Fractal geometry and its uses for characterizing microstructure
Observers of nature at scales from microscopic to global have long recognized that few structures are actually described by Euclidean geometry. Mountains are not cones, clouds are not ellipsoids, and surfaces are not planes. Classical geometry allows dimensions of 0 (point), 1 (line), 2 (surface), and 3 (volume). The advent of a new geometry that allows for fractional dimensions between these integer topological values has stirred much interest because it seems to provide a tool for describing many natural objects. As is the case for many new tools, this fractal geometry is subject to some overuse and abuse.A classic illustration of fractal dimension concerns the length of a boundary line, such as the coast of Britain. Measuring maps with different scales, or striding along the coastline with various measuring rods, produces a result that depends on the resolution. More than this is required for the coastline to be fractal, however: It must also be self-similar.