resection for a recurrence rate of 15%. Average time to recurrence was 23 months. Combined approaches were used when indicated in 34% (39/114) of patients, including adjuvant osteoplastic flap, midface degloving, trephine, or Caldwell-Luc approaches. Four patients (4%) had cerebrospinal fluid leaks that were successfully repaired endoscopically. Conclusion In this large series of endoscopically resected IPs with extensive clinical follow-up, recurrences occurred an average of 23 months after the procedure. This emphasizes the importance of long-term endoscopic follow-up to detect recurrences in all patients. Endoscopic or endoscopic-assisted resection of IPs is a valid technique in this series with recurrence rates comparable with open approaches.

scholarly journals Characteristic of COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients: early findings from a tertiary care center, Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu, India

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 2048
Author(s):  
Babitha Rexlin G. ◽  
Suresh P. M.
Keyword(s):  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
Family Welfare ◽  
P Value ◽  
Mild Disease ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility

Background: The planet faces a new challenge with COVID-19 disease caused by novel SARS-CoV2. Pediatric COVID-19 is considered to be mild. Methods: The study aim was to describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic findings and outcome of a cohort of paediatric patients according to Ministry of health and family welfare (MOHFW) criteria, at KKGMCH a tertiary care facility in Kanyakumari district. It’s a retrospective chart review including data of children aged 0 to 12 years with COVID-19 from 20 March to 19 July 2020. Results: Of the 137 children with COVID-19, 17 (12.45%) were infants, 65 (35%) were 1-5 years and 72 (52.55%) were 6-12 years. Age didn’t have influence on acquiring the illness as p value is 0.125. Age had no influence on severity too as p value is 0.28. 46.7% were female and 53.3% were male. There was an apparent male preponderance with (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.21) but a non-significant p value of 0.54. of the 34 (24.8%) mild symptomatic, 22 (64.7%) were males and 12 (35.2%) were females. The p value is 0.086 stating gender non-influential on severity. 129 (94.1%) children had contact history. The contacts were parents or close relatives. No child with comorbidity presented during this period. Most common clinical features were fever (8.76%), cough (6.6%), rhinorrhoea (2.2%), vomiting (2.9%) and diarrhoea (1.5%). Children never progressed to severe respiratory illness requiring intensive care as per MOHFW criteria. 1 (0.7%) presented with focal consolidation in chest x-ray. All 137 (100%) children got cured.Conclusion: Study concludes pediatric COVID-19 is a mild disease without mortality at beginning of pandemic in Kanyakumari district. Factors like age and gender neither influenced the occurrence of the disease nor the severity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document