scholarly journals Intellectual Property Law – Transfer of Technology

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veerendra Tulzapurkar
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Confidential Information ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Transfer Of Technology ◽  
The Law ◽  
Written Law

The law of patent, trademark law, copyright law and the law relating to industrial designs are the statutory enactments forming part of intellectual property law which have a bearing on the transfer of technology. There is one more branch of intellectual property law which also has a bearing on the transfer of technology and that is the law relating to confidential information or law relating to confidentiality. This law is not a written law; it is judge made law, in the sense that it is developed through cases.

Ontologies and Law

2011 ◽  
pp. 819-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Cevenini ◽  
Giuseppe Contissa ◽  
Migle Laukyte ◽  
Régis Riveret
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
General Relation ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Ontology Development ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Ontology

This chapter introduces the reader with the specificity of the development of a particular type of legal ontology, that is ontology of copyright law. The process of the development of this ontology (ALIS IP Ontology) should be seen as a miniature guide for anyone who will pursuit a goal to create an ontology for any sphere of law. In this chapter the development of the copyright ontology is not addressed separately as such, but in vaster perspective, analyzing not only particular problems that the development of the legal ontology implies, but also looking at the ontology development issues in the light of the general relation that the law (and intellectual property law in particular) has with the IT domain.

The Emergence and Development of United States Intellectual Property Law

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oren Bracha
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
The United States ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
History Of ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Further Development

This chapter surveys the history of intellectual property law in the United States from its colonial origins to the present, and focuses on the three subfields that have a claim for seniority in terms of their longevity and importance: patent, copyright, and trademark. The development of these subfields is described as a process in which law has interacted with technology, economic factors, ideology, and politics. The chapter describes how at the end of the eighteenth-century American patent and copyright law emerged out of two sources: British laws and institutions and local colonial practices. The further development of American intellectual property law is analysed as comprising three stages: early patent, copyright, and trademark law; the consolidation of the modern framework of these fields through significant transformations beginning in the second half of the nineteenth century; and the various developments from the early twentieth century to the present.

Summary of Results

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Kuenzler
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Networked Economy

The persuasive force of the accepted account’s property logic has driven antitrust and intellectual property law jurisprudence for at least the past three decades. It has been through the theory of trademark ownership and the commercial strategy of branding that these laws led the courts to comprehend markets as fundamentally bifurcated—as operating according to discrete types of interbrand and intrabrand competition—a division that had an effect far beyond the confines of trademark law and resonates today in the way government agencies and courts evaluate the emerging challenges of the networked economy along the previously introduced distinction between intertype and intratype competition. While the government in its appeal to the Supreme Court in ...

Fixing Improvisation

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthea Kraut
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
African American ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Tap Dance ◽  
American Vernacular ◽  
The Relationship

This chapter juxtaposes brief case studies of African American vernacular dancers from the first half of the twentieth century in order to reexamine the relationship between the ideology of intellectual property law and the traditions of jazz and tap dance, which rely heavily on improvisation. The examples of the blackface performer Johnny Hudgins, who claimed a copyright in his pantomime routine in the 1920s, and of Fred and Sledge, the class-act dance duo featured in the hit 1948 musical Kiss Me, Kate, whose choreography was copyrighted by the white modern dancer Hanya Holm, prompt a rethinking of the assumed opposition between the originality and fixity requirements of copyright law and the improvisatory ethos of jazz and tap dance. Ultimately, the chapter argues that whether claiming or disavowing uniqueness, embracing or resisting documentation, African American vernacular dancers were both advantaged and hampered by copyright law.

scholarly journals Beyond Invention: Patent as Knowledge Law

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Madison
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Cultural Influences ◽  
The United States ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Invention Patent ◽  
Patentable Subject Matter

The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Bilski v. Kappos, concerning the legal standard for determining patentable subject matter under the American Patent Act, is used as a starting point for a brief review of historical, philosophical, and cultural influences on subject matter questions in both patent and copyright law. The article suggests that patent and copyright law jurisprudence was constructed initially by the Court with explicit attention to the relationship between these forms of intellectual property law and the roles of knowledge in society. Over time, explicit attention to that relationship has largely disappeared from the Court’s opinions. The article suggests that renewing consideration of the idea of a law of knowledge would bring some clarity not only to patentable subject matter questions in particular but also to much of intellectual property law in general.

CRIMINALISING COPYRIGHT: A STORY OF PUBLISHERS, PIRATES AND PIECES OF EIGHT

2007 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 625-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Digital Technology ◽  
Film Industry ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Digital World ◽  
Fit For Purpose ◽  
One Year

On 6 December 2006, the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property unveiled its much-anticipated report investigating whether intellectual property law was still “fit for purpose in an era of globalisation, digitisation and increasing economic specialisation”. The Review, which had one year in which to cover the entire field of intellectual property law, concluded that there was no need for radical overhaul of the system. However, it did make a number of recommendations for reform and one area it considered to be particularly important was strengthening enforcement of IP rights. In recent years, concerns about the inadequate enforcement of intellectual property laws have focused mainly on copyright law and the entertainment industries. More specifically, they have centred on the opportunities for copyright infringement offered by digital technology and the internet. The music industry was the first to find itself out of its depth in the brave new digital world, and the film industry quickly followed. “Piracy”, we are told, is now rife and must be fought at every opportunity.

13. The emergence and forms of intellectual property law

2020 ◽  
pp. 223-229
Author(s):  
Ian J. Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Famous Scientist ◽  
Trade Marks ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Isaac Newton ◽  
Technical Effect ◽  
The Law

Systems of intellectual property law date back many centuries and play a very important role in the information technology field. The main forms of intellectual property law are patents, copyright and trade marks. All play important roles and are considered in this section of the book. Patents and copyright have been applied in an IT context from the early days of the computer whilst trade marks have come to assume more significance with the commercialization of the Internet and its use by major manufacturers who typically own many trade marks developed for use in the course of their activities in the physical environment. As with many areas, the connection between the real and virtual words is not exact. The application of the law of copyright to software has seldom been in doubt. It is clear that the unauthorized copying of all of a work is unlawful. What is not clear is the extent of the protection. The famous scientist Isaac Newton is quoted as saying “If I have seen further, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants”. Most later works build to some extent on their predecessors and there is a difficult dividing line between fair and unfair use of such works. Somewhat different issues apply in relation to patents – a branch of the law which offers the strongest protection but does require that works be innovative and produce a technical effect – that they should do something. This can be difficult to assess in respect of very fast-moving technologies.

Intellectual Property Law

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavroula Karapapa ◽  
Luke McDonagh
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Trade Mark ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Trade Secrets ◽  
Trade Marks ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Trade Mark Infringement ◽  
Comprehensive Text ◽  
Absolute Grounds For Refusal

Intellectual Property Law aims to provide a comprehensive text on all aspects of this field. The first part looks at the complexities of copyright law, from authorship and first ownership to infringements and defences. It also covers moral and related rights. The second part looks exclusively at passing off. Then the text turns to trade marks. It examines the absolute grounds for refusal and the relative grounds for refusal of registration. It looks in detail at infringement and loss of registration of trade marks, and this part of the book ends with an examination of defences to trade mark infringement. The next part is about patents. After an introduction to patents the text analyses ownership and infringement of patents. The text then moves on to confidential information, in other words, trade secrets. Designs are examined after this. The final few chapters are about the exploitation and enforcement of intellectual property. The text concludes.

Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Torremans
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Trade Mark ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Ninth Edition ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law

Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law provides readers with a clear introduction to UK intellectual property law, whilst carefully placing the law in its global context and acknowledging the influence of EU and other international jurisdictions over its development. The book examines the methods and reasoning behind key statutory and case decisions, and provides readers with real-life examples of intellectual property law in action, helping to bring the subject to life. Recent developments within the law relating to biotechnology patenting, IT and internet, and trade mark, imaging, and character rights are explored, providing readers with a cutting-edge analysis of the subject. Chapter introductions and concluding overviews help to set the scene and provide a succinct summary of the topic areas, whilst lists of annotated further reading offer the perfect starting point for those who wish to explore a topic further. In this, its ninth edition, the book integrates the recent developments on the Unitary Patent; examines the reform of copyright, both EU (the fundamental cases from the CJEU) and domestic; and the recast of the Trade Mark Directive.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document